Mahmud of Ghazni vs Rajendra Chola

[Shark2]

Pashtuns are the most backward people of South Asia. This is the main reason why Afghanistan is
the least developed country in South Asia.
Pashtuns are even less developed than Sub-Saharan Africans.

 

[genmirajborgza786]

Mahmud of Ghazni and Rajendra Chola were the most powerful rulers in South Asia in the
11th century. Both rulers were contemporaries who ruled in the first half of the 11th century.
Mahmud of Ghazni was the greatest ruler of the Ghaznavid Dynasty which covered during
his reign parts of what is modern Afghanistan and Pakistan. He became famous as he launched
several military campaigns in northwestern Indian Subcontinent.
Rajendra Chola was the most powerful ruler of the Chola Dynasty. He conquered southern India and
Sri Lanka and he successfully invaded huge parts of Southeast Asia and northeastern India.
But who of the 2 Kings would prevail in a clash of the titans.

in land battle Ghazni would have the upper hand , but on naval or sea battle Rajendra Chola would have more chances to win

Mahmud Ghaznavi was one of the very few leaders who were never defeated in a battlefield. and is considered one of the greatest conqueror of the world. Professor Sharma is of the view that, “Mahmud was a seasoned soldier. Fear did not find any place in his heart. His army won against the rulers of India ‘like comb through a poll of hair.” It was no small achievement to “develop a small mountain principality of Ghazni into a large and prosperous empire by sheer force of arms.

The map of extent of his vast empire

View attachment 221430

the Cholas were one of the strongest empires of Asia , stretching from south India to almost all of Indo-china (south east asia ) the map you provided shows only a part of the Chola empire , their total map is much larger , mate there is also a world outside of north India, Afghanistan & Pakistan & its much bigger

 

[Water Car Engineer]

Lets all relax with this stupid superior complex crap on both sides. Makes both look really mental.

 

[Water Car Engineer]

Kadamba rulers were brahmins so aryans decendents in south India Now days southis hate aryans but at the same time love to claim aryan kingdoms

They can claim whatever caste they like, they're all still Indian.

\

Go look at the paintings, relief, sculptural works of ancient India. This is what the Indian aristocracy look like, nothing like central asian.

It's also funny you guys make fun of tribals(as if they did something to you), but that element is one of the key components that makes one a S. Asian. It's present in pretty every single person from Afg to S. India, though in different frequencies, it's still there. Which is highly ironic.

 

[Kabira]

They can claim whatever caste they like, they're all still Indian.

\

Go look at the paintings, relief, sculptural works of ancient India. This is what the Indian aristocracy look like, nothing like central asian.

It's also funny you guys make fun of tribals(as if they did something to you), but that element is one of the key components that makes one a S. Asian. It's present in pretty every single person from Afg to S. India, though in different frequencies, it's still there. Which is highly ironic.

You marry with mundas once and you become like that, but they were proud of their foreign origins and kept distance from native low castes as much as possible. Even today south indian brahmans are known to look little bit different, and are genetically more shifted towards north then other south indians.

 

[Zarvan]

Mahmud of Ghazni and Rajendra Chola were the most powerful rulers in South Asia in the
11th century. Both rulers were contemporaries who ruled in the first half of the 11th century.
Mahmud of Ghazni was the greatest ruler of the Ghaznavid Dynasty which covered during
his reign parts of what is modern Afghanistan and Pakistan. He became famous as he launched
several military campaigns in northwestern Indian Subcontinent.
Rajendra Chola was the most powerful ruler of the Chola Dynasty. He conquered southern India and
Sri Lanka and he successfully invaded huge parts of Southeast Asia and northeastern India.
But who of the 2 Kings would prevail in a clash of the titans.

Ghaznavi was a great man with great victories specially somnath was biggest of them.

 

[Water Car Engineer]

You marry with mundas once and you become like that, but they were proud of their foreign origins and kept distance from native low castes as much as possible. Even today south indian brahmans are known to look little bit different, and are genetically more shifted towards north then other south indians.

By the time the caste system was formed, the higher ups were already mixed.

It doesnt matter if there is slight differences or not, they're all Indian, wouldnt fit any where else but India.

 

[pakdefender]

Going by the number of Campaigns Mahmud Ghaznavi had going eastwards into india and lack of Chola campaigns going westwards , Mahmud Ghaznavi would win over Chola

 

[Kabira]

By the time the caste system was formed, the higher ups were already mixed.

It doesnt matter if there is slight differences or not, they're all Indian, wouldnt fit any where else but India.

Even indian bengalis on pdf claim aryan/foreign origins who look more indians then mussalis I have seen. So looks and foreign claims are different thing.

No doubt all these aryan kingdoms had nothing to do with Indians.

 

[Water Car Engineer]

Even indian bengalis on pdf claim aryan/foreign origins who look more indians then mussalis I have seen. So looks and foreign claims are different thing.

No doubt all these aryan kingdoms had nothing to do with Indians.

Yes, they were very much Indian. Claim whatever caste, doesnt make you any less native.They looked like Indian, dressed like Indians, built Indian architecture, among so many things, because they were Indian.

 

[Kabira]

Yes, they were very much Indian. Claim whatever caste, doesnt make you any less native.They looked like Indian, dressed like Indians, built Indian architecture, among so many things, because they were Indian.

Yes it make difference, its like saying arabs were Pakistanis. They didn't dress like Indians, but indians dressed like aryans Indians didn't even used to wear any cloth before aryans.

Till 19th century half of south indians were naked.

 

[Water Car Engineer]

Yes it make difference, its like saying arabs were Pakistanis.

No, it's like claiming every Persian achievement is somehow Arabian, because a few claim Arabian descent. When in fact it's completely Persian achievements, which everyone knows.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

You are wrong again like you when you mentioned Sikhs were not part of British army before 1857.

But for the sake of our discussion i shall stick to the kushan and their relation with Royal Gupta's.

Firstly practice a composite religion not just Buddhism thus we have a kushan ruler by the name of Vasudeva a Hindu God.

Secondly the successor of kaniska was vassals of Samudragupta as noted Historian VA Smith corroborated.

In his inscription he mentioned a ruler "Devanam putra shahanshanushai" as his vassals which clearly relates to later kushan.

Do you know which troops british used to put down the 1857 mutiny? Troops from Punjab,KPK,Baluchistan and the Nepali Gurkhas...!

I am not a Tamil.
My ancestors are from the Deccan which has a greater military history than the pathetic countries
called Afghanistan and Pakistan.
I am very proud that the Satavahana Dynasty of the Deccan defeated the Scythian invaders and protected
major parts of India. The same Scythians easily conquered and enslaved the ancestors of Pakistan and
Afghanistan.
The Chalukya Dynasty from the Deccan defeated the Arab invaders in the 8th century and protected
the whole southern part of India at a time when whole Afghanistan and Pakistan was under Arab rule.
The Arabs enslaved your ancestors and forced them to follow the Arab religion and to use the Arab script.
From the 10th to 12th century the Deccan was ruled by the famous Western Chalukya Empire which
was together with the Chola Dynasty the most powerful forces in South Asia.
At that time Afghanistan and Pakistan were ruled by the Turks who ensalved your ancestors
and who forced you guys to use Turkic words.
The Vijayanagar Empire from the Deccan defeated the Turkic invaders of the Delhi Sultanate and drove
the Turks out of south India from the 14th to 16th century.
During this period the people of Afghanistan were raped by the Mongols and the Pakis were
enslaved by Mongols and Turks.
In the 17th century the famous Maratha Empire emerged and destroyed the Mughals.
During this period Aghanistan and Pakistan were under the rule of Persian and Mughals.
Throughout the pathetic history of Pakistan and Afghanistan these people were never
able to repel foreign invasions. The people of Afghanistan and Pakistan were only
good at licking the asses of foreign invaders.

I didn't read your BS post .. Just read the act that you are from Deccan (south india) .. It should be enough for you to stfu .. After getting gangbanged and ruled by Nizam of Hyderabad Deccan who himself was of Turkic blood... You might have to recheck your DNA.

India has a higher literacy rate, higher GDP per Capita and a higher HDI than Pakistan.
So its pretty obvious that India is more developed than Pakistan.
Only 2 Indian states like Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu have a higher GDP than whole
Pakistan despite of the fact that Pakistan has a larger population than both states.
Even bangladesh is doing better than Pakistan.

Higher GDP per capita ? By what 10-20 dollars? And a non extisting Middle class and more poverty than Africa ? And all that achievement only after Pak got stuck in a war ? From 60-mid 2000s you were taking a dump under the bridge ?


2 states lol .. Look at your "bihar" which you claim is the land of Mauryas ? Lmao it has more population than Pak and is South Asias shithole! So much for your culture.

Pashtuns walked around in Deccan like bosses and lords , how many of your indigenous Deccanis even stepped a foot in Pakhtunkhwa?. The Afghan Khiljis ruled over your Deccan, our brothers Tughlaq turks ruled over your Deccan. Mailk Makh Afghan founded Bahmani sultanate of Deccan and appointed Zafar Khan as his successor, who is said to be either Turk or Afghan. So the credit of founding Deccan sultanates goes to a Pashtun noble of Tughlaq empire. All of the muslim Deccan sultanates had Afghan and habshi soldiers , and they subjugated your people. Your Shivaji stabbed an Afghan , Afzal Khan with treachery. Aurangzeb's famous general who hunted down Marathas like pigs in Deccan , Diler Khan, was a Daudzai Afghan. Daud Khan panni was governor of Arcot and deccan. Miana Afghans established Savaynur state in Deccan, Panni Afghans established rule on Karrnool.

The point is, we Afghans/Pashtuns, stepped over your Deccan through out history and subjugated your people............thats why you are reacting this way

That's gotta hurt... Even today a large number of Khiljis reside in Pakistan.. Our brother @ghilzai. Himself is of Turkic origin.. So much for their (Indians) retarded claims !

Pashtuns walked around in Deccan like bosses and lords , how many of your indigenous Deccanis even stepped a foot in Pakhtunkhwa?. The Afghan Khiljis ruled over your Deccan, our brothers Tughlaq turks ruled over your Deccan. Mailk Makh Afghan founded Bahmani sultanate of Deccan and appointed Zafar Khan as his successor, who is said to be either Turk or Afghan. So the credit of founding Deccan sultanates goes to a Pashtun noble of Tughlaq empire. All of the muslim Deccan sultanates had Afghan and habshi soldiers , and they subjugated your people. Your Shivaji stabbed an Afghan , Afzal Khan with treachery. Aurangzeb's famous general who hunted down Marathas like pigs in Deccan , Diler Khan, was a Daudzai Afghan. Daud Khan panni was governor of Arcot and deccan. Miana Afghans established Savaynur state in Deccan, Panni Afghans established rule on Karrnool.

The point is, we Afghans/Pashtuns, stepped over your Deccan through out history and subjugated your people............thats why you are reacting this way

Haha that's gotta hurt his feelings ...

Yes I know. But it was the Pratihara of north India and the Chalukya Dynasty from the Deccan
which protected India against the Arab invaders. Or otherwise we would be wannabe
Arabs like Pakis who even use the Arab script to honor their Arab masters

That's coz we aren't indians .. Not go we use Arabic script ,, you moron ... Even punjabis (including hindu n Sikhs) were using what you cl Shah Mukhi script .. Used by saints n Sufis like Bulhay Shah,Waris Shah etc.. It was much much later that the dikhs adopted Gurumukhi script.. The Sikh empire itself used persian as a court language .. N even those guys were from modern day Pak not from Deccan dhakan!

 

[Water Car Engineer]

I didn't read your BS post .. Just read the act that you are from Deccan (south india) .. It should be enough for you to stfu .. After getting gangbanged and ruled by Nizam of Hyderabad Deccan who himself was of Turkic blood... You might have to recheck your DNA.

You're the last one to mention, 'recheck your DNA' statement. Nizams were practically getting owned by the Marathas, even paying them to not attack.


Deccan is historically by far one of the most resilient parts of India, they have proved that over and over and over again. Even if they're not overhyped like many other regions.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

The funny thing is that they even named one missile after the Indian ruler Tipu Sultan.
Tipu Sultan was a proud Indian ruler who never surrendered to any foreign invader
unlike Pakis who loved to be under the rule of every foreign invader.

Even Tipus fathet was a migrant from Punjab and rose up from the ranks!..

And according to your hindu brethren he was a tyrant who massacred nairs and other South Indian hindus,enforced Jazia and dhimmi and destroyed temples .. And the mighty "hindu" warriors sided with the british ..

You're the last one to mention, 'recheck your DNA' statement. Nizams were practically getting owned by the Marathas, even paying them to not attack.


Deccan is historically by far one of the most resilient parts of India, they have proved that over and over and over again. Even if they're not overhyped like many other regions.

The Nizzam and Afghans must have done somethin right than to pacify the "resistant" warriors of Hyderabad so muh that it was much later that te indian mulitary after independence had to invade and capture the state.. (Although there are also many reports of indian forces committing attrocities on the people o Hyderabad after the military actions.


As for the DNA comment you might as well read his filthy posts on previous pages.