Modi crossed 'red line' by talking about Balochistan: Pakistan

[Mukunda Murthi Rao]

Yes because India talking about Baluchistan is such an effective tactic, because of it Baluchistan is on the verge of independence, thank you Modi!

Your words mean nothing, Baluchistan will always remain part of Pakistan. Can't say the same for Kashmir though.

Yeah right.. kashmir banega pakistan... isnt that the line u have been harping for almost 70 yrs now?
As far as balochistan is concerned, modi hasnt even mentioned baloch independence yet and look at ur reaction.
The last time india talked about breaking up pakistan at this level, u actually lost half ur country.

 

[punit]

kinne kheechi thi ye Red Line !!

 

[Star Wars]

kinne kheechi thi ye Red Line !!

Reminds me of Obama's red line...

 

[[Bregs]]

Will be interesting to see how Pakistan responds to this, their diplomats are already comparatively far weaker. I don't think they are prepared or even know how to deal with this. They might have to bring some of their old Guards like Mehmood Qureshi...

Yes what they will do is for them to decide but the have limited choice and flexibility as of now, perhaps more shouts in UN bu thats not expected to help much either. countries like china, saudis never spoil there relations with other for there ally

 

[hussain0216]

We massively reduced your influence of terrorism in Kashmir.. İran Afghanistan are India's bilateral partners. You can to nothing but watch helplessly


Of course you can do what ever u want but who is going to listen? And we just started what u been doing for decades and we will continue u to do so ever after.

Kashmir is in turmoil, tens dead, millions under curfew

Afghanistan cant even control its own provinces let alone help india

All of iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan are opposed to terrorists in Balochistan Do you think iran will support you screwing around its back yard

India's plan is simple, mouth off and hope Pakistan backs off from Kashmir, we hold all the cards here

 

[Hamza913]

Yeah right.. kashmir banega pakistan... isnt that the line u have been harping for almost 70 yrs now?
As far as balochistan is concerned, modi hasnt even mentioned baloch independence yet and look at ur reaction.
The last time india talked about breaking up pakistan at this level, u actually lost half ur country.

Kashmir will leave India at some point, or at the very least India will be forced to treat IOK nicely. Either way, Kashmir wins.

When Modi's mentioning Baluchistan what do you think he's referring to? The sand? He's obviously referring to independence, but it won't make a difference, especially with CPEC.

Las time India talked about breaking Pakistan was probably yesterday, you guys do it non stop which is quite sad considering how many countries have broken off from India. Also, please do check the map as you will find Bangladesh is smaller than Kashmir.

 

[Pakistan First]

Wheels have already been set into motion. News coming in from different insurgency-prone regions of India in the coming days will be interesting. Much bigger playground and numerous fault lines for us to play with and exploit on the other side. It's in our favour that India took the first step in taking off it's gloves.

We already have an in-service spy in custody. We have Indian prime minister openly accepting supporting and sponsoring of terrorism in Pakistan. Pakistan has all valid reasons and ground it needs.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

huh! but crossing International border line by terrorists is always ok.

Islamabad, Aug 18, 2016, (PTI)

Pakistan today said Prime Minister Narendra Modi crossed the "red line" by talking about Balochistan and asserted that it will "forcefully" raise the Kashmir issue at the UN General Assembly session next month.

"The Prime Minister strongly pleaded the case of Kashmir during General Assembly session last year and we will again forcefully raise the issue," Foreign Office Spokesperson Nafees Zakaria said.

Zakaria, in his weekly news briefing here, also took strong exception to the remarks by Prime Minister Modi on Balochistan.

Prime Minister Modi had brought up Pakistani atrocities on people of Balochistan and Azad Kashmir in his Independence Day speech.

"It is the violation of the UN Charter...He (Modi) crossed the red line by talking about Balochistan," Zakaria said.

He alleged that India was involved in subversive activities in Balochistan and Karachi. Zakaria also claimed that India was referring to Balochistan to cover up its human rights violations in Kashmir.

Zakaria said Prime Minister Sharif will lead the official delegation at the General Assembly session. He said the UN Secretary General and most of the UN members had already been informed about the "precarious situation" in Kashmir.

Zakaria said the UN and international community should remind India that it must fulfil its commitment to give the right of self-determination to the people of Jammu and Kashmir as per Security Council resolutions.

He said the issue was still outstanding on the Security Council agenda for more than six decades.

"Pakistan strongly condemns the continuing use of force by India and violation of human rights. The brutal use of force has killed at least 80 people and at least 100 have been blinded by use of pellet guns," Zakaria alleged.

He said the international community and human rights organisations should call upon India to stop use of "brute force" in Kashmir.

Asked about Indian taking action against Amnesty International, he said it showed how India was treating the issue of human rights in Kashmir.

Zakaria said Pakistan had proposed to India to hold talks on Kashmir. However, he refused to confirm if India had responded to the proposal.

When asked about any conditions India had put before them for starting dialogue, the spokesman said Pakistan proposed that Kashmir should be the focus of the talks.

Zakaria also claimed that the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) was aimed at economic development of not only Pakistan and China but the entire region. He said India's objection to such a beneficial economic project was beyond comprehension.

Zakaria said Pakistan had invited finance ministers of SAARC countries for the next week meeting but so far was waiting for confirmation on Arun Jaitley's participation.

http://www.deccanherald.com/content/565337/modi-crossed-red-line-talking.html

Again, India again interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states.
Bhutan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka. Now Is Pakistan.
India interference in the internal affairs of each country.
Oh, the superpower.
Although India does not have the power of the superpower, but already have the thinking of superpower.

 

[hussain0216]

Yes what they will do is for them to decide but the have limited choice and flexibility as of now, perhaps more shouts in UN bu thats not expected to help much either. countries like china, saudis never spoil there relations with other for there ally

How about we do nothing and just give statements whilst knowing india really dosent have any ability to do anything in Balochistan except funnel terrorists from Afghanistan. We can then use that as a basis to actively harm indian embassies and asets in Afghanistan

Whilst ramp up the support for Kashmir and millions under curfew

 

[Mukunda Murthi Rao]

Kashmir will leave India at some point, or at the very least India will be forced to treat IOK nicely. Either way, Kashmir wins.

When Modi's mentioning Baluchistan what do you think he's referring to? The sand? He's obviously referring to independence, but it won't make a difference, especially with CPEC.

Las time India talked about breaking Pakistan was probably yesterday, you guys do it non stop which is quite sad considering how many countries have broken off from India. Also, please do check the map as you will find Bangladesh is smaller than Kashmir.

We are all game for treating kashmiris nicely, hell we even want that.

He has just pointed out ur hipicricy regarding HR violations and not talked about its independence. Please listen to his speech again.

Please tell me how many countries have broken away from post independent india?

And bangladesh may be smaller in size, but it was more than 50% of the population. It hardly ever happens that the majority population wants independence and does not want to carry the heritage.... just for a perspective.
Kashmiris are hardly 70 lakhs, and not all of them want independence. So you can imagine, they will be dissulisioned someday and come back into the mainstream and lead a happy life.

 

[Grevion]

Modi was very sincere in his efforts for peace with Pakistan. But the decision makers in the Pakistani establishment were too naive to play by there decades old policy of proxy attacks and denials.
Now is not the time for peace talks. Pakistan has made continuous efforts to internationalize the Kashmir issue and India is only repaying the gratitude.

 

[Kao Boy]

Talking about JNK is every Pakistanis birth right..

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Pakistan's resources are limited. In ANY CASE they will fund Indian separatists and terrorists (from JnK, Punjab, NE etc). The higher the stakes the more spread out Pak resources will be. India will focus on one or at most two areas in the beginning on the other hand. That is much better and more effective.

 

[zip]

Kashmir is in turmoil, tens dead, millions under curfew

Afghanistan cant even control its own provinces let alone help india

All of iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan are opposed to terrorists in Balochistan Do you think iran will support you screwing around its back yard

India's plan is simple, mouth off and hope Pakistan backs off from Kashmir, we hold all the cards here

You have already moved your pawn using nonstate actors in India.. There is no place to move back.. India just started it's game.. Just moral support from India is a lot for baluchistan.. World starts to look at you with clinical look. .

 

[illusion8]

What UN charter? What red line?