What's new

Israeli politician suggests doctors could refuse to treat gay patients

undercover JIX

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
9,146
Reaction score
2
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan

Israeli politician suggests doctors could refuse to treat gay patients​

President condemns anti-LGBTQ rhetoric after comment by Orit Strook, which she later said referred to certain procedures
A demonstration in Jerusalem in 2021 against Israeli lawmakers who oppose gay rights.

A demonstration in Jerusalem in 2021 against Israeli lawmakers who oppose gay rights. Photograph: Emmanuel Dunand/AFP/Getty Images

Ben Lynfield in Jerusalem
Mon 26 Dec 2022 16.32 GMT


A suggestion by one of Benjamin Netanyahu’s incoming ministers that Israeli doctors should be allowed to refuse treatment to LGBTQ patients on religious grounds has heightened fears that the new government poses an unprecedented threat to gay rights.
The Israeli president, Isaac Herzog, has weighed in to condemn the growing anti-LGBTQ rhetoric, saying: “The racist pronouncements of recent days against the LGBTQ community and other sectors of the public make me extremely worried and concerned.” The president, whose post is largely ceremonial but who commands a degree of authority, added that such rhetoric undermined Israeli “democratic and moral values”.

Netanyahu – who called Strook’s remarks “unacceptable” – denies his new government will pose a threat to gay rights but critics say he is too weak to control his ultra nationalist and ultraorthodox coalition partners pushing Israel to increasingly adopt what they view as divinely ordained religious heritage.

A Gay Pride events in Tel Aviv in 2021
Israel’s LGBTQ+ community fear for future under far-right government
Read more



In a radio interview on Sunday, the incoming national missions minister, Orit Strook, of the Religious Zionist party, was widely understood as implying that Israeli doctors would be able to refuse treatment to LGBTQ patients in the spirit of legislation her party is drafting and in accordance with coalition agreements that provide for amending an anti-discrimination law.
Strook specified that a doctor could refuse care to a patient if doing so violates his religious beliefs “as long as there are enough other doctors who can give this service”.
After sharp criticism of her remarks, Strook, a leader of the illegal Israeli settler community in Hebron, later tweeted that she had been referring to medical procedures that would be religiously objectionable, not LGBTQ individuals. She did not specify which procedures they might be but stressed that it was inconceivable to force a Jewish doctor to violate Jewish law in a Jewish state “that was established after 2000 years of exile due to Jews who sacrificed their lives for the fulfilment of Torah”.
Strook’s party is advancing an amendment to an anti-discrimination law that allows exceptions to service providers where religious beliefs of the provider would be violated. This principle is also specified in Netanyahu’s coalition agreement with the ultra-Orthodox Torah Judaism party.
Another Religious Zionist legislator, Simcha Rothman, said on Sunday that under the change, hotel owners would be able to refuse rooms to gay groups. “Freedom of occupation means that someone is allowed to act not nicely to the assortment of customers and to boycott or not to boycott them.”

The changes to the law, if they materialise, are also expected to impact on Israel’s Arab minority citizens and pave the way for further inroads by the Jewish fundamentalists of Religious Zionism, who also support annexation of the occupied West Bank. Netanyahu reiterated a pledge that his government would not harm the LGBTQ community, but tellingly, members of his Likud party ruled out changing the coalition agreement.
Ofer Newman, the chief executive of Igy (Israel Gay Youth), termed the statements and legislative plan “dangerous”. He predicted more violence and abuse against his community. “We’re in a new situation in which politicians who want to push people back to the closet possess ministerial power. We are in a frightened and alert mindset.”
Alon Shachar, executive director of Jerusalem Open House for Pride and Tolerance, said: “The changes the new government seeks to lead are liable to bring us to a situation in which LGBTQ people return to living in a reality of fear, violence and racism.
“If these ideas materialise and become reality in deeds they will effect not only the gay community but all Israeli society.”
Yossi Beilin, a former minister of justice, stressed that since Netanyahu needed the extreme right parties to help legislate a weakening of the judiciary so that corruption proceedings against him would be cancelled, he might accommodate their demands.
“Since Netanyahu is very, very weak he has no option [of handling] these extremist forces, some of whom are lunatics,” Beilin said. “Maybe he intends not to implement these things but I’m not sure he can avoid doing so. These people are really zealots.”
“We have never been in such a situation. The jury is out. We may be facing a different Israel with halacha [Jewish law] as a point of interest that people living in darkness will support.
Netanyahu intends to hold a vote in parliament on his new government on Thursday 29 December, just days before his mandate to do so expires, the speaker of parliament said on Monday.
Netanyahu’s bloc of rightwing and religious parties won a parliamentary election last month, but the veteran leader has had a harder time than expected in finalising coalition deals.

… we have a small favour to ask. Tens of millions have placed their trust in the Guardian’s fearless journalism since we started publishing 200 years ago, turning to us in moments of crisis, uncertainty, solidarity and hope. More than 1.5 million supporters, from 180 countries, now power us financially – keeping us open to all, and fiercely independent. Will you make a difference and support us too?
Unlike many others, the Guardian has no shareholders and no billionaire owner. Just the determination and passion to deliver high-impact global reporting, always free from commercial or political influence. Reporting like this is vital for democracy, for fairness and to demand better from the powerful.
And we provide all this for free, for everyone to read. We do this because we believe in information equality. Greater numbers of people can keep track of the global events shaping our world, understand their impact on people and communities, and become inspired to take meaningful action. Millions can benefit from open access to quality, truthful news, regardless of their ability to pay for it.

 
Damn, so jewish homeland has to accomodate this too? Whatever happened to the original holy land bitterly fought for??
Oh wait its the khazars doing all the doings
 
technically doctors can refuse threat anybody even the mentioned politician if the situation is not life threatening . but if he suggest that it happen in life threatening situation i very much like to see the reaction inside Israel about that and if such law pass then i like to see the international reaction to it and how AIPAC propagandist want to spin it in positive light
 
Damn, so jewish homeland has to accomodate this too? Whatever happened to the original holy land bitterly fought for??
Oh wait its the khazars doing all the doings
This is great....Best way to destroy a nation
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom