Kerry calls for more efforts to purge Pakistan of militancy

[Joe Shearer]

How he dares? This is not what Pakistan's militancy deserves because we have sacrificed a lot so far since 2000

Digging a hole and then filling it in doesn't really achieve much. Especially when only some of the holes are filled in, and others remain.

Kerry needs to purge his brains of all the crap he gets when in India.. He needs a treatment asap.

Where do you live at the moment? Where did you school? Go to college, if you did? Work, if you reached that age?

My question is, where do your loyalties lie? Why do you display a US flag at all? Why not chuck it out of the window and display two Pakistani flags?

These are not intended to irritate, just to illustrate that your feelings for one side are over-riding the other side completely.

 

[T-Rex]

Digging a hole and then filling it in doesn't really achieve much. Especially when only some of the holes are filled in, and others remain.

This is what happens when you have a terror outfit like the RAW operating inside a country. All the holes can never be filled for the RAW is constantly busy digging them.

 

[Joe Shearer]

This is what happens when you have a terror outfit like the RAW operating inside a country. All the holes can never be filled for the RAW is constantly busy digging them.

We have a thousand and one documented instances of what people did to themselves, without any intervention by anybody outside.

Do you have one - ONE - documented instance of what RAW did? Other than their own biographies and memoirs?

(I know you don't; I am just reminding you that making sweeping statements might get you into trouble, and as far as the getting into trouble is concerned, the first mover wins).

 

[surya kiran]

The Beghairati who were the first to introduce state sponsored terrorism be it Sri Lanka,Nepal or Pakistan taking high ground.

The beghairat who shy away from "adhering" to resolution itself pushed at the UN.

The Beghairat from the land of Beghairati should stfu.

Actually, that day 1 goes to your land of the ghairat mand land. From day 1 poking nose everywhere. State backed terrorism. Ghairat mand which then resulted in sending ghairat mand troops to fight and then saying not your troops and refusing to take back bodies because of State sponsored, state backed terrorism stand which would be exposed to the world. Which was by the way eventually exposed.

The Beghairati who were the first to introduce state sponsored terrorism be it Sri Lanka,Nepal or Pakistan taking high ground.

The beghairat who shy away from "adhering" to resolution itself pushed at the UN.

The Beghairat from the land of Beghairati should stfu.

Please read UN resolutions before spousing utter rubbish.

Also, you signed the Simla. Which said bilateral. So you have not adhered to either. Ghairat mand land whose signature means nothing.

............................................................

India with its multiple layered fencing all along tne indo-pak border with lasers and sensors, cameras and bsf all along the border, India should stop accusing Pakistan as its isnt possible to cross into India now. Why this false blame gange from India, if the fence is off no use, then take it down, atleas in Kashmir

You really think a fence is going to solve a problem. What it can do is reduce the number of infiltrations. Its like saying, lets not have a lock. A thief if he wants can pick the lock. The lock only reduces the possibility of increased theft

totally agree pakistan should be ghairatmand and take a lesson from mohd bin qasim who came to sind against terrorist and call from a single muslim girl against the attrocities , pakistan should wake up to the terrorist modi and its goons

Yas yas as ghairat mand as possible. But Pak has always been Qasim. Sneaking and refusing to accept its own soldiers were in the Kargil peaks.

 

[I S I]

“We will not and we cannot make distinctions between good and bad terrorists… Terrorism is terrorism,”

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

pakistan doesn't differentiate between good and bad terrorists. but we have still some morality left in us to differentiate between a terrorist and a freedom fighter.
US and india should also define terrorists.
Can a person with popular support of his community fighting for a common cause be called a terrorist?
Can a person with no public support and fighting for cause which is not the cause of local people be called a freedom fighter?

i know indians will try to prove burhan wani was a terrorist as despite 200k people attending his funeral and that too under curfew.
they will also try to prove BLA a freedom fighters despite the fact no one was there to bury Dr. Allah nazar when he was killed by FC.

This should have been the official Pakistani government response within minutes of this statement by Kerry. Really, the pathetic response by Pakistan to these accusations has been the main reason why these demands are made. It's almost as if Pakistan has a slave-master arrengment with the outside world.

its really a pathetic response by pakistanis but plz name one region which is unstable and us wasn't part of unstability?

 

[footmarks]

pakistan doesn't differentiate between good and bad terrorists. but we have still some morality left in us to differentiate between a terrorist and a freedom fighter.
US and india should also define terrorists.
Can a person with popular support of his community fighting for a common cause be called a terrorist?
Can a person with no public support and fighting for cause which is not the cause of local people be called a freedom fighter?

i know indians will try to prove burhan wani was a terrorist as despite 200k people attending his funeral and that too under curfew.
they will also try to prove BLA a freedom fighters despite the fact no one was there to bury Dr. Allah nazar when he was killed by FC.


its really a pathetic response by pakistanis but plz name one region which is unstable and us wasn't part of unstability?

200K people attending his funeral? who counted? If that "Common cause" means raising pakistani and ISIS flags in tandem, yes, a terrorist he is. India is not going to tolerate any religious insurgency in the garb of freedom.
Xinjiang province in China has no US involvement, but unstable.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

200K people attending his funeral? who counted? If that "Common cause" means raising pakistani and ISIS flags in tandem, yes, a terrorist he is. India is not going to tolerate any religious insurgency in the garb of freedom.
Xinjiang province in China has no US involvement, but unstable.

they counted 200k:
http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/ja...lley-attend-burhan-wani-s-funeral/263661.html
http://zeenews.india.com/news/jammu...ir-bjp-office-in-kulgam-attacked_1905262.html
http://thediplomat.com/2016/07/burhan-wanis-killing-brings-kashmir-to-a-crossroads/
the common cause is freedom from india. and as a typical indian they are terrorists. but for us they are and will be freedom fighters and we don't care what you call it. india itself have been helping good tamil terrorists in srilanks,mukti bahni in bangladesh, northern alliance in afghanistan. US is helping good terrorists in syria. it even created the bad terrorists in syria too.

 

[Soumitra]

Perhaps Kerry Can shed some light on Kashmir atrocities too ?

He wont. You know why - Because of a $ 2 trillion economy.

Baap bada na bhaiya, Sabse bada rupaiya

 

[footmarks]

they counted 200k:
http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/ja...lley-attend-burhan-wani-s-funeral/263661.html
http://zeenews.india.com/news/jammu...ir-bjp-office-in-kulgam-attacked_1905262.html
http://thediplomat.com/2016/07/burhan-wanis-killing-brings-kashmir-to-a-crossroads/
the common cause is freedom from india. and as a typical indian they are terrorists. but for us they are and will be freedom fighters and we don't care what you call it. india itself have been helping good tamil terrorists in srilanks,mukti bahni in bangladesh, northern alliance in afghanistan. US is helping good terrorists in syria. it even created the bad terrorists in syria too.

your link says, estimates. You have no right to support freedom in J & K till you declare P0K as independent country. you just want to gobble up the land.

 

[surya kiran]

your link says, estimates. You have no right to support freedom in J & K till you declare P0K as independent country. you just want to gobble up the land.

inlcuding gilgit

 

[koolio]

why do you think they came to control Afghanistan? That was not the aim. The aim was to set up a post here regardless of what hell hole Afghanistan remains or becomes.

Isnt it interesting to note that under American occupation, Afghanistan has become a sanctuary of all types enemies of Pakistan? Isnt this one of the objectives of American occupation to destabilize Pakistan? Which ever region America has landed its forces after 9/11, it has brought havoc to the region and nothing else. Learn from America how to use proxies.

I agree, but I was referring to his speech which he continues the "DO MORE MANTRA", I still remember when the Army went in Swat valley, western analysts at the time were saying it will take 10 years to clear Swat valley and it was cleared in a matter of few months, everyone in the western world were shocked at the speed it was cleared, Pak army has done a fantastic job in clearing tribal border areas, probably the toughest place in the world and yet "DO MORE MANTRA" continues while other nations have completely failed.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

your link says, estimates. You have no right to support freedom in J & K till you declare P0K as independent country. you just want to gobble up the land.

estimates are the closest values. People of AJK never wanted independence just like indian occupied kashmir. and for your information AJK is an autonomous region with its own president and prime minister.
note: plz don't show me videos of awami worker party protesting for release of baba jan as azadi march in AJK.

inlcuding gilgit

at the time maharaja tried to acced with india he wasn't controlling gilgit baltistan. gilgit baltistan is not the part of kashmir and it wasn't before. the maharaja just bought kashmir for 54 lack from british.

 

[surya kiran]

at the time maharaja tried to acced with india he wasn't controlling gilgit baltistan. gilgit baltistan is not the part of kashmir and it wasn't before. the maharaja just bought kashmir for 54 lack from british.

Tell me, when did the Maharajah lose control of Gilgit?

@Joe Shearer you have way more patience than me to explain historical facts.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Tell me, when did the Maharajah lose control of Gilgit?

@Joe Shearer you have way more patience than me to explain historical facts.

On the 2nd of November. 8 days after.



So now you know what it feels like. You might also like to educate him how the Maharaja acquired the territory of Gilgit. Not Baltistan. Baltistan was differently acquired. Not Ladakh. Ladakh was differently acquired.

Have fun. Be prepared to be received with incredulity and disbelief.