What's new

Launch of the First Australian Navy Hobart Class Air Warfare Destroyer

Would appreciate your comments on this thread!

Sir,

I would have shared my precious feedback :p: but I am still learning about this gola barood and equipment, I may have been born a soldier but education made me something really opposite. :D

Sorry yeh sab mayray liay rocket science hai aur mayray sir pay say guzar jata hai :(
 
Hobart Class Air Warfare Destroyers, Australia


hide.gif

Key Data

  • Type Air Warfare Destroyer (AWD)
  • Builder ASC, BAE Systems and FORGACS Group
  • Operator Royal Australian Navy (RAN)
  • Crew Approx 180
  • Full Load Displacement 7,000t
  • Overall Length 147m
  • Beam 18.6m



The Hobart Class air warfare destroyers (AWD) are being built by AWD Alliance for the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). The air warfare destroyer programme, known as SEA 4000, will deliver three advanced multirole warships to replace the FFGs of the RAN.

The three AWDs will be named HMAS Hobart, HMAS Brisbane and HMAS Sydney. The first AWD is expected to be delivered in December 2014, and the second and third warships are slated for early 2016 and mid-2017 respectively.

The $8bn AWD project is the largest Defence procurement project ever undertaken in Australia. It is expected to create 3,000 jobs in Australia and also benefit thousands of companies based in the nation.

Air warfare destroyer programme

The Hobart Class AWD programme is intended to deliver an affordable, effective, flexible and sustainable air warfare destroyer platform to the RAN. The requirement for modern warships was established by the Kinnaird Review in 2003. Gibbs & Cox and Navantia submitted warship designs to the Commonwealth Government.

The Australian Government selected ASC as the shipbuilder for the programme in May 2005. In June 2007, the existing design of Navantia was selected as a platform for the AWD programme. ASC entered into an alliance-based contract with the Defence Materiel Organisation and Raytheon Australia. The project has passed critical design review in January 2010.

Hobart Class AWD design

"The AWD platform is based on the Navantia-designed F100 frigate."
The AWD platform is based on the Navantia-designed F100 frigate, which is in service with the Spanish Navy. The baseline design has been slightly modified for Australian use, including the displacement of the AWD being increased to 7,000t, and the hangar modified to accommodate a range of helicopters.

The range now includes powerful diesel engines combined with improved fuel tank arrangements. The design also incorporates a bow thruster to provide better manoeuvrability.

AWD construction

The AWD Alliance subcontracted the FORGACS group and NQEA Australia as the preferred suppliers to build 70% of the blocks. In June 2009, the work allotted to the NQEA was transferred to BAE Systems Australia due to financial obligations.

The ships are being built using a modular construction method. The hull blocks of three destroyers are being constructed at three shipyards, including ASC in Osborne, BAE Systems in Melbourne and Forgacs in Newcastle. The assembling, outfitting, equipment and systems installation and trial activities will be carried out at the newly opened ASC Osborne shipyard.

A total of 31 blocks are being constructed for each ship, of which 70% are built by BAE Systems and Forgacs, and the remaining by ASC. ASC's facility located northwest of Adelaide's CBD will fabricate nine blocks for each ship. Work is currently underway on six blocks including decking and superstructure components.

Work is in progress on seven of the 12 main keel blocks fabricated for each ship at Melbourne and Victoria facilities of BAE Systems. Forgacs will fabricate 10 blocks for each ship in Newcastle. Work is underway on five central blocks, including the superstructure. Accommodation modules for all the ships are being built by Taylor Brothers in Hobart.

In June 2010, AWD Alliance has signed a $25m contract with Toll North to transport 66 hull blocks from Newcastle and Melbourne to Osborne Shipyard for assembly. BlueScope Steel has been contracted to supply 3,000t of steel required for the ship construction.

Hobart Class AWD missions

The Hobart Class will provide air defence for vessels, land-based forces and infrastructure in coastal lines. It will also defend and destroy missiles and aircraft within a range of 150km. The destroyers can also be deployed in law enforcement operations, defence aid to the civil community, collection of environmental data, rescue operations and diplomatic roles.

The Hobart Class will be equipped with advanced sonar systems, decoys and surface-launched torpedoes for anti-submarine warfare (ASW) operations.

Hobart Class AWD weapon systems

The Hobart Class AWDs will be the first RAN warships to be equipped with the Aegis combat system. Aegis includes a SPY-1D(V) radar, Mk 41 vertical launch system (VLS), SM-2 standard missile and an open architecture (OA) combat system.

"The Hobart Class will provide air defence for vessels."
The AWD will also be armed with the SM-6 long-range anti-aircraft missile, the Harpoon anti-ship missile system and Mk32 Mod9 surface vessel torpedo tubes (SVTT) for MU90 torpedoes.

The AWD will be fitted with a BAE Systems Mk 45 5" 62 calibre gun and a Phalanx Block 1B close-in weapons system (CIWS).

AWD helicopter system

The Hobart Class will feature a flight deck and a hangar to allow the operations of helicopters and UAVs. The existing hangar design will be modified to carry a wide range of helicopters.

Hobart Class countermeasures

"The Hobart Class will be equipped with advanced sonar systems and decoys."
The destroyer will be equipped with a ES-3701 tactical radar electronic support measures (ESM) and surveillance system. In December 2008, the AWD Alliance awarded a contract for the supply of a decoy launching system to Terma. Four deck-mounted MK-137 130mm decoy launchers can fire decoys to deceive incoming anti-ship missiles. Other countermeasures include Nulka active missile decoy launchers and ASW torpedo decoys.

AWD sensors

The AWD's sensor suite will include AN/SPY-1D(V) phased array radar, horizon search radar, SAM Electronics X-band navigation radar, integrated hull-mounted and towed array sonar system, and VAMPIR infrared search and track (IRST) system.

Hobart Class propulsion

The AWD will be equipped with a combined diesel and gas (CODAG) propulsion system with two GE LM 2500 gas turbines and two diesel engines. The vessel will also be fitted with a bow thruster for improved manoeuvrability.

Hobart Class Air Warfare Destroyers - Naval Technology

Air Warfare Destroyer (AWD)

The Hobart Class Air Warfare Destroyer (AWD) will deliver an effective, flexible and sustainable Air Warfare Destroyer capability for the security of Australia.

The 2000 Defence White Paper stated the Australian Defence Force would replace the Navy’s FFGs with a class of at least three air defence capable ships, the new Air Warfare Destroyers.

The Air Warfare Destroyer Program will provide the Royal Australian Navy (RAN) with one of the world’s most capable all purpose warships. In selecting the F100 as the baseline platform design and coupling it with the Aegis combat system, the Australian Government has ensured tomorrow’s Navy has the best equipment to defend Australia and its national interests.

These Hobart Class AWDs will provide air defence for accompanying ships in addition to land forces and infrastructure in coastal areas, and for self-protection against missiles and aircraft. The Aegis Combat System incorporating the state-of-the-art phased array radar, AN/SPY 1D(V), in combination with the SM-2 missile, will provide an advanced air defence system capable of engaging enemy aircraft and missiles at ranges in excess of 150km.

The AWDs will carry a helicopter for surveillance and response to support key warfare areas. The surface warfare function will include long range anti-ship missiles and a naval gun capable of firing extended range munitions in support of land forces.

The Hobart Class will also conduct Undersea Warfare and be equipped with modern sonar systems, decoys, surface-launched torpedoes and an array of effective close-in defensive weapons.

These capabilities ensure the AWDs have the layered defensive and offensive capability required to counter conventional and asymmetric threats.

