Lord Ahmed: Former peer guilty of trying to rape girl

[waz]

Ok the girl can be explained maybe but how on earth is the boy explained, that to his brothers were also booked on the same charge. The boy was 11....

 

[TheSolution]

They target 14 year old girls and bribe with them alcohol and drugs. Would you want your daughter to be druggged and cooerced into sex at 14 when the guy is 17/18?

The Pakistanis who live in the North are an utter humiliation. I don't know from which asshole of Pakistan these people come from but I have first hand experience of them and they are clueless on how to behave.

Unfortunately, this is true, never experienced them in real life, but the videos on social media, they don't even act like normal humans.

I thought it was excessive British racial stereotypes, but they really are very very odd.

 

[WinterFangs]

Thank god I’m from London, northerner are a different breed, can’t understand their brain or accent. these type of people are the reason death penalty should be brought back, pedos, child abusers and child killers all need to be hanged in public, on top of that it just brings more unnecessary hate towards innocent minorities and British Asians.

 

[Turingsage]

Exactly my thoughts.
Indian and British lobby simply trying to contain him. He is getting too rich and strong over there which is bothering many over there. Also he is strong voice for Kashmir which bothers indians
What a joke British legal system is becoming ,they put up such funny charges against anyone and think people will buy it.

Yes its always conspiracies against Pakistani's. Always it's the Indians and the Whites.
If there are conspiracies then how come he moved up and up and up and up all those 40 years eventually to end up as a Lord no less.
If they wanted to conspire against him they could have stopped him decades ago.
Of course in a Pakistani mind you need absolutely no proof or even a tiny shred of evidence to back up these outrageous accusations.
These Pakistani's would like nothing better than to bury the victims so that they can continue to pretend living in their fantasy.
Ask any innocent Pakistani which legal system they would prefer, Pakistani or British ??
The guilty always prefer the Pakistani one as can easily buy your way out of justice, even if you commit multiple murders.

 

[Imran Khan]

Yes its always conspiracies against Pakistani's. Always it's the Indians and the Whites.
If there are conspiracies then how come he moved up and up and up and up all those 40 years eventually to end up as a Lord no less.
If they wanted to conspire against him they could have stopped him decades ago.
Of course in a Pakistani mind you need absolutely no proof or even a tiny shred of evidence to back up these outrageous accusations.
These Pakistani's would like nothing better than to bury the victims so that they can continue to pretend living in their fantasy.
Ask any innocent Pakistani which legal system they would prefer, Pakistani or British ??
The guilty always prefer the Pakistani one as can easily buy your way out of justice, even if you commit multiple murders.

Yes its always conspiracies against Pakistani's. Always it's the Indians and the Whites.
If there are conspiracies then how come he moved up and up and up and up all those 40 years eventually to end up as a Lord no less.
If they wanted to conspire against him they could have stopped him decades ago.
Of course in a Pakistani mind you need absolutely no proof or even a tiny shred of evidence to back up these outrageous accusations.
These Pakistani's would like nothing better than to bury the victims so that they can continue to pretend living in their fantasy.
Ask any innocent Pakistani which legal system they would prefer, Pakistani or British ??
The guilty always prefer the Pakistani one as can easily buy your way out of justice, even if you commit multiple murders.

50 years and its funny

 

[Samurai_assassin]

Yes its always conspiracies against Pakistani's. Always it's the Indians and the Whites.
If there are conspiracies then how come he moved up and up and up and up all those 40 years eventually to end up as a Lord no less.
If they wanted to conspire against him they could have stopped him decades ago.
Of course in a Pakistani mind you need absolutely no proof or even a tiny shred of evidence to back up these outrageous accusations.
These Pakistani's would like nothing better than to bury the victims so that they can continue to pretend living in their fantasy.
Ask any innocent Pakistani which legal system they would prefer, Pakistani or British ??
The guilty always prefer the Pakistani one as can easily buy your way out of justice, even if you commit multiple murders.

Not entirely true. 3 members of the 2012 Rochalde grooming gang including their leader are current fighting their deportation from the UK to Pakistan. The gang wants to serve their sentence in UK and not Pakistan.

 

[HttpError]

Apparently the OP cannot tell the geographic difference between Pakistan and the United Kingdom. Moved to the correct section

He was so excited after reading that news that he forgot the difference between Pakistan and England due to sheer excitement levels. @Turingsage

 

[Turingsage]

Quote
Not entirely true. 3 members of the 2012 Rochalde grooming gang including their leader are current fighting their deportation from the UK to Pakistan. The gang wants to serve their sentence in UK and not Pakistan.
Samurai assassin

Rochdale grooming gang members to fight deportation from UK by invoking their human rights
Adil Khan, 51, and Abdul Rauf, 52, are invoking Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights - the right to a private and family life


men

Adil Khan, 51 and Qari Abdul Rauf, 52, are fighting deportation (Image: Greater Manchester Police/PA Wire)

Sign up for our daily newsletter to get the day's biggest stories sent direct to your inbox
Subscribe
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Two men who were part of the notorious Rochdale grooming gang will fight deportation from the UK by invoking their human rights, a tribunal has heard.
Adil Khan, 51, and Qari Abdul Rauf, 52, have been told they are to be sent back to Pakistan for the public good after both were part of a gang convicted of a catalogue of serious sex offences against young girls.
It's now six years since the Home Office began efforts to deport them.
Today (Thursday) it emerged both are appealing against the deportation order served on them last July, on the grounds of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – their right to a private and family life.
READ MORE : Rochdale grooming gang member 'still in town six years after deportation threat'
Khan got a 13-year-old girl pregnant but denied he was the father, then met another girl, 15, and trafficked her to others, using violence when she complained.

He was sentenced to eight years in 2012 and released on licence four years later.
Rauf, a father-of-five, trafficked a 15-year-old girl for sex, driving her to secluded areas to have sex with her in his taxi and ferrying her to a flat in Rochdale where he and others had sex with her.

He was jailed for six years and released in November 2014 after serving two years and six months of his sentence.

Nine members of the original Rochdale grooming gang were jailed in 2012 (Image: Manchester Evening News)
At an immigration tribunal case management hearing held by video-link on Thursday, judges were told that before the Article 8 appeals are heard there must be a hearing to consider the issue of 'statelessness'.
Khan claims to have renounced his Pakistani citizenship which would make him 'stateless' and a bar to deportation.
Sonali Naik QC, representing Rauf, who is legally aided, said: “The matter needs to be thoroughly litigated.”
Ms Naik said the Article 8 appeals of Rauf and Khan should then be dealt with separately and individually as other similar cases have been dealt with in the past, 'all the way to Strasbourg'.
Cathryn McGahey QC, representing the Home Office, said the matters should be dealt with jointly as the background facts are the same.
Both Rauf’s and the Government’s lawyers must now instruct experts in Pakistani law for the forthcoming appeal hearing on the issue of statelessness, and the hearing has been adjourned until a date in September – around 13 years after Rauf and Khan first committed the offences.

Last month Khan told a preliminary hearing: “We have not committed that big a crime.”
Neither Rauf or Khan were present for Thursday’s hearing.
Both were among four in the gang with dual UK-Pakistani citizenship, so liable to be stripped of UK citizenship and deported after then home secretary Theresa May ruled it would be 'conducive to the public good' to deprive the four of the right to remain in Britain.
They were part of a nine-strong gang of Asian men convicted of sex offences against vulnerable girls in 2012.
For two years from early 2008, girls as young as 12 were plied with alcohol and drugs and gang-raped in rooms above takeaway shops and ferried to different flats in taxis where cash was paid to use the girls.
Police said as many as 47 girls were groomed.
Khan, Rauf and another man, Abdul Aziz, then fought, and lost, a long legal battle against the deportation order, losing a final Court of Appeal ruling in 2018.

But the failure to then deport any of the four, almost a decade after their conviction, has led to anger in Rochdale, where victims were living alongside their tormentors, and has heaped public criticism on a number of home secretaries.
Last year the M.E.N. revealed how one terrified victim bumped into her freed abuser while shopping in Asda.
She ran from the supermarket in tears and reported Adil Khan to the authorities as he was with another young child.
Now a young woman, she saw Khan with another child in an aisle of Asda superstore in Rochdale town centre.
She told a friend: "Oh my God, he's been in Asda. I've never been so scared in all my life. I feel like my heart just stopped beating."
She was left outraged that Khan and two other members of the gang remained in Rochdale despite losing their appeal against deportation.
The young woman - who cannot be named as a victim of a sex crime but who was Ruby in the BBC drama about the scandal Three Girls - confided in former GMP detective Maggie Oliver who worked on the police investigation but later resigned in disgust at how victims were treated and turned whistleblower and campaigner.

(Image: BBC/Ewen Spencer)
The Home Office began the process of removing the men’s British citizenship in July 2015 to pave the way for their deportation but they challenged the move, saying it breached their human rights and the rights of their children.
They lost their case at the Court of Appeal in August 2018 but they remained in Rochdale.
The long-running case will extend to September at least and will probably go into next year.
RELATED ARTICLES

• Outrage over why Rochdale grooming gang members are still in town years after being ordered to leave UK

It's five years since the government vowed to deport a trio of vile Rochdale sex groomers who preyed on vulnerable school-age girls... but they're still living in the town

Rochdale grooming gang members fight deportation with human rights plea

Adil Khan, 51, and Abdul Rauf, 52, are invoking Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights - the right to a private and family life

www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk

 

[Turingsage]

He was so excited after reading that news that he forgot the difference between Pakistan and England due to sheer excitement levels. @Turingsage

It was in the right section because Lord Ahmed was for years the leader promoting all Pakistani and Kashmiri issues in Parliament.
He was always holding soirees for diplomats in his second home at the Pakistani High Commission in London. He holds Pakistani id though he is desperately trying to claim he does not hold a Pakistani passport as he fears deportation

 

[TheSolution]

Rochdale grooming gang members to fight deportation from UK by invoking their human rights
Adil Khan, 51, and Abdul Rauf, 52, are invoking Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights - the right to a private and family life


men

Adil Khan, 51 and Qari Abdul Rauf, 52, are fighting deportation (Image: Greater Manchester Police/PA Wire)

Sign up for our daily newsletter to get the day's biggest stories sent direct to your inbox
Subscribe
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Two men who were part of the notorious Rochdale grooming gang will fight deportation from the UK by invoking their human rights, a tribunal has heard.
Adil Khan, 51, and Qari Abdul Rauf, 52, have been told they are to be sent back to Pakistan for the public good after both were part of a gang convicted of a catalogue of serious sex offences against young girls.
It's now six years since the Home Office began efforts to deport them.
Today (Thursday) it emerged both are appealing against the deportation order served on them last July, on the grounds of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – their right to a private and family life.
READ MORE : Rochdale grooming gang member 'still in town six years after deportation threat'
Khan got a 13-year-old girl pregnant but denied he was the father, then met another girl, 15, and trafficked her to others, using violence when she complained.

He was sentenced to eight years in 2012 and released on licence four years later.
Rauf, a father-of-five, trafficked a 15-year-old girl for sex, driving her to secluded areas to have sex with her in his taxi and ferrying her to a flat in Rochdale where he and others had sex with her.

He was jailed for six years and released in November 2014 after serving two years and six months of his sentence.

Nine members of the original Rochdale grooming gang were jailed in 2012 (Image: Manchester Evening News)
At an immigration tribunal case management hearing held by video-link on Thursday, judges were told that before the Article 8 appeals are heard there must be a hearing to consider the issue of 'statelessness'.
Khan claims to have renounced his Pakistani citizenship which would make him 'stateless' and a bar to deportation.
Sonali Naik QC, representing Rauf, who is legally aided, said: “The matter needs to be thoroughly litigated.”
Ms Naik said the Article 8 appeals of Rauf and Khan should then be dealt with separately and individually as other similar cases have been dealt with in the past, 'all the way to Strasbourg'.
Cathryn McGahey QC, representing the Home Office, said the matters should be dealt with jointly as the background facts are the same.
Both Rauf’s and the Government’s lawyers must now instruct experts in Pakistani law for the forthcoming appeal hearing on the issue of statelessness, and the hearing has been adjourned until a date in September – around 13 years after Rauf and Khan first committed the offences.

