JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 7]

[Thorough Pro]

if can make it 20 feet bigger then it can also carry an AllKhalid on the centerline hardpoint..........that would be awesome

Block 3 with all the changes under the skin including strengthening and rewiring etc.. is it possible that we may see slightly bigger landing gear... something like 2 feet bigger landing gear can make a clearing difference required for carrying some arsenal including a multi-launcher which is a bit vertical than horizontal. any comments?

 

[GriffinsRule]

if can make it 20 feet bigger then it can also carry an AllKhalid on the centerline hardpoint..........that would be awesome

Thats the plan for the twin engine JF-17 as it will require more thrust

 

[SQ8]

if can make it 20 feet bigger then it can also carry an AllKhalid on the centerline hardpoint..........that would be awesome

Khalid the tank or khalid the 90B.. I think if the gears get as tall as the concorde it could be done.

Not to mention the SSG troops it could carry with all these changes, yet it would still have the same weight class, planform and be able to use 5 WS-13s.

That being said, in all seriousness it is the process that destroyed the F-111 and created the superhornet which had little in common with the original hornet and has F-16s eat it for lunch everytime in DACT.

 

[Safriz]

if can make it 20 feet bigger then it can also carry an AllKhalid on the centerline hardpoint..........that would be awesome

I rather have it carrying Ababeel MIRV ...One under each wing

 

[Tamiyah]

Ap log to shuruh hi hogye.

 

[Thorough Pro]

It's so much fun when lazy bums who can't fix a short leg on their living room chair come up with suggestions to make a 4th gen fighter better than its designers

It was a full toss, don't expect it not to be hit out of the park

Ap log to shuruh hi hogye.

 

[AsifIjaz]

if can make it 20 feet bigger then it can also carry an AllKhalid on the centerline hardpoint..........that would be awesome

that's an imbecile statement in response to something that has been mentioned as a cause for a lot of things. Anyways, u can have it your way and hand whatever you want under it.

 

[Dazzler]

 

[Thorough Pro]

Actually your wish was stupid to start with. Look at the pic above this post and calculate how much more internal space in an already a small airframe would be wasted to accommodate two feet longer landing gears (one folding forwards, the other backwards) and then make it impossible to hang anything on the centerline hardpoint

that's an imbecile statement in response to something that has been mentioned as a cause for a lot of things. Anyways, u can have it your way and hand whatever you want under it.

 

[Pampa]

New radome paint ?

 

[Safriz]

Actually your wish was stupid to start with. Look at the pic above this post and calculate how much more internal space in an already a small airframe would be wasted to accommodate two feet longer landing gears (one folding forwards, the othe

Actually your wish was stupid to start with. Look at the pic above this post and calculate how much more internal space in an already a small airframe would be wasted to accommodate two feet longer landing gears (one folding forwards, the other backwards) and then make it impossible to hang anything on the centerline hardpoint

بھائ چھوڑ دو بچے کو ۔

 

[araz]

Thats the plan for the twin engine JF-17 as it will require more thrust

The Al khalid will have its engine on for increasing the thrust of course.

that's an imbecile statement in response to something that has been mentioned as a cause for a lot of things. Anyways, u can have it your way and hand whatever you want under it.

Yar insaan apnay bhaion say he to mazaq karta hai. Dont mind the banter lets move on.
A

 

[Deino]

Thats the plan for the twin engine JF-17 as it will require more thrust

Since when will there be a twin-engined Thunder? From all I got via the latest sometimes controversial discussions, this option was brought forward by some certain individual members as an opinion for the future AZM but not as a fact.

Or did I miss something?

 

[GriffinsRule]

Since when will there be a twin-engined Thunder? From all I got via the latest sometimes controversial discussions, this option was brought forward by some certain individual members as an opinion for the future AZM but not as a fact.

Or did I miss something?

Just a sarcastic post in response to carrying a tank as payload ... you can ignore it.

 

[DANGER-ZONE]

New radome paint ?

Yes, probably after refurbishment but it will turn darker by the passage of time, same as F-16.