Ships
  • HMAS Hobart (III)
  • HMAS Brisbane (III)
  • HMAS Sydney (V)
Characteristics
  • Length 146.7 metres
  • Beam: 18.6 metres
  • Draft: 7.2 metres
  • Full Load Displacement: 7,000 tonnes
    Performance
  • Top Speed: 28+ knots
  • Range: 5,000+ nautical miles at 18+ knots
    Crew
  • Approx 180
    Accommodation
  • 234
    Combat System
  • Aegis Weapon System Baseline 7.1
  • AN/SPY-1D(V) Phased Array Radar
  • Horizon Search Radar
  • Mk 41 Vertical Launch System (48 VLS Cells)
  • Mk 45 5” 62 Calibre Gun
  • Advanced HARPOON Weapon Control System: 2 quad launchers
  • EW Suite
  • Very Short Range Air and Surface Defence
  • NULKA Active Missile Decoy system
  • Integrated Sonar System incorporating a Hull Mounted and towed array sonar
  • Communications Suite
    Aviation
  • Hangars: 1
    Boats
  • Two Rigid Hulled Inflatable Boats
Air Warfare Destroyer (AWD) | Royal Australian Navy


View attachment 224421 View attachment 224422 View attachment 224423 View attachment 224424

Its displacement is slightly less than that of INS Kolkata.

Shorter than Kolkata but its beam is 18.6 M.

Overall a formidable platform.
 
Hobart Class Air Warfare Destroyers, Australia


hide.gif

Key Data

  • Type Air Warfare Destroyer (AWD)
  • Builder ASC, BAE Systems and FORGACS Group
  • Operator Royal Australian Navy (RAN)
  • Crew Approx 180
  • Full Load Displacement 7,000t
  • Overall Length 147m
  • Beam 18.6m

The Hobart Class air warfare destroyers (AWD) are being built by AWD Alliance for the Royal Australian Navy (RAN). The air warfare destroyer programme, known as SEA 4000, will deliver three advanced multirole warships to replace the FFGs of the RAN.

The three AWDs will be named HMAS Hobart, HMAS Brisbane and HMAS Sydney. The first AWD is expected to be delivered in December 2014, and the second and third warships are slated for early 2016 and mid-2017 respectively.

The $8bn AWD project is the largest Defence procurement project ever undertaken in Australia. It is expected to create 3,000 jobs in Australia and also benefit thousands of companies based in the nation.

Air warfare destroyer programme

The Hobart Class AWD programme is intended to deliver an affordable, effective, flexible and sustainable air warfare destroyer platform to the RAN. The requirement for modern warships was established by the Kinnaird Review in 2003. Gibbs & Cox and Navantia submitted warship designs to the Commonwealth Government.

The Australian Government selected ASC as the shipbuilder for the programme in May 2005. In June 2007, the existing design of Navantia was selected as a platform for the AWD programme. ASC entered into an alliance-based contract with the Defence Materiel Organisation and Raytheon Australia. The project has passed critical design review in January 2010.

Hobart Class AWD design

"The AWD platform is based on the Navantia-designed F100 frigate."
The AWD platform is based on the Navantia-designed F100 frigate, which is in service with the Spanish Navy. The baseline design has been slightly modified for Australian use, including the displacement of the AWD being increased to 7,000t, and the hangar modified to accommodate a range of helicopters.

The range now includes powerful diesel engines combined with improved fuel tank arrangements. The design also incorporates a bow thruster to provide better manoeuvrability.

AWD construction

The AWD Alliance subcontracted the FORGACS group and NQEA Australia as the preferred suppliers to build 70% of the blocks. In June 2009, the work allotted to the NQEA was transferred to BAE Systems Australia due to financial obligations.

The ships are being built using a modular construction method. The hull blocks of three destroyers are being constructed at three shipyards, including ASC in Osborne, BAE Systems in Melbourne and Forgacs in Newcastle. The assembling, outfitting, equipment and systems installation and trial activities will be carried out at the newly opened ASC Osborne shipyard.

A total of 31 blocks are being constructed for each ship, of which 70% are built by BAE Systems and Forgacs, and the remaining by ASC. ASC's facility located northwest of Adelaide's CBD will fabricate nine blocks for each ship. Work is currently underway on six blocks including decking and superstructure components.

Work is in progress on seven of the 12 main keel blocks fabricated for each ship at Melbourne and Victoria facilities of BAE Systems. Forgacs will fabricate 10 blocks for each ship in Newcastle. Work is underway on five central blocks, including the superstructure. Accommodation modules for all the ships are being built by Taylor Brothers in Hobart.

In June 2010, AWD Alliance has signed a $25m contract with Toll North to transport 66 hull blocks from Newcastle and Melbourne to Osborne Shipyard for assembly. BlueScope Steel has been contracted to supply 3,000t of steel required for the ship construction.

Hobart Class AWD missions

The Hobart Class will provide air defence for vessels, land-based forces and infrastructure in coastal lines. It will also defend and destroy missiles and aircraft within a range of 150km. The destroyers can also be deployed in law enforcement operations, defence aid to the civil community, collection of environmental data, rescue operations and diplomatic roles.

The Hobart Class will be equipped with advanced sonar systems, decoys and surface-launched torpedoes for anti-submarine warfare (ASW) operations.

Hobart Class AWD weapon systems

The Hobart Class AWDs will be the first RAN warships to be equipped with the Aegis combat system. Aegis includes a SPY-1D(V) radar, Mk 41 vertical launch system (VLS), SM-2 standard missile and an open architecture (OA) combat system.

"The Hobart Class will provide air defence for vessels."
The AWD will also be armed with the SM-6 long-range anti-aircraft missile, the Harpoon anti-ship missile system and Mk32 Mod9 surface vessel torpedo tubes (SVTT) for MU90 torpedoes.

The AWD will be fitted with a BAE Systems Mk 45 5" 62 calibre gun and a Phalanx Block 1B close-in weapons system (CIWS).

AWD helicopter system

The Hobart Class will feature a flight deck and a hangar to allow the operations of helicopters and UAVs. The existing hangar design will be modified to carry a wide range of helicopters.

Hobart Class countermeasures

"The Hobart Class will be equipped with advanced sonar systems and decoys."
The destroyer will be equipped with a ES-3701 tactical radar electronic support measures (ESM) and surveillance system. In December 2008, the AWD Alliance awarded a contract for the supply of a decoy launching system to Terma. Four deck-mounted MK-137 130mm decoy launchers can fire decoys to deceive incoming anti-ship missiles. Other countermeasures include Nulka active missile decoy launchers and ASW torpedo decoys.

AWD sensors

The AWD's sensor suite will include AN/SPY-1D(V) phased array radar, horizon search radar, SAM Electronics X-band navigation radar, integrated hull-mounted and towed array sonar system, and VAMPIR infrared search and track (IRST) system.

Hobart Class propulsion

The AWD will be equipped with a combined diesel and gas (CODAG) propulsion system with two GE LM 2500 gas turbines and two diesel engines. The vessel will also be fitted with a bow thruster for improved manoeuvrability.

Hobart Class Air Warfare Destroyers - Naval Technology

Air Warfare Destroyer (AWD)

The Hobart Class Air Warfare Destroyer (AWD) will deliver an effective, flexible and sustainable Air Warfare Destroyer capability for the security of Australia.

The 2000 Defence White Paper stated the Australian Defence Force would replace the Navy’s FFGs with a class of at least three air defence capable ships, the new Air Warfare Destroyers.

The Air Warfare Destroyer Program will provide the Royal Australian Navy (RAN) with one of the world’s most capable all purpose warships. In selecting the F100 as the baseline platform design and coupling it with the Aegis combat system, the Australian Government has ensured tomorrow’s Navy has the best equipment to defend Australia and its national interests.

These Hobart Class AWDs will provide air defence for accompanying ships in addition to land forces and infrastructure in coastal areas, and for self-protection against missiles and aircraft. The Aegis Combat System incorporating the state-of-the-art phased array radar, AN/SPY 1D(V), in combination with the SM-2 missile, will provide an advanced air defence system capable of engaging enemy aircraft and missiles at ranges in excess of 150km.

The AWDs will carry a helicopter for surveillance and response to support key warfare areas. The surface warfare function will include long range anti-ship missiles and a naval gun capable of firing extended range munitions in support of land forces.

The Hobart Class will also conduct Undersea Warfare and be equipped with modern sonar systems, decoys, surface-launched torpedoes and an array of effective close-in defensive weapons.

These capabilities ensure the AWDs have the layered defensive and offensive capability required to counter conventional and asymmetric threats.

Ships
  • HMAS Hobart (III)
  • HMAS Brisbane (III)
  • HMAS Sydney (V)
Characteristics
  • Length 146.7 metres
  • Beam: 18.6 metres
  • Draft: 7.2 metres
  • Full Load Displacement: 7,000 tonnes
    Performance
  • Top Speed: 28+ knots
  • Range: 5,000+ nautical miles at 18+ knots
    Crew
  • Approx 180
    Accommodation
  • 234
    Combat System
  • Aegis Weapon System Baseline 7.1
  • AN/SPY-1D(V) Phased Array Radar
  • Horizon Search Radar
  • Mk 41 Vertical Launch System (48 VLS Cells)
  • Mk 45 5” 62 Calibre Gun
  • Advanced HARPOON Weapon Control System: 2 quad launchers
  • EW Suite
  • Very Short Range Air and Surface Defence
  • NULKA Active Missile Decoy system
  • Integrated Sonar System incorporating a Hull Mounted and towed array sonar
  • Communications Suite
    Aviation
  • Hangars: 1
    Boats
  • Two Rigid Hulled Inflatable Boats
Air Warfare Destroyer (AWD) | Royal Australian Navy


View attachment 224421 View attachment 224422 View attachment 224423 View attachment 224424
It seem Australia has started to focus on its defence.
 
I would not necessary say Hobart Class is such a debacle of the Zumwalt (And I would not actually called Zumwalt Class a debacle either)

I was only answering BJlaowai tongue in cheek, J. Because I doubted his article's standpoint.
On the Zumwalt though ( and I visited Bath Iron Works where I have family ), the program was a debacle IMHoO.
Not so much capacity wise but as a procurement mismanagement, as you said because R&D costs exploded.

About this, in a day and age where we curtail deployment on anything but bona fide wars ( think Libya affair ) due
to public opinion, uncontrolled program spending is a problem of major importance if not on a purely military effects
rationale. It is in that sense that the Zumwalt class is bad. I'm preparing a piece on the Rafale for my blog today for
example and one point in favor will be that the program was successful on that ( spending ) even though the money
did hinder its development and induction whereas both F-22 and F-35 while great suffered from cost increases.

Overall, you and I don't stand far apart at all.
Good day mate, Tay.
 
I was only answering BJlaowai tongue in cheek, J. Because I doubted his article's standpoint.
On the Zumwalt though ( and I visited Bath Iron Works where I have family ), the program was a debacle IMHoO.
Not so much capacity wise but as a procurement mismanagement, as you said because R&D costs exploded.

About this, in a day and age where we curtail deployment on anything but bona fide wars ( think Libya affair ) due
to public opinion, uncontrolled program spending is a problem of major importance if not on a purely military effects
rationale. It is in that sense that the Zumwalt class is bad. I'm preparing a piece on the Rafale for my blog today for
example and one point in favor will be that the program was successful on that ( spending ) even though the money
did hinder its development and induction whereas both F-22 and F-35 while great suffered from cost increases.

Overall, you and I don't stand far apart at all.
Good day mate, Tay.

the problems with Hobart Class is not lies within the design of the ships, surely not lies within the technologies (like what happened with Zummwalt in which Zummwalt itself using so many new technologies within, and Hobart Class itself mostly using off the shelf technologies in which available in markets), the problems lies in the capacity of Australian shipbuilding company, lot of mishaps management happened during the building process not to mention their efficiency is must be questioned as Australian itself is not been known to have a profitable and continues shipbuilding industry like South Korean, Chinese, Japanese or France had. You can find an article in which contain the expression of Abbot for the Australian Shipbuilding company.
 
@madokafc Agreed milady! So not a technical glitch but a program one which is what I meant prior!
Too few , too many, too costly, wrong attribution, all these happen regardless of the qualities of the
weapon system themselves and are often politically induced.

Have a great day, Tay.
 
Its displacement is slightly less than that of INS Kolkata.

Shorter than Kolkata but its beam is 18.6 M.

Overall a formidable platform.

It better be its costing them a bomb
 
@Taygibay
anyway this a nice ship, wish my country had something comparable in the class in near future to keep the balance of power in the region.
 
Australia is huge Continent with a huge Coast line to Protect , they need to modernize their fleet , and this ship Proves they are in right direction ..
 
I was only answering BJlaowai tongue in cheek, J. Because I doubted his article's standpoint.
On the Zumwalt though ( and I visited Bath Iron Works where I have family ), the program was a debacle IMHoO.
Not so much capacity wise but as a procurement mismanagement, as you said because R&D costs exploded.

About this, in a day and age where we curtail deployment on anything but bona fide wars ( think Libya affair ) due
to public opinion, uncontrolled program spending is a problem of major importance if not on a purely military effects
rationale. It is in that sense that the Zumwalt class is bad. I'm preparing a piece on the Rafale for my blog today for
example and one point in favor will be that the program was successful on that ( spending ) even though the money
did hinder its development and induction whereas both F-22 and F-35 while great suffered from cost increases.

Overall, you and I don't stand far apart at all.
Good day mate, Tay.

The Aussie situation is actually a lot different than the Zumwalt one IMO

Problem with the Hobart Class is, the Hobart Class and the Canberra class are a cut from the same cloths, think of this as money saving strategy for maybe 10 or 15 years on.

RAN (Royal Australian Navy) were offered US AB Class flight 2 for 1.5 bil and it get the same gadget the USN is having, and they offer us 3 ships for 5 bil IIRC. But the top brass designed to go after the Spanish design simply because we are having the same builder already establish base for the Canberra Class LHD and it will save the Navy a bunch of money for maintenance and parts and that's led to the ultimate decision of getting a Álvaro de Bazán class design.

But the Zumwalt is another thing, it's something the USN put too early in the drawing board, no doubt the zumwalt is going to be one heck of a cutting edge ship, but the question remain is, did the US actually need them?

If there are one thing I think is wrong about the whole zumwalt program, then it would the why they design such a ship the NAVY DOES NOT NEED in the first place?

It's much like we spend a bunch of money designing B-2 Spirit Bomber only to find out we can do the job better by saturating our enemy with B-1 and B-52. But by the time this started to surface, we already bought and pay for the whole R&D, then it will only be stupider if we don't build something out of it, as the building cost is always a lot smaller than the R&D cost. The same happens with the Zumwalts, we think we need a cutting edge ship only to find out the world is not up to it, but by then it's always too late, all 20 bil R&D cost has already been paid, we have no choice but making a few of those just to recover the cost, well, better that than write off the whole 20 bil R&D
 
@jhungary Yes, again agreed mate! I only compared the two in response to another poster.

As I said to Madokafc, the problems are often caused by vision, MIC promises and so on.
To a point, one of the best things that can happen to any forces is to be restricted money wise.
Then, they learn to think twice about wet dreams. The Zumwalt and the two latest jets in America
are testimoney to that : the quality is there but not the procurement logic.

Read you later, Tay
 
@jhungary Yes, again agreed mate! I only compared the two in response to another poster.

As I said to Madokafc, the problems are often caused by vision, MIC promises and so on.
To a point, one of the best things that can happen to any forces is to be restricted money wise.
Then, they learn to think twice about wet dreams. The Zumwalt and the two latest jets in America
are testimoney to that : the quality is there but not the procurement logic.

Read you later, Tay

lol the US military procurement logic is often compare to Chinese Buyer to foreign real estate market.

They are over enthusiastic buyer and willing to pay a lot of money first then ask question later...
 
They are over enthusiastic buyer and willing to pay a lot of money first then ask question later...

Yup! Then again, some forces are going to extremes the other way. In France, there was a suggestion recently
made to the effect that weapon platforms ( frigates and transport planes ) could be sold to specially created firms
that would then rent them to the MinDef!!!
VIDEO. L’armée française louera-t-elle bientôt ses armes ? | L’Oeil du 20 heures | Francetv info
The costs associated with maintenance and operational readiness would then be those of the private sector
and officially, the savings would tally 2 B euros!

Then again, that's pretty much what our Brit cousins are doing with the Voyager deal. PFI / FSTA

Oh well … Tay.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom