i dont know what army will buy but they want to save money all the budget go on sallaries and Budgetary pensionsYour not making sense. It either is 2 billion and too expensive to acquire or cheaper and the object of negotiation. Not both
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i dont know what army will buy but they want to save money all the budget go on sallaries and Budgetary pensionsYour not making sense. It either is 2 billion and too expensive to acquire or cheaper and the object of negotiation. Not both
Youneed about 4-5 boats to have 1 out at sea at all times. And that is rather a slim second strike capability....It is not 1 sub but 2-3 according to israel defence journal. I know that the navy need to have better ships but way israel need 7-8 submarines when the navy will have a huge Appgrate in the coming years (saar 6, saar 72) . The saar coverts can protect the gas field.
Secound strik capabilities?
$1.3 billion is the price of 2 submarines I thinkno discount?
why do they subsidize?$1.3 billion is the price of 2 submarines I think
I guess the third is subsidize by germany
Not necessarily, as the navy may pay of the oldest 3 earlier than their service life would require.So israel going to have a fleet of 9 dolphin submarin. In the entire history of the israeli navy israel didn't possess that large quantity of nucler capable sub. That mean the navy going to have a major boost. but the question is why we need large fleet of subs. UK for exampel possess 12 submarin and it is an island. Our surrounded countrys expact egypt dont have even a navy and we have peace treaty with egypt and even if egypt going to have some kind of "arbic spring" and the muslims brotherhood will be in power thier navy is usless aginst us. why not to use that money for the foot soldiers?
@Penguin
@500
Not necessarily, as the navy may pay of the oldest 3 earlier than their service life would require.
I think your view of surrounding navies is too limited (Saudi, Turkish navies?).
So long as you are friend with Turkey maybe.... lets see what happens in Syria first, yes?Turkish navy is not our problems , We even sell turkey weapons. Sudia is USA ally in the ME i cant see even in the far futer war between us and sudia.
But the war israel going to have the near future is with hamas and hizbullah.
Why not to use the 1.3 bilion of dolars in buying systems that can help the infentry like anti tank systems, more attack helicopter, apc, protection systems for tanks and apc, smart artilary(tamuz,atmos).
It is nice to have a big number of sub but we dont need to project power that will never be used. I simply cant see the logic in that.
Even for the second strick capabilities (never going to happened ,lets be realistic)
Israel have m 113 apc that need badly to be replaced. I sereved in the givati brigade and that apc have worse protection then my car.
The reserves soldiers also need improvement.