Modi in Sheikh Zayed Mosque UAE

[uparyupari]

Uthapuram case i shared is one such incident. You might be ignorant, you can find plenty of cases. May be not every temple this restriction is there but there are plenty of it with restriction. Pls dont try to simplify it. I dont know which temple you entered but checked with many frends only brahmin with janiwar can enter garbha.

Until 1989, Dalits were entering the temple. you may be talking about one temple. But trust me until 1989 dalits and other lower caste people were not allowed to enter each other home. forget temple. Even now also its practised in many areas. It is only western education and Indian government strict rules and campaigns reduced it further.

This is how a famous temple treats lower cast people in India. They have roll over what ever is leftover of brahmin food plates.

I am confused ....... where they MADE to roll over the food or did they roll over by their own free will ?

 

[Josef K]

They have roll over what ever is leftover of brahmin food plates.

And no body is forcing them to roll over. It is a superstition that is ingrained in those people. The ones that do it willingly are the lower castes themselves. Hence the problem. Once again you are back to twisting an issue as per your agenda to show that these people are forced to do something. If you want to talk about caste atrocities, then there is so much we can talk about outside of the religious context. We are talking about temples here. No temple can legally stop a dalit from entering. Show me one and we can sue them (if they already haven't been facing any action).

I am confused ....... where they MADE to roll over the food or did they roll over by their own free will ?

It is by free will actually. And so this custom is lasting. Our friend here posts things without mentioning the context just to push his agenda.

 

[uparyupari]

And no body is forcing them to roll over. It is a superstition that is ingrained in those people. The ones that do it willingly are the lower castes themselves. Hence the problem. Once again you are back to twisting an issue as per your agenda to show that these people are forced to do something. If you want to talk about caste atrocities, then there is so much we can talk about outside of the religious context. We are talking about temples here. No temple can legally stop a dalit from entering. Show me one and we can sue them (if they already haven't been facing any action).


It is by free will actually. And so this custom is lasting. Our friend here posts things without mentioning the context just to push his agenda.

I know .......... I just wanted to highlight his bigotry.

 

[Sid N]

Who told you this? Hinduvata guys who equate Arab=Muslim or confuse race with religion. You know basically when some local people embraced Islam then your hinduvadi felt ashamed and disassociate them for being native people and started calling them traitor and outsiders and dalits etc because they adopted new religion and took pride in Islam

No, I am not arab and my ancestors are native people of photohar region of Pakistan with no origin or link with arab, Persia or whatsoever. I am not denying there are few people who claim to be syed in pakistan but they are tiny bit of our population ..just because Muslim feel pride in Islam or are loyal to Islam don't make them arab. Its most stupid things i ever heard from Indian Hindus and i dont know who feed this non sense in their brain and they start speak on behalf of all Muslims

I am just telling you what i heard from the indian muslims here,infact the only muslims of the subcontinent who carry their clan along are in pak punjab,certainly not so in rest of india.They have no clue whatsoever.

There was no hindutva or such before 1911 and i dont want to discuss such history as it is impossible to ggauge what might have happened.But the partition caused all the bad blood,Anyway,i have no problems with muslim religion and their deen and spiritual path.

Most muslims of south india consider themselves separate from hindus and think they came from arabs.

 

[Hindustani78]

mohd kamran

bohoth log kehte hain aisa,and the country is called bharat.Al hind kya hain?

Bharat is the homeland of all the ancient Rig Vedic tribes , Hind is even ancient name which talks about the ancient Rig Vedic tribes.

 

[The_Showstopper]

I cant due to obvious reason.
Dont need to argue with me.I have experienced something like that.

So in short, you have nothing to prove your allegations... Thank you for your time

 

[Levina]

Land was donated to temple even before the Modi was landed there.

I am not sure about this, because ppl living in Abudhabi had given up hopes for a temple.

If you think that UAE allowed Hindus to build temple just looking at Modi face...then i pity you.

Pity me after misconstruing my post???
Lolzz
Where did I say that UAE govt did so to please Modi???
I merely said that this decision to allot land came too late.

If the country follows strict rule then forget Modi, Even obama cant do a thing. Its really cheap to claim by Modi and his followers for credit for this.
UAE alcohol rules are also not so strict like Saudi.
.

I live in UAE and have been around GCC, so I for one know that UAE is a more liberal country when compared to KSA and Kuwait, be it alcohol related laws or dress code.

 

[SrNair]

So in short, you have nothing to prove your allegations... Thank you for your time

And I dont need your certificate.

 

[darksider]

Wherever Modi goes, he goes on his own terms.

Dabbanggg!!

Indians dont exaggerated everything.
Even muslims dont wear skull cap when they go to masjid.i have skull cap but dont wear it often.

 

[Josef K]

Indians dont exaggerated everything.
Even muslims dont wear skull cap when they go to masjid.i have skull cap but dont wear it often.

Oh really??? Then you must tell that to these guys:

'Refusal to Wear Skull Cap Shows Modi's Bias against Muslims' -The New Indian Express
PM Modi visits mosque in UAE, but refuses to wear skull-cap in India: Vaghela | The Indian Express


P.S: We know you needn't wear a skull cap too. But some of the so-called seculars in India made it a huge issue when he refused to wear one. Hence the jibe about skull cap. Before jumping to comment, know the context first.

 

[doublemaster]

I am not sure about this, because ppl living in Abudhabi had given up hopes for a temple.

Pity me after misconstruing my post???
Lolzz
Where did I say that UAE govt did so to please Modi???
I merely said that this decision to allot land came too late.

I live in UAE and have been around GCC, so I for one know that UAE is a more liberal country when compared to KSA and Kuwait, be it alcohol related laws or dress code.

Twitterati Troll Narendra Modi Over Tweet on UAE Alloting Land for First Temple in Abu Dhabi

Agree on rest of the parts....pity on bhakts who thinks so...not pointed at u

 

[SarthakGanguly]

I cant due to obvious reason.
Dont need to argue with me.I have experienced something like that.

Most mosques allow non Muslims to enter. That would prevent conversions. But most don't allow women.
But there are mosques which are closed to other sects of Islam.

 

[doublemaster]

And no body is forcing them to roll over. It is a superstition that is ingrained in those people. The ones that do it willingly are the lower castes themselves. Hence the problem. Once again you are back to twisting an issue as per your agenda to show that these people are forced to do something. If you want to talk about caste atrocities, then there is so much we can talk about outside of the religious context. We are talking about temples here. No temple can legally stop a dalit from entering. Show me one and we can sue them (if they already haven't been facing any action).


It is by free will actually. And so this custom is lasting. Our friend here posts things without mentioning the context just to push his agenda.

yes, Agree that its not legal but many indian temple doesnt allow, though case of dalits not allowed to enter temple is reducing it issue still there. Just google u can find many incidents.

Oh really??? Then you must tell that to these guys:

'Refusal to Wear Skull Cap Shows Modi's Bias against Muslims' -The New Indian Express
PM Modi visits mosque in UAE, but refuses to wear skull-cap in India: Vaghela | The Indian Express


P.S: We know you needn't wear a skull cap too. But some of the so-called seculars in India made it a huge issue when he refused to wear one. Hence the jibe about skull cap. Before jumping to comment, know the context first.

Frend, Who cares if Modi wears scull cap or not? For muslims it doesnt even matter and that doesnt even reduce 2002 wounds. But issue is he is ready wear every other kind of topi and refused only scull cap. That shows hatred.

Muslims dont think that wearing scull cap is symbol of secularism, Actually if he thinks wearing scull cap is sin, he has the right to reject it. But here his intention is very clearly visible. Any kid can understand why he refused when he has no problem with all other. If he was offered beef curry and he rejected it no one would have asked him. Because every one knows it is not allowed for some hindus.

Modi actually proved one good thing, To be a secular muslims need not goto temple and worship idols to prove they are secular. Or they need not accept Hindu perspective of god to show secular. This not secularism. Muslims use to argue this since long back. Now muslim can show Modi as example and say this is not allowed in my religion so like Modi i am rejecting it.

 

[The_Showstopper]

And I dont need your certificate.

Neither do Indian muslims need your certification so rest easy...

 

[SrNair]

Neither do Indian muslims need your certification so rest easy...

And who the F are you talk on the behalf of entire Muslims in India?They also dont need your advice.