What's new

Lata Mangeshkar Almost became a Pakistani

This is beyond funny.

The person who cooked up this absurd story does not know the deep relationship the Mangeshkar family had with Veer Savarkar (The original Hindutva icon).



Mangeshkar family’s close ties with freedom fighter Veer Savarkar: Patriotism and love for arts form the bedrock of an everlasting relationship

lata-mangeshkar-veer-savarkar.png


Freedom fighter and among the earliest proponents of the Hindutva ideology, Veer Savarkar, remains one of the most vilified personalities in India’s history. For decades, Savarkar was treated with disdain and demonised by successive Indian governments, a majority of them headed by the Congress party. A conscious effort was undertaken to defame Veer Savarkar so as to discredit his beliefs and undermine his contribution to India’s freedom struggle.

But legendary singer Lata Mangeshkar and her family were among those who saw through this facade carefully created by the Congress party and its loyalists and held Savarkar for who he was—a staunch patriot dedicated to the cause of India’s freedom and an erudite man with a flair for poetry and writing.

Vinayak Damodar Savarkar or Veer Savarkar was an Indian freedom fighter, activist, politician, lawyer, and writer, who is regarded for articulating the political philosophy of Hindutva. He was born in Bhagalpur village near Nasik in Maharashtra.

Later, he joined the Hindu Mahasabha and advocated the term Hindutva which was previously formulated by Chandranath Basu. He was arrested in 1910 by the British administration over his association with the revolutionary group India House. Savarkar was sentenced to two life terms in the Cellular Jail in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands in 1911 after he made a failed attempt to escape while being transported from Marseilles.

While serving his sentence, Savarkar wrote on a broad range of topics—from his yearning for the motherland to his understanding of the Hindutva, about its pride and defined all the people descended of Hindu culture as being part of Hindutva, including the Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs.

The close bond shared between freedom fighter Veer Savarkar and the Mangeshkar family

Lata Mangeshkar and her family shared close ties with Veer Savarkar, something which she has always been proud and unapologetic about. Every year on Savarkar’s birth and death anniversaries, which fall on May 28 and February 26 respectively, the award-winning singer does not shy away from publicly paying her tributes to the Hindutva ideologue and reiterating his invaluable contribution to India’s independence struggle against the British.

This year too, Lata Mangeshkar took to her social media pages to pay homage to the freedom fighter by remembering him and sharing his old pictures with her followers.


Lata Mangeshkar termed Savarkar as the ‘true son of Mother India’ and hailed him as a father-like figure. During his lifetime, Veer Savarkar was referred to as ‘Tatya’ by Lata Mangeshkar, which is a term used in deference for a father or elderly male relation.

Last year, the veteran singer reminisced about the freedom fighter, stating that his name was etched in the hearts of the Mangeshkar family. She had also tweeted that she was honouring the ‘great and multi-faceted personality’ on his ‘Jayanti.’

She had shared a video along with her tweet, which was audio of the song Shat Janma Shodhitana, which had been composed by Lata Mangeshkar’s father Deenanath Mangeshkar. This song was written by Veer Savarkar for her father’s play Sanyasta Khadag.

Earlier in 2019, the veteran singer had posted a tweet recalling her close bond between her family and freedom fighter Veer Savarkar. The legendary singer posted a tweet providing details of her family’s association with Veer Savarkar.


“Veer Savarkar ji aur hamare pariwar ke bahut ghanisht sambandh the, isiliye unhone mere pitaji ki natak company ke liye natak ‘Sanyasta Khadag’ likha tha. Is natak ka pehla prayog 18th Sep 1931 ko hua tha, is natak mein se ek geet bahut lokpriya hua (the families of Veer Savarkar ji and ours were very close, so he wrote the play “Sanyasta Khadag’ for my father’s theatre company. This play was first staged on September 18, 1931, and a song from the play became very popular),” Ms Mangeshkar had tweeted while sharing the link to the song Shat Janma Shoditana.

Veer Savarkar ji aur hamare pariwar ke bahut ghanisht sambandh the,isiliye unhone mere pita ji ki natak company ke liye natak “ Sanyasta Khadag “ likha tha. Is natak ka pehla prayog 18th Sep 1931 ko hua tha,is natak mein se ek geet bahut lokpriya hua. https://t.co/RMzBUc69SB
— Lata Mangeshkar (@mangeshkarlata) September 19, 2019

Lata Mangeshkar would have left singing if it were not for Veer Savarkar’s timely advice


It is a little-known fact that early in her career, Lata Mangeshkar had made her mind of giving up singing to devote her time and energies to social service and for the welfare of the poor. Author Yatindra Mishra in his book ‘Lata: Sur Gatha‘ reveals how it was Veer Savarkar who dissuaded Lata Mangeshkar from taking that decision and inspired her to continue pursuing singing.

In his book, Mishra says Lata, in her teens, had taken a vow of engaging in social service. For this, she was involved in discussions and consultation with revolutionary freedom fighter Veer Savarkar, deliberating on different ways through which she could fulfil her vow. At one point when Lata was thinking of relinquishing her singing career to devote time for social service, Savarkar had talked her out of the notion and reminded her of her father, Deenanath Mangeshkar, who was then one of the leading lights in the Indian classical music and art firmament.

Savarkar had explained to her that one can still engage in the service of society by devoting oneself to music and singing. This affirmation helped Lata Mangeshkar radically upend her notions about a career in music being incompatible with her pledge of indulging in social service. She heeded Savarkar’s advice and completely immersed herself in music, becoming a legendary singer in the process. If it were not for Savarkar’s seminal counsel to Lata Mangeshkar, the world would have been bereft of one of the most transcendent singers to have graced the earth.

The ceaseless vilification of Veer Savarkar by successive Congress-led governments

But history has not been kind to the freedom fighter. Through a concerted attempt, Savarkar was constantly made an object of scorn and contempt by successive governments after India attained freedom in 1947. He was also falsely implicated in the murder of Gandhi Ji but was later exonerated for the lack of evidence against him.

Author Vikram Sampath recently came up with his concluding volume on freedom fighter Veer Savarkar, Savarkar: A Contested Legacy, 1924-1966, which chronicled the final leg of the freedom fighter’s extraordinary life. The book was released on 26 July 2021 and it instantly rekindled the debate surrounding the vigorous attempts made by successive Congress governments and left-liberal intelligentsia to falsely vilify the freedom fighter and besmirch his reputation.

All India Radio under Congress govt sacked Lata Mangeshkar’s brother Pandit Hridaynath for his musical composition on Veer Savarkar’s poems

The Mangeshkar family, comprising of Lata Mangeshkar and Usha Mangeshkar, other sisters and their only brother, Hridaynath, had been composing tunes based on poems written by Veer Savarkar. However, this did not sit well with the Congress party, which had assiduously created a narrative that villainised the freedom fighter. As a result, the All India Radio under the Congress rule had sacked Hridaynath Mangeshkar in 1954 for his musical composition on Veer Savarkar’s poems.

Years later, in an interview with ABP Majha, Hridaynath Mangeshkar admitted how he was fired from All India Radio because he chose to compose a poem written by Veer Savarkar. Mangeshkar said he was canned from his job at the All India Radio, only because he had dared to create a musical rendition of Veer Savarkar’s iconic poem wherein he extolled the sea to take him back to the motherland.

“I was working in All India Radio at that time. I was 17 years old and my salary was Rs 500 per month. It may be peanuts today but Rs 500 was considered a big fat salary during that time…but I was summarily fired from the All India Radio because I chose to create a musical composition for Veer Savarkar’s famous poem ‘Ne majsi ne parat matrubhoomila, sagara pran talmalala‘,” Mangeshkar said in Marathi.

In 2009, 100 years since Savarkar penned the popular poem Ne majsi ne parat matrubhoomila, sagara pran talmalala, Lata Mangeshkar recalled how the poem aroused patriotic fervour and was inspirational to not just Maharashtrians, but to all Indians.

Lata Mangeshkar had then lamented that Veer Savarkar did not get the respect he deserved in independent India. “Savarkar sacrificed a lot for the country. But independent India did not honour him and give his due,” Lata had bemoaned.
 
Last edited:
This is beyond funny.

The person who cooked up this absurd story does not know the deep relationship the Mangeshkar family had with Veer Savarkar (The original Hindutva icon).



Mangeshkar family’s close ties with freedom fighter Veer Savarkar: Patriotism and love for arts form the bedrock of an everlasting relationship

lata-mangeshkar-veer-savarkar.png


Freedom fighter and among the earliest proponents of the Hindutva ideology, Veer Savarkar, remains one of the most vilified personalities in India’s history. For decades, Savarkar was treated with disdain and demonised by successive Indian governments, a majority of them headed by the Congress party. A conscious effort was undertaken to defame Veer Savarkar so as to discredit his beliefs and undermine his contribution to India’s freedom struggle.

But legendary singer Lata Mangeshkar and her family were among those who saw through this facade carefully created by the Congress party and its loyalists and held Savarkar for who he was—a staunch patriot dedicated to the cause of India’s freedom and an erudite man with a flair for poetry and writing.

Vinayak Damodar Savarkar or Veer Savarkar was an Indian freedom fighter, activist, politician, lawyer, and writer, who is regarded for articulating the political philosophy of Hindutva. He was born in Bhagalpur village near Nasik in Maharashtra.

Later, he joined the Hindu Mahasabha and advocated the term Hindutva which was previously formulated by Chandranath Basu. He was arrested in 1910 by the British administration over his association with the revolutionary group India House. Savarkar was sentenced to two life terms in the Cellular Jail in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands in 1911 after he made a failed attempt to escape while being transported from Marseilles.

While serving his sentence, Savarkar wrote on a broad range of topics—from his yearning for the motherland to his understanding of the Hindutva, about its pride and defined all the people descended of Hindu culture as being part of Hindutva, including the Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs.

The close bond shared between freedom fighter Veer Savarkar and the Mangeshkar family

Lata Mangeshkar and her family shared close ties with Veer Savarkar, something which she has always been proud and unapologetic about. Every year on Savarkar’s birth and death anniversaries, which fall on May 28 and February 26 respectively, the award-winning singer does not shy away from publicly paying her tributes to the Hindutva ideologue and reiterating his invaluable contribution to India’s independence struggle against the British.

This year too, Lata Mangeshkar took to her social media pages to pay homage to the freedom fighter by remembering him and sharing his old pictures with her followers.


Lata Mangeshkar termed Savarkar as the ‘true son of Mother India’ and hailed him as a father-like figure. During his lifetime, Veer Savarkar was referred to as ‘Tatya’ by Lata Mangeshkar, which is a term used in deference for a father or elderly male relation.

Last year, the veteran singer reminisced about the freedom fighter, stating that his name was etched in the hearts of the Mangeshkar family. She had also tweeted that she was honouring the ‘great and multi-faceted personality’ on his ‘Jayanti.’

She had shared a video along with her tweet, which was audio of the song Shat Janma Shodhitana, which had been composed by Lata Mangeshkar’s father Deenanath Mangeshkar. This song was written by Veer Savarkar for her father’s play Sanyasta Khadag.

Earlier in 2019, the veteran singer had posted a tweet recalling her close bond between her family and freedom fighter Veer Savarkar. The legendary singer posted a tweet providing details of her family’s association with Veer Savarkar.


“Veer Savarkar ji aur hamare pariwar ke bahut ghanisht sambandh the, isiliye unhone mere pitaji ki natak company ke liye natak ‘Sanyasta Khadag’ likha tha. Is natak ka pehla prayog 18th Sep 1931 ko hua tha, is natak mein se ek geet bahut lokpriya hua (the families of Veer Savarkar ji and ours were very close, so he wrote the play “Sanyasta Khadag’ for my father’s theatre company. This play was first staged on September 18, 1931, and a song from the play became very popular),” Ms Mangeshkar had tweeted while sharing the link to the song Shat Janma Shoditana.


Lata Mangeshkar would have left singing if it were not for Veer Savarkar’s timely advice


It is a little-known fact that early in her career, Lata Mangeshkar had made her mind of giving up singing to devote her time and energies to social service and for the welfare of the poor. Author Yatindra Mishra in his book ‘Lata: Sur Gatha‘ reveals how it was Veer Savarkar who dissuaded Lata Mangeshkar from taking that decision and inspired her to continue pursuing singing.

In his book, Mishra says Lata, in her teens, had taken a vow of engaging in social service. For this, she was involved in discussions and consultation with revolutionary freedom fighter Veer Savarkar, deliberating on different ways through which she could fulfil her vow. At one point when Lata was thinking of relinquishing her singing career to devote time for social service, Savarkar had talked her out of the notion and reminded her of her father, Deenanath Mangeshkar, who was then one of the leading lights in the Indian classical music and art firmament.

Savarkar had explained to her that one can still engage in the service of society by devoting oneself to music and singing. This affirmation helped Lata Mangeshkar radically upend her notions about a career in music being incompatible with her pledge of indulging in social service. She heeded Savarkar’s advice and completely immersed herself in music, becoming a legendary singer in the process. If it were not for Savarkar’s seminal counsel to Lata Mangeshkar, the world would have been bereft of one of the most transcendent singers to have graced the earth.

The ceaseless vilification of Veer Savarkar by successive Congress-led governments

But history has not been kind to the freedom fighter. Through a concerted attempt, Savarkar was constantly made an object of scorn and contempt by successive governments after India attained freedom in 1947. He was also falsely implicated in the murder of Gandhi Ji but was later exonerated for the lack of evidence against him.

Author Vikram Sampath recently came up with his concluding volume on freedom fighter Veer Savarkar, Savarkar: A Contested Legacy, 1924-1966, which chronicled the final leg of the freedom fighter’s extraordinary life. The book was released on 26 July 2021 and it instantly rekindled the debate surrounding the vigorous attempts made by successive Congress governments and left-liberal intelligentsia to falsely vilify the freedom fighter and besmirch his reputation.

All India Radio under Congress govt sacked Lata Mangeshkar’s brother Pandit Hridaynath for his musical composition on Veer Savarkar’s poems

The Mangeshkar family, comprising of Lata Mangeshkar and Usha Mangeshkar, other sisters and their only brother, Hridaynath, had been composing tunes based on poems written by Veer Savarkar. However, this did not sit well with the Congress party, which had assiduously created a narrative that villainised the freedom fighter. As a result, the All India Radio under the Congress rule had sacked Hridaynath Mangeshkar in 1954 for his musical composition on Veer Savarkar’s poems.

Years later, in an interview with ABP Majha, Hridaynath Mangeshkar admitted how he was fired from All India Radio because he chose to compose a poem written by Veer Savarkar. Mangeshkar said he was canned from his job at the All India Radio, only because he had dared to create a musical rendition of Veer Savarkar’s iconic poem wherein he extolled the sea to take him back to the motherland.

“I was working in All India Radio at that time. I was 17 years old and my salary was Rs 500 per month. It may be peanuts today but Rs 500 was considered a big fat salary during that time…but I was summarily fired from the All India Radio because I chose to create a musical composition for Veer Savarkar’s famous poem ‘Ne majsi ne parat matrubhoomila, sagara pran talmalala‘,” Mangeshkar said in Marathi.

In 2009, 100 years since Savarkar penned the popular poem Ne majsi ne parat matrubhoomila, sagara pran talmalala, Lata Mangeshkar recalled how the poem aroused patriotic fervour and was inspirational to not just Maharashtrians, but to all Indians.

Lata Mangeshkar had then lamented that Veer Savarkar did not get the respect he deserved in independent India. “Savarkar sacrificed a lot for the country. But independent India did not honour him and give his due,” Lata had bemoaned.

This is just stupid logic, one association doesn't counteract the other.
They are both factual realities, how does one cancel the other?
Please grow up.

I have a close Muslim friend, who's brother in law is an active mid level BJP member in Maharashtra.
I have couple of Hindu Indian friends from two different states. One has a father in law as BJP councillor, the other has his whole family as hard-core BJP supporters, including MLA's representing BJP in his immediate family. They are extremely close friends. I have other personal examples, that I rather not share.


How does one association cancel out the other, it does not.
You are presenting childish logic.
 
There was no love, there was no relationship. It's loose gossip based on hearsay.

This is what happens when you spend a tiny part of your life with someone who turns out to be a celebrity. You concoct bullshit stories about them!

Lol at she wanting to leave India at the zenith of her career!
And look at the rationale given by the one sided lover- that it will "hurt Indian nation too deeply" Haha! 🤣

Look at it this way,
one way the BJP got strategic success was to ban Lata's performance in Pakistan; even when the singer was willing.

so, yes a government that think banning a musician is a real issue, represents an indian nation hurt too deeply.

Ha Ha.
 
This is just stupid logic, one association doesn't counteract the other.
They are both factual realities, how does one cancel the other?
Please grow up.

I have a close Muslim friend, who's brother in law is an active mid level BJP member in Maharashtra.
I have couple of Hindu Indian friends from two different states. One has a father in law as BJP councillor, the other has his whole family as hard-core BJP supporters, including MLA's representing BJP in his immediate family. They are extremely close friends. I have other personal examples, that I rather not share.


How does one association cancel out the other, it does not.
You are presenting childish logic.

Veer Savarkar is not BJP. BJP is mild and tame, its a political party and like any political party, compromise is a way of life.

Veer Savarkar was an ideologue. Uncompromising and unflinching even in the face of extreme danger. And people around him were people who shared his own ideas and practiced them. Especially those closest to him.

Lata Mangeshkar was devoted to him, believed every word he said and put it into practice.

To imagine that such a person would marry a muslim and then move to pakistan is beyond absurd. Its the equivalent of saying Modi will marry a muslim women, convert and move to pakistan for love. Such a thing would NEVER happen with people who have strong convictions.
 
Veer Savarkar is not BJP. BJP is mild and tame, its a political party and like any political party, compromise is a way of life.

Veer Savarkar was an ideologue. Uncompromising and unflinching even in the face of extreme danger. And people around him were people who shared his own ideas and practiced them. Especially those closest to him.

Lata Mangeshkar was devoted to him, believed every word he said and put it into practice.

To imagine that such a person would marry a muslim and then move to pakistan is beyond absurd. Its the equivalent of saying Modi will marry a muslim women, convert and move to pakistan for love. Such a thing would NEVER happen with people who have strong convictions.

I'm sorry, but please you really need to grow up. This is just silly.
BJP is a political party like no other, it is a political arm of the RSS. Savarkar/RSS/BJP are all linked, to try and dissociate them is to present lies, that's not right.

The point being, those people I know are hard core Hindus, Lata may have respected savarkar but that does not mean anything. One aspect of life does not beget the other, it is just childish to assume otherwise.

If this story was just hearsay, then you could make your argument, but it is not hearsay.
No one has denied it, and certainly not Lata, otherwise we would have heard about it by now, and the BBC would be in the courts.

I appreciate you are deeply hurt by this factual story, but you cannot present childish logic to hide your pain.
 
I'm sorry, but please you really need to grow up. This is just silly.
BJP is a political party like no other, it is a political arm of the RSS. Savarkar/RSS/BJP are all linked, to try and dissociate them is to present lies, that's not right.

The point being, those people I know are hard core Hindus, Lata may have respected savarkar but that does not mean anything. One aspect of life does not beget the other, it is just childish to assume otherwise.

If this story was just hearsay, then you could make your argument, but it is not hearsay.
No one has denied it, and certainly not Lata, otherwise we would have heard about it by now, and the BBC would be in the courts.

I appreciate you are deeply hurt by this factual story, but you cannot present childish logic to hide your pain.

Lata Mangeshkar is 92 years old. She couldn't care any less about gossip.

She has been the target of gossip all her life and by now she must be invulnerable to it. So LOL at her wanting to quash this. If anything, it would give her a good chuckle. Same as me.

It is equally laughable that you try to teach me about RSS, BJP, VHP and Hindu Mahasabha.

They are all different and distinct organizations with separate and distinct goals. This is the equivalent of someone saying all blacks look the same to me. Or all chinese look the same.

Lata was willing to GIVE UP HER SINGING, GIVE UP HER PASSION for her vows to serve the poor. And she decided otherwise when Savarkar told her to continue singing. She held Savarkars words ABOVE her own decision and thought.

In any case there has been plenty written about her true love stories.

She was in Love with her brother's friend and Dungarpur's prince Raj Singh Dungarpur. This was a love story that streached into decades and since his father, the king of Dungarpur - Maharawal Lakshman Singhjidid not agree since she was a commoner,

Raj Singh had decided to accept his father's decision because of his immense love and respect for him, but the doting son had vowed not to marry anyone in his whole life and had informed his parents about it. However, Lata Mangeshkar was also madly in love with Raj Singh, as a result, the iconic singer had also vowed the same, and the two had remained friends for life.

Both of them remained Single and NEVER married since they had vowed they will marry each other and no one ese.

lata-1569608885.jpg



Prince Raj Singh Dungarpur was a Cricketer and former President of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), and a close friend of Lata's brother, Hridaynath Mangeshkar.

They used to meet in her brothers hous and Raj Singh used to call Lata Mangeshkar by the name 'Mithoo'.

article-2021927014104051040000.JPG



Finally Just because you claim someone is a "staunch" Hindu, it does not make him one. Neither is voting for BJP make one a "staunch" Hindu. Such a though is what is really childish.
 
Lata Mangeshkar is 92 years old. She couldn't care any less about gossip.

She has been the target of gossip all her life and by now she must be invulnerable to it. So LOL at her wanting to quash this. If anything, it would give her a good chuckle. Same as me.

It is equally laughable that you try to teach me about RSS, BJP, VHP and Hindu Mahasabha.

They are all different and distinct organizations with separate and distinct goals. This is the equivalent of someone saying all blacks look the same to me. Or all chinese look the same.

Lata was willing to GIVE UP HER SINGING, GIVE UP HER PASSION for her vows to serve the poor. And she decided otherwise when Savarkar told her to continue singing. She held Savarkars words ABOVE her own decision and thought.

In any case there has been plenty written about her true love stories.

She was in Love with her brother's friend and Dungarpur's prince Raj Singh Dungarpur. This was a love story that streached into decades and since his father, the king of Dungarpur - Maharawal Lakshman Singhjidid not agree since she was a commoner,

Raj Singh had decided to accept his father's decision because of his immense love and respect for him, but the doting son had vowed not to marry anyone in his whole life and had informed his parents about it. However, Lata Mangeshkar was also madly in love with Raj Singh, as a result, the iconic singer had also vowed the same, and the two had remained friends for life.

Both of them remained Single and NEVER married since they had vowed they will marry each other and no one ese.

lata-1569608885.jpg



Prince Raj Singh Dungarpur was a Cricketer and former President of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), and a close friend of Lata's brother, Hridaynath Mangeshkar.

They used to meet in her brothers hous and Raj Singh used to call Lata Mangeshkar by the name 'Mithoo'.

article-2021927014104051040000.JPG



Finally Just because you claim someone is a "staunch" Hindu, it does not make him one. Neither is voting for BJP make one a "staunch" Hindu. Such a though is what is really childish.

What the heck did you just write?
Come on, can you please post relevant material, you cannot post snippets about her life, then claim they are relevant to the discussion, that's just dumb.

So, now you are comparing Blacks with the RSS?
Seriously?

What is wrong with you?
You are providing an equivalence of what is a racist approach towards black people to political organisations in India. This is just dumb beyond belief.

Savarkar/RSS/BJP are all deeply interrelated, for you to deny that is to spread shameless lies. Either you are lying, or you are totally ignorant, both are bad.
Your arrogance is just astounding.
 
What the heck did you just write?
Come on, can you please post relevant material, you cannot post snippets about her life, then claim they are relevant to the discussion, that's just dumb.

So, now you are comparing Blacks with the RSS?
Seriously?

What is wrong with you?
You are providing an equivalence of what is a racist approach towards black people to political organisations in India. This is just dumb beyond belief.

Savarkar/RSS/BJP are all deeply interrelated, for you to deny that is to spread shameless lies. Either you are lying, or you are totally ignorant, both are bad.
Your arrogance is just astounding.

Why only RSS, BJP and Savarkar ? all Indians are deeply interrelated.

What does it prove ? absolutely nothing.

Your deliberate misinterpretation of my rather simple post is not my problem. it will continue to remain yours.

Indian tabloids are full of love story between Lata Mangeshkar and Raj Singh. A simple google search will give you all that you want to know about them.

The "uncompromising and unflinching" Veer wrote FIVE mercy petitions to the British

Read the mercy petition that this rascal wrote to the British


Plenty have been written regarding the Facts of the matter. There is no more use peddling the same propaganda for the umpteenth time. There are no takers for such vicious comments anymore.
 
The "uncompromising and unflinching" Veer wrote FIVE mercy petitions to the British

Read the mercy petition that this rascal wrote to the British


Savarkar was a great boot-licker of British. These people, in line with Bankim Chandra Chatterjee, who wrote that infamous novel "Anandamath", believed that their real enemy is not British, but Muslims. Interestingly, INC adopted "Vande Maataram", from that obnoxious novel, as it's anthem.
 
Savarkar was a great boot-licker of British. These people, in line with Bankim Chandra Chatterjee, who wrote that infamous novel "Anandamath", believed that their real enemy is not British, but Muslims. Interestingly, INC adopted "Vande Maataram", from that obnoxious novel, as it's anthem.

Vande Maataram is a fantastic inspirational song.

As a matter of fact, Lata Mangeshkar sang it.

 
Vande Maataram is a fantastic inspirational song.

Of course, it is for you; so, you can shove it where sun doesn't shine, or any other place of your choice. As a Pakistani, it is utterly worthless for me. Period. Don't try to impose your ridiculous metaphysical idiosyncrasies on us.
 
Why only RSS, BJP and Savarkar ? all Indians are deeply interrelated.

What does it prove ? absolutely nothing.

Your deliberate misinterpretation of my rather simple post is not my problem. it will continue to remain yours.

Indian tabloids are full of love story between Lata Mangeshkar and Raj Singh. A simple google search will give you all that you want to know about them.



Plenty have been written regarding the Facts of the matter. There is no more use peddling the same propaganda for the umpteenth time. There are no takers for such vicious comments anymore.

You really are an ignorant fool.

You are confusing yourself, it is you who created that link, not me, you idiot.
By making a claim they have nothing to do with each other, I had to correct your claim that those organisations are very much interrelated.
How dumb do you have to be to make a claim, then forget about it, then place that claim on the other person.
What the heck is wrong you, you TROLL.

I have had nearly a dozen Indian girls and women, is Lata not allowed to have more then one love story in her life?
What are you finding difficult to understand.
One association does not explain the other. You cannot explain one part of a persons life by highlighting other parts, only a stupid ignorant child would attempt such a thing.
You are nothing better then a troll.
 
Back
Top Bottom