Good thing you pointed this out. So shall we see the "Pakistani" submarine that fired the SCLM? Or is there a classic "It's classified as the world is against us" argument coming up hiding the truth.
This is trident test
and this is Babur 3
Do you see any submarine firing those tridents? You cant see any because its a submarine and it is supposed to be "submerged". Shall I repeat that again, if that didnt sink in? School boy error you Indians kept on doing and you are not the first. Important thing is, there are not tugs in miles from the launching point, to hold the pantoon in place in both these clips.
As I said, proof is in the pudding.
Hey you know what neither has Pakistan. Like you said seeing is beliving, we haven't seen any underwater footage of Pakistani submarine firing one.
Read above.
Let's see...
1. Proven VLS Capabilities.
2. Proven credible SLBM capabilities with 2 missiles
3. An inducted nuclear sub with VLS.
4. Canisterised road and rail mobile extended range missiles.
5. Dedicated sat link capabilities with dedicated satellite for communications and survilance.
6. A credible BMD to to soften the initial strike and protect the primaries.
7. And a clear transparent system which just adds to the credibility of above.
These all vs below
1. 450Km SCLM launched from god knows what.
2. A new frakenastine rocket with a comically oversized nose warhead cowl said to contain MIRVs (again as you said seeing is beliving, no one saw the actual MIRV in action)
3. Even more comically 60Km range "Nuke" tipped nasar.
4.And above all ISPR with its secretive reporting. No doubt takes the claims with a pinch of salt.
PS: Before you jump on the keyboard with nationalistic rage, let me point out these capabilities pointed out above do not include those which can be requested/bought from Israel, US, Russia or any other strategic friends. So please keep the "borrow from China" component out.
Lot of bullsh|t, but let me summaries.
1. Your VLS counts to nothing if it hasnt been proven. There are no Indian missile launches till date which hasnt used the pontoons. Do you know what pontoons are right? mere statements can make me queen of England.
2. Your SLBM are as vulnerable to first strike as your land based "non TEL" missiles are. Mobility is the key for survival. As long as you are firing your SLBMs from pontoons, Pakistan can neutralize them with first strike.
3. See 1.
4. Indian doesnt not have any TEL land based missile. Vulnerable to first strike.
5. You can communicate all you want. That wont save you from our first strike doctrine, unless you have assured survivability.
6. Credible BDM? Against MIRV? Nice delusion. Borrowed Israeli tech can get you as far really. Try harder.
7. God know what that is. Neither interested.
Now coming to other point.
1. Trust me, it is 450km not a single KM above that range, just like Shaheen 3 was 2570Km. If that makes you sleep better at night.
2. Yea I do agree, its looks like a giant dildo, circumcised actually if you look at the warhead section, waiting to tear apart India's rear end.
3. I can understand your pain, since you lot dont know what miniaturization looks like or what those TNWs are like. I will let you off the hook.
4. ISPR report when the event actually happened and our weapons have matured. We dont suffer the "premature ejaculation" of India, where things are unveiled when clearly they are far from ready.
. And of all people, its you lot should be raising the questions.
