What's new

M1a2 is best tank of the world ?

To all the fanboys T-14 isnt operational and therefor isn't a comparison.

Beside, we all saw how "good" Russian tank brigades stood against lesser tanks in Israeli-arabs wars
 
To all the fanboys F-14 isnt operational and therefor isn't a comparison.

Beside, we all saw how "good" Russian tank brigades stood against lesser tanks in Israeli-arabs wars

F-14 is not operational? F-14 is in service in Iran air force. F-14 and F-117 were decommissioned from US military after Cold War to save money, not because they are not capable systems.

To all the fanboys F-14 isnt operational and therefor isn't a comparison.

Beside, we all saw how "good" Russian tank brigades stood against lesser tanks in Israeli-arabs wars

Like I said, a system is only as good as the people who operate them.
 
F-14 is not operational? F-14 is in service in Iran air force. F-14 and F-117 were decommissioned from US military after Cold War to save money, not because they are not capable systems.



Like I said, a system is only as good as the people who operate them.
I missclicked F instead of T, altho I don't see how I could mean F-14 in tank thread.
 
Canada selected Leopard 2 over M1A2. M1A2 ain't the best out there. Only very pro America countries like Saudi Arabia buy M1A2.
 
I read a lot of posts, websites, military forums, despite the poor performance of M1 in the Middle East (Iraq, Yemen).
Poor performance of M1 in the Middle East? Is this a joke?

It was destroyed by USSR and China's anti-tank old weapons, it is still the best tank in the world on western media rating, why?
You think that an MBT is invincible?

How many Russian MBT have fallen in the battlefield? Shall I enlighten you?

Canada selected Leopard 2 over M1A2. M1A2 ain't the best out there. Only very pro America countries like Saudi Arabia buy M1A2.
And Australia chose M1A1.

A number of factors are considered for choosing an MBT. These are expensive machines.
 
Comparing active tanks to other active tanks is just stupid.
Comparing operational tanks to none operational tanks is just a joke.
Unless someone can actually explains why one tank is better for any condition on earth, and for any tasks you better close this thread
 
Poor performance of M1 in the Middle East? Is this a joke?


You think that an MBT is invincible?

How many Russian MBT have fallen in the battlefield? Shall I enlighten you?


And Australia chose M1A1.

A number of factors are considered for choosing an MBT. These are expensive machines.

No T-90 destroyed, I recall being destroyed in Syria. All of them just hurt the average, but the Abram was destroyed in Iraq, Yemen

An-electronic-optical-pressure-lamp-during-Shtora-circled-in-red-on-the-T-90-down-after-winning-TOW-missiles.jpg

T90-Syria-777x437.jpg



vs

454d83c02208be72ab02db0271082125--m-abrams-battle-tank.jpg

Saudi-tank-destroyed-at-border-with-Yemen.jpg
1026381586.jpg


Poor performance of M1 in the Middle East? Is this a joke?


You think that an MBT is invincible?

How many Russian MBT have fallen in the battlefield? Shall I enlighten you?


And Australia chose M1A1.

A number of factors are considered for choosing an MBT. These are expensive machines.

You can find out information about Saudi M1A2 and M1 Abram of Iraq being destroyed in Iraq and Yemen

http://www.chinatopix.com/articles/...-tanks-russian-iranian-anti-tank-missiles.htm

https://www.janes.com/article/39550/iraqi-abrams-losses-revealed

http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...-ditches-u-s-m1-abrams-for-russian-t-90-tanks

https://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htarm/20160827.aspx

https://www.govexec.com/contracting/2016/08/saudi-losses-yemen-war-exposed-us-tank-deal/130632/
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom