CAPRICORN-88
SENIOR MEMBER
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/Colonel.jpg)
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2015
- Messages
- 4,407
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
Really.YES IT DID you liar. Did you even bother reading it?? Are you using facts interpretation with "Chinese characteristics" or something?
Here is that University of Cambridge report:
View attachment 761099![]()
COVID-19: genetic network analysis provides ‘snapshot’ of pandemic origins
Study charts the 'incipient supernova' of SARS-CoV-2 through genetic mutations as it spread from China and Asia to Australia, Europe and North America.www.cam.ac.uk
Researchers from Cambridge, UK, and Germany have reconstructed the early 'evolutionary paths' of SARS-CoV-2 in humans – as infection spread from Wuhan out to Europe and North America – using genetic network techniques.'
Forster and colleagues found that the closest type of SARS-CoV-2 to the one discovered in bats – type ‘A’, the “original human virus genome” – was present in Wuhan, but surprisingly was not the city’s predominant virus type.
Versions of ‘A’ were seen in Chinese individuals, and Americans reported to have lived in Wuhan, and mutated versions of ‘A’ were found in patients from the USA and Australia.
Wuhan’s major virus type, ‘B’, was prevalent in patients from across East Asia. However, the variant didn’t travel much beyond the region without further mutations – implying a 'founder event' in Wuhan, or 'resistance' against this type of coronavirus outside East Asia, say researchers.
YOU ARE BY FAR THE BIGGEST LYING CLOWN ON PDF
He sure does. Everything coming out of his mouth is suspect.
![OMG HAHA :omghaha: :omghaha:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/15042.gif)
![OMG HAHA :omghaha: :omghaha:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/15042.gif)
![OMG HAHA :omghaha: :omghaha:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/15042.gif)
Then you do have a comprehension problem even with this later report.
I have read a summary of the original report without commenting initially until I understand what it means.
But I admit I am not that clever as I was assisted by an accompanying analysis and summary.
Let's look at what you have presented.
Forster and colleagues found that the closest type of SARS-CoV-2 to the one discovered in bats – type ‘A’, the “original human virus genome” – was present in Wuhan, but surprisingly was not the city’s predominant virus type.
Do you understand what it means?
Strain B surprising was the predominant strain that cause Wuhan into a lockdown. Makes no sense at all. If Strain A started ot all then it must be the predominant strain.
Hello Hello. Is your brain working, boz?
Strain A presumably from bat were presented among certain individuals.
The strain A is NOT the predominant strain affecting folks ftom WUHAN but found among some individuals that were tested mainly foreigners e.g. Americans.
And do you know who did the testing?
This Wuhan conspiracy theory was invented by a China hater Steven Bannon.
![Cheers :cheers: :cheers:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/cute/cheers.gif)
So you see the joke is on you.
A wannabe but failed Propagandist who could not read.
![OMG HAHA :omghaha: :omghaha:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/15042.gif)
![OMG HAHA :omghaha: :omghaha:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/15042.gif)
![OMG HAHA :omghaha: :omghaha:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/15042.gif)
Last edited: