Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But the Block III can be molded and shaped based on the recent real world experience
When Allah-u Azimushshan opens a door it can't be closed; when HE closes a door it can't be opened....
As if JF-17 is like the Staff of Hazret-i Musa (PBUH)!!!! With HIS PERMISSION, it becomes like the snake to eat up all the illusive snakes of the Firaun's magicians....
La Galibe Illallah...
Great kill for Paf.
Paf will take this experience and make block 3 more deadly.
The event of the last two days have shown the PAF is the tip of the spear of the Pakistan Armed Forces. The JF-17 with 15 years of operational experience is now getting a chance to prove itself. Reports state the JF-17 has fired BVR missiles and carried out air strikes.
Can the JF-17 Block II now be considered a full spectrum battle tested fighter? (beyond its counter insurgency operations)
This experience of the last 48-72 hours can help refine the JF-17 Block III design, although this standoff episode is not over yet. The amount of Stealth Shaping, EW equipement, the need for an IRST or not, The need for improved Missiles/PGMs and in which way, if the plane's size needs to be increased based on the profile of real world CAP missions carried out, if the design should be increased by 25% like @MastanKhan states; should the engine be switched to the WS-10/WS-15 class... evolving into a more potent design, to the point that it can counter the Su-30MKI, Rafale, and F-16 Block 70/F-21 on its own, and Pakistan can afford to retire the F-16 once and for all etc.
BTW, any word on this "unnamed BVR missile" recently test fired by the PAF?
https://thediplomat.com/2019/02/has...ii-fighter-jet-engaged-in-its-first-dogfight/
Reports of the US wary of Pakistan's use of the F-16 in the current standoff may see the Russians suspend future sale of RD-93 Engines if large future Indian deals are signed. The PAF may need to request use of the WS-13 Engine on the Block III despite it shortcomings. Another realization is that China will not intervene at the current level, but if things escalate would China shift Fighter/bombers to its air bases in Sichuan, Tibet and Xinjiang. Does the current standoff not give them a good chance to fly along the borders with spy planes and soak up as much data for refining equipment (like the JF-17) and techniques.
The Indian Adventurism has given the PAF a real world exercise to refine itself, while their Tejas sits on the sidelines.
The WS-13 has almost reached the maturity level of the WS-10, and its specs are slightly ahead to the RD-93, so it is time for the PAF should start to put its trust on this engine.
Really hope so, it's been a long wait for Chinese jet enginesThe WS-13 has almost reached the maturity level of the WS-10, and its specs are slightly ahead to the RD-93, so it is time for the PAF should start to put its trust on this engine.
Agreed. Operational use and extensive field testing will also flush out any unforeseen issues. Some aircraft maybe lost, but PAF will more quickly reach a more reliable engine, from a more reliable supplier, as soon as possible. Use on the JF-17 can be PAF's contribution to Project AZM; field testing WS-13, as it is also slated for use on the J-31.
The WS-13 was extensively tested on the J-31, and compared to the RD-93, it has practically no smoke, so its internal combustion is more smooth in comparison.
Really hope so, it's been a long wait for Chinese jet engines
Wasn't WS13 the engine that failed to satisfy the PLA back 8 years ago?The WS-13 was extensively tested on the J-31, and compared to the RD-93, it has practically no smoke, so its internal combustion is more smooth in comparison.
What about Engine life (MTBU), Thrust, Fuel consumption, and cost?