What's new

It belongs to China

Kido.
When you are talking serious history in the textbook printed in China, I wonder about Chinese's mentality, they don't feel any shamefull when Chinese are ruled by invaders very long time in their history. Mongolia and Machus was foreigners, conquered and ruled China. China was colony of them. It's truth, such textbook printed in China is fake with lies to brainwash Chinese.
Related to Chinese characters, what do you think when Japanese use it up to now ?

here you go, if you bring the revisionism history into the topic, guess all professors around the world are going to fight in mechakucha...

by that logic, the UK has not been a world power, but a huge humiliation of German colony since 13 century....

Related to Chinese characters, what do you think when Japanese use it up to now ?

the Japanese use Chinese words, not the Chinese language.

did you also use katakana, or 平仮名hirakana, or likewise?
 
history revisionism is a dangerous and immoral thing, only bring more troubles and hatred between nations, and a huge threat to world peace.
 
I find that some viet show their so called to prove the island are theirs, about chinese comments, even we show it, they will said our history is fake. The phillipine want us go to so called UNCLOS, if someone have doubt on Beijing, whether we also should to follow you? China is shameful? What about you? We insolate so called rule of the world, please what is the rule?
I or most of chinese are tired of the boring and endless argue on these, we just support government solve it by using force, I know government want so, they buy the time, I dont know how long it will? And here, my suggest, chinese here don't argue with these shti on these, don't waste your spit, just neglect them, let PLA tackle them. put your attention on internal development and other topic, that's better.
 
history revisionism is a dangerous and immoral thing, only bring more troubles and hatred between nations, and a huge threat to world peace.

Yes, history revisionism is what China is trying to do.

Reminder that we don't try history revisionism, we have occupied the islands peacefully, continuously, and in reality.

I find that some viet show their so called to prove the island are theirs, about chinese comments, even we show it, they will said our history is fake. The phillipine want us go to so called UNCLOS, if someone have doubt on Beijing, whether we also should to follow you? China is shameful? What about you? We insolate so called rule of the world, please what is the rule?
I or most of chinese are tired of the boring and endless argue on these, we just support government solve it by using force, I know government want so, they buy the time, I dont know how long it will? And here, my suggest, chinese here don't argue with these shti on these, don't waste your spit, just neglect them, let PLA tackle them. put your attention on internal development and other topic, that's better.

Like Germany did in the 1940s?
 
here you go, if you bring the revisionism history into the topic, guess all professors around the world are going to fight in mechakucha...

by that logic, the UK has not been a world power, but a huge humiliation of German colony since 13 century....



the Japanese use Chinese words, not the Chinese language.

did you also use katakana, or 平仮名hirakana, or likewise?

You belong to low IQ chinese. You don't understand may question. I stated that Japanese use chinese chatracters, or with another expression: chinese symbols, not language.
 
I find that some viet show their so called to prove the island are theirs, about chinese comments, even we show it, they will said our history is fake. The phillipine want us go to so called UNCLOS, if someone have doubt on Beijing, whether we also should to follow you? China is shameful? What about you? We insolate so called rule of the world, please what is the rule?
I or most of chinese are tired of the boring and endless argue on these, we just support government solve it by using force, I know government want so, they buy the time, I dont know how long it will? And here, my suggest, chinese here don't argue with these shti on these, don't waste your spit, just neglect them, let PLA tackle them. put your attention on internal development and other topic, that's better.

China claim Islands but didn't have evidents to approve it, then refer to force. It's argument of robbers. :butcher:
 
China is preying on the Philippines marine resource because their people is running out of fish to fish LOL and they are spreading their claws to those who let them. South China Sea is not correct it should be written as CHINA SEE because of their attitude "CHINA SEE, CHINA GET"
 
Kido.
When you are talking serious history in the textbook printed in China, I wonder about Chinese's mentality, they don't feel any shamefull when Chinese are ruled by invaders very long time in their history. Mongolia and Machus was foreigners, conquered and ruled China. China was colony of them. It's truth, such textbook printed in China is fake with lies to brainwash Chinese.
Related to Chinese characters, what do you think when Japanese use it up to now ?

orange agent really does something to the viets``poor viets cant read their old textbooks (written in Chinese) yet bragging about history```its like retards bragging about normality

lol China guy acting all insulted and stuff. This forum is still funny even without SinoChallenged!

Your English is also very bad (sentence structure).

Also as for the topic: Go to UNCLOS or stfu with your little delusions of grandeur and racial "superiority"(<<lol) which are based on factory workers sweating like dogs.
where are you from``you think you are different? becuase europeans used to be the sweaty factory dogs too, and you are just the son of one of them and nothing more, atleast those europeans made history
 
orange agent really does something to the viets``poor viets cant read their old textbooks (written in Chinese) yet bragging about history```its like retards bragging about normality

You can read our History are written by Viets with Chinese

&#21335; &#22269; &#23665; &#27827; &#21335; &#24093; &#23621;
&#21335; &#22283; &#23665; &#27827; &#21335; &#24093; &#23621;
&#25130; &#28982; &#23450; &#20998; &#22312; &#22825; &#20070;
&#25130; &#28982; &#23450; &#20998; &#22312; &#22825; &#26360;
&#22914; &#20309; &#36870; &#34383; &#26469; &#20405; &#29359;
&#22914; &#20309; &#36870; &#34396; &#20358; &#20405; &#29359;
&#27741; &#31561; &#34892; &#30475; &#21462; &#36133; &#34394;
&#27741; &#31561; &#34892; &#30475; &#21462; &#25943; &#34395;


Nam qu&#7889;c s&#417;n hà nam &#273;&#7871; c&#432;
Ti&#7879;t nhiên &#273;&#7883;nh ph&#7853;n t&#7841;i thiên th&#432;
Nh&#432; hà ngh&#7883;ch l&#7895; lai xâm ph&#7841;m
Nh&#7919; &#273;&#7859;ng hành khang th&#7911; b&#7841;i h&#432;.
Sông núi n&#432;&#7899;c Nam vua Nam &#7903;,
Rành rành &#273;&#7883;nh ph&#7853;n t&#7841;i sách tr&#7901;i.
C&#7899; sao l&#361; gi&#7863;c sang xâm ph&#7841;m,
Chúng bay s&#7869; b&#7883; &#273;ánh t&#417;i b&#7901;i!

In English:

The Southern country's mountain and river the Southern Emperor in-habits.
The separation is natural and allotted in Heaven's Book.
If the bandits come to trespass it,
You shall, in doing that, see yourselves to be handed with failure and shame!
 
It belongs to China

The Scarborough Shoal does belong to China which discovered it and drew it in a map as early as 1279 during the Yuan Dynasty. Chinese fishermen, from both the Mainland and Taiwan, have since used it. As a matter of fact, Guo Shoujing, (the Chinese astronomer, engineer and mathematician who worked under the Mongol ruler, Kublai Khan) performed surveying of the South China Sea, and the surveying point was the Scarborough Shoal which is considered part of the Zhongsha Islands (renamed Huangyan Island in 1983).

By contrast, the “old maps” being relied upon by our Department of Foreign Affairs in its spurious claim on the same territory were drawn up only in 1820, or 541 years after China’s. I am surprised that Senator Edgardo Angara—supposedly a renowned lawyer—can claim that a map drawn 5 centuries and 4 decades after, takes precedence over the much earlier map of China.

So, what exactly was the territory we declared independence from the US in 1946? Why is it that NONE of our constitutions, past and present, from 1899, 1935, 1943, 1973, 1986 and 1987, include either the Spratlys or the Scarborough Shoal within our declared national territory? Where, or from whom, did we, all of a sudden, acquire title to these? Out of thin air?


Victor N. Arches II
Manila Standard Today

It belongs to China - Manila Standard Today - Daily news, current events, latest news in the Philippines

Exactly , this is the truth the whole truth nothing but the truth .
 
Exactly , this is the truth the whole truth nothing but the truth .

Here is truth.

Philippines-China-Sou_Mali.jpg
 
"The Philippines runs crying to the US, begging for assistance in its territorial dispute with China, and citing the UNCLOS as its only ground to back up its claim.

What many Filipinos do not know, however, is that the US did NOT ratify the UNCLOS! Why? Because the UNCLOS affects national sovereignty. The US refuses to be taken to the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea.

And here we are, acting like fools, asking the US to convince or even force China to do exactly what the US itself refuses to do.

That is why we are now the laughing stock of the world."


Victor N. Arches II (vnarches)
Manila Standard Today

you have to understand these two desperately poor and incapable of doing anything countries this is their only way out of poverty, desperate times call for desperate measures.
 
where are you from``you think you are different? becuase europeans used to be the sweaty factory dogs too, and you are just the son of one of them and nothing more, atleast those europeans made history

Don't bother taking aim at Europe. Audio is an Indian false-flagger who had the endurance to rack up 400 posts.
 
Back
Top Bottom