Slav Defence
THINK TANK VICE CHAIRMAN: ANALYST
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2010
- Messages
- 7,574
- Reaction score
- 117
- Country
- Location
The article reflects author's scattered mentality.
1-He has merged different events in arbitrarily fashion,which kills the sequence and harmony.
2-The writer criticize the mentality of professors upon which I agree with him,but fails to deliver solution properly.
3-The article seems more like bashing done so far.
4-Nothing constructive.
5-The writer himself could have discussed all events and view points in much more professional way.
1-Jinns:
Mostly abrahamic religion discussed jinns, creatures found before existence of human race.Many paranormal events are associated with them.Our entertainment industry are also incomplete without discussing such unseen creature.
There is nothing wrong to teach the subject and research courses in humanities or metaphysics or paranormal sciences that how and when such concept was invaded in human knowledge.
I strongly believe that everything we assume or being we imagine somewhere lies in universe,but with other status and phenotype.The universe is huge,our own existence is still undefined phenomenon,so I believe that anything could be created from material which exists in universe.Anything is possible which Allah wills.(my faith as muslim)
However,utilization for nuclear reactor is really stupid and the person should be kicked for this,lol
2-Zaid Hamid's enigma:
The defense analysts zaid hamid had discussed of watching angles coming for help.I guess the author wanted to criticize his paranormal analysis,but again in false fashion.Zaid saheb's analysis appears more religious to me rather then political or might be he gives tinge of unseen with politics?Zaid saheb can do much better by keeping such lines separately,especially when targeting international audiences.
3-The 9/11 fiasco and new world order:
The writer cannot comment on this book unless he cannot read that book and investigate references on his own.Here it appears to me that he tried to add spices further.A game of manipulation without insight.
4-Resolution:
The Russians are discussing auras and their research and of others have helped us today to build up the concept that human auras is not paranormal.We are able to understand it scientifically and now Russian scientists are thinking to alter genes via aura control,which are just ionic diffusion resulting due to metabolic activities and thinking process.
So establishing reserach has nothing wrong,but getting obsession is.
The article lacks proposal and it neither suggests correct orientation.
5-Over all rating?
Yes,the post is criticism and ranting.I enjoyed the rants and agreed with criticism of some weird logic by professors,but the article could be far more better if problems were highlighted in sequence rather in arbitrary fashion.
Conclusion:
When something is beyond our knowledge we call in magic or story b/c for us it is unconfirmed.However,when we investigate and understands the mechanism behind it,we call it science.Anything that could be measured can be included in science and any thing which cannot be covered is either named as magic,myth or any other story.
As a student of science,we must keep our mind open to all things which lies in universe and at the same time must also accept that their definition and mechanism is out of our reach.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I miss @syedali73 right now,and I want to see how @Syed.Ali.Haider will make me to say;''bingo''
@Akheilos input will be enjoyed as well
Post elaborated instead of writing in commandment style as suggested by @Providence
regards
1-He has merged different events in arbitrarily fashion,which kills the sequence and harmony.
2-The writer criticize the mentality of professors upon which I agree with him,but fails to deliver solution properly.
3-The article seems more like bashing done so far.
4-Nothing constructive.
5-The writer himself could have discussed all events and view points in much more professional way.
1-Jinns:
Mostly abrahamic religion discussed jinns, creatures found before existence of human race.Many paranormal events are associated with them.Our entertainment industry are also incomplete without discussing such unseen creature.
There is nothing wrong to teach the subject and research courses in humanities or metaphysics or paranormal sciences that how and when such concept was invaded in human knowledge.
I strongly believe that everything we assume or being we imagine somewhere lies in universe,but with other status and phenotype.The universe is huge,our own existence is still undefined phenomenon,so I believe that anything could be created from material which exists in universe.Anything is possible which Allah wills.(my faith as muslim)
However,utilization for nuclear reactor is really stupid and the person should be kicked for this,lol
2-Zaid Hamid's enigma:
The defense analysts zaid hamid had discussed of watching angles coming for help.I guess the author wanted to criticize his paranormal analysis,but again in false fashion.Zaid saheb's analysis appears more religious to me rather then political or might be he gives tinge of unseen with politics?Zaid saheb can do much better by keeping such lines separately,especially when targeting international audiences.
3-The 9/11 fiasco and new world order:
The writer cannot comment on this book unless he cannot read that book and investigate references on his own.Here it appears to me that he tried to add spices further.A game of manipulation without insight.
4-Resolution:
The Russians are discussing auras and their research and of others have helped us today to build up the concept that human auras is not paranormal.We are able to understand it scientifically and now Russian scientists are thinking to alter genes via aura control,which are just ionic diffusion resulting due to metabolic activities and thinking process.
So establishing reserach has nothing wrong,but getting obsession is.
The article lacks proposal and it neither suggests correct orientation.
5-Over all rating?
Yes,the post is criticism and ranting.I enjoyed the rants and agreed with criticism of some weird logic by professors,but the article could be far more better if problems were highlighted in sequence rather in arbitrary fashion.
Conclusion:
When something is beyond our knowledge we call in magic or story b/c for us it is unconfirmed.However,when we investigate and understands the mechanism behind it,we call it science.Anything that could be measured can be included in science and any thing which cannot be covered is either named as magic,myth or any other story.
As a student of science,we must keep our mind open to all things which lies in universe and at the same time must also accept that their definition and mechanism is out of our reach.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I miss @syedali73 right now,and I want to see how @Syed.Ali.Haider will make me to say;''bingo''
@Akheilos input will be enjoyed as well
Post elaborated instead of writing in commandment style as suggested by @Providence
regards
Last edited:
