What's new

Jayasuriya goes on Karachi shopping spree

damn thats alot of suit cases and he really does look like a sindhi well it was a pleasure to have him over here and hope that he would once more come here again so that we will once more host him as our guest :tup::tup::tup::tup:
 
. .
I happen to meet Sri Lankans everyday and i have always found them to be very nice people. We need to get each other closer in lots of other things maybe like in economic activity...

:yahoo:
pak_srilanka_flag_400.jpg
 
.
Lankans are very friendly people, I have always enjoyed their company.
 
.
Sri Lankans are very friendly people and they appreciate Pakistan's help in defeating the LTTE.

The defeat of the LTTE was a big strategic defeat for India.
 
.
You have sound knowledge of strategy. If we had supported ltte , lanka will never be in peace but in piece. The ltte stabbed on their own feet.

India has a very large Tamil population which armed, funded and trained the LTTE in their fight with Sri Lanka. India turned a blind eye to this and when Sri Lanka asked for weapons, India refused.

India tried getting involved in solving the civil war in Sri Lanka but got its arse kicked and since then has taken a passive stance.

Pakistan on the other hand armed, trained and equipped the Sri Lankan forces which decisively defeated the LTTE.
 
.
India has a very large Tamil population which armed, funded and trained the LTTE in their fight with Sri Lanka. India turned a blind eye to this and when Sri Lanka asked for weapons, India refused.

India tried getting involved in solving the civil war in Sri Lanka but got its arse kicked and since then has taken a passive stance.

Pakistan on the other hand armed, trained and equipped the Sri Lankan forces which decisively defeated the LTTE.

Chhod na yaar. Jis cheez ki ratti bhar bhi knowledge nahin uspe kyon bakar maarna. Chilll Maar.:agree:
 
.
Chhod na yaar. Jis cheez ki ratti bhar bhi knowledge nahin uspe kyon bakar maarna. Chilll Maar.:agree:

Honestly whats the background to India's role in Sri Lanka civil war? Role or no role, I would like to know :)
 
.
Sri Lankans are very friendly people and they appreciate Pakistan's help in defeating the LTTE.

The defeat of the LTTE was a big strategic defeat for India.

Killing Rajiv Gandhi was the biggest blunder by LTTE, It lost India's support.
 
.
India has a very large Tamil population which armed, funded and trained the LTTE in their fight with Sri Lanka. India turned a blind eye to this and when Sri Lanka asked for weapons, India refused.

India tried getting involved in solving the civil war in Sri Lanka but got its arse kicked and since then has taken a passive stance.

Pakistan on the other hand armed, trained and equipped the Sri Lankan forces which decisively defeated the LTTE.

If India would have supported LTTE, there is no question of any LTTE defeat. Pakistan is a non issue here.
 
.
Honestly whats the background to India's role in Sri Lanka civil war? Role or no role, I would like to know :)

In July 1983, Civil War breaks out in Sri Lanka between majority Sinhalese and minority Tamil.
In 1987, India sends troops as peace keepers to end the conflict. The LTTE train their guns on Indian Soldiers and thousands of Indian Troops die and LTTE assassinate Indian PM.
India withdraws and takes a passive stance refusing to sell heavy weaponry to Sri Lanka and chastising Sri Lanka for asking for weapons from China as India's own Tamil population support the LTTE.

India favors a two state solution in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka asks Pakistan for help who sends its tanks, rockets, rpg, machine guns and other heavy weaponry despite stern Indian objections.

Sri Lanka defeat the LTTE in two years after the arrival of the Pakistani Weaponry.
 
.
India has a very large Tamil population which armed, funded and trained the LTTE in their fight with Sri Lanka. India turned a blind eye to this and when Sri Lanka asked for weapons, India refused.

India tried getting involved in solving the civil war in Sri Lanka but got its arse kicked and since then has taken a passive stance.

Pakistan on the other hand armed, trained and equipped the Sri Lankan forces which decisively defeated the LTTE.
That is the most moronic post that I have ever come accross.
It was not the Tamil population of TN that armed, trained the LTTE. LTTE was a self propelled organization that was used by INDIA to punish SL for allowing Pakistani Navy ships during 1973.
you think that an entire section became hostile for the love extending Shinhalees. They distributed book called "Why Tamils should be killed" by their Minister Sirieal Mathew.

In July 1983, Civil War breaks out in Sri Lanka between majority Sinhalese and minority Tamil.
In 1987, India sends troops as peace keepers to end the conflict. The LTTE train their guns on Indian Soldiers and thousands of Indian Troops die and LTTE assassinate Indian PM.
India withdraws and takes a passive stance refusing to sell heavy weaponry to Sri Lanka and chastising Sri Lanka for asking for weapons from China as India's own Tamil population support the LTTE.

India favors a two state solution in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka asks Pakistan for help who sends its tanks, rockets, rpg, machine guns and other heavy weaponry despite stern Indian objections.

Sri Lanka defeat the LTTE in two years after the arrival of the Pakistani Weaponry.

Boost about hot air from you butt. winning the LTTE was not only your help, its the combined effort of Isreal, China, Pakistan, India, Russia who extended support to the Shinhala trrops to massacar an entire race.
That was never a fair fight. 1 David against 9 Golioth
 
. .
India has a very large Tamil population which armed, funded and trained the LTTE in their fight with Sri Lanka. India turned a blind eye to this and when Sri Lanka asked for weapons, India refused.

India tried getting involved in solving the civil war in Sri Lanka but got its arse kicked and since then has taken a passive stance.

Pakistan on the other hand armed, trained and equipped the Sri Lankan forces which decisively defeated the LTTE.

If it helps you sleep , keep thinking along the same lines. the truth though is quite different. LTTE made a huge mistake by assassinating Rajiv Gandhi and we stopped our support right then. Had they not done that , we would have gladly helped LTTE liberate Tamil Lands. You really overestimate your ability and see world events as a consequence of your country's role . Pakistan broke up USSR, Pakistan helped defeated LTTE , Pakistani pilots helped fight Israel blah blah blah. Neither did USSR break up due to Pakistan , nor was LTTE defeated as a result of your support to Sri Lanka. They lost because we didn't support them. Sri Lanka still has a huge and pretty pissed off Tamil Population. With a little military support from our side , tamil lands can still be liberated. Though we see no reason to do that because there are already many problems and unresolved conflicts in the immediate neighborhood.
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom