What's new

Jamaat men torch Hindu temple, houses in Noakhali

I am not well versed into bangladeshi politics so do correct me but according to radio canada, the Jamat party disagrees with the international tribunal with respect to the court decision. Was there a problem with the trials or mishandling of evidence that is essentially leading to a potent civil war or is it simply a fringe right party looking for attention :)

The court maintained all the procedures and his charges are specific. But jamat is not loyal to BD. So they have started all the violence.

GALLOWS for Sayedee
Death handed for 2 charges
2013-03-01__fr01.jpg


Ending all speculations, the first war crimes tribunal yesterday sentenced Jamaat leader Delawar Hossain Sayedee to death in its maiden verdict almost three years after its formation.

The 73-year-old Jamaat-e-Islami nayeb-e-ameer was found guilty of murder, abduction, confinement, torture, rape, persecution, and abetment of torture, looting, forceful religious conversions and setting homes ablaze in rural areas of southern district Pirojpur during the Liberation War.

While thousands of people, ignoring the Jamaat-called hartal, gathered at Shahbagh in the capital yesterday and celebrated the verdict, Jamaat and student body Islami Chhatra Shibir sent a wave of violence across the country that claimed at least 33 lives.

The judgment turned the spotlight on the nine-month war in which the Pakistani army along with its collaborators had killed three million Bangalees and raped more then 200,000 women. About 10 million people had to flee to India as refugees and millions more were displaced inside the country during the war in 1971.

In the verdict, the judges of the International Crimes Tribunal-1 said, "The road to freedom for the people of Bangladesh was arduous and torturous, smeared with blood, toil and sacrifices. In the contemporary world history, perhaps no nation paid as dearly as the Bangalees did for their emancipation."

Sayedee was brought to the dock around 11:10am and the tribunal judges started reading out the 56-page summery of the verdict after an introduction in which it was said that the Sayedee of 1971 was being tried, not the MP Sayedee or the Sayedee known for his religious sermons or the political leader Sayedee.

Sayedee, then a 30-year-old grocer, was not involved in politics during the war. He could speak Urdu well as he had obtained the Alim degree from madrasa. He welcomed the Pakistani army at Parerhat Bazar of Pirojpur.

He formed the local Peace Committee and subsequently, as a member of ******* force (auxiliary force of the Pakistan army), he actively took part in the atrocities committed by the Pakistani army and ******* force on civilians, the Hindu community and pro-liberation people, the court said.

Later on in life, Sayedee started delivering religious sermons (waaz) in and outside the country. He has a few thousand fans. He used titles like "Allama" and "Moulana". He was elected parliament member twice, in 1996 and 2001. He joined Jamaat and became its nayeb-e-ameer.

In the summary of the judgment based on crimes committed four decades ago, Tribunal-1 Chairman Justice ATM Fazle Kabir said, "As judges of this tribunal, we firmly hold and believe in the doctrine that 'justice in the future cannot be achieved unless injustice of the past is addressed'.”

Even though Tribunal-2 had delivered judgments in two war crimes cases, one against Abul Kalam Azad and the other against Jamaat leader Abdul Quader Mollah, Tribunal-1 delivered its first verdict yesterday.

It was formed in March, 2010, before Tribunal-2 and it is dealing with three other cases.

Sayedee's case was also the first case to get rolling at the tribunals and it took Tribunal-1 18 months to conclude the trial. The trial was troubled by several obstacles: failure to produce witnesses by prosecution and defence, the so-called Skype controversy, and reconstitution of the tribunal and a barrage of defence petitions.

Sayedee was indicated on October 3, 2011. The prosecution had piled 20 charges against him for crimes he committed in Pirojpur in 1971.

However, Justice Kabir and tribunal members Justice Jahangir Hossain and Justice Anwarul Haque unanimously held Sayedee guilty in eight of the 20 charges of crimes against humanity.

Justice Kabir said the three judges were convinced with the evidence on record that the accused knowingly and on purpose stood against the War of Liberation and joined the ******* force to resist the birth of Bangladesh.

"It is proved that the accused [Sayedee] as one of the Razakars or a person of a group of individuals took active part in the attacks directed against civilian population at Parerhat area, causing murder, deportation, rape, looting of goods, setting fire to the houses and shops of civilians, forceful religious conversion, inhuman acts and torture which fall within the purview of crimes against humanity," read the conclusion of the verdict.

Sayedee was sentenced to death in two of the charges even though found "guilty beyond reasonable doubt" in eight. He was sentenced to death for the abduction, torture and murder of Ibrahim Kutti and the killing of Bisabali in Pirojpur.

The tribunal said the gravity of the offences in the other six charges appeared to be lesser than that of the two in which he was sentenced to death. Since the tribunal had already awarded the capital punishment, they refrained from passing separate imprisonments for the six charges.

The prosecution examined nine witnesses to prove the charge of Kutti killing and setting fire to the houses of the Hindus at Parerhat.

Mofizuddin Posari, who was also captured by the Pakistani army and Razakars along with Kutti, testified against Sayedee. He said Sayedee as a member of the ******* force captured them and ultimately the Pakistani army killed Kutti.

“We find no reason to disbelieve evidence of PW-7 [witness Posari] as to the murder of Kutti, destruction of houses of civilians in a large scale by setting fire which constitute crimes against humanity,” the tribunal said.

The prosecution examined three eyewitnesses to prove Bisabali's killing in Umedpur village in Pirojpur.

With the assistance of Sayedee, the Pakistani army attacked the Hindu-dominated neighbourhood of Umedpur village and looted valuables from homes.

“It is evident that one civilian named Bisabali was caught and tortured by Razakars, thereafter victim Bisabali was fastened to a coconut tree and she was shot dead by a ******* at the insistence of accused Delawar Hossain Sayedee,” the tribunal said.

The judges said as per International Crimes (Tribunals) Act, 1973, Sayedee be convicted and sentenced to death and be "hanged by the neck till he is dead".

Since the tribunals enjoy the status of the High Court, a convict has the right to file an appeal only with the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court within 30 days of the judgment delivery.

Defence counsels of Sayedee said they would appeal.

Terming the verdict an absolute deviation from justice, chief defence counsel Abdur Razzaq said the tribunal did “utmost injustice to Moulana Sayedee” through the verdict.

“The tribunal should have acquitted him from the charges. I think the prosecution couldn't prove a single charge,” Razzaq told reporters at his Dhanmondi home yesterday.

Several hundred lawyers, journalists and observers had gathered at the tribunal to witness the much-awaited judgment delivery in Sayedee's case yesterday.

High security measures were in place in and around the old high court building where the tribunals are. Many could not get in and had to wait outside.

In parts of the country, people of all walks of life brought out celebratory processions.

GUILTY IN OTHER 6 CHARGES
On May 7, 1971, Sayedee identified the houses and shops of the Hindus, and people who support Awami League and the Liberation War at Parerhat Bazar in Pirojpur. He as one of the perpetrators raided those shops and houses and looted valuables, including 22 shers of gold and silver from the shop of one Makhanlal Saha.

On May 8, 1971, Sayedee led a team of the Pakistan army to the house of Nurul Islam Khan, where he identified for the army Nurul Islam as an Awami League leader and his son Shahidul Islam Selim as a freedom fighter. Sayedee then detained Nurul Islam and handed him over to the army men who tortured Nurul Islam. His house was then looted and finally set on fire.

On June 2, 1971, Sayedee led a team of Peace (Shanti) Committee members, accompanied by the Pakistani army, to raid the house of Mahbubul Alam Howlader (freedom fighter) of Tengra Khali village in Indurkani. Sayedee and the team then detained Mahbubul's elder brother Abdul Mazid Howlader and tortured him, and looted cash money, jewellery and other valuables from the house.

During the final stages of the war, Sayedee one morning led a team of 50 to 60 Razakars into the attack on the Hindu-dominated neighbourhood of Hoglabunia in Pirojpur. Seeing the attackers, the Hindus managed to flee but one Shefali Gharami failed. Some Razakars entered her room and raped her. Being the leader of the team, Sayedee failed to prevent them from committing rape. He and the members of his team also set fire to the dwellings of the neighbourhood.

During the Liberation War, Sayedee led a group of 10-12 armed Razakars and Peace Committee members and surrounded the house of Gouranga Saha of Parerhat Bandar in Pirojpur. Sayedee and the others abducted three women and handed them over to the Pakistan army at Pirojpur where they were confined and raped for three days before being released.

During the war, Sayedee, being a member of ******* and exercising his power, forced 100-150 Hindus of Parerhat and other villages to convert to Islam and compelled them to go to the mosque to offer prayers.

GALLOWS <i>for Sayedee</i>
 
No, that is your solution. The solution is to stop targeting Jamaatis and hear them out. They are Bengali citizens as well.

Charge them for war crimes? Why now?

First focus on the war crimes currently conducted by the Indian forces THEN go 40 years back.

What an astonishing piece of logic!
 
Grenade on busy road defused
Police have defused a grenade that they spotted on a footpath opposite Ruposhi Bangla Hotel in the capital hours after Jamaat-e-Islami leader Delwar Hossain Sayedee was sentenced to death for his war crimes of 1971. - See more at: Grenade on busy road defused - bdnews24.com



"The bomb was defused by exploding it on the footpath," said Detective Police’s Assistant Commissioner (Bomb Disposal Unit) Sanowar Hossain.

Dhaka Metropolitan Police’s Joint Commissioner Monirul Islam said it was not possible to remove from the footpath.

It was around 3pm that police got information about a bomb-like object lying abandoned on the footpath in front of the hotel.

Asked about the type of the grenade, Islam had said, "We can tell you that only after examining its substances."

He said the law keepers had been ordered to stay more alert as the grenade was found near the 'Ganajagaran Mancha' at Shahbagh where the mass agitation have been going on for 24 days now in demand of awarding death sentence to all the convicted war criminals and slapping a ban on the Jamaat-e-Islami.

The grenade was found amid reports of crude bomb explosions elsewhere in the city immediately after the death verdict for Sayedee.

Police also fired blank shots at Matijheel to prevent a gathering of the activists of the Islamist party and its student wing Islami Chhatra Shibir. - See more at: Grenade on busy road defused - bdnews24.com

So they simply want to prove why people call them terrorist ????
 
let me tell you the situation...
1. one party (majority)asking for death sentence of criminals and protesting peacefully when some criminals getting jails.
2. other party (4.6%)wants to stop the judgements, when court gives jail or death sentence, they start violence

short cut story telling :D

Ahahah classic case of both sides not respecting the decisions of the court, however for me as an outsider, its hard to encompass the concept for going against the judiciary without sufficient evidence proving that the trial was null, which neither side can prove as far as the sources I have read. So isn`t it better to simply accept the judiciaries decision on this , if i am not offending anyone.
 
let me tell you the situation...
1. one party (majority)asking for death sentence of criminals and protesting peacefully when some criminals getting jails.
2. other party (4.6%)wants to stop the judgements, when court gives jail or death sentence, they start violence

short cut story telling :D

U r escaping the truth majority of BD want death sentence to war criminals.
 
Well the courts already established that however why are they questioning the courts decision, this is a clear disrespect to the laws of land and furthermore bangladaìse consitution, they must have a reason ie. mistrial or something otherwise why would a political party try to create a havoc on innocents.

even the other party who oppose judgement they disrespected national flag and attacked Martyrs monument. so now government working to ban this party.
it is not about religious party, but some international news reporter calling them islamic party. we are seriously angry about it.
general people and other 12 Islamic do not recognize them as Islamic party.
 
i do not worry about what you think. you are not a regular member, you come in this forum in rare case.

And the regular suspects have thanked you. Not that it matters, but I have been a member at this forum for much longer than you lot.
 
Ahahah classic case of both sides not respecting the decisions of the court, however for me as an outsider, its hard to encompass the concept for going against the judiciary without sufficient evidence proving that the trial was null, which neither side can prove as far as the sources I have read. So isn`t it better to simply accept the judiciaries decision on this , if i am not offending anyone.

Bangladesh War Crimes Tribunal: Sayedee trial analysis: Safe house register

Read it and let me know if you dont think the trial was not staged and politically motivated.
 
@WebMaster don't believe the propaganda from government mouthpieces or the hindutva brigade. I have not read the verdict this time around but in the previous case a person was sentenced to life yet there was not a single piece of prima facie evidence against him. Everything was based on hearsay.... No eye withness. The prosecution could not provide one single piece of evidence of either any named victims, or time or place and could not position the guy Kader Mollah during these supposed crime. The kangaroo court drama continues.

The shabagh Sheeps are BAL activists, it is a contrived situation to create caos. It's a well planned strategy as BAL can not remain in power any other way.

If any temples has been torched likely to be BAL agent provocateurs doing it. There are precedence of BAL false flag operations to back up the assertion.

JI cadres are obviously responding to police provocations but targeting minorities is something that they won't do as it would not make any strategic sense. BAL is targeting Hindus just as they had targeted budhists as inflaming communal situation only assist BAL.

It is not for you, or me, or any other person to start sitting in judgement on courts, whether on Bangladeshi courts, or Pakistani courts or Indian courts. They do consider evidence, they do come to conclusions, and these conclusions are not always to popular liking. That is no reason to contest them and to propose violent uprisings in protest. It is this attitude which has led to the sorry state of Pakistan today, and you will still find some Pakistanis, increasingly in the minority, who think that the rule of law counts for little, or nothing. They are behind the misery of their nation. So will you be, if you do not change, and join the bulk of your population that seeks to do things in broad daylight, not in criminal darkness, and that upholds the rule of law.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Co-incidentally, the goal of the Shahbag protesters and BAL have converged.

You are resorting to personal attacks without any provocation. Shows your intellectual level. @Loki should really have a look at the point you've just made.

Thanks again for all the effort you've put writing the reply.

Joy Bangla!


No to "Joy Bangla" as I have nothing to do with Kolikata, by admitting that you do, you have also shown your true colours.

Nevertheless, you can not point to a single personal attack against you in my post. Crying foul running to Mods won't help.

The goal of "Shahbag circus" and "BAL" has always been the same, that is why BAL never attacked Shahbag circus, it does not take high IQ to figure that out. How can any intelligent adult fail to see that?

Don't ever talk about my intellectual level, which has been shown to be much higher than all "Kolikatan agents" in history.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Although I condemn attacking our ethnic minorities as they are my fellow countrymen but its just funny how indians are swarming in this thread and speaking about secularism and proper treatment of minoriities and what not. Whereas Indians are very passionate about their probable next Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi who was the main Architect of killing thousands of Muslims in Gujrat. I am just amazed at this level of hypocrisy.
Tell me Indians is hypocrisy somehow coded in your genotypes thereby making it impossible to let go or what???
On the thread: This just happened once in a blue moon and will not happen again In sha Allah. Our hindu brothers are Bangladeshis first and most of the Bangladeshi muslims wont even tolerate atrocities against Hindus.

I am passionate about Narendra Modi, but not in a way that you imagine, and there are many like me. Your generalistion was a poorly chosen one.
 
No to "Joy Bangla" as I have nothing to do with Kolikata, by admitting that you do, you have also shown your true colours.

Nevertheless, you can not point to a single personal attack against you in my post. Crying foul running to Mods won't help.

The goal of "Shahbag circus" and "BAL" has always been the same, that is why BAL never attacked Shahbag circus, it does not take high IQ to figure that out. How can any intelligent adult fail to see that?

Don't ever talk about my intellectual level, which has been shown to be much higher than all "Kolikatan agents" in history.

I'm putting you on my ignore list. Please do not quote me in any of your posts. Thank you.
 
Back
Top Bottom