Many houses torched in Rangamati

[Hasan89]

Your etc. etc. has no historical value. The Muslims from Bengal entered Arakan in the 1430s at the head of an expedition team sent by Sultan Ghyasuddin Azam Shah to reinstate a Buddhist King who was earlier ousted by his nephew twenty years ago with the help of Burmese.

But, with your shallow knowledge of history, you are imagining that the Rohingyas went there for a picnic after 1947 when east Pakistan had so few populations. To know the facts, read the Arakanese Muslims' political activities vis-a-vis Japanese invasion force in the WWll as well as their subsequent contribution to free Burma from the British.

They wanted Arakan to join with east Pakistan. But, though many of the most renowned families in Chittagong immigrated back from Arakan long before 1947, they took little interest to patronize their plea. So, Arakan remained with Burma.

As for earlier union with Burma, you have to read the history of British naval invasion of Rangoon in the early 19th century after the Burmese attacked Assam. Till this time Assam was a separate entity (ies) free of Bengal or Delhi.

Living in your own cuckoo land.

Minorities in india get killed for eating beef. Whereas in BD parts where minorities eat Pork, is sold openly and no one gets killed. Being a Muslim majority 90% Muslim, Pork is highly offensive and prohibited, but theh still allow the minorities in Chittagong to have what they want.

It can’t be said same in India, were beef worshippers, cow urine lovers will mob you in a heartbeat.

 

[Buddhistforlife]

They can do whatever they like provided they put it in the constitution. Supposedly secular countries like Thailand don't go this route, same in Bangladesh.

In Bangladesh Pork and Turtle meat is openly sold for Hindus and Christians who consume it. These food items are quite offensive to majority Muslims but they see the need to allow non-Muslims to buy whatever they want. Live and let live brother.....

Sanity is what sanity does. Rest (like in Myanmar) are crazy people bent on Nazi principles.

A country with 94% Buddhist can be called a Buddhist country whether the constitution says or not. Buddhism is prioritized in Thailand a great extent and monks are respected very much in Thailand.

 

[Nilgiri]

Your etc. etc. has no historical value. The Muslims from Bengal entered Arakan in the 1430s at the head of an expedition team sent by Sultan Ghyasuddin Azam Shah to reinstate a Buddhist King who was earlier ousted by his nephew twenty years ago with the help of Burmese.

But, with your shallow knowledge of history, you are imagining that the Rohingyas went there for a picnic after 1947 when east Pakistan had so few populations. To know the facts, read the Arakanese Muslims' political activities vis-a-vis Japanese invasion force in the WWll as well as their subsequent contribution to free Burma from the British.

They wanted Arakan to join with east Pakistan. But, though many of the most renowned families in Chittagong immigrated back from Arakan long before 1947, they took little interest to patronize their plea. So, Arakan remained with Burma.

As for earlier union with Burma, you have to read the history of British naval invasion of Rangoon in the early 19th century after the Burmese attacked Assam. Till this time Assam was a separate entity (ies) free of Bengal or Delhi.

Sorry but if you call for a neighbouring country to annex the piece of land you inhabit (like Rohingya did during East Pakistan days), regardless of how other communities living there feel:

a) you have made it clear you identify with that country way more than the one hosting you (and thus you do not belong)...i.e you believe the border was drawn wrong. It is basically a declaration of long term war...and you prove to everyone what your overriding identity and loyalty is to.

b) You deserve to be expelled to that said country you identify more with if you cannot accomplish the annexing objective your community made. Burmese were just occupied with the other civil conflicts to getting around to dealing with Rohingya for some time...but they never forgot.

And like I said you can quote "1430" as much you want....very few rohingya can trace back that long (given massive amount of rohingya arrived during British raj time only and after that)....and it is moot point anyway given the world standard enforced post WW2 - where for example fully indigenous (tracing back to Neolitihic age, forget your 1430) German populations of even full fledged cities like Breslau, Danzig, konigsberg (you can look this up yourself and also the new names of these cities) were forcibly deported....simply because of the new political borders drawn or made relevant (like British essentially did in this area i.e CHT-CTG-Arakan junction).

@Desert Fox @Psychic @django @Aung Zaya @Gibbs

 

[UKBengali]

Sorry but if you call for a neighbouring country to annex the piece of land you inhabit (like Rohingya did during East Pakistan days), regardless of how other communities living there feel:

a) you have made it clear you identify with that country way more than the one hosting you (and thus you do not belong)...i.e you believe the border was drawn wrong. It is basically a declaration of long term war...and you prove to everyone what your overriding identity and loyalty is to.

b) You deserve to be expelled to that said country you identify more with if you cannot accomplish the annexing objective your community made. Burmese were just occupied with the other civil conflicts to getting around to dealing with Rohingya for some time...but they never forgot.

And like I said you can quote "1430" as much you want....very few rohingya can trace back that long (given massive amount of rohingya arrived during British raj time only and after that)....and it is moot point anyway given the world standard enforced post WW2 - where for example fully indigenous (tracing back to Neolitihic age, forget your 1430) German populations of even full fledged cities like Breslau, Danzig, konigsberg (you can look this up yourself and also the new names of these cities) were forcibly deported....simply because of the new political borders drawn or made relevant (like British essentially did in this area i.e CHT-CTG-Arakan junction).

@Desert Fox @Psychic @django @Aung Zaya @Gibbs

You are right on one thing I will give you that.
Might makes right in this world.

Simple fact is that BD is a far richer and homogenous country than the savages.

BD will force the rules to it's advantage.

 

[Psychic]

Sorry but if you call for a neighbouring country to annex the piece of land you inhabit (like Rohingya did during East Pakistan days), regardless of how other communities living there feel:

a) you have made it clear you identify with that country way more than the one hosting you (and thus you do not belong)...i.e you believe the border was drawn wrong. It is basically a declaration of long term war...and you prove to everyone what your overriding identity and loyalty is to.

b) You deserve to be expelled to that said country you identify more with if you cannot accomplish the annexing objective your community made. Burmese were just occupied with the other civil conflicts to getting around to dealing with Rohingya for some time...but they never forgot.

And like I said you can quote "1430" as much you want....very few rohingya can trace back that long (given massive amount of rohingya arrived during British raj time only and after that)....and it is moot point anyway given the world standard enforced post WW2 - where for example fully indigenous (tracing back to Neolitihic age, forget your 1430) German populations of even full fledged cities like Breslau, Danzig, konigsberg (you can look this up yourself and also the new names of these cities) were forcibly deported....simply because of the new political borders drawn or made relevant (like British essentially did in this area i.e CHT-CTG-Arakan junction).

@Desert Fox @Psychic @django @Aung Zaya @Gibbs

Burma actually cooperated with Pakistan during 1971 conflict.

" With air operations all but over for No 14 Squadron, the COC at Rawalpindi decided to put the aircrew to good use on the Western Front, where the war was in full fury. Early at 0300 hrs on 9 December, eight pilots and several other personnel who were considered indispensable to the war effort, were seen off by the AOC East Pakistan as they boarded PIA’s lone surviving Twin Otter............... The aircraft’s destination was Akyab (now known as Sittwe), a manned airfield in Burma, about 300 miles SSE of Dacca. It was surmised that the Burmese government would not be unduly obdurate in allowing a safe passage to the Pakistanis, who were at least putting up a pretence of being civilians faced with one or the other exigency of dire nature.
................................After a week of internment in the same cottage, all Pakistani personnel were smuggled out by the Pakistani Embassy in Rangoon, in obvious collusion with the Burmese authorities. From Rangoon, they flew out to Bangkok, then to Teheran and finally, Karachi. Unfortunately, by the time the PAF aircrew reached their squadrons, the war had been over for many days.

......................The remaining helicopter managed to take-off for Akyab well before dawn on 16 December..................It was part of Pak Army Aviation’s staggered aerial convoy that included its three Mi-8 helicopters, one Alouette-III helicopter and, three Beavers of the Plant Protection Department seconded to the Army. (Two more of Army’s Alouette-III helicopters flew out of Dacca later in the afternoon). All of these assets were later retrieved from Burma.[15] Besides the aircrew, there were 123 passengers, mostly women and children, all of whom made it back from Rangoon to Karachi via Colombo, in a PIA aircraft. As an aside, despite a lapse of over four decades, Pakistan owes a gracious acknowledgement to the Myanmar government for the help provided in the most difficult circumstances.


http://kaiser-aeronaut.blogspot.com/2012/10/the-last-stand-air-war-1971.html

That however doesn't imply that I approve of the Burmese policy towards Rohingya people today.

 

[Nilgiri]

Burma actually cooperated with Pakistan during 1971 conflict.

" With air operations all but over for No 14 Squadron, the COC at Rawalpindi decided to put the aircrew to good use on the Western Front, where the war was in full fury. Early at 0300 hrs on 9 December, eight pilots and several other personnel who were considered indispensable to the war effort, were seen off by the AOC East Pakistan as they boarded PIA’s lone surviving Twin Otter............... The aircraft’s destination was Akyab (now known as Sittwe), a manned airfield in Burma, about 300 miles SSE of Dacca. It was surmised that the Burmese government would not be unduly obdurate in allowing a safe passage to the Pakistanis, who were at least putting up a pretence of being civilians faced with one or the other exigency of dire nature.
................................After a week of internment in the same cottage, all Pakistani personnel were smuggled out by the Pakistani Embassy in Rangoon, in obvious collusion with the Burmese authorities. From Rangoon, they flew out to Bangkok, then to Teheran and finally, Karachi. Unfortunately, by the time the PAF aircrew reached their squadrons, the war had been over for many days.

......................The remaining helicopter managed to take-off for Akyab well before dawn on 16 December..................It was part of Pak Army Aviation’s staggered aerial convoy that included its three Mi-8 helicopters, one Alouette-III helicopter and, three Beavers of the Plant Protection Department seconded to the Army. (Two more of Army’s Alouette-III helicopters flew out of Dacca later in the afternoon). All of these assets were later retrieved from Burma.[15] Besides the aircrew, there were 123 passengers, mostly women and children, all of whom made it back from Rangoon to Karachi via Colombo, in a PIA aircraft. As an aside, despite a lapse of over four decades, Pakistan owes a gracious acknowledgement to the Myanmar government for the help provided in the most difficult circumstances.


http://kaiser-aeronaut.blogspot.com/2012/10/the-last-stand-air-war-1971.html

That however doesn't imply that I approve of the Burmese policy towards Rohingya people today.

Yah I am more talking about this:

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/09/rohingyas-burma/540513/

That “real place” dates back to the aftermath of World War II, when the forebears of the Rohingya appealed to Pakistan, which at the time included what is now Bangladesh, to annex their territory. Pakistan did not do so. Subsequently, many of the Muslims took up arms and fought a separatist rebellion until the 1960s, though vestiges of the rebellion continued until the 1990s.

It is likely that Burma helped Pakistan in that war given Pakistan did not listen to Rohingya call for military intervention in Arakan during the 50s and 60s.

Also explains why Burma relations with Bangladesh immediately were pretty sour and have stayed so.

 

[fallstuff]

Jamaati muslims like you have hatred for Buddhists of Bangladesh particularly the Chakmas however you guys expect Myanmar government to treat muslims in their country with respect. What irony..

Post smells like curry, there is an Indian behind the Nepali flag.

Thats what I was trying to say. Listen I dont know about the chakmas neither do i care for them but the fact is that they had their own army back in 1970s and they fought the Bangladesh army and were cunning warriors. By this statement neither Im glorifying what Chakmas did but im stating mere facts.


Hindus are not savages and we dont believe in carrying out aritrocities against innocent. Its your culture not ours.

Aborting millions of female fetuses and female infanticide is a popular Hindu practice in India . Only savages do that.

 

[Bilal9]

Post smells like curry, there is an Indian behind the Nepali flag.

Are you thinking what I'm thinking?

Aborting millions of female fetuses and female infanticide is a popular Hindu practice in India . Only savages do that.

Female infanticide is one thing, then you also got honor killing.

It is unfortunate that clueless Bangladeshi boys will be going to India now with open student Visa regime and will end up getting married to Indian girls. I know of several cases personally.

After marriage tell the couple to catch a flight to Bangladesh immediately, otherwise girl's family will come after both of them for honor killing which is acceptable for marrying a Mleccha (non-Hindu) person. This is extremely common in North India and police will simply look the other way, medieval though it my sound.

 

[AfrazulMandal]

It is unfortunate that clueless Bangladeshi boys will be going to India now with open student Visa regime and will end up getting married to Indian girls. I know of several cases personally.

This happens? Lovely.
Brahmins must be pissed off, lol.
Hope they don't bring the filthy worship habits to BD though.

This is extremely common in North India

Court Hindu girls from Malda, Kolkata or Uttar Dinajpur. You won't face issues.

 

[TopCat]

Yah I am more talking about this:

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/09/rohingyas-burma/540513/

That “real place” dates back to the aftermath of World War II, when the forebears of the Rohingya appealed to Pakistan, which at the time included what is now Bangladesh, to annex their territory. Pakistan did not do so. Subsequently, many of the Muslims took up arms and fought a separatist rebellion until the 1960s, though vestiges of the rebellion continued until the 1990s.

It is likely that Burma helped Pakistan in that war given Pakistan did not listen to Rohingya call for military intervention in Arakan during the 50s and 60s.

Also explains why Burma relations with Bangladesh immediately were pretty sour and have stayed so.

Because Burma bent down to Ayub Khan and accepted NAF border line. Pakistan was very busy tackling India and they did not want to open a 3rd front. Also Burmese found PK as common allies in 60s when kicking out black South Indinas like Tamils.

 

[Nilgiri]

Because Burma bent down to Ayub Khan and accepted NAF border line. Pakistan was very busy tackling India and they did not want to open a 3rd front. Also Burmese found PK as common allies in 60s when kicking out black South Indinas like Tamils.

No surprise that delta could only handle Burma man to man when Pakistan was in charge.

The distinct lack of testosterone (which you have also commented on via your legs opening commentary before) is evident as seen by the two pole vaulter lonely virgins here making their fantasies given the reality of their illegal + isolated + crap menial job existence.

700,000+ people forcibly returned in a few short weeks is quite a record for 21st century, no other country would stand for it.

 

[Homo Sapiens]

Because Burma bent down to Ayub Khan and accepted NAF border line.

It is actually the opposite.Ayub regime abandoned the claim of 5 miles of southern bank of Naf river to please his burmese friends.burmese in turn duly reciprocated that favor in 1971 war by allowing escape of Pakistani war criminals.West Pak leadership, not surprisingly was very liberal when it comes to throw away territory of East Bengal.

 

[bluesky]

You are right on one thing I will give you that.
Might makes right in this world.

Simple fact is that BD is a far richer and homogenous country than the savages.

BD will force the rules to it's advantage.

Why so many 'will be'? With the development, it is always will do, and now BD WILL set new rules when it is mightier. When is this mightier thing going to happen? In the year 3000 CE? This mightier thing involves the quality of leadership.

- President Ayub Khan forced Burma out of Teknaf side of Naf sometime in 1964 when east Pakistan had less than one division of troops.
- Begum Zia repulsed Burmese effort to build barrage over the Naf in 2001.
- General Moin expelled the Burmese navy in 2008 from our sea.

This vixen Hasina cannot act because she is power hungry. She is jealous of the military to become a savior of the country. This vixen has sold her soul to India and she does not do a thing that displeases her benefactor. This Hasina should be hanged for treason.

 

[Buddhistforlife]

Because Burma bent down to Ayub Khan and accepted NAF border line. Pakistan was very busy tackling India and they did not want to open a 3rd front. Also Burmese found PK as common allies in 60s when kicking out black South Indinas like Tamils.

Why so many 'wills'? With the development, it is always will do, and now BD WILL set new rules when it is mightier. When is this going to happen? In the year 3000 CE? This mightier thing involves the quality of leadership.

- President Ayub Khan forced Burma out of Teknaf side of Naf sometime in 1964 when east Pakistan had less than one division of troops.
- Begum Zia repulsed Burmese effort to build barrage over the Naf in 2001.
- General Moin expelled the Burmese navy in 2008 from our sea.

This vixen Hasina cannot act because she is power hungry. She is jealous of the military to become a savior of the country. This vixen has sold her soul to India and she does not do a thing that displeases her benefactor. This Hasina should be hanged for treason.

Say what you want but we dont need a Secular(Sickular) and Liberal Myanmar. This liberalism and Secularism is destroying the non muslim countries because muslims are getting too many advantages. However in hardcore muslim states like Bangladesh and Pakistan the government openly attacks minorities and snatches the land and property of hindus, christians and buddhists.

In muslim countries where secularism and liberalism is hated then why should non muslim countries be secular? But the day is not far when theocracy will take over the non muslim world and we will see how you servants of Allah manages to sruvive. It had already started. In

You are right on one thing I will give you that.
Might makes right in this world.

Simple fact is that BD is a far richer and homogenous country than the savages.

BD will force the rules to it's advantage.

Don't care. Just remember that Bangladeshi muslims were not innocent either. Bangladeshi muslims especially the supporters of Jamaat and BNP always attacked minorities especially hindus and the chakma tribals. Now dont play the victim card when Myanmar is doing the same.

This happens? Lovely.
Brahmins must be pissed off, lol.
Hope they don't bring the filthy worship habits to BD though.


Court Hindu girls from Malda, Kolkata or Uttar Dinajpur. You won't face issues.

Indian muslims are the biggest anti hindus and anti indians. You Indian muslims are a bigger threat to India then Pakistanis.

Why so many 'wills'? With the development, it is always will do, and now BD WILL set new rules when it is mightier. When is this going to happen? In the year 3000 CE? This mightier thing involves the quality of leadership.

- President Ayub Khan forced Burma out of Teknaf side of Naf sometime in 1964 when east Pakistan had less than one division of troops.
- Begum Zia repulsed Burmese effort to build barrage over the Naf in 2001.
- General Moin expelled the Burmese navy in 2008 from our sea.

This vixen Hasina cannot act because she is power hungry. She is jealous of the military to become a savior of the country. This vixen has sold her soul to India and she does not do a thing that displeases her benefactor. This Hasina should be hanged for treason.

Those days are gone son. Focus on the present not the past. Currently Myanmar army is 6 times larger then Bangladesh army and your weapons are of no use against them. They already has got smaller ballistic missiles and they are now developing more stronger ballistics missiles. Not to forget the great enemy of Islam, Israel is training Myanmar army. Also you guys can never fight against Myanmar in the Chittagong hill tracts because if a war takes place between Myanmar and Bangladesh, the tribal chakmas and marmas will also start guerilla attacks on the army and your tiny Bangladesh army will have to face dual threats.

 

[bluesky]

Sorry but if you call for a neighbouring country to annex the piece of land you inhabit (like Rohingya did during East Pakistan days), regardless of how other communities living there feel:

Do you think what PDF brats like @UKBengali or @Homo Sapiens say in this forum has any relevancy with the geopolitics of the region? In some other post, @Homo Sapiens was claiming another five km stretch south of Naaf river.