Last month Khan told a preliminary hearing: “We have not committed that big a crime.”
Neither Rauf or Khan were present for Thursday’s hearing.
Both were among four in the gang with dual UK-Pakistani citizenship, so liable to be stripped of UK citizenship and deported after then home secretary Theresa May ruled it would be 'conducive to the public good' to deprive the four of the right to remain in Britain.
They were part of a nine-strong gang of Asian men convicted of sex offences against vulnerable girls in 2012.
For two years from early 2008, girls as young as 12 were plied with alcohol and drugs and gang-raped in rooms above takeaway shops and ferried to different flats in taxis where cash was paid to use the girls.
Police said as many as 47 girls were groomed.
Khan, Rauf and another man, Abdul Aziz, then fought, and lost, a long legal battle against the deportation order, losing a final Court of Appeal ruling in 2018.

But the failure to then deport any of the four, almost a decade after their conviction, has led to anger in Rochdale, where victims were living alongside their tormentors, and has heaped public criticism on a number of home secretaries.
Last year the M.E.N. revealed how one terrified victim bumped into her freed abuser while shopping in Asda.
She ran from the supermarket in tears and reported Adil Khan to the authorities as he was with another young child.
Now a young woman, she saw Khan with another child in an aisle of Asda superstore in Rochdale town centre.
She told a friend: "Oh my God, he's been in Asda. I've never been so scared in all my life. I feel like my heart just stopped beating."
She was left outraged that Khan and two other members of the gang remained in Rochdale despite losing their appeal against deportation.
The young woman - who cannot be named as a victim of a sex crime but who was Ruby in the BBC drama about the scandal Three Girls - confided in former GMP detective Maggie Oliver who worked on the police investigation but later resigned in disgust at how victims were treated and turned whistleblower and campaigner.

(Image: BBC/Ewen Spencer)
The Home Office began the process of removing the men’s British citizenship in July 2015 to pave the way for their deportation but they challenged the move, saying it breached their human rights and the rights of their children.
They lost their case at the Court of Appeal in August 2018 but they remained in Rochdale.
The long-running case will extend to September at least and will probably go into next year.
RELATED ARTICLES

• Outrage over why Rochdale grooming gang members are still in town years after being ordered to leave UK

It's five years since the government vowed to deport a trio of vile Rochdale sex groomers who preyed on vulnerable school-age girls... but they're still living in the town

Rochdale grooming gang members fight deportation with human rights plea

Adil Khan, 51, and Abdul Rauf, 52, are invoking Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights - the right to a private and family life

www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk

Death penalty or castration at the very least

 

[Trango Towers]

Quote
Not entirely true. 3 members of the 2012 Rochalde grooming gang including their leader are current fighting their deportation from the UK to Pakistan. The gang wants to serve their sentence in UK and not Pakistan.
Samurai assassin

Rochdale grooming gang members to fight deportation from UK by invoking their human rights
Adil Khan, 51, and Abdul Rauf, 52, are invoking Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights - the right to a private and family life


men

Adil Khan, 51 and Qari Abdul Rauf, 52, are fighting deportation (Image: Greater Manchester Police/PA Wire)

Sign up for our daily newsletter to get the day's biggest stories sent direct to your inbox
Subscribe
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Two men who were part of the notorious Rochdale grooming gang will fight deportation from the UK by invoking their human rights, a tribunal has heard.
Adil Khan, 51, and Qari Abdul Rauf, 52, have been told they are to be sent back to Pakistan for the public good after both were part of a gang convicted of a catalogue of serious sex offences against young girls.
It's now six years since the Home Office began efforts to deport them.
Today (Thursday) it emerged both are appealing against the deportation order served on them last July, on the grounds of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – their right to a private and family life.
READ MORE : Rochdale grooming gang member 'still in town six years after deportation threat'
Khan got a 13-year-old girl pregnant but denied he was the father, then met another girl, 15, and trafficked her to others, using violence when she complained.

He was sentenced to eight years in 2012 and released on licence four years later.
Rauf, a father-of-five, trafficked a 15-year-old girl for sex, driving her to secluded areas to have sex with her in his taxi and ferrying her to a flat in Rochdale where he and others had sex with her.

He was jailed for six years and released in November 2014 after serving two years and six months of his sentence.

Nine members of the original Rochdale grooming gang were jailed in 2012 (Image: Manchester Evening News)
At an immigration tribunal case management hearing held by video-link on Thursday, judges were told that before the Article 8 appeals are heard there must be a hearing to consider the issue of 'statelessness'.
Khan claims to have renounced his Pakistani citizenship which would make him 'stateless' and a bar to deportation.
Sonali Naik QC, representing Rauf, who is legally aided, said: “The matter needs to be thoroughly litigated.”
Ms Naik said the Article 8 appeals of Rauf and Khan should then be dealt with separately and individually as other similar cases have been dealt with in the past, 'all the way to Strasbourg'.
Cathryn McGahey QC, representing the Home Office, said the matters should be dealt with jointly as the background facts are the same.
Both Rauf’s and the Government’s lawyers must now instruct experts in Pakistani law for the forthcoming appeal hearing on the issue of statelessness, and the hearing has been adjourned until a date in September – around 13 years after Rauf and Khan first committed the offences.

Last month Khan told a preliminary hearing: “We have not committed that big a crime.”
Neither Rauf or Khan were present for Thursday’s hearing.
Both were among four in the gang with dual UK-Pakistani citizenship, so liable to be stripped of UK citizenship and deported after then home secretary Theresa May ruled it would be 'conducive to the public good' to deprive the four of the right to remain in Britain.
They were part of a nine-strong gang of Asian men convicted of sex offences against vulnerable girls in 2012.
For two years from early 2008, girls as young as 12 were plied with alcohol and drugs and gang-raped in rooms above takeaway shops and ferried to different flats in taxis where cash was paid to use the girls.
Police said as many as 47 girls were groomed.
Khan, Rauf and another man, Abdul Aziz, then fought, and lost, a long legal battle against the deportation order, losing a final Court of Appeal ruling in 2018.

But the failure to then deport any of the four, almost a decade after their conviction, has led to anger in Rochdale, where victims were living alongside their tormentors, and has heaped public criticism on a number of home secretaries.
Last year the M.E.N. revealed how one terrified victim bumped into her freed abuser while shopping in Asda.
She ran from the supermarket in tears and reported Adil Khan to the authorities as he was with another young child.
Now a young woman, she saw Khan with another child in an aisle of Asda superstore in Rochdale town centre.
She told a friend: "Oh my God, he's been in Asda. I've never been so scared in all my life. I feel like my heart just stopped beating."
She was left outraged that Khan and two other members of the gang remained in Rochdale despite losing their appeal against deportation.
The young woman - who cannot be named as a victim of a sex crime but who was Ruby in the BBC drama about the scandal Three Girls - confided in former GMP detective Maggie Oliver who worked on the police investigation but later resigned in disgust at how victims were treated and turned whistleblower and campaigner.

(Image: BBC/Ewen Spencer)
The Home Office began the process of removing the men’s British citizenship in July 2015 to pave the way for their deportation but they challenged the move, saying it breached their human rights and the rights of their children.
They lost their case at the Court of Appeal in August 2018 but they remained in Rochdale.
The long-running case will extend to September at least and will probably go into next year.
RELATED ARTICLES

• Outrage over why Rochdale grooming gang members are still in town years after being ordered to leave UK

It's five years since the government vowed to deport a trio of vile Rochdale sex groomers who preyed on vulnerable school-age girls... but they're still living in the town

Rochdale grooming gang members fight deportation with human rights plea

Adil Khan, 51, and Abdul Rauf, 52, are invoking Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights - the right to a private and family life

www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk

Pakistan should not allow them anywhere near Pakistan. Its in pakistans interest to protect its children and these people grew up in the UK and they should remain here either in jail or under close monitoring

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Some years back i had heard in media that in that town rotherham there was big child grooming scandal which came out.Adult asian men were exploiting underage white girls.

From what i heard in the north and places like rotherham they mainly originate from mirpur in azad kashmir.

Unfortunately in Thailand and the Philippines, 10,000s of underage girls are groomed by middle aged, middle class white english men. In northern england, countless white english girls are groomed by Pakistani men in their 20s to 50s. Both cases are immoral and repugnant.

 

[Trango Towers]

Unfortunately in Thailand and the Philippines, 10,000s of underage girls are groomed by middle aged, middle class white english men. In northern england, countless white english girls are groomed by Pakistani men in their 20s to 50s. Both cases are immoral and repugnant.

Let's not forget the NSPCC register is full or white family members sexually abusing their own children.
This is a sickness that needs serious attention.
All children need protecting globally

 

[Azadkashmir]

Andrew says hi

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Lord Ahmed was the leading promotor of Pakistan and Kashmir interests in the House of Lords.
He was outspoken about "Indian Atrocities" in Kashmir and endlessly proclaimed his Kashmiri and Pakistani heritage.
Today found guilty of an atrocity himself

Lord Ahmed: Former peer guilty of trying to rape girl
Published
38 minutes ago

Image source, UK Parliament
Image caption,
Lord Ahmed was charged with two counts of attempting to rape a girl under 16, indecent assault of a boy under 14 and raping a boy under 16
A former Labour peer has been found guilty of trying to rape a girl when he was a teenager in the 1970s.
Lord Ahmed of Rotherham was also convicted of a serious sexual assault against a boy during the same period.
Jurors at Sheffield Crown Court were told the "repeated sexual abuse" happened in Rotherham over several years.
The 64-year-old, who appeared under his real name of Nazir Ahmed, had denied the charges.
Judge Mr Justice Lavender will decide later when Lord Ahmed will be sentenced.

• Read more Yorkshire stories

During his trial, prosecutor Tom Little QC told the court Lord Ahmed had attempted to rape the girl in the early 1970s, when the defendant was aged 16 or 17 but she was much younger.
Mr Little said Lord Ahmed claimed the allegations were a "malicious fiction" but a phone recording of a 2016 conversation between the two victims showed they were not "made-up or concocted".
The call was prompted by an email from the man saying: "I have evidence against that paedophile," the jury previously heard.
Lord Ahmed was charged along with his two older brothers, Mohammed Farouq, 71, and Mohammed Tariq, 65, but both were deemed unfit to stand trial.
Farouq and Tariq faced charges of indecent assault in relation to the same boy that Lord Ahmed abused, with the jury also finding they did the acts alleged.

Lord Ahmed: Former Labour peer guilty of child sex offences

Lord Ahmed of Rotherham is convicted of assaulting a young boy and a girl's attempted rape.

www.bbc.co.uk

Prince andrew, ghislaine maxwell and Jewish grooming gangs say hi:

Ghislaine Maxwell’s privileged defenders have proven how entitled the elite really are

Behold the moral illiteracy of the filthy rich and famous. They expect law-keepers and other upholders of social standards to handle them with (designer) kid gloves

www.google.co.uk

Let's not forget the NSPCC register is full or white family members sexually abusing their own children.
This is a sickness that needs serious attention.
All children need protecting globally

Prince andrew, ghislain maxwell and Jewish grooming gangs say hi:

Ghislaine Maxwell’s privileged defenders have proven how entitled the elite really are

Behold the moral illiteracy of the filthy rich and famous. They expect law-keepers and other upholders of social standards to handle them with (designer) kid gloves

www.google.co.uk