What's new

Musharraf’s book-launch in September

Now im looking for the clause which makes the President Duty Bound not to make the state secrets public.

Clause would not be in the constitution so stop wasting time by looking for it there......in the uk it comes under the official secrets act ....and in pakistan it will also be part of separate piece of legislation than the constitution.
 
. . . .
What is the mood on the streets of Pakistan? Do people feel the way Lahori, Skeptic etc. feel? Or is Asim's (Mushy's) stance accepted?

I'm talking not about the elite of Pakistan, but the regular folk on the street who make up the bulk and who'll be casting votes (hopefully) next year.
 
.
By Shahzeb Jillani
BBC News, Washington

3cc36a684fc6164e295b83ba0f266489.gif



92078193b0eed56d0707945ea3c50926.jpg
The book has generated a lot of controversy

Not surprisingly, Pakistan's President Pervez Musharraf's memoirs has generated a strong reaction.

Now he must respond to some of the strongest criticism and denials about his sensational claims made in In The Line of Fire.

In an interview with an American TV network before the book launch, Gen Musharraf said that the US had threatened to bomb Pakistan "back to the Stone Age" if it did not cooperate in the war on terror.

In a joint press briefing after meeting President Bush at the White House on Friday, he refused to clarify the comments saying "he was honour-bound" to the publishers not to discuss the book before the launch.

For his part, President Bush said he is not aware of his country making such a threat to Pakistan.

Startling claims

Moreover, Richard Armitage, the former US official Gen Musharraf names as having delivered the threat to his intelligence chief, has denied the remarks attributed to him.
Mr Armitage, however, admits that soon after 9/11 he did deliver "a strong message" to the Pakistanis that either they were with the US or against it in the US-led war on terror.

In his book, Gen Musharraf has also made some startling claims about the 1999 Kargil conflict with India.

He lauds Pakistan army's "landmark" performance during the Kargil conflict and claims that it was the Indian army which wanted to capture Pakistani territory in 1999 that finally led to the Kargil war.

For many Indians, Kargil is a painful episode of betrayal and military adventure by Pakistan.

c7fb8270ad7b2d1f41ea98450c785265.jpg
Gen Musharraf says Indian army's moves sparked off the Kargil war

No wonder then, that President Musharraf's latest claims have drawn bitter reaction from Indian politicians and the media.

"All that he is saying is a pack of lies. He attacked us and then lost. That's the reality," is how India's former national security advisor, Brajesh Mishra, sums up the popular Indian sentiment.

The renewed controversy over what led to the Kargil conflict and who was responsible for it comes at a time when nearly more than a week ago the two countries decided to resume the suspended peace talks.
During the recent meeting in Havana, Gen Musharraf and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh pledged to work together to resolve all their disputes, including Kashmir.

'Trust deficit'

For the first time, they also decided to set up a joint mechanism to fight terrorism, something Mr Singh's government is still facing a lot of criticism for from the main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
According to Indian officials, in Havana, the two sides made significant progress in improving the "trust deficit" between the two South Asian rivals.

Now, analysts worry that Gen Musharraf's candid views about the Kargil conflict threaten to reopen old wounds and spoil the prevailing positive mood for dialogue between the two nations.

In Pakistan, Gen Musharraf's critics have taken strong exception to the way he is seen to be promoting his book during his official US visit.
The opposition has accused him as a self promoting military ruler seeking to make a fortune in the name of Pakistan.

9cf804306465998dd8f79e5516bcc20f.jpg
Gen Musharraf says the US threatened to bomb Pakistan

But, say his supporters, like him or not, through his controversial disclosures, he has managed to sell the book as a must read on contemporary Pakistan.

Meanwhile, In The Line Of Fire, out at the book stands in the US and Pakistan since early Monday morning, is said to be selling fairly well.

The book ranked 17th and 18th on online book retailer Amazon.com and Barnes & Nobles best sellers list respectively just before its launch. Within hours, it jumped to 14th on Amazon list and 12th on Barnes & Nobles site. Given the controversies it seems to have triggered, the book is expected to climb further on the best sellers list.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/5380350.stm
 
.
Book makes waves in India


By Jawed Naqvi

NEW DELHI, Sept 25: President Pervez Musharraf’s autobiographical book, released in New York on Monday, is making waves in India, inviting lacerating rebuttals and sceptical previews on Kargil and other controversial issues, but former army chief V.P. Malik was emphatic that it should not be banned.

Several Indian media outfits were flashing the hardback copy of In the Line of Fire’on Monday, after it was scooped by The Hindu on Saturday. In the melee that followed, inconsequential printer’s devil too, like ‘Islambad’ instead of ‘Islamabad’ as dateline in the preface, became a topic for discussion.

A Hindi version of the book titled ‘Agnipath’ after an Indian movie featuring Amitabh Bachchan, has been delayed by a couple of days. Even this has become subject of speculation, with some anchors claiming that the Indian prime minister’s office had somehow got involved.

Former army chief V.P. Malik, who supervised India’s response in the mid-1999 Kargil standoff, rejected Gen Musharraf’s claim in the book on how the conflict began, but said the book should not be banned.

Gen Musharraf had surprised the Indian army in the run up to the conflict, Gen Malik said in a TV discussion. “Now he has surprised us again with a new preposterous allegation that we were about to attack (across the LOC).”

Former Indian national security advisor Brajesh Mishra was quoted as saying it was ‘a tissue of lies’ for Gen Musharraf to claim that Indian manoeuvres were responsible for the Kargil conflict.

The Hindu carried excerpts from a chapter devoted to ‘out of the box’ solution to the Kashmir dispute. The solution has four key elements, which he presents in his 368-page book.

The first element is identification of the geographic regions of the erstwhile princely state of Jammu and Kashmir that need resolution.

This means specifically addressing the question whether all five regions or ‘provinces’ — the Northern Areas and ‘Azad Kashmir’ comprising the Pakistan part and Jammu, Srinagar, and Ladakh in the Indian part — are “on the table for discussion or are there ethnic, political and strategic considerations dictating some give and take.”

The Hindu said the second component of the Musharraf solution is demilitarisation of “this identified region or regions” and curbing “all militant parts of the freedom struggle.” This would give “comfort to the Kashmiris who are fed up with fighting and killing on both sides.”

The third is the introduction of “self-governance or self-rule in the identified regions.” This would enable Kashmiris to “have the satisfaction of running their own affairs without having an international character and remaining short of independence.”

The fourth element is setting up “a joint mechanism with a membership of Pakistanis, Indians and Kashmiris overseeing the self-governance and dealing with residual subjects common to all identified regions and those subjects that are beyond the scope of self-governance.”

It quotes Gen Musharraf as saying: “I have myself spent hours on many a day pondering over a possible ‘out of the box’ solution…The idea that I have evolved which ought to satisfy Pakistan, India and the Kashmiris involves a partial stepping back by all.” He clarifies that “the idea is purely personal and would need refinement and selling to the public by all involved parties for acceptance as a via media.”

http://www.dawn.com/2006/09/26/top9.htm
 
.
WRAPUP 1-'Overly candid' Musharraf memoir tough on neighbors

By Paul Eckert, Asia Correspondent

NEW YORK, Sept 25 (Reuters) - Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf said on Monday he went against the advice of aides to write a memoir that could rile neighbors India and Afghanistan and accuses the United States of threatening to bomb his country "back to the Stone Age."

Musharraf's autobiography, "In the Line of Fire," has already drawn denials from President George W. Bush and raised eyebrows in India. But Musharraf said sensitive security matters were the only topics he shied away from.
"Most of the people in fact were against my writing this book at this moment, but like a good military leader, I took the decision against the major part of their advice," he told the Council on Foreign Relations in New York.

"I have been chastised by associates for being forthright and overly candid, and this is reflected, I think, even in my writing style," he said at the launch of his 335-page memoir.

Musharraf's book recounts how he decided it would have been suicidal for Pakistan to go to war against the United States after being threatened by Washington a day after al Qaeda's strikes on Sept. 11.

With the United States demanding Pakistan's help to launch attacks on al Qaeda and its Taliban hosts in Afghanistan, Musharraf recalled how the then U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell had telephoned him with an ultimatum: "You are either with us or against us."

He also wrote that Powell's deputy, Richard Armitage, warned Lieutenant-General Mehmood Ahmad, the director-general of the Inter-Services Intelligence, that if Pakistan chose the terrorists' side "then we should be prepared to be bombed back to the Stone Age."
Armitage, who like Powell has left government, on Monday denied using such a threat, after Musharraf first described the exchanges during an interview with CBS's "60 Minutes" last week.

Musharraf's book says he conducted a war game to weigh the option of fighting the United States and found that Pakistan's military would have been wiped out, its economy couldn't be sustained, and the nation lacked the unity needed for such a confrontation.

CHIDES KARZAI

In New York on Monday, the combative Musharraf echoed his book in dismissing as "ridiculous" frequent allegations from Afghanistan that Taliban leaders are running an insurgency from the city of Quetta in southwest Pakistan.

Two days before a key three-way meeting with Afghan President Hamid Karzai and Bush, Musharraf chided Karzai, saying he was failing to wean ethnic Pushtuns away from the Islamic militants.

"The sooner Mr. President Karzai understands his own country's environment, the easier it will be for him," said Musharraf.

He added: "I have always been saying that I believe President Karzai to be the right person to be president of Afghanistan."

Musharraf wrote that his best guess is that al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden is hiding somewhere in Afghanistan's eastern province of Kunar and that Taliban leader Mullah Mohammad Omar was most likely to be near his original base in southern Afghanistan.

The book, published just over a week after Musharraf agreed with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to resume a stalled peace process, described the Pakistani's fears that the Indian leader had fallen under the influence of New Delhi's old guard.

"I think the Indian establishment -- the bureaucrats, diplomats, intelligence agencies, and perhaps even the military

-- has gotten the better of him," Musharraf added in a passage he said was written in June.

The nuclear armed rivals have fought two of their three wars over mostly Muslim Kashmir since independence in 1947, and the Himalayan region remains divided by a cease-fire line.

India froze the peace process in reaction to a series of bomb blasts in Mumbai that killed over 180 people on July 11 as suspicions fell on a Pakistan-based group.

(Additional reporting by Simon Cameron-Moore and Kamran Haider in ISLAMABAD)

http://today.reuters.com/news/artic...d=&cap=&sz=13&WTModLoc=BizArt-C1-ArticlePage3
 
.
Musharraf's book too expensive!

Priced at Rs 1,295 and even with all the media hype, President Pervez Musharraf's book In Line of Fire is too expensive for the average people of Pakistan.
Many book readers have termed the price high, NNI news agency reported, adding that the book, launched by Musharraf on Monday in New York, was available at different bookstores in the twin cities of Islamabad and Rawalpindi.

"However, most of the booksellers are satisfied with its sale as copies were booked by many customers in advance," The Nation newspaper reported Tuesday.

According to The News International, Musharraf has reportedly received an advance of somewhere between $1 million and $3 million for the book.

American publisher Simon & Schuster has priced the book at $28. But America's largest book retailer Barnes and Noble has offered a discount, making the book cheaper at $22. At some places, it is likely to be sold at $16.

While critics in the US and in Pakistan have found fault with the way Musharraf is plugging his own book, using even the meeting with US President George W Bush for it, the media accompanying him on the US visit says that he could not have chosen a better timing and place to pull off this landmark in publishing the history of a third world head of state.

Musharraf has himself said that the book is all about governing Pakistan, which has always been difficult and, more so, after 9/11.

But the American publisher and CBS TV network that is linked to it said: "Musharraf did not wait until his retirement to write his memoirs because, according to CBS, in his case "there are no guarantees that he will live long enough to have one (retirement)".
The News international quoted CBS as saying: "Musharraf knows his future is not likely to be decided by popular opinion. His immediate predecessors have been exiled, imprisoned or died under mysterious circumstances..."
 
.
Musharraf's book too expensive!

Priced at Rs 1,295 and even with all the media hype, President Pervez Musharraf's book In Line of Fire is too expensive for the average people of Pakistan.
Many book readers have termed the price high, NNI news agency reported, adding that the book, launched by Musharraf on Monday in New York, was available at different bookstores in the twin cities of Islamabad and Rawalpindi.

"However, most of the booksellers are satisfied with its sale as copies were booked by many customers in advance," The Nation newspaper reported Tuesday.

According to The News International, Musharraf has reportedly received an advance of somewhere between $1 million and $3 million for the book.

American publisher Simon & Schuster has priced the book at $28. But America's largest book retailer Barnes and Noble has offered a discount, making the book cheaper at $22. At some places, it is likely to be sold at $16.

While critics in the US and in Pakistan have found fault with the way Musharraf is plugging his own book, using even the meeting with US President George W Bush for it, the media accompanying him on the US visit says that he could not have chosen a better timing and place to pull off this landmark in publishing the history of a third world head of state.

Musharraf has himself said that the book is all about governing Pakistan, which has always been difficult and, more so, after 9/11.

But the American publisher and CBS TV network that is linked to it said: "Musharraf did not wait until his retirement to write his memoirs because, according to CBS, in his case "there are no guarantees that he will live long enough to have one (retirement)".
The News international quoted CBS as saying: "Musharraf knows his future is not likely to be decided by popular opinion. His immediate predecessors have been exiled, imprisoned or died under mysterious circumstances..."



It is matter of great shame that his own people are not getting a copy at an affordable price. Not that this is something difficult... translated into urdu and published in paperback.....costing no more than Rs 20 wouldnot have been that big a deal.....at an affordable price i am sure the book would have been sold by numbers in the hundreds of thousands ( if not a couple of million)......in pakistan alone.
 
.
Is Urdu edition already available in Pakistan?
I'm sure it will cost less as there's no tax on local publications.
 
. . .
Is Urdu edition already available in Pakistan?
I'm sure it will cost less as there's no tax on local publications.
It is not a local publication. Simon & Schuster is an American publications company.
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom