What's new

Mahmud of Ghazni vs Rajendra Chola

Who will win

  • Mahmud of Ghazni

    Votes: 18 48.6%
  • Rajendra Chola

    Votes: 19 51.4%

  • Total voters
    37
\
The Nizzam and Afghans must have done somethin right than to pacify the "resistant" warriors of Hyderabad so muh that it was much later that te indian mulitary after independence had to invade and capture the state.. (Although there are also many reports of indian forces committing attrocities on the people o Hyderabad after the military actions.
.


At the same time there were the Marathas who practically dominated every other kingdom within India, including the likes of Mysore or Nizams. If you know the history of the Deccan, you would know the Deccan always made a come back, over and over again. This is just the reality, and totally an un-hyped one.

From the Andhras all the way to the Marathas.
 
At the same time there were the Marathas who practically dominated every other kingdom within India, including the likes of Mysore or Nizams. If you know the history of the Deccan, you would know the Deccan always made a come back, over and over again. This is just the reality, and totally an un-hyped one.

From the Andhras all the way to the Marathas.
Lol U are wasting time hear...
Gazni with Chola?
Cholas built dam and irrigation projects, Unified half of south east asia, Art , religion , culture and literature flourished. Trade dominated , had economic connection with romans. Most powerful navy of the region. Where ever Cholas went region flourished. Local administration was practiced ( local democracy).
And to moroons who dont know the difference between Aryans and Dravidians recheck the history.
And also maybe some of u suffer from identity crisis but dont think everyone does.
 
I do think that Ghaznis were more up to date with military tactics however. And probably would have won out. At the same time, Cholas were no push overs what so ever.
 
Do you know which troops british used to put down the 1857 mutiny? Troops from Punjab,KPK,Baluchistan and the Nepali Gurkhas...!


I didn't read your BS post .. Just read the act that you are from Deccan (south india) .. It should be enough for you to stfu .. After getting gangbanged and ruled by Nizam of Hyderabad Deccan who himself was of Turkic blood... You might have to recheck your DNA.


Higher GDP per capita ? By what 10-20 dollars? And a non extisting Middle class and more poverty than Africa ? And all that achievement only after Pak got stuck in a war ? From 60-mid 2000s you were taking a dump under the bridge ?:lol:


2 states lol .. Look at your "bihar" which you claim is the land of Mauryas ? Lmao it has more population than Pak and is South Asias shithole! So much for your culture.


That's gotta hurt... Even today a large number of Khiljis reside in Pakistan.. Our brother @ghilzai. Himself is of Turkic origin.. So much for their (Indians) retarded claims !


Haha that's gotta hurt his feelings ...


That's coz we aren't indians .. Not go we use Arabic script ,, you moron ... Even punjabis (including hindu n Sikhs) were using what you cl Shah Mukhi script .. Used by saints n Sufis like Bulhay Shah,Waris Shah etc.. It was much much later that the dikhs adopted Gurumukhi script.. The Sikh empire itself used persian as a court language .. N even those guys were from modern day Pak not from Deccan dhakan!
Long before 1857 there was Jat regiment (Pun,UP,Haryana),Rajput Regiment,Madras,Maratha and few Sikh Battalions all of them took active part in crushing of the revolt,Sikh soldiers helped in the relieve of Lucknow and Ara (Bihar) while Indian jat were part of British who dragged the emperor hiding in his ancestors mausoleum.

There was no separate Baluch regiment during 1857.



And origin of Tipu is uncertain.
 
T
ooP9R40.jpg
They are barely dressed
 
I do think that Ghaznis were more up to date with military tactics however. And probably would have won out. At the same time, Cholas were no push overs what so ever.

If they could defeat hindu shahis, Cholas were no match. Btw is chola pronounced as "chhola"? If it is, then the word has a very dirty/vulgar meaning in Punjabi language.
 
Even Tipus fathet was a migrant from Punjab and rose up from the ranks!..:lol:

And according to your hindu brethren he was a tyrant who massacred nairs and other South Indian hindus,enforced Jazia and dhimmi and destroyed temples .. And the mighty "hindu" warriors sided with the british .. :rofl:



The Nizzam and Afghans must have done somethin right than to pacify the "resistant" warriors of Hyderabad so muh that it was much later that te indian mulitary after independence had to invade and capture the state.. (Although there are also many reports of indian forces committing attrocities on the people o Hyderabad after the military actions.


As for the DNA comment you might as well read his filthy posts on previous pages.
The Nizams :lol:
The Nizams were defeated by the Marathas of the Maratha Empire and were forced to pay
tributes to the Marathas from the Deccan every year like the Rajputs had to pay to the Mughals.
The Nizams were paying like good dogs until the year 1795. The Nizams refused to pay
the demands of the Marathas. The Marathas sent a huge army against the Nizams and
routed the Nizam army. On that day 15 000 Turkic soldiers were slaughtered by the the
Marathas from the Deccan.8-)
This is one of the main reasons why the Nizams signed a treaty with the British.
 
Do you know which troops british used to put down the 1857 mutiny? Troops from Punjab,KPK,Baluchistan and the Nepali Gurkhas...!


I didn't read your BS post .. Just read the act that you are from Deccan (south india) .. It should be enough for you to stfu .. After getting gangbanged and ruled by Nizam of Hyderabad Deccan who himself was of Turkic blood... You might have to recheck your DNA.


Higher GDP per capita ? By what 10-20 dollars? And a non extisting Middle class and more poverty than Africa ? And all that achievement only after Pak got stuck in a war ? From 60-mid 2000s you were taking a dump under the bridge ?:lol:


2 states lol .. Look at your "bihar" which you claim is the land of Mauryas ? Lmao it has more population than Pak and is South Asias shithole! So much for your culture.


That's gotta hurt... Even today a large number of Khiljis reside in Pakistan.. Our brother @ghilzai. Himself is of Turkic origin.. So much for their (Indians) retarded claims !


Haha that's gotta hurt his feelings ...


That's coz we aren't indians .. Not go we use Arabic script ,, you moron ... Even punjabis (including hindu n Sikhs) were using what you cl Shah Mukhi script .. Used by saints n Sufis like Bulhay Shah,Waris Shah etc.. It was much much later that the dikhs adopted Gurumukhi script.. The Sikh empire itself used persian as a court language .. N even those guys were from modern day Pak not from Deccan dhakan!
India has a higher GDP per capita, higher literacy rate and higher HDI than Pakistan.
So its obvious that India is more developed than Pakistan.
2 Indian states from the Deccan like Maharashtra and Karnataka have a higher GDP than Pakistan despite
of the fact that Pakistan has a much larger population than Maharashtra and Karnataka.
 
India has a higher GDP per capita, higher literacy rate and higher HDI than Pakistan.
So its obvious that India is more developed than Pakistan.
2 Indian states from the Deccan like Maharashtra and Karnataka have a higher GDP than Pakistan despite
of the fact that Pakistan has a much larger population than Maharashtra and Karnataka.

You guys love to make up numbers with ancient hindu maths, but India's gdp is only 7 times bigger and also have 7 times more population. Average Indian is more hungry, have less toilets, less clean water, more poverty compared to average Pakistani according to UN reports.
 
You guys love to make up numbers with ancient hindu maths, but India's gdp is only 7 times bigger and also have 7 times more population. Average Indian is more hungry, have less toilets, less clean water, more poverty compared to average Pakistani according to UN reports.
Source ?

1.Indian GDP is more than 8 times Bigger according to IMF and would be 10 times as India high growt rate than Pakistan

2. Global Hunger Index

India 55

Pak 57


List of countries by GDP (nominal) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


India reduces hunger, moves up 8 ranks in global index - The Hindu Business Line : Mobile Edition
 
Last edited:
Source ?

1.Indian GDP is more than 8 times Bigger according to IMF and would be 10 times as India high growt rate than Pakistan

2. Global Hunger Index

India 55

Pak 57


List of countries by GDP (nominal) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


India reduces hunger, moves up 8 ranks in global index - The Hindu Business Line : Mobile Edition

Pak GDP is $319 billion now, so IMF need to update their numbers. This is despite without changing base for last 10 or more years. The last report I checked India had more hunger, maybe operation zarb azb is the reason for lower ranking this year. Indians are very small and generarly look starved so they need to update ranking with that in mind as well.

But this will not last longer. And according to UN report less % are below poverty line compared to Indians.
 
Last edited:
Pak GDP is $319 billion now, so IMF need to update their numbers. This is despite without changing base for last 10 or more years. The last report I checked India had more hunger, maybe operation zarb azb is the reason for lower ranking this year. Indians are very small and generarly look starved so they need to update ranking with that in mind as well.

But this will not last longer. And according to UN report less % are below poverty line compared to Indians.



Ya very small :D
They are very small compared to the dardic(K) guys in here .:sarcastic:
Now stay on topic .
This is not a GDP contest but a thread concerns about history
 
Pak GDP is $319 billion now, so IMF need to update their numbers. This is despite without changing base for last 10 or more years. The last report I checked India had more hunger, maybe operation zarb azb is the reason for lower ranking this year. Indians are very small and generarly look starved so they need to update ranking with that in mind as well.

But this will not last longer. And according to UN report less % are below poverty line compared to Indians.
Actually Indian GDP is almost 10 Times of pak GDP the figure I quoted you was from 2014.

Indian GDP is $2.308 trillion.

Any source of pak GDP is $319 billion ?


Regarding starve don't force me post pics of Pak wrestlers and MMA fighters humiliated by Indians time 2 time.
 
Back
Top Bottom