JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 7]

[Gallium Nitride]

Sinegal ordered mashaq ?? Or jf ? They have nothing and would be surprise if going straight for jf a

http://www.scramble.nl/orbats/senegal/summary

They have ordered both

 

[ziaulislam]

basic design remain same for blk-3 and its just a upgrade bro, not new design jet and can you tell me why USA calling F-16 block-30 and F-16 block-60 as a F-16 BECAUSE NEW BUILT UPGRADE AND DESIGN REMAIN SAME

its useless discussion, names changes nothing while russia upgrades names like su 27, su 30 amd mig 29 to 35, USA doesnt

 

[Gallium Nitride]

its useless discussion, names changes nothing while russia upgrades names like su 27, su 30 amd mig 29 to 35, USA doesnt

We're simply following the NATO standards

 

[Bratva]

@MiG-35-BD PAF will induct these prototypes of JF-17B, but these are mainly for export. Countries like Myanmar, Senegal and Nigeria need these for training purpose. This year PAC will produce 12 additional JF-17A Block IIs in supplement production so PAF will have 62 Block IIAs, Block III's final contract is about to be signed in a few weeks.
What I know about Block III, mentioned is the Thales Scorpion HMD, AESA Radar either from NRIET or J-10C's Wushi AESA. Block IIIB will be similar to this B prototype while Block IIIA will have redesigning. And good news is that the powerplant is not RD-93 (Not sure which one but will let you know soon).

Do you think French will not betray us again ?

 

[Tipu7]

Do you think French will not betray us again ?

There are no mutual loyalties in first place, only game of personal interest. We have shown incompetence at several occasions.

 

[khanasifm]

Do you think French will not betray us again ?

It’s a US company acquired by French firm in 2012 mostly in Maryland and Aurora IL

But looks like. Claiming just 1553 architecture Along with motor ica hw and interface to integrate well let’s see what is the final out Come

Not sure [emoji848] why f-16 went with other Hmds vs this one ? Hey claim F22p f-16 already integrates the question is do they have active users ?? Usaf Ang or foreign users

 

[Gallium Nitride]

Do you think French will not betray us again ?

The French always did their best to offer us with latest technology like Mirage 2000 but we're the one who backed

 

[gambit]

The major difference between pulse doppler and aesa is rate of scanning where the latter takes the crown by scanning both hemispheres simultaneously. BUT, avoiding various types of ground clutter is still difficult for most aesas too. @gambit

In every radar echo, the Doppler component is always there.

Say you -- the radar -- are scanning two objects. One body is static, the other is moving towards you. You will receive two echoes. The fact that one body has a constant rate of change of motion is not noticed. That was the first radar of WW II days.

A 'pulse Doppler' radar is specifically designed to filter out the Doppler component of every echo in a single scan. If there are 100 echoes, there will be 100 Doppler signals. Even stationary objects with their Doppler signals of zero are processed.

Then we incorporated Doppler signals processing into every radar. We make the PD signals process a subordinate stage of the overall data processing. If the radar is moving, then stationary objects will have greater than zero Doppler signals. Background clutter will have a constant PD rate and this will be classified as -- 'background clutter'. Objects that are moving with any angular perspectives in respect to the radar will standout against background clutter. So if we switch mode on the radar so that it will display only the PD process stage, we have just turned the radar into a PD system.

So with this understanding, PD processing is still problematic even for (p/a)ESA systems. An ESA system has the HARDWARE advantage of providing faster beam scanning, variable freqs, variable pulse characteristics, etc. The hardware advantage will produce clearer and more refined PD signals for every targets in a single scan, but if the SOFTWARE is not there to exploit those refined signals, the ESA system is no better than the non-ESA system.

The software has to be there. An ESA system can be superior than the non-ESA at everything, including PD signals processing. But the software has to be matching.

 

[Maxpane]

They have ordered both

Sir how many they have ordered?

 

[Gallium Nitride]

Sir how many they have ordered?

4 Initially

 

[Maxpane]

4 Initially

Ok sir . Thank you sir

Ok sir . Thank you sir

Sir are they ordering block2?

 

[Gallium Nitride]

Ok sir . Thank you sir


Sir are they ordering block2?

Yes Block II

 

[Maxpane]

Thank you again sir

 

[Hell hound]

@gambit one more question sir .how does the rockwell collins jhmcs function do the have a reticle like the one on scorpion jhmcs or is everything projected on visor? and comparing both of these system which one is better

 

[ziaulislam]

from ispr new song

seems like targetting pod