The claims are of your quotes are Not Complete you Draw facts that suits your motives. As for UN throwing
"evidence of affiliation" Pakistan already sign Simla agreement in which he agrees that third party is not involve in Kashmir Dispute.
In 1947, British rule in India ended with the creation of two new nations: the
Union of India and the
Dominion of Pakistan, while British
suzerainty over the 562 Indian
princely statesended. According to the
Indian Independence Act 1947, "the suzerainty of His Majesty over the Indian States lapses, and with it, all treaties and agreements in force at the date of the passing of this Act between His Majesty and the rulers of Indian States",
[19] so the states were left to choose whether to join India or Pakistan or to remain independent. Jammu and Kashmir, the largest of the princely states, had a predominantly Muslim population, while having a Hindu ruler (
Maharaja Hari Singh.)
On partition Pakistan expected Kashmir to be annexed to it.
In October 1947,
Muslim revolutionaries in western Kashmir[20] and Pakistani tribals from Dir entered Kashmir, intending to liberate it from Dogra rule. Unable to withstand the invasion, the Maharaja signed the Instrument of Accession on 25 October 1947[21] that was accepted by the government of India on 27 October 1947
The treaty was signed in
Simla,
India, by
Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, the
Prime Minister of Pakistan, and
Indira Gandhi, the
Prime Minister of India. The agreement also paved the way for diplomatic recognition of
Bangladesh by
Pakistan. Technically the document was signed on 0040 hours in the night of 3rd of July, despite this official documents are dated July 2, 1972.
[2][3]Few major outcomes of the Simla Agreement are:
Both countries will "settle their differences by peaceful means through bilateral negotiations".
[1][4] India has, many a times, maintained that Kashmir dispute is a bilateral issue and must be settled through bilateral negotiations as per Simla Agreement, 1972 and thus, had denied any"Third party intervention even that of (United Nations)".
The agreement converted the cease-fire line of December 17, 1971 into the
Line of Control (LOC) between India and Pakistan and it was agreed that "neither side shall seek to alter it unilaterally, irrespective of mutual differences and legal interpretations".
[1][3] Many Indian bureaucrats have later argued that a tacit agreement, to convert this LOC into international border, was reached during a one-on-one meeting between the two heads of state. However, Pakistani bureaucrats have denied any such thing.
and i have one thing From UN also Proof OF Pakistan aggression
United Nations Security Council Resolution 47, adopted on April 21, 1948, after hearing arguments from both India and Pakistan the Council increased the size of the Commission established by
United Nations Security Council Resolution 39 to five members, instructed the Commission to go to the
subcontinent and help the governments of India and Pakistan restore peace and order to the region and prepare for a plebiscite to decide the fate of
Kashmir. The resolution was passed by
United Nations Security Council under
chapter VI of UN Charter.
The resolution recommended that in order to ensure the impartiality of the plebiscite Pakistan withdraw all tribesmen and nationals who entered the region for the purpose of fighting and that India leave only the minimum number of troops needed to keep civil order. The Commission was also to send as many observers into the region as it deemed necessary to ensure the provisions of the resolution were enacted.
"Pakistan ignored the UN mandate", did not withdraw its troops and claimed the withdrawal of Indian forces was a prerequisite as per this resolution.[5] Subsequently Pakistan refused to implement the plebiscite until India accedes to it and continued holding on to the portion of Kashmir under its control".
Source:
Resolution 47 on 21 April 1948.
Simla Agreement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
