It was way easy to charge him because he was a seasoned child predator with obvious criminal history of pedophilia. Unlike lord nazir who is a noble business man and charity worker with zero such history. Also unlike that man he is a politician which is a big motive of his rivals to defame him.
Finally that man is now 105 ,50 years back he was 55 ,so he was indeed a pedophile if he forced himself sexually on some teenager . That's not the case with Lord nazir who himself was a teenager at that time. Come on no one is buying that horse crap .
Either Lord Ahmed is stupid or he is a sexual predator
In either case it is good riddance
@SecularNationalist
Lord Nazir Ahmed sexually and emotionally exploited a vulnerable woman, a conduct report concludes.
www.bbc.com
Lord Ahmed retires from Parliament days before expulsion
By Richard Watson
BBC Newsnight
Published17 November 2020
A member of the House of Lords retired from Parliament after seeing a conduct report recommending he be expelled for sexually exploiting a vulnerable woman.
The
Lords Conduct Committee concluded Lord Ahmed of Rotherham emotionally and sexually exploited Tahira Zaman, who came to him for help in 2017.
The inquiry into his behaviour followed a BBC Newsnight investigation.
Lord Ahmed said the allegations in the report were not true and he would appeal against the decision.
Ms Zaman said she was "elated and relieved" at the report's findings.
'I was looking for help'
The Lords Conduct Committee report concluded Lord Ahmed had exploited Ms Zaman, despite knowing she was receiving treatment for anxiety and depression.
The Lords Commissioner for Standards, Lucy Scott-Moncrieff, said this "exacerbates the seriousness" of his breaches of the code of conduct.
Ms Zaman told Newsnight last year: "I was looking for help and he took advantage of me, he abused his power."
She said she had approached Lord Ahmed because she thought he could help her get the Metropolitan Police to investigate a faith healer who she believed was exploiting women.
Lord Ahmed wrote to the Met Police Commissioner on headed paper on 2 March, and he and Ms Zaman met at a restaurant in east London in February 2017 to discuss the case.
After dinner, Ms Zaman alleged that Lord Ahmed groped her upper thigh.
On the balance of probabilities, the Commissioner for Standards' investigation found that Lord Ahmed had sexually assaulted her.
Ms Zaman says she was shocked by his behaviour and broke off contact.
But, encouraged by a friend, she messaged Lord Ahmed on 14 July that year to ask if he had received a reply from the police.
He said he had and they arranged to meet at his house in east London to discuss it.
She told Newsnight last year: "He was saying I'm beautiful and, you know, he really likes me."
Later that evening, in September 2017, they had sex.
The Commissioner for Standards concludes: "I find that it is more likely than not that Ms Zaman went to Lord Ahmed's house at his invitation to discuss the offer made by the police to meet her.
"However, he had no intention of forwarding her concerns to the police and his use of the offer of a meeting made in the letter from the police to lure Ms Zaman to his house was dishonest."
Lord Ahmed continued to pursue her and Ms Zaman felt they were entering into a relationship.
But Ms Zaman says that after two months the relationship ended. She says she realised she had been exploited.
Ms Zaman first complained to the House of Lords about Lord Ahmed's behaviour in January 2018.
She approached Newsnight after the Commissioner for Standards told her Lord Ahmed could not be investigated because the code of conduct only covered his parliamentary "duties" - mainly proceedings of the House of Lords.
Newsnight investigation
Newsnight began to investigate the Lords' decision not to accept Ms Zaman's complaint, for a film broadcast in February last year.
Interviewed by Newsnight, Lord Carlile QC, a former deputy high court judge, said the Commissioner for Standards had "got it wrong", adding: "If someone comes to you for help, particularly if they're vulnerable and you form a sexual relationship, actually that's disgraceful."
The Commissioner for Standards denied this, telling Newsnight that was a misunderstanding of the code of conduct.
Ten weeks after the film was broadcast, the House of Lords changed the wording of the code to cover parliamentary "activities", rather than just "duties".
It was retrospective and so covered Lord Ahmed's behaviour.
Ms Zaman re-submitted her complaint, which led to a detailed investigation by the Commissioner for Standards.
'I wanted justice'
Responding to the report, Ms Zaman said: "I feel elated and relieved because the whole experience for me was quite traumatising. I'm still digesting, digesting it.
"I keep on telling myself that I've got what I wanted - I wanted justice."
Lord Ahmed said: "I am extremely disappointed by the report of the conduct committee, which is based on a flawed and unfair investigation process.
"I have always said, and maintain, that the allegations contained in the report are not true.
"Given this, I am now going to continue pursuing my appeal to the European Court of Human Rights to remedy this injustice."
You can see Newsnight's update on its investigation at 22:45 GMT.
Thats very interesting. And very sad that Idi Amin did what he did, but you were a remnant of colonialism. Africa really needed to get rid of it. It needed to get the Indians and others out for its own future.
I know a lot of white south Africans and they had an amazing civilisation, remarkable culture and very very wealthy and successful country. They are slowly being kicked out and they really have no future in South Africa. It's awful that it needs to be done, but Africa really needs to reverse colonialism. Unfortunately a part fo that is getting rid of people that colonised them.
If Africans can expel outsiders is it fine for Europeans to expel Pakistanis, Turks tomorrow ?