Kashmiris must be allowed to decide their future: Imran Khan

[Vanamali]

But do mind that every favour will be reciprocated wherever it matters.

When India pays,

India is a secular republic. It is not a religious country like Pakistan.

it would be along with compound Interest....

 

[HAIDER]

Musharraf plan should be implemented. Which was acceptable for all 3 parties.

 

[American Pakistani]

Disagree.

Whole of J&K belongs to India. Pakistan cannot conduct referendum in the sovereign land of India. Anyone who do not want to live in India can move to Pakistan.

A bharti cannot tell what Kashmiri can or cannot do. Try coming to Azad Kashmir with ill agenda...

 

[Jackdaws]

In Punjab, no Hindu majority tehsil or district was given to Pakistan.
But at least 5 Muslim majority tehsils in Punjab were transferred to India.
Get your facts straight.



That area is uninhabited,
As for 1963 Sino-Pak Boundary Agreement, it is provisional.
In case Kashmir legally accedes to India following the referendum, China has agreed that it will renegotiate its boundaries with India.
JFYI Contrary to the Indian propaganda, Pakistan actually gained several hundred square kilometers of land previously under Chinese control
And as for the uninhabited area you lost to China, that was never under the rule of the Maharaja of Kashmir, or the British.

Which Muslim majority tehsils were given to India?

 

[Adonis]

First of all you strike me as a indian living in New Zealand because of the amount of bias in your post.
On a world stage as far as india is concerned it,s not better than pakistan. So if you are referring to indian might then again you are again embarrassing yourself.The world views both india and pakistan as regional powers but they only see india as a aggressor.Whenever the topic of genocide comes up the world only see videos from indian occupied kashmir.Not only the world is listening but soon will act on it.And even if they won,t act the whole indian occupied kashmir is acting against you which is more than enough to show the world who is on the wrong side.
And i believe it,s more than not listening it,s actually ignoring the issue deliberately because if kashmir issue gets solved the international arms suppliers for both india and pakistan will enjoy much less profits.Lot,s of international politics here as well.
And i do not buy your might is right principle history shows us how the oppressed stood up against the oppressor and taught harsh lessons to their oppressor.Kashmir was never part of india and never will be.

Thanks for judging me Sir (but your are wrong, I am not an Indian or of Indian descent). On the same note, the way you have emphasised on what world thinks of India Pakistan, demonstrates your bias against your country without knowing the facts, lamenting your ill-informed views with pseudo-authority on world matters.

Do you see US as aggressor, Israel as aggressor, China as aggressor (Tibet), almost all Europe as aggressor (colonisers).... if answer is yes then second part is....has anything been done so far for the oppressed... if the answer is NO..... Might is Right.

Now regarding oppressed standing against oppressor....it all about timing, when oppressor got weak and the oppressed got opportunity......so wait for that time...otherwise world is full of oppressed (even in your own backyard in Balochistan) , in Kashmir, Palestine etc.....

 

[SecularNationalist]

Thanks for judging me Sir (but your are wrong, I am not an Indian or of Indian descent). On the same note, the way you have emphasised on what world thinks of India Pakistan, demonstrates your bias against your country without knowing the facts, lamenting your ill-informed views with pseudo-authority on world matters.

Do you see US as aggressor, Israel as aggressor, China as aggressor (Tibet), almost all Europe as aggressor (colonisers).... if answer is yes then second part is....has anything been done so far for the oppressed... if the answer is NO..... Might is Right.

Now regarding oppressed standing against oppressor....it all about timing, when oppressor got weak and the oppressed got opportunity......so wait for that time...otherwise world is full of oppressed (even in your own backyard in Balochistan) , in Kashmir, Palestine etc.....

Ok lets assume you are not indian.
Comparing a RAW funded mini fights in Baluchistan with a UN recognized serious issue like kashmir and yet you have the audacity to call me ill informed.
And oh yes the oppressor is getting weak by turning a huge amount of regional population against him A population representing a huge chunk of land.

 

[War Thunder]

India is a secular republic. It is not a religious country like Pakistan.

yeah except the hindu mobs get to enjoy the freedom to lynch whoever and wherever they want, and hindu fascists and extremists are elected to power.
An amazingly secular republic for sure.

 

[Clutch]

They always had the choice to move to Pakistan. No one is stopping them.

They are the indigenous peoples. Indian Hindu skin pigment is not made for that weather.

 

[Kabira]

Musharraf plane should be implemented. Which was acceptable for all 3 parties.

What plan? That sounded like giving away GB and AJK by retarded Musharraf. There is no need for cross border movement because gilgitis or AJK don’t have their kin across the border. Kashmir valley is entirely in IoK and they should be given option of vote.

 

[M. Sarmad]

Which Muslim majority tehsils were given to India?

In Punjab:

Tehsils that were transferred to India where Muslims were in absolute majority :

• Firozpur Jhirka (78.79% Muslims)
• Zira - (65.26 % Muslims)
  
• Ajnala - (59.46 % Muslims, 37% Hindus and Sikhs)
• Nakodar - (59.41% Muslims)
• Nuh - (57.8 % Muslims)
  
• Ferozpur - (55.25% Muslims)
• Batala - (55.07 % Muslims)
• Gurdaspur - (52.16% Muslims)
• Jalandhar - (51.1 % Muslims)

The most significant objections regarding the Radcliffe Award were that the tehsils of Ferozepur and Zira in Ferozepur districts, Nakodar and Jalandhar in Jalandhar district, Ajnala in Amritsar district and Gurdaspur and Batala in Gurdaspur district had Muslim majority and were almost contiguous to West Punjab, yet they were given to East Punjab or the Indian Punjab.



Tehsils transferred to India where Muslims were the largest religious group :

• Dasuya - 48.35% Muslims
  
• Amritsar - 45.49% Muslims
• Hoshiarpur - 45.09% Muslims
  
• Fazilka - 43.3% Muslims
• Muktsar - 42.79% Muslims
• Ludhiana - 39.27% Muslims

Tehsils transferred to Pakistan where Hindus and Sikhs were in majority

• NIL

Tehsils transferred to Pakistan where either Hindus or Sikhs were the largest religious group.

• NIL

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

In Punjab:

Tehsils that were transferred to India where Muslims were in absolute majority :

• Ajnala - (59.46 % Muslims, 37% Hindus and Sikhs)
• Zira - (65.26 % Muslims)
• Nakodar - (59.41% Muslims)
• Ferozpur - (55.25% Muslims)
• Nuh - (57.8 % Muslims)
• Batala - (55.07 % Muslims)
• Gurdaspur - (52.16% Muslims)
• Jalandhar - (51.1 % Muslims)

Tehsils transferred to India where Muslims were the largest religious group :

• Amritsar - 45.49% Muslims
• Fazilka - 43.3 %
• Muktsar - 42.79%
• Dasuya - 48.35%
• Hoshiarpur - 45.09 %
• Ludhiana - 39.27 %

Tehsils transferred to Pakistan where Hindus and Sikhs were in majority

• NIL

Tehsils transferred to Pakistan where either Hindus or Sikhs were the largest religious group.

• NIL

Very telling. Thanks for the post.

My parents’ families were from two of those tehsils.

Obviously they thought they were going to end up in Pakistan, until the British deceived them and the Hindu/Sikh mobs came for blood.

Similar thing happened to Jammu and now they are doing it to South Kashmir, esp. Pulwama.

 

[M. Sarmad]

Very telling. Thanks for the post.

My parents’ families were from two of those tehsils.

Obviously they thought they were going to end up in Pakistan, until the British deceived them and the Hindu/Sikh mobs came for blood.

Similar thing happened to Jammu and now they are doing it to South Kashmir, esp. Pulwama.

Yes, it was all well-planned. Before converting Jammu to a Hindu/Sikh majority division from a Muslim majority one, various adjoining Muslim majority districts/tehsils from neighboring Punjab were also unfairly transferred to India in order to give the latter a land access to J&K thus enabling the Indians to occupy J&K. All Muslims from those Muslim majority tehsils were then either killed or expelled by Hindus and Sikhs


Kashmir valley is almost entirely Muslim so the Indians cannot convert them to a minority (as they did in Jammu) ... So, they want to exterminate the entire Kashmiri Muslim population; A Genocide

 

[Tom M]

Musharraf plane should be implemented. Which was acceptable for all 3 parties.

A lot of water has flowed under the bridge after that. So it is hardly possible now.

What plan? That sounded like giving away GB and AJK by retarded Musharraf. There is no need for cross border movement because gilgitis or AJK don’t have their kin across the border. Kashmir valley is entirely in IoK and they should be given option of vote.

If wished were horses .... LOL

A plebiscite means, in the entirety of the Kashmir Kingdom in it's true shape like how it was pre-1947, else nothing. Just remember that point.

Yes, it was all well-planned. Before converting Jammu to a Hindu/Sikh majority division from a Muslim majority one, various Muslim majority districts/tehsils from neighboring Punjab were also unfairly transferred to India in order to give the latter a land access to J&K thus enabling the Indians to occupy J&K. All Muslims from those Muslim majority tehsils were then either killed or expelled by Hindus and Sikhs


Kashmir valley is almost entirely Muslim so the Indians cannot convert them to a minority (as they did in Jammu) ... So, they want to exterminate the entire Kashmiri Muslim population; A Genocide

As if the similar things never happened from the Pakistan side and no one was killed by Pakistani's (especially Pakistani Muslims)during partition. Try to be honest at-least when you say thing that the entire world already know.

 

[M. Sarmad]

As if the similar things never happened from the Pakistan side and no one was killed by Pakistani's (especially Pakistani Muslims)during partition. Try to be honest at-least when you say thing that the entire world already know.

Muslims were expelled from areas and Tehsils of Punjab even where they were in majority. No Hindu or Sikh had to leave Hindu/Sikh majority areas.

As for Muslims also killing Non-Muslims during partition, no one is denying that. But the number of Muslims killed by Non-Muslims was much higher.

The attacks, financed by Hindu tycoons and Sikh Maharajas, were so well--planned and organized that many in Pakistan (and even in India) declared them "The Sikh Plan" and claimed that great Sikh conspiracy laid behind the attacks. Quite suspiciously, Sikh leaders had ordered their followers to evacuate en masse the canal lands of West Punjab (Faisalabad and Sahiwal especially) even though there were no attacks on them by Muslim mobs.

Even Nehru declared that the Sikhs were the aggressors. He said he believed that some Sikh leaders were hoping to provoke a war between India and Pakistan, so they could launch an invasion to recapture the western half of Punjab. Whatever the real intentions of the Sikh leaders were, they failed to achieve their goal. They were only successful in (either killing or) driving almost each and every Muslim out of East Punjab. But that didn't come without a cost. All Hindus and Sikhs (too) had to leave West Punjab.

 

[Kabira]

If wished were horses .... LOL

A plebiscite means, in the entirety of the Kashmir Kingdom in it's true shape like how it was pre-1947, else nothing. Just remember that point.

Sure, but no free movement of people between both sides before referendum.