LOL: India has told China to cease activities in Pakistan's Kashmir and Indian Ocean.

[MAJESTICAL]

View attachment 244583

 

[Srinivas]

Chinese CCP overestimates itself.

Chinese economic march was slowed about an year ago. They cannot take on all the countries around them.

Who the are these chinese to lurk in disputed areas of India?

India has asked China to cease activities in Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir: Parrikar
Parrikar also said the government has taken note of reports indicating increased Chinese ships and submarine forays into the Indian Ocean Region.

Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar has asked China to cease its activities in Azad Kashmir India has asked China to cease its activities in Azad Kashmir, Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar said today. In a written reply in Lok Sabha, he said that government has taken note of reports regarding presence of Chinese persons in Azad Kashmir (***), including in Gilgit-Baltistan region. “Government has also conveyed its concerns to China about their activities in *** and asked them to cease such activities,” he said.



In another reply, he said the government has taken note of reports indicating increased Chinese ships and submarine forays into the Indian Ocean Region. “China has also been deploying naval ships as part of their anti-piracy escort force in the Gulf of Aden since January 2009. It is understood that 20 such deployments have been undertaken till date,” Parrikar said. He added that a Chinese submarine, deployed in the Gulf of Aden since April this year, undertook replenishment at Karachi in May and July by transit through international waters - See more at: India has asked China to cease activities in Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir: Parrikar | The Indian Express












Lets all just laugh at India

 

[Shamain]

its azad kashmir

@Shamain agay ap sambhalo

May nay give up kar diya. This forum is for upholding indins words and stance.
So wont say more.

And candid statements made in press have the same connotations as official bilateral communications.

Bravo...

Are u for real??
Candid statements? Any statement that is directed at any other country involves diplomacy and shud be carefully made. Secondly his statement kaante say kaanta was clearly made towards pakistan. When statements go on air then they involve diplomacy at all levels. But maybe being an indian and used to things' like manohar and his statements u wont understand these things.

And as of bilateral communication u are such a genius , he is talking abt Pakistan with China where firstly India has no say, zabardastee poking nose tho we are good at mauling such noses and we will, back to the point, this in no way is bilateral , it is interference and shows indian desperation for pakistani attention. And if u still insist then it has to be trilateral.! Ur diplomacy skills fail right here and go down the gutter.

Oh and if u need tissues to wipe ur tears , dont ask us pakistanis we dont have extra stock for indians.

Indeed poor memory on my part, as i don't recall poor diplomacy on our part...please do remind me.

Dvyani khobragade

What ur so called famous 'diplomacy' had done here.

 

[Jamwal's]

Though China is not our eternal enemy but a fellow civilization but that won't stop India to drill Oil in South China sea (vietnam) while Welcoming Japanese infrastructure investment in Arunachal Pradesh.

 

[Trisonics]

 

[MilSpec]

May nay give up kar diya. This forum is for upholding indins words and stance.
So wont say more.

Are u for real??
Candid statements? Any statement that is directed at any other country involves diplomacy and shud be carefully made. Secondly his statement kaante say kaanta was clearly made towards pakistan. When statements go on air then they involve diplomacy at all levels. But maybe being an indian and used to things' like manohar and his statements u wont understand these things.

And as of bilateral communication u are such a genius , he is talking abt Pakistan with China where firstly India has no say, zabardastee poking nose tho we are good at mauling such noses and we will, back to the point, this in no way is bilateral , it is interference and shows indian desperation for pakistani attention. And if u still insist then it has to be trilateral.! Ur diplomacy skills fail right here and go down the gutter.

Oh and if u need tissues to wipe ur tears , don't ask us pakistanis we dont have extra stock for indians.

As usual, comprehension remains a distant dream in such conversations, But still lets give it a try.... When pakistan complains about Indian presence in Afghanistan to Kabul, it doesn't become a trilateral issue, it remains bilatral as the conversation is taking place between Islamabad (oops I mean Rawalpindi) and Kabul. Similarly when India registers a protest to China about Pakistan about a diputed territory , it still is a Bilatral discussion. Hope that clarifies the simple comprehension issue at hand here.

Dvyani khobragade

What ur so called famous 'diplomacy' had done here.

It is for you to evaluate, the issue of consular diplomat facing serious charges, gathered an unilateral apology from Sec of State, got the diplomat safely back to India, without any prosecution.
On stark contrast compare that to Salala incident , or even Raymond Davis, you will see the writ of Indian Diplomacy right there. but then again, I doubt that was your objective, was it?

 

[Trisonics]

As usual, comprehension remains a distant dream in such conversations, But still lets give it a try.... When pakistan complains about Indian presence in Afghanistan to Kabul, it doesn't become a trilateral issue, it remains bilatral as the conversation is taking place between Islamabad (oops I mean Rawalpindi) and Kabul. Similarly when India registers a protest to China about Pakistan about a diputed territory , it still is a Bilatral discussion. Hope that clarifies the simple comprehension issue at hand here.






It is for you to evaluate, the issue of consular diplomat facing serious charges, gathered an unilateral apology from Sec of State, got the diplomat safely back to India, without any prosecution.
On stark contrast compare that to Salala incident , or even Raymond Davis, you will see the writ of Indian Diplomacy right there. but then again, I doubt that was your objective, was it?

You can only engage an average Pakistani at a certain level, the more you explain, the more absurd they will get. Don't dumb it down for them, at least on this forum. I've given up and end up looking for gifs which they seem to understand much better than a few statements. Don't waste your time especially on such threads that are created for trolling only..

 

[al_asad_al_mulk]

Nothing funny,its in disputed territory we have every right to protest Chinese operations there.

The disputed one with you here no dispute you moron abbey pagal hey kiya..

 

[Shotgunner51]

We love the way China treat you.Thats why we love China.In front of China you become Chiken yellow n in front Pakistan as1/6 of you act as a Tarzan.But we got a gun against a Tarzan so we don care who the hell you are.

 

[MilSpec]

You can only engage an average Pakistani at a certain level, the more you explain, the more absurd they will get. Don't dumb it down for them, at least on this forum. I've given up and end up looking for gifs which they seem to understand much better than a few statements. Don't waste your time especially on such threads that are created for trolling only..

btw Huge Respect squadron namesake. Although No 35 is disbanded, a close friend served in Sq 102....

 

[Shamain]

As usual, comprehension remains a distant dream in such conversations, But still lets give it a try.... When pakistan complains about Indian presence in Afghanistan to Kabul, it doesn't become a trilateral issue, it remains bilatral as the conversation is taking place between Islamabad (oops I mean Rawalpindi) and Kabul. Similarly when India registers a protest to China about Pakistan about a diputed territory , it still is a Bilatral discussion. Hope that clarifies the simple comprehension issue at hand here.

EL O EL.
Ihave to say something, i have noticed u even before ,u quote ppl u write half ur point or maybe u have no point in the first place , then when ppl respond accordingly u go around shouting abt lack of comprehension.

Btw isnt it ironic the person who complains the most abt others' comprehension on this site is you.

If afghanistan was on ur mind u shud have given the example in earlier post ,idont have some psychic powres to guess stuff.

Secondly, did u read what india had complained abt ? India was asking china to stay out of Pakistani territory ,who the hell on earth india is to interfere? The region is willingly staying with pakistan.

If india calls pakistani kashmir disputed than she is accepting the international stance , UNO stance on Kashmir which declares it disputed. By that definition india and pakistan both shud head for uno mandated plebiscite .

Now the pansy who runs away from plebiscite is known by everyone.

When Pakistan complains abt Indian sponsored terrorism thru afghanistan (firstly in candid or non candid any statements Pakistan conducts herself classily and uses formal , decent lingo in making statements, unlike bazaru language ppl who arent worth wiping floors but are appointed as heads of institutions but then their nation deserves that), Pakistan is complaining abt india exporting terrorism,she isnt telling afghanistan to throw india out of certain territory cuz pakistan has any claim onit.

Now do u see the difference between the nature of two statements or not. Too much to expect from an indian to see the differnce.

And if still sticking to ur logic that it is bilateral communication and it shows due diligence by india then the same due diligence expression should be used for Pakistan when she highlights Indian exported terrorism

It is for you to evaluate, the issue of consular diplomat facing serious charges, gathered an unilateral apology from Sec of State, got the diplomat safely back to India, without any prosecution.
On stark contrast compare that to Salala incident , or even Raymond Davis, you will see the writ of Indian Diplomacy right there. but then again, I doubt that was your objective, was it?

After salalah whther apology came or not we blocked nato for seven months.

True raymond davis is a blot but we never screamed to be champions of diplomacy unlike u, who despite touting to be one always forget the main reason why i mentioned devyani.
The woman enjoyed full diplomatic immunity at the time of arrest. I think u know what diplomatic immunity entails.

If u have good diplomatic relations this is never what u get. Dont ever recall any Pakistani diplomat getting treated this way.

 

[Not So Good]

India has asked China to cease activities in Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir: Parrikar
Parrikar also said the government has taken note of reports indicating increased Chinese ships and submarine forays into the Indian Ocean Region.

Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar has asked China to cease its activities in Azad Kashmir India has asked China to cease its activities in Azad Kashmir, Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar said today. In a written reply in Lok Sabha, he said that government has taken note of reports regarding presence of Chinese persons in Azad Kashmir (***), including in Gilgit-Baltistan region. “Government has also conveyed its concerns to China about their activities in *** and asked them to cease such activities,” he said.



In another reply, he said the government has taken note of reports indicating increased Chinese ships and submarine forays into the Indian Ocean Region. “China has also been deploying naval ships as part of their anti-piracy escort force in the Gulf of Aden since January 2009. It is understood that 20 such deployments have been undertaken till date,” Parrikar said. He added that a Chinese submarine, deployed in the Gulf of Aden since April this year, undertook replenishment at Karachi in May and July by transit through international waters - See more at: India has asked China to cease activities in Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir: Parrikar | The Indian Express












Lets all just laugh at India

Laughing is good, it increases blood circulation, keep laughing

As usual, comprehension remains a distant dream in such conversations, But still lets give it a try....

Dont even try, this is not aa correct place for
things like logic, facts, comprehension, common sense, leave your brain out of itis

 

[al_asad_al_mulk]

Laughing is good, it increases blood circulation, keep laughing


Dont even try, this is not aa correct place for
things like logic, facts, comprehension, common sense, leave your brain out of itis

What I observed indian feel cill in their backbone. ISNT IT..

 

[Not So Good]

What I observed indian feel cill in their backbone. ISNT IT..

You sir are beyond our comprehensive power
Forgive me

 

[I M Sikander]

And guess what, chinese must be replied india with a middle finger.