What's new

Malaysia considering new multirole fighter jets, including the LCA-Tejas

. .
loiter time is just one hr........ angle of attack is just 600 km........do the maths!

Its not about Teja being technologically inferior, its just that its a 40 years old project, whose design itself is based on old Mirage 3/5 which is a design of 1950s era.

Its today the smallest jet out there but with very limited endurance(this is the primary reason for its rejection, and the reasons for IAF only using it for point defence as of now)........

They r trying to overload a design build for the old technologies and for the warfare of old era with the contemporary modern technologies and warfare.

If they instead build a new and proper 4 or 4.5 gen design today, then this day would not have come.

now its more of a matter of national pride and prestige to continue with it.

 
.
loiter time is just one hr........ angle of attack is just 600 km........do the maths!

Its not about Teja being technologically inferior, its just that its a 40 years old project, whose design itself is based on old Mirage 3/5 which is a design of 1950s era.

Its today the smallest jet out there but with very limited endurance(this is the primary reason for its rejection, and the reasons for IAF only using it for point defence as of now)........

They r trying to overload a design build for the old technologies and for the warfare of old era with the contemporary modern technologies and warfare.

If they instead build a new and proper 4 or 4.5 gen design today, then this day would not have come.

now its more of a matter of national pride and prestige to continue with it.

What an incredible post! I'm glad to have lived to read it. Shows that the sons of the great can be as stupid as - never mind.
 
. . .
The angle of attack is 600 km, the maximum speed is 2000 seconds and the payload weight is roughly eleventeen pascals.

Don't question it you silly uneducated pleb!

@VCheng @Joe Shearer @Vibrio @jbgt90 @KAL-EL @jhungary @Hamartia Antidote @ranjeet @Robinhood Pandey @Vergennes @TOPGUN @Mage @Tanveer666 @Atlas @anant_s @kmc_chacko @GeraltofRivia
he is the special one @Nilgiri :enjoy::D

range is i think 600 km radius with just 1 hr carrying fuel capacity.
Are you taking about ferry range or with internal fuel, and Tejas has a turbo fan which is very fuel efficient than turbo jet which is very fuel inefficient, stop trolling @Umair Nawaz :devil::angry::mad:
 
.
Last edited:
.
he is the special one @Nilgiri :enjoy::D


Are you taking about ferry range or with internal fuel, and Tejas has a turbo fan which is very fuel efficient than turbo jet which is very fuel inefficient, stop trolling @Umair Nawaz :devil::angry::mad:
kaka g jitna b fuel efficient ho, lekin jab loiter time he 1 hr ka hoga to bechara engine kya kary ga, besides their own media had reported that, 1 hr fuel carrying capacity jab hogy to jitna b efficient engine hoga 600 km ki range he dy ga! khass kr wo American engine jo iss py laga hua ha.
 
.
kaka g jitna b fuel efficient ho, lekin jab loiter time he 1 hr ka hoga to bechara engine kya kary ga, besides their own media had reported that, 1 hr fuel carrying capacity jab hogy to jitna b efficient engine hoga 600 km ki range he dy ga! khass kr wo American engine jo iss py laga hua ha.
you know what is AAR means and you're just talking about combat radius not range, stop trolling @Umair Nawaz :crazy::crazy::crazy:
 
.
you know what is AAR means and you're just talking about combat radius not range, stop trolling @Umair Nawaz :crazy::crazy::crazy:
o lalay main aviation ka banda to nai hun, ye inn ky media py aaya tha, wohe kah raha hun.

Im right that it has 1 hr of fuel carrying capacity and which makes its combat radius 600km.
 
.
o lalay main aviation ka banda to nai hun, ye inn ky media py aaya tha, wohe kah raha hun.

Im right that it has 1 hr of fuel carrying capacity and which makes its combat radius 600km.
If you have no knowledge about aviation why you argue on this subject, and don't believe at any media they don't know about technical aspect of military matters and F-16 has combat radius of 700 km, F-22 has 500 km so what's your point @Umair Nawaz o_O:what::hitwall::hitwall:
 
.
he is the special one @Nilgiri :enjoy::D


Are you taking about ferry range or with internal fuel, and Tejas has a turbo fan which is very fuel efficient than turbo jet which is very fuel inefficient, stop trolling @Umair Nawaz :devil::angry::mad:

LOL...and he got banned (I guess for all that Karachi dramabaaz happening elsewhere).

it can also make the kesssl run in less than 12 paesecs!

Han shot Greedo in less than 12 microsecs! Silly Lucas changed that grrrrr!...the decline commenced shortly after.
 
. .
....... angle of attack is just 600 km....

This shows your excellent knowledge in the area of fighter plane technology. Anybody would stop reading from here the remaining post.

range is i think 600 km radius with just 1 hr carrying fuel capacity.

Another gem of a post. Why don't you post about open defection in India and indulge in such technical discussion. You should do whatever you are good at.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom