Loot and plunder by Indian army after liberation war in 1971

[third eye]

Is Kashmir issue the internal affair of India?

Without a doubt !!

 

[haviZsultan]

Without a doubt !!

Woah thats a tall statement. How so?

 

[third eye]

Woah thats a tall statement. How so?

Do not have the time & inclination to go back to ' birds & bees' again & again.

There are numerous inputs here itself on this forum. Suggest u go thru them...

 

[haviZsultan]

Do not have the time & inclination to go back to ' birds & bees' again & again.

There are numerous inputs here itself on this forum. Suggest u go thru them...

Lol. India supported terrorism in bangladesh in 71 and continues to use the Bangladeshis and RAW continues using its terrorism to change and topple governments and cause major problems in the country. Water supply is blocked and innocent bangladeshis are murdered brutally almost daily by forces in the name of illegal immigration.

If India acted and formed the mukti bahini to destroy muslims and Pakistan then the people of Pakistan have every right to raise their voice for Kashmir. Not only that the people of Kashmir want freedom with 9% vouching for ceding IOK to Pakistan so it is not in anyway an internal affair of India.

I enjoy it when Indians show how double sided they can be. You should have stayed passive in 71 to say that kashmir is an internal affair of India. Also if u're going to say bangladeshis started crossing border in 71 then know that over 4000 Kashmiris cross border to Pakistan every year. We have a right to fight Indian occupation then dont we?

Advice: Dont be a hypocrate. If its ok for you the same is okay for us. Kashmir is in no way your internal problem and it sar pey sawaar on not only the Pakistani and kasmiris but also the bangladeshis who understand u had no love for bangladesh but only a vast hatred for the largest muslim state in the world which had its borders right next to you.

 

[salman nedian]

Without a doubt !!

So my dear Friend! There are refugees coming from occupied Kashmir who are living in camps of Azad Kashmir now according to your own logic Kashmir is not the internal issue of India.

 

[indradhanush]

But why rake this issue which is 35 years old, it is very difficult to ascertain what is fact and what is fiction.

 

[salman nedian]

But why rake this issue which is 35 years old, it is very difficult to ascertain what is fact and what is fiction.

Nothing special! Just to uncover the Indian terrorism and looting history.

 

[third eye]

Lol. India supported terrorism in bangladesh in 71 and continues to use the Bangladeshis and RAW continues using its terrorism to change and topple governments and cause major problems in the country. Water supply is blocked and innocent bangladeshis are murdered brutally almost daily by forces in the name of illegal immigration.

What hapened in E Pak was a result of mishandling by GOP. As regards water supply, it is not blocked. If it was, nations downstream would trun dry. How does RAW topple Govts ? Notice BD has elections which are more representative then those in Pak .

If India acted and formed the mukti bahini to destroy muslims and Pakistan then the people of Pakistan have every right to raise their voice for Kashmir. Not only that the people of Kashmir want freedom with 9% vouching for ceding IOK to Pakistan so it is not in anyway an internal affair of India.

The mukti bahini was not formed by India but by the ppl of EP/BD themselves, ask any BD on this forum, he'll tell you the same. As rgds J&K ( stop calling it Kashmir). Why are we discusing what right Pak has with relation to J&K ? Pak already celebrates solidarity days, officially states that its stated policy is to provide support etc..so what are we discussing ? How effective it has been is another issue.

I enjoy it when Indians show how double sided they can be. You should have stayed passive in 71 to say that kashmir is an internal affair of India. Also if u're going to say bangladeshis started crossing border in 71 then know that over 4000 Kashmiris cross border to Pakistan every year. We have a right to fight Indian occupation then dont we?

Are 4000 ppl form J&K crossing every year ? Need some proof on this . Whether or not Pak has a right is something I do not wish to argue, but Pak has tried its best unsucessfully so far. How sucessful will it be in the future , what else can it do ?


Advice: Dont be a hypocrate. If its ok for you the same is okay for us. Kashmir is in no way your internal problem and it sar pey sawaar on not only the Pakistani and kasmiris but also the bangladeshis who understand u had no love for bangladesh but only a vast hatred for the largest muslim state in the world which had its borders right next to you.

Thanx for ur advice, its not needed. Pak can continue to do whatever it wants / can. There has been no change in the situation on the ground in 60 yrs +, nor will there ever be. It is only used as a plank to bind the nation together under the tutelage of the army. After all if there is no J&K prob, what would the justification be for the army to govern the nation under the garb of ' protecting the nation' ?

 

[salman nedian]

Thanx for ur advice, its not needed. Pak can continue to do whatever it wants / can. There has been no change in the situation on the ground in 60 yrs +, nor will there ever be. It is only used as a plank to bind the nation together under the tutelage of the army. After all if there is no J&K prob, what would the justification be for the army to govern the nation under the garb of ' protecting the nation' ?

Kashmir problem is not created by Pakistan it is the result of Indian aggression which shows your expansionist desires.

The mukti bahini was not formed by India but by the ppl of EP/BD themselves, ask any BD on this forum, he'll tell you the same.

If Mukti Bahini was formed by the people of East Pakistan than stop taking credit for the separation of East Pakistan. what ever happened was the result of the efforts by Bengalis and than why they should be thankful to you. Who are you????????

 

[third eye]

Kashmir problem is not created by Pakistan it is the result of Indian aggression which shows your expansionist desires.

If India had expansionist desires, we wouldn't have handed over EP to BD in its entirety. Any way , this discussion is leading now where .

If Mukti Bahini was formed by the people of East Pakistan than stop taking credit for the separation of East Pakistan. what ever happened was the result of the efforts by Bengalis and than why they should be thankful to you. Who are you????????

You don't seem to remember..whom did Niazi surrender to ? Who's paratroopers landed at Tangail ? Where did the 93,000 POWs stay ? Who knocked the PAF out of the sky in EP ? Should I go on ?

 

[salman nedian]

You don't seem to remember..whom did Niazi surrender to ? Who's paratroopers landed at Tangail ? Where did the 93,000 POWs stay ? Who knocked the PAF out of the sky in EP ? Should I go on ?

So you were involved in terrorism. Come on mate I am tired, at least adopt a single opinion, don’t be hypocrite and confused.

 

[third eye]

So you were involved in terrorism. Come on mate I am tired, at least adopt a single opinion, don’t be hypocrite and confused.

There seems to be a comprehension issue here.

 

[salman nedian]

There seems to be a comprehension issue here.

Exactly friend!

 

[EagleEyes]

You don't seem to remember..whom did Niazi surrender to ? Who's paratroopers landed at Tangail ? Where did the 93,000 POWs stay ? Who knocked the PAF out of the sky in EP ? Should I go on ?

So they teach you in Indian schools that IAF knocked out PAF in the skies? Did they also teach you that Pakistan handed over Bangladesh to India? There is some serious comprehension issue no doubt.

- Note please discuss the topic.

 

[third eye]

So they teach you in Indian schools that IAF knocked out PAF in the skies? Did they also teach you that Pakistan handed over Bangladesh to India? There is some serious comprehension issue no doubt.

- Note please discuss the topic.

You don't have to be Eienstien to make conclusions when :

1. The Eastern Army Commander accepts the personal weapon of Gen AAK Niazi & 93,000 Pows drop their weapons & stay captive for two yrs thereafter. - Normally this implies abject surrender.

2. After the first week of war, no enemy planes are seen over EP & the IAF has a free run - this would imply knocking out of the PAF from the EP sky.

Sure, Let return to the topic.