Many houses torched in Rangamati

[KAMDEV]

By the historical reasons, Nepal is a fortunate country. Rajput warriors did not invade this mountain terrain during their rule over India. Muslims from Bengal invaded only two times. One was during the time of Sultan Iliyas Shah as chronicled below:

Iliyas Shah made a bold thrust across the inhospitable region of Terai in Nepal in 1350, yet to be trodden by the Muslim soldiers. He advanced as far as the capital Kathmandu, destroyed the temple of Svayambhunath and returned with immense booty. He, however, did not annex any part of Nepal.

The other invasion was sometime in 1763 CE by the troops of Mir Kashim Ali Khan, the Nawab of Bengal. He needed money to fight off the British. His forces under Gurgon Khan devastated many Mandirs, but could not get hold of any gold. So, he came back empty-handed.

In the subsequent 'Battle of Buxar' in 1764 CE, his forces were almost winning over the East India Company troops when a 10,000 cavalry detachment sent by the reinstated Nawab Mir Zafar Ali Khan arrived to fight against and defeat him. This defeat was the last nail in the coffin to end the semi-independence of Bengal.

Nepalese should extend thanks to the Muslims of Bengal. Had they annexed/grabbed Nepal, you can rest assured that Nepal would have been a part of India in its true meaning. However, here you are talking against your Muslim saviors out of ignorance of history.

@Bilal9 @Homo Sapiens @Nilgiri @UKBengali

Lol mir qasim invaded nepal.
Gorakhas never lost to anybody including english.

But I have seen one thing and that is in the Bangladesh army there are proportionately a big number of tribal officers however in the other sectors of Bangladesh this is not the case although the tribals have quota everywhere. Can you tell me the reason?

Bangladesh has comparatively better record.

 

[Buddhistforlife]

By the historical reasons, Nepal is a fortunate country. Rajput warriors did not invade this mountain terrain during their rule over India. Muslims from Bengal invaded only two times. One was during the time of Sultan Iliyas Shah as chronicled below:

Iliyas Shah made a bold thrust across the inhospitable region of Terai in Nepal in 1350, yet to be trodden by the Muslim soldiers. He advanced as far as the capital Kathmandu, destroyed the temple of Svayambhunath and returned with immense booty. He, however, did not annex any part of Nepal.

The other invasion was sometime in 1763 CE by the troops of Mir Kashim Ali Khan, the Nawab of Bengal. He needed money to fight off the British. His forces under Gurgon Khan devastated many Mandirs, but could not get hold of any gold. So, he came back empty-handed.

In the subsequent 'Battle of Buxar' in 1764 CE, his forces were almost winning over the East India Company troops when a 10,000 cavalry detachment sent by the reinstated Nawab Mir Zafar Ali Khan arrived to fight against and defeat him. This defeat was the last nail in the coffin to end the semi-independence of Bengal.

Nepalese should extend thanks to the Muslims of Bengal. Had they annexed/grabbed Nepal, you can rest assured that Nepal would have been a part of India in its true meaning. However, here you are talking against your Muslim saviors out of ignorance of history.

@Bilal9 @Homo Sapiens @Nilgiri @UKBengali

Its not my problem if you can't stand the truth. It's not my made up story. Check international newspaper even the papers of your own country you will find how the lands and properties of minorities are being illegally grabbed by muslims. Also there is an enemy property act which made thungs more worse for minorities

By the historical reasons, Nepal is a fortunate country. Rajput warriors did not invade this mountain terrain during their rule over India. Muslims from Bengal invaded only two times. One was during the time of Sultan Iliyas Shah as chronicled below:

Iliyas Shah made a bold thrust across the inhospitable region of Terai in Nepal in 1350, yet to be trodden by the Muslim soldiers. He advanced as far as the capital Kathmandu, destroyed the temple of Svayambhunath and returned with immense booty. He, however, did not annex any part of Nepal.

The other invasion was sometime in 1763 CE by the troops of Mir Kashim Ali Khan, the Nawab of Bengal. He needed money to fight off the British. His forces under Gurgon Khan devastated many Mandirs, but could not get hold of any gold. So, he came back empty-handed.

In the subsequent 'Battle of Buxar' in 1764 CE, his forces were almost winning over the East India Company troops when a 10,000 cavalry detachment sent by the reinstated Nawab Mir Zafar Ali Khan arrived to fight against and defeat him. This defeat was the last nail in the coffin to end the semi-independence of Bengal.

Nepalese should extend thanks to the Muslims of Bengal. Had they annexed/grabbed Nepal, you can rest assured that Nepal would have been a part of India in its true meaning. However, here you are talking against your Muslim saviors out of ignorance of history.

@Bilal9 @Homo Sapiens @Nilgiri @UKBengali

Now you guys will tell me that land grabbing is everyone's problem due to bangladesh having a huge population but if that was the case then why are muslims not losing their lands to illegal land grabbers? Tell me one incident where a land mafia grabbed lands belonging to vulnerable muslim people?

 

[Bilal9]

why are muslims not losing their lands to illegal land grabbers?

They do, all the time. Your Muslim label won't help you if you're weak and have no backing from Powerful village people like Union Members in a village. Muslims scheme against Muslims to grab land all the time...

 

[KAMDEV]

They do, all the time. Your Muslim label won't help you if you're weak and have no backing from Powerful village people like Union Members in a village. Muslims scheme against Muslims to grab land all the time...

Ultimately it comes to poor and weak whether hindu or muslims, only weak and poor suffer.

 

[bluesky]

Lol mir qasim invaded nepal.
Gorakhas never lost to anybody including english.

Gorkhas or what Nawab Mir Kashim Ali Khan sent an expedition to Nepal headed by Armenian General Gurgon Khan. Gorkhas lost, could not protect their land and the Bengal troops marched to Kathmandu. Do not brag about something that never happened.

 

[Buddhistforlife]

They do, all the time. Your Muslim label won't help you if you're weak and have no backing from Powerful village people like Union Members in a village. Muslims scheme against Muslims to grab land all the time...

Accha if Buddhist countries ban Eid Ul Adha will it be logical because Buddhism follows Ahimsa means non violence and animal killing is one of the greatest sins in Buddhism?

 

[Flynn Swagmire]

Accha if Buddhist countries ban Eid Ul Adha will it be logical because Buddhism follows Ahimsa means non violence and animal killing is one of the greatest sins in Buddhism?

Buddhists doesn't consume meat?

 

[KAMDEV]

Buddhists doesn't consume meat?

They eat meat .

 

[Flynn Swagmire]

They eat meat .

So, problem solved for #66 number post and gurkha13...

 

[KAMDEV]

Buddhists doesn't consume meat?

They consume a lot

 

[Buddhistforlife]

So, problem solved for #66 number post and gurkha13...

If Bangladesh can have Islam as state religion then what is wrong in Myanmar and other Buddhist majority states having Buddhism as state religion?

 

[sazzad99]

If Bangladesh can have Islam as state religion then what is wrong in Myanmar and other Buddhist majority states having Buddhism as state religion?

Myanmar could have satanism as their state religion tomorrow, we wouldn't give two shits about it. Its their constant prosecution of minorities we have issues with, especially when it becomes our burden.

 

[Flynn Swagmire]

If Bangladesh can have Islam as state religion then what is wrong in Myanmar and other Buddhist majority states having Buddhism as state religion?

LOL, we dont give a flying fuk about any country's religion except ours. They can have black magic as their state religion too. We dont care...

 

[sazzad99]

LOL, we dont give a flying fuk about any country's religion except ours. They can have black magic as their state religion too. We dont care...

OYYYYYYY don't copy my comment, damn it lol

 

[Nilgiri]

Myanmar could have satanism as their state religion tomorrow, we wouldn't give two shits about it. Its their constant prosecution of minorities we have issues with, especially when it becomes our burden.

If you don't want a burden today, you should have stopped exporting illegals yesterday.

This is all karma coming back to you now. It will only increase with time till everyone outside BD is satisfied.

@django @Desert Fox @Aung Zaya