What's new

love jihad in india - reality exposed by operation juliet

Firstly, I am a Sanghi. I would be a RSS sevak were I to be given equal standing as a Hindu, not a separate arm.

I hate bigots. Whether they are green or saffron.

the sangh is not particularly a non-bigot movement. :)

you can write about this now or whenever you feel like.

I am a Shiv Sainik in all ways but political.

you mean you partake only of their umm, cultural activities??

what are those??

I am therefore by all equations, well entrenched within the Hindu right, and not riding piggyback on a popular wave.

Please do not take my word for it. Please peruse the archives and read my views from 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 (then I got permanently banned unfortunately). And make your own mind about whether this is a temporary symbiotic phase or deeply ingrained.

This above is for some others as well who doubt my credentials as a ideological Hindutvawadi and just another mad bawa brandishing his ineffectual communal pappu.

i don't doubt this which is why i made that revenge point.

P.S. Yes, I have always found you decent and decorous in your posts.

thank you.

Except when you take side swipes at my ancient faith.

i but only ask simple questions... i have also asked members like zarvan about the accident-dead hajis.
 
.
the sangh is not particularly a non-bigot movement. :)

you can write about this now or whenever you feel like.

The RSS has changed over time. I do not see bigotry emanating from the RSS per se. Nor the BJP. Or the Shiv Sena. I see all three as greatly nationalistic organisations.

And I see a shared wariness and concern about the unfettered growth of a certain demographic that is detrimental to the well being of the nation and all those that do not belong to that demographic.

And ultimately to that demographic itself, as it self cannibalizes.

We see the signs and read the writing on the wall. In light of what we have seen over the past 7 decades to our east and west.

We would like to keep the center on the right course. Pardon the pun. The saffron right of course. The Aryan right.

you mean you partake only of their umm, cultural activities??

what are those??

They are personal ties, as I have mentioned on more than one occasion in the past. And as such not for open consumption here.

i don't doubt this which is why i made that revenge point.

There is no sense of taking revenge on those who gave us refuge. On those who were converted by the converted.

I see Indic Muslims as an extension of Iranic Muslims. With certain key differences of course. Circumstantial.

I see India as an immovable and irresistible force that stopped that which we could not. And as such, I see great value in putting my efforts behind such a force. A force I see fighting the good fight.

i but only ask simple questions... i have also asked members like zarvan about the accident-dead hajis.

I believe Zarvan can answer for himself.

But I would or should be excused for being less than deliriously excited when a convert (or descendant of one) from a sister Aryan faith tells me that there is not much in the way of a future for mine.

We've been around. And we are still here.

And Parsis are not the only Zoroastrians out there. Not by far. One and a half million at last count. Sketchy by any standards, when one looks at the countries this count comes from. And the current resident faith there.

Cheers, Doc
 
Last edited:
.
You practically called me called me as part of hindutva brigade.... Lol....

Sure someone who thinks that there is a community wide conspiracy to bed hindu women is a rational person

Should not be your concern. This is an Indian issue. Entirely.

My post was regarding someone with that thought process being appointed a TTA on a Pakistani defence site
 
.
Sure someone who thinks that there is a community wide conspiracy to bed hindu women is a rational person



My post was regarding someone with that thought process being appointed a TTA on a Pakistani defence site
There is a conspiracy. On a distributed level. Worldwide. India is not an exception.

Second part I agree - Indians should ideally not have been TTAs or any position holders with authority in a Pakistani forum.
 
. . . . . . . . . .
He's here. :agree:
With you???

thank you, also for your selecting "al-salute". :D
:-)
what are "real kashmiris"?? :)

and yes, i feel sad for the mass migration of the pandits out of the valley... i also feel that kashmir issue's settlement will go very far in getting rid of many of south asia's problems... you would have seen my "kashmir : the definitive solution" thread... i will hopefully start on more local progressive political involvement soon and you can rest assured that i will speak unbiased about kashmiri pandits.
You have questioned and answered in same para. Islam arrived in the valley in late 12th century while those pagans were living in the valley from milleniums.
now that is telling, yes?? :)

how can people be impure?? that seems particularly a aryan and brahminical thinking... i am not dragging this but just stating a historical fact.

nevertheless, future of humanity is a post-religion communist humanity.
Dude stop being a cherry picker, read it whole to understand how Hindus of that time felt when their place of worship was attacked and destroyed, their daughters were raped and their valuables were looted.
isn't pakistan army acting against taliban and qaeda?? didn't musharraf raid the lal masjid?? isn't bangladesh acting against the jamaatis there?? aren't there pakistani films recently about the war against taliban?? aren't more pakistanis regretting pakistan establishment's participation in usa government's regime-change war in afghanistan in the 80's?? isn't all this different from indian establishment/army not acting against the sangh all these 68 years?? we must be fair when talking of subcontinent muslims presently, yes?? :)
they are cleaning the mess they had created for others, they are not doing it for charity work. even then they are dividing the mess into good Kachra and Bad Kachra. And how are these related in this context???
right... thought that kind of representation is most of the indian members pdf, the very fact of the sangh crying about "award wapsi" means that there are a few million indians at least who are progressive and that is significant... the current and the future of india depends of these progressives.
Yes the few millions who were sleeping when thousands of people killed but are awake to support butchering of voiceless innocuous cows and to oppose the credo and faith of 1000 million people. And yes how can i forget the lynching, although i have provided same incident with minorities in lead. But thats not important. Cool....
:angel::angel::angel:

He's here. :agree:
Oh, You mean online:oops::oops:
 
.
He is a communist and socialist too, right... So in all he is a communist socialist Islamic?? How could it be??? :o::o:

Loon in my attic.

sarthak needs to be reminded that four out of the eight founders of the "communist party of india" ( 1921 ) were muslim... he also must be reminded that afghanistan ( majority-muslim ) was the only country in south asia that was socialist/communist for the longest time ( about 12 years ) until regime-changed by usa government... he must look up the "rawalpindi conspiracy"... i won't mention a range of muslim-majority countries that were socialist or within the "communist" camp... he even ignores what is represented by my user-name and profile-pic.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom