Mushahid’s 3-point plan: How ice could thaw on Siachen dispute

[Skull and Bones]

Passage of time,we forced india into considering LOC as IB.we will force them further.

By 2050-60 Pakistan will have enough firepower to threaten existance of Hinduvta state bharat.

2050-60 me hum chane aur aalu bhujiya bechenge.

 

[SamantK]

Every time you talk of peace, India takes it as a weakness. Posts above are an evidence of that mindset.

Only talk and talk is cheap. Pakistan and many Pakistanis have spoken about peace as the means to give Pakistan discounts at our expense.

Let Pakistan stop all the infiltration and ISI supporting LeT then maybe you can talk, ok?

 

[janon]

it is rather about guts than size.

You are at a disadvantage on that as well.

 

[Fireurimagination]

10 more years and India will annex the entire J&K mark my words

 

[Imran Khan]

fighting for ice ? seriously its deserve all those lives loses? man have a peace we are humans

10 more years and India will annex the entire J&K mark my words

there will be no pakistan in 1948 said indians in 1947 .

 

[silent poison]

fighting for ice ? seriously its deserve all those lives loses? man have a peace we are humans


there will be no pakistan in 1948 said indians in 1947 .

Pakistani will stay united forever said Pakistani in 1948 !

#Bangladesh
#Balochistan
#Rulers of Punjab ( you know what I wanna say from my third point ) hehehe

 

[Fireurimagination]

fighting for ice ? seriously its deserve all those lives loses? man have a peace we are humans


there will be no pakistan in 1948 said indians in 1947 .

No no there will be Pakistan but sans entire Kashmir P

 

[Imran Khan]

No no there will be Pakistan but sans entire Kashmir P

 

[Sal12]

Indian Kashmir (including Siachin) = 39,000 sq miles
Pak Kashmir = 33,000 sq miles
Chinese KAshmir = 14,000 sq miles

Pak already got a big part of Kashmir and Inida does not have half of KAshmir since 1948.

Pak economy is 1/8 of indian econony but then India has 10 times more poor than Pak to look after them.

Pak military is hardly 1/2 of Indian military and there are many areas where this is less than half as number of tanks, nukes etc.

India do talk strong when Pak speaks about Kashmir but what India does do to China. Look what China has done. Her president was in India and PLA made incursion in Indian territoy (Ladakh) at the same time. From last few years, China makes incuriosn in Indian territory, stays there for few days and then both Indian army and PLA decides no one will keep their troops there in that part of territory. In this way China force India not to have their troops in their own percieved territory. One more thing..the above mentioned indian Kashmir area also takes count of that territory which has become no mans land between China and India.

Pak is 1/8 of India but still Pak behaves much stronger with India as compared to India when it comes to China.

 

[janon]

Pak is 1/8 of India but still Pak behaves much stronger with India as compared to India when it comes to China.

And when it comes to USA?

India does not have the ignominy of foreigners bombing and missiling our territory and people for ages, and being unable to do anything. Heck, no country suffers that much shame.

Hear a whirring noise? That may be a helicopter full of foreign commandos coming to kill terrorists inside Pak that Pak military cannot and will not. See a small speck in the sky? It's a foreign drone hovering in your skies, ready to reign hellfire at a finger's press in Virginia. How many Pakistanis have been impotently killed by foreign missiles, and what have you done about it other than wailing uselessly? And you have the nerve to talk about Chinese soldiers intruding into contested territory and accomplishing nothing.

Do something about all the foreign drones and missiles flying over you and giving a middle finger to your sovereignity, before preaching to much stronger, prouder countries. Have some shame.

Dekho, dekho kaun aaya?
Bhago, bhago, DRONE aaya!

 

[greatone]

Have some shame.

Quoted for Emphasis

 

[Sal12]

Drone only operates in FATA which is not even 1% of Pak. Even then drones operate with the consent of Pak militray. The Drones do sometimes have been helpfull in killing TTP commanders like Batullah mehsood, Hakim ullah mehsood. Its not possible for USA to target anyone in FATA without the approval of Pak military and this is no secret.

USA didnt target any one in first few months of this year in FATA beacsue Pak has told them not to do so because negoatiations were going on between Govt and TTP. And when Pak launched its operation in North Waziristan 2 months ago then Drones started opearting again becuase Pak has asked them to do so.

In short...the drone operates in less than 1% of Pak and even then they operate with approval of Pak military beacuase its helpful agaiant TTP.

 

[janon]

Drone only operates in FATA which is not even 1% of Pak. Even then drones operate with the consent of Pak militray. The Drones do sometimes have been helpfull in killing TTP commanders like Batullah mehsood, Hakim ullah mehsood. Its not possible for USA to target anyone in FATA without the approval of Pak military and this is no secret.

USA didnt target any one in first few months of this year in FATA beacsue Pak has told them not to do so because negoatiations were going on between Govt and TTP. And when Pak launched its operation in North Waziristan 2 months ago then Drones started opearting again becuase Pak has asked them to do so.

In short...the drone operates in less than 1% of Pak and even then they operate with approval of Pak military beacuase its helpful agaiant TTP.

Right, keep telling yourself that. USA operates drones only because mighty Pakistan allows them to. Yea, right.

As for the excuse about that part not being Pakistan - how many Paksitanis have died in the drone strikes? And by that same logic, how many Indians live in Chumar, and what percentage of India has been intruded by Chinese soldiers? 0.0000001%?

Now do you see why it is comically pathetic of you to prattle about a few Chinese soldiers wandering no man's land, when your own country has no sovereignity to speak of?

See the absurdity?

 

[farhan_9909]

You are at a disadvantage on that as well.

If we exclude the sikh,baqi tho sab indians abc ye.Pata nahin aik thapar k sath kidhar parey hongay

 

[janon]

If we exclude the sikh,baqi tho sab indians abc ye.Pata nahin aik thapar k sath kidhar parey hongay

Yes yes, how can ten hindus face one musalman, right?

Whatever you say.

For us, we are Indians first - not sikh or jain or sunni or shia or atheist. We look at our foreign policy in that light. It may be difficult for you to understand that.