So Pasthtuns, Balouch, Persian Nomadic tribes that in total make up 40% of Pakistan's population are the same race/ethnicity as South and Central indians???????............
AT MOST ONLY 3% of indians have ANY sort of racial connection to Pakistan. Therefore at least 97% of indians are racially COMPLETELY different to Pakistanis.
that makes us different.
worthless gangadeshis trying desperately to latch on to pakistanis and their history and identity are the reason ur india is considered shythole of the world. And dont worry abt pakistan it is in way great state masha Allah and faring far too well than ganga gutter to east
searching thru post history? Stop flattering urself. Ppl dont even spit on these open shytting gangadeshis ,let alone spend time on digging out u indeez posts. And pretty hilarious that too coming from a gangadeshi obsessed with pakistanis constantly hovering over a pakistani forum. But being an indian u defo lack any iota of ghairat to eff off from the forum where u are insulted like crap.
LMAO typical of a gangadeshis resorting to typical "religious hatred" comments to win over an argument. Whilst the discussion here is clearly abt a fight on ethnicity and open shytting ganagdeshis desperately linking themselves to ethnic groups they have got jackshytt to do with, Its high time u start worrying abt your religious hatred towards muslims and islam which makes u mention this sort if comment u made above here daily else it will not only cosnume u but only push u further into more mob lynchings and mainly raping of women which indians have been doing quite proudly.
By putting it in different verbose words one cant deny urdus origins. There is no whitewashing of history here what Kaptaan had stated was plain truth. Urdu was basically simplified form of sanskrit dialect called hindutstani, this dialect was spoken around in Up, hyderabad regions. Mughals used this dialect to create urdu by adding persian and arabic loan words. Later language did evolve and developed its own small vocabulary, but putting in all those flowery words and "history" "legacy" of so and so wont change the fact that urdu wasnt indigenous to modern day pakistani land and it was brought to modern Pakistani region by britains.
what nonsense 70 years refined and developed them? Differences were always there and already quite refined and developed which led to the seperation. Stop projecting that differences soldified only post partition.
Allah (SWTA) Himself created families, clans, tribes, ethnic groups and races as He states in the Quran. There is nothing wrong with identifying with any of those as long as false sense of superiority does not come into the picture.
First of all marriage between Pakistani Punjabi and Pashtun/Baloch is not common. I personally would love to see marriage between different ethnic groups of Pakistan because they are all Pakistani Muslims but some people dont even marrige outside their caste/tribe let alone having marriage with those belong to different ethnic group or speak different language .. How many Punjabi men and women you do see in KPK or Balchoustian who got married with local Pahstun or baloh man or woman ? There are few such marriages exist in cities of Punjab or karachi because of setllement of some pahstun family there but not much examples . I have seen such couples only in attock city
First of all marriage between Pakistani Punjabi and Pashtun/Baloch is not common. I personally would love to see marriage between different ethnic groups of Pakistan because they are all Pakistani Muslims but some people dont even marrige outside their caste/tribe let alone having marriage with those belong to different ethnic group or speak different language .. How many Punjabi men and women you do see in KPK or Balchoustian who got married with local Pahstun or baloh man or woman ? There are few such marriages exist in cities of Punjab or karachi because of setllement of some pahstun family there but not much examples . I have seen such couples only in attock city
Northern India and Pakistani punjab has been under same Muslim rule in the past. Ever herad of Delhi Sultanate and mamluk/Khilji/Lohdi/Tuglaq/ dynasty? I already said that India has no links with Pashtun or Baloch people so dont know why you are repeating same stuff again and again and secondly India is second most populated countries thats why Indian Punjabi dont make huge percentage of total population of India. ... When Pakistani pashtun dont feel ashame to associate themelves with Afghan eventhough afghnistan has been hostile to Pakistan as well then i dont understand the mindet of Pakistani Punjabi who feel ashmed to recogise their past and pretend to be something who they are not. Our curret army chief has surname bajwa(jat clans) which is again surnames of many Indians in Punjab
here is population comparison. Pakistan has more Punjabi , Pahstun and Blacoh than others but it spread all over
Punjabi by region
Pakistan 94,486,500
India 30,000,000
United Kingdom 700,000
Sindhi by region
Pakistan: 28,900,000
India: 3,000,000
Canada: 11,500
Pahstun by region
Afghanistan: 13,750,117 (2008)
Pakistan: 30,699,037 (2008)
Iran: 110,000 (1993)
India: 13,000 (2009)
Baloch by region
Pakistan 8,000,000 (2016)
Iran 1,500,000 (2016)
UAE 468,000 (2014)
170 million, definitely less than in Pakistan!
First of all there is no one look of Pakistani Punjabi or Indian Punjabi that you can make such stupid statemnet about look as if all Pakistani Punjabi look same and all Indian Punjabi look same and they boht look different to each others. Clans of Jatt, Rajputs, Gujjars and Arains are found on both sides of the now divided Punjab .Pakistani Punjabi having same surnames( rao, Rana,waraich choudry, memon, cheema, Bajwa, bhatti, dhillion, gill, gondal etc) and claming to be different i.e arabic or perisan is bit funny in my eyes ..sure Pakistani have ideological and political differnces with India, follow Islam and their loyalty is with Pakistan but this should not be excuse to pretend to be something who they are not. Arabs were pagans before Islam and their language was Arabic and they did not renounce their linguistic and cultural identities after embracing Islam. Same is the case with iranians
so then what you were say prior to 1947? stateless? No national identity? No existence? Pakistani identity came into existence in 1947 just like Indian identity did not exist prior to 1947. You see geogrphic mapping of this region kept changing during different rules and kindoms. even Pakistan of 1947 is not same as Pakistan of 1971 any more,, Btw what was the religion of your ancestors prior to Islam? why you dont tell me your ethnic background so that i bring out the fact for you to burst ur bubbles?Lol.......being non-indian does not make you Arabic or wanting to be Arab......lol.....
You keep talking about small percentages of indians (less than 3%) who have SOME racial connection to Pakistan. So even by your own admission, AT LEAST 97% of indians have NO racial connection to Pakistan whatsoever.
Again I ask, WHERE is the evidence that proves Pakistanis & indians are the same race?
