Jordan Pilot Burned Alive By ISIS

[Mrc]

Not to mention the 200000 American christians killed to so called secure japan. Bunch of hypocrites are all they are. They act like ISIL justifying whatever evil their nation and people have done.

To secure japan from japanese u mean...i agree with rest of your statement...please do read it again what u have written

 

[Gunsnroses]

@waz @Horus
Kindly read the thread and clean it from the dickheads of ISIS who are verifying this heinous act as genuine Islamic act.

 

[Mrc]

during the time of the sahaba and the Ridda (apostate Arab tribes) when Abu Bakr was caliph he instructed the commanders to fear Allah. They were to exert themselves in the utmost way in the way of Allah., and allow no sloth to retard those efforts. They were commanded that if any tribe responds with azan it was not to be molested or attacked. Those who did not respond with such a response were to be dealt with by sword and fire. All apostates guilty of murdering muslims were to be killed. Those who were guilty of burning muslims were to be dealt with in the same way. This is called the law of qisas in the sharia.

Again source .... also i am certain that during ridda wars there is not a single documented case of burning some one alive under command of khalid ibne walid

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

• The Islamic State captured Moaz the Jordanian pilot on December 24th 2014 after shooting down his F-16 fighter jet from the skies of al-Raqqah (Syria). What was his jet doing in the skies of al-Raqqah?

• Moaz was part of the American-Arab-Iranian (Shia) coalition who was bombing innocent Muslim civilians in Syria and Iraq day and night. There have been more than 3000 tonnes of bombsthrown upon Muslims since the coalition against the Islamic State.

• The Islamic State decided to lock Moaz in a cage (representing a building), burn him alive, and then throw concrete bricks on his dead body (similar to how a person is burnt from an airstrike and the building falls on his body)), as a Qisaas (retribution punishment) for what he did to the Muslims in al-Raqqah.

No matter how much empathy one may feel for Moaz, he allied with disbelievers to kill Muslims while he had the choice to live safely in Jordan with his family.

This is what made him face the death he faced. The Islamic State is giving a clear warning to the Arabs' and the world in general - that if you kill Muslims and fight the Islamic State - you will get a death similar to how you gave it to the Muslims.

وَإِنْ عَاقَبْتُمْ فَعَاقِبُوا بِمِثْلِ مَا عُوقِبْتُم بِهِ ۖ
And if you punish [an enemy, O believers], punish with an equivalent of that with which you were harmed. (Quran 16:126)

You and other ISIL filth are not human beings, while Muath is one. You and your filthy damned cult will pay for every curl of his hair.

 

[Pak-Americanos]

during the time of the sahaba and the Ridda (apostate Arab tribes) when Abu Bakr was caliph he instructed the commanders to fear Allah. They were to exert themselves in the utmost way in the way of Allah., and allow no sloth to retard those efforts. They were commanded that if any tribe responds with azan it was not to be molested or attacked. Those who did not respond with such a response were to be dealt with by sword and fire. All apostates guilty of murdering muslims were to be killed. Those who were guilty of burning muslims were to be dealt with in the same way. This is called the law of qisas in the sharia.

You are comparing that faggot Al-Baghdadi to the Companion of the Prophet Abu Bakr?? Ha, Mashallah, I didn't know former drunkards can attain such high marks. When did the 1.6 Billion Muslims around the world declare this Al-Baghdadi to be the Caliph? When did this take place?

 

[BLACKEAGLE]

while bombing the city of raqqa i wonder how many innocent muslim women and children the pilot burned alive and buried under rubble?

that was just starters he will have his main course in hell.

Tell your filthy brothers to enjoy hell:

 

[AXO4D]

Any example from prophet(pbuh)'s life or life of sahaba where a person was burned??????
if not than than a single hadees only in imam an nawawi book needs to be seen very critically and in context..

this is the whole text from imam an nawawi and imam al qurtabi book...
interpret it in what ever way you want...
i am not justifying their crime i am just saying if such punishment is in islam we should not abuse it as it might fall under sin...

The permissibility to burn someone to death in retaliation if he burned to death one of the Muslims

Imâm An-Nawawî رحمه الله, "If the transgressor kills using a sword, then Qisâs should not be applied to him with anything other than a sword, because Allâh (Most High) says, "Then whoever transgresses the prohibition against you, you transgress likewise against him. (Quran 2:194)". And also because the sword is the lightest type of pain (i.e. causes the least amount of pain). So if he uses this to kill, but then Qisâs is applied on him with other than a sword- then the oppressed one has taken more than his legitimate right; because he only had the right to kill, yet, he not only killed, he also caused the transgressor torment.

But if the transgressor burned his victim (till death), or drowned him, or threw stones at him (till death), or threw him off a cliff, or struck him with a piece of wood (till death), or confined him (till death), or refused to give him water and food till the victim died- then it is the right of the guardian to apply Qisâs with the equal means, since Allâh says, "And if you punish (your enemy, O you believers in the Oneness of Allâh), then punish them with the like of that with which you were afflicted. (Quran 16:126)". And also due to what is narrated form Al-Barâ' may Allâh be pleased with him from the Prophet ﻢﻠﺳﻭ ﻪﻴﻠﻋ ﷲﺍ ﻰﻠﺻ, "Whosoever torches (a Muslim till death), then we shall also torch him; and whosoever drowns (a Muslim till death), then we shall also drown him."

And Qisâs is a matter of being equally like in retaliation, and it is perfectly possible to be equally like in retaliation with regards to these forms of Qisâs to be carried out- so it is permissible. And it is also permissible for the oppressed (in the situations just mentioned) to use a sword for Qisâs, because it is his right to kill and also torment- but if he only chooses to kill with a sword and gives up his right to torment, then this is also permissible." (End of quote from Imâm An-Nawawî رحمه الله)



Imâm Al-Qurtubî's opinion on burning the enemy to death in equal retaliation (Qisas) against the one who burns the Muslims to death

Imâm Al-Qurtubî رحمه الله said, "And the saying of Allâh: "Then whoever transgresses the prohibition against you, you transgress likewise against him."

"And if you punish (your enemy, O you believers in the Oneness of Allâh), then punish them with the like of that with which you were afflicted."

The Salaf have said that these Verses are all-encompassing of everything- and they supported this conclusion with the statement of the Prophet ﻰﻠﺻ ﻢﻠﺳﻭ ﻪﻴﻠﻋ ﷲﺍ, which is narrated by Abû Dâwûd, That he kept the broken plate in the home of the one who broke it and sent the intact one, and he said: "A platter for a platter and food for food"

There is no difference of opinion between the scholars, that the original base of this Verse is about being equal in Qisâs; so whosoever kills with something, then he shall be killed with the thing which he used to kill with- and this is the opinion of the majority of the scholars- as long as they do not kill with something which is a sin (Fisq), such as sodomy, consumption of alcohol- so in such cases, he should be killed with the sword. Yet the Shâfi'iyyah have the opinion that those who kill with an act of sin- they should also be killed with that same act; their opinion states that [in case of sodomy], that a rod should be forced into his anus till he dies- [in case of murder by overdose of alcohol] he should be given alcohol to quench his thirst, till his death also.

And Ibn Al-Mâjashûn 141 رحمه الله said that whoever kills by burning his victim with fire, or by poisoning him- then such a criminal should not be killed using that same way [i.e. fire or poison], because the Prophet ﻢﻠﺳﻭ ﻪﻴﻠﻋ ﷲﺍ ﻰﻠﺻ said, "None punishes with fire except Allâh"; and poison is a type of fire inside the intestines; But the majority of the scholars have said that it is permissible [to retaliate with fire] due to the generality of the Verse." 142 (End of quote from Imâm Al-Qurtubî رحمه الله)

 

[Mosamania]

this is the whole text from imam an nawawi and imam al qurtabi book...
interpret it in what ever way you want...
i am not justifying their crime i am just saying if such punishment is in islam we should not abuse it as it might fall under sin...

The permissibility to burn someone to death in retaliation if he burned to death one of the Muslims

Imâm An-Nawawî رحمه الله, "If the transgressor kills using a sword, then Qisâs should not be applied to him with anything other than a sword, because Allâh (Most High) says, "Then whoever transgresses the prohibition against you, you transgress likewise against him. (Quran 2:194)". And also because the sword is the lightest type of pain (i.e. causes the least amount of pain). So if he uses this to kill, but then Qisâs is applied on him with other than a sword- then the oppressed one has taken more than his legitimate right; because he only had the right to kill, yet, he not only killed, he also caused the transgressor torment.

But if the transgressor burned his victim (till death), or drowned him, or threw stones at him (till death), or threw him off a cliff, or struck him with a piece of wood (till death), or confined him (till death), or refused to give him water and food till the victim died- then it is the right of the guardian to apply Qisâs with the equal means, since Allâh says, "And if you punish (your enemy, O you believers in the Oneness of Allâh), then punish them with the like of that with which you were afflicted. (Quran 16:126)". And also due to what is narrated form Al-Barâ' may Allâh be pleased with him from the Prophet ﻢﻠﺳﻭ ﻪﻴﻠﻋ ﷲﺍ ﻰﻠﺻ, "Whosoever torches (a Muslim till death), then we shall also torch him; and whosoever drowns (a Muslim till death), then we shall also drown him."

And Qisâs is a matter of being equally like in retaliation, and it is perfectly possible to be equally like in retaliation with regards to these forms of Qisâs to be carried out- so it is permissible. And it is also permissible for the oppressed (in the situations just mentioned) to use a sword for Qisâs, because it is his right to kill and also torment- but if he only chooses to kill with a sword and gives up his right to torment, then this is also permissible." (End of quote from Imâm An-Nawawî رحمه الله)



Imâm Al-Qurtubî's opinion on burning the enemy to death in equal retaliation (Qisas) against the one who burns the Muslims to death

Imâm Al-Qurtubî رحمه الله said, "And the saying of Allâh: "Then whoever transgresses the prohibition against you, you transgress likewise against him."

"And if you punish (your enemy, O you believers in the Oneness of Allâh), then punish them with the like of that with which you were afflicted."

The Salaf have said that these Verses are all-encompassing of everything- and they supported this conclusion with the statement of the Prophet ﻰﻠﺻ ﻢﻠﺳﻭ ﻪﻴﻠﻋ ﷲﺍ, which is narrated by Abû Dâwûd, That he kept the broken plate in the home of the one who broke it and sent the intact one, and he said: "A platter for a platter and food for food"

There is no difference of opinion between the scholars, that the original base of this Verse is about being equal in Qisâs; so whosoever kills with something, then he shall be killed with the thing which he used to kill with- and this is the opinion of the majority of the scholars- as long as they do not kill with something which is a sin (Fisq), such as sodomy, consumption of alcohol- so in such cases, he should be killed with the sword. Yet the Shâfi'iyyah have the opinion that those who kill with an act of sin- they should also be killed with that same act; their opinion states that [in case of sodomy], that a rod should be forced into his anus till he dies- [in case of murder by overdose of alcohol] he should be given alcohol to quench his thirst, till his death also.

And Ibn Al-Mâjashûn 141 رحمه الله said that whoever kills by burning his victim with fire, or by poisoning him- then such a criminal should not be killed using that same way [i.e. fire or poison], because the Prophet ﻢﻠﺳﻭ ﻪﻴﻠﻋ ﷲﺍ ﻰﻠﺻ said, "None punishes with fire except Allâh"; and poison is a type of fire inside the intestines; But the majority of the scholars have said that it is permissible [to retaliate with fire] due to the generality of the Verse." 142 (End of quote from Imâm Al-Qurtubî رحمه الله)

@Horus

Hahahahahahaaaaaa, the Muslim civil war brother, I hate it when I am right but rarely am I wrong. The time of cleansing is at hand, it will be the bloodiest few years in our recent history. I wonder what Phoenix will rise from the ashes of this one Eh.

 

[Hyperion]

Did they send the ashes back to Jordan?

 

[Mosamania]

Did they send the ashes back to Jordan?

You really are the biggest little $hit there is aren't you? You are actively celebrating his death. Does his Arabness offend you so much?

 

[Hyperion]

I'm not, in fact. I'm just pissed at how did he loose that brand spanking new F16!!

Regarding ISIS vs Jordan issue, I'm neutral. As they, the Jordanian's along with others in the immediate neighborhood created this mess in the first place.

Regarding ISIS vs rest of the world, I'm with rest of the world and want to take out ISIS along with the root cause that created ISIS in the first place.

Btw, on topic, one pathetic Jordanian died at the hands of those fundos who you guys created and the rants seem never ending, and just month ago, same ideological bastards, who were created by the same powers to serve as strategic depth against Iran, BUTCHERED 500 children, and all we got back was "regret"........ and the funding still continues........ so don't mind, if I don't give a shit about a worthless Jordanian combatant. Combatants die, unfortunately.

You really are the biggest little $hit there is aren't you? You are actively celebrating his death. Does his Arabness offend you so much?

 

[1000]

I'm not, in fact. I'm just pissed at how did he loose that brand spanking new F16!!

Regarding ISIS vs Jordan issue, I'm neutral. As they, the Jordanian's along with others in the immediate neighborhood created this mess in the first place.

Regarding ISIS vs rest of the world, I'm with rest of the world and want to take out ISIS along with the root cause that created ISIS in the first place.

Btw, on topic, one pathetic Jordanian died at the hands of those fundos who you guys created and the rants seem never ending, and just month ago, same ideological bastards, who were created by the same powers to serve as strategic depth to Iran, BUTCHERED 500 children, and all we got back was "regret"........ and the funding still continues........ so don't mind, if I don't give a shit about a worthless Jordanian combatant. Combatants die, unfortunately.

You're right.

Those terrorists have been burning, beheading, bombing and slaughtering people for years, only now when foreigners taste it they become angry. Jordan itself has hosted pro ISIS meetings and has always been their safe house against Iraq. Had it been a 'Rafidi' that got burnt half of the Arabs on PDF would be celebrating.

 

[Mosamania]

I'm not, in fact. I'm just pissed at how did he loose that brand spanking new F16!!

Regarding ISIS vs Jordan issue, I'm neutral. As they, the Jordanian's along with others in the immediate neighborhood created this mess in the first place.

Regarding ISIS vs rest of the world, I'm with rest of the world and want to take out ISIS along with the root cause that created ISIS in the first place.

Btw, on topic, one pathetic Jordanian died at the hands of those fundos who you guys created and the rants seem never ending, and just month ago, same ideological bastards, who were created by the same powers to serve as strategic depth to Iran, BUTCHERED 500 children, and all we got back was "regret"........ and the funding still continues........ so don't mind, if I don't give a shit about a worthless Jordanian combatant. Combatants die, unfortunately.

You really are as ignorant as you are stupid aren't you? So you just scoure from here and there and make up facts then believe them. How is that working for you?

You're right.

Those terrorists have been burning, beheading, bombing and slaughtering people for years, only now when foreigners taste it they become angry. Jordan itself has hosted pro ISIS meetings and has always been their safe house against Iraq. Had it been a 'Rafidi' that got burnt half of the Arabs on PDF would be celebrating.

Maybe you should look at your buddy go lucky Assad. He is the one that unleashed ISI on you. Yet now that he is serving your Iranian masters interest he becomes a saint. Hahahahaha you people truly are pathetic.

 

[Falcon29]

You really are as ignorant as you are stupid aren't you? So you just scoure from here and there and make up facts then believe them. How is that working for you?



Maybe you should look at your buddy go lucky Assad. He is the one that unleashed ISI on you. Yet now that he is serving your Iranian masters interest he becomes a saint. Hahahahaha you people truly are pathetic.

All Arabs besides Palestinians and Muslim Brotherhood are pathetic. Muslim Brotherhood will remain and expand.

 

[1000]

Maybe you should look at your buddy go lucky Assad. He is the one that unleashed ISI on you. Yet now that he is serving your Iranian masters interest he becomes a saint. Hahahahaha you people truly are pathetic.

No one mentioned Assad and no one said he was a saint. No problem for me, fu** Assad as well.

But you agree with me don't you, as I said before the only way to defeat the terrorists is to have their supporters taste their filth, that way they will quit supporting them wherever they are, whether in Syria/Iraq or elsewhere. I've seen changes in opinions for the positive, looks like it's true after all. ISIS killing kuffar won't bring us anywhere anyway, they have to target their own, that way the world will defeat them.