RazPaK
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2010
- Messages
- 14,056
- Reaction score
- -49
- Country
- Location
All 4 Madhabs? I thought there were more than 4 religions!
I don't know what this clown is going about, like I said he is just troll.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All 4 Madhabs? I thought there were more than 4 religions!
Well the Irish were suspected as terrorist for quite long UK(who know probably even now).
But thats hardly a consolation for muslims, rather it should make an irish guy angry.
Tamils are suspected in lanka.
Non of them had the notoriety because they were not in global scale, like global jihad has.
I know there is some negative feeling about muslims in western world, but I think that is relatively recent phenomena.
There does not seem to be a motive of western media, rather they are just playing along with public mood, and show some bad news(bad news sells).
All 4 Madhabs? I thought there were more than 4 religions!
I don't understand?
I'm talking about the Hanafi, Hanbali, Shafi'ee and Malik'ee school of thought(s).
Muslims being shown as crazy barbarians in western media for 50 years? clearly you are telling lies.Sure the Irish were suspected as terrorists but did the UK invade Ireland and murder 100k+ people?
And what do you mean global scale?
what does "global scale" have anything to do with anything?
All these terrorist groups targeted there perceived oppressors. The Irish targeted the English, the Tamils targeted the government etc etc.
AL quida target America.
Being a global scale, doesn