Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NEW DELHI: Besieged Kashmiris, including those that once had faith in their destiny with India, would today prefer to be ruled by China than New Delhi, Jammu and Kashmir’s former pro-India chief minister Farooq Abdullah said in a TV interview aired on Wednesday.
“Today Kashmiris do not feel Indian and do not want to be Indian … They are slaves … They would rather have the Chinese rule them,” Mr Abdullah told veteran TV anchor Karan Thapar, in an interview for The Wire online.
Angry Kashmiris would prefer Chinese rule, says Farooq Abdullah
“Today Kashmiris do not feel Indian and do not want to be Indian [...] they are slaves," he says.www.dawn.com
Of course they would given a choice between the two.
Forget Abdulla, even the opposition congress leaders didn't even know they were gonna repeal Art 370, catching them off guard and successfully dividing the opposition and getting it passed.Dr Abdullah suggested the prime minister deliberately went out of his way to give him the impression the massive increase in troops was for security purposes. He said the prime minister did not say a word about Articles 370 and 35A
China has no interest in Kashmir, Kashmir belongs to Pakistan.
NEW DELHI: Besieged Kashmiris, including those that once had faith in their destiny with India, would today prefer to be ruled by China than New Delhi, Jammu and Kashmir’s former pro-India chief minister Farooq Abdullah said in a TV interview aired on Wednesday.
“Today Kashmiris do not feel Indian and do not want to be Indian … They are slaves … They would rather have the Chinese rule them,” Mr Abdullah told veteran TV anchor Karan Thapar, in an interview for The Wire online.
Angry Kashmiris would prefer Chinese rule, says Farooq Abdullah
“Today Kashmiris do not feel Indian and do not want to be Indian [...] they are slaves," he says.www.dawn.com
Division of the subcontinent was based on Muslims for Pakistan and Hindus for India.Why should Kashmir be part of Pak?
Because we respect the wishes of Kashmiris, while Delhi acts regardless of the wishes of Kashmiris. The honourable forum member you're replying to was making a point. The point is that India is right down at the bottom of the list of preferences.Why should Kashmir be part of Pak?
If they want to be ruled by China, they can apply for Chinese asylum. Problem solved. Your diatribe against Hindutva doesn't need a counter. You are just ignorant on the matter.Here's the problem you Pajeetistani zombies don't get. The reason ANY Kashmiri would prefer Chinese rule to Indian rule has nothing at all to do with Islam. The propaganda you've been spoonfed since birth that somehow only religious extremists oppose Delhi is laughable. Under Chinese rule or Pakistani rule or independent rule, the one group that will be put firmly in its place is the HINDUTVA FILTH that has twisted Hinduism into a terrorist cult whose sole purpose is to rewrite history and alleviate the butthurt caused by centuries of Muslim rule in the subcontinent. This inferiority complex driven mechanism is proudly on display in Modi, Shah et al in the political chambers of Delhi.
Kashmiris are a colourful and diverse group of people united by culture, language and heritage. Delhi will never understand this. Delhi has even left its own Kashmiri agents hanging out to dry, as per Abdullah senior's immortal words "this is not my India". Of course it isn't Mr Abdullah, it never was your India and it never can be because it's a hindutva state.
There is no question that Beijing would crush hindutva like the mosquito it is, were they given a chance. That's all that matters to Kashmiris, Pakistanis, Chinese and the dwindling few non-hindutva Indians who may or may not exist out there.
Division of the subcontinent was based on Muslims for Pakistan and Hindus for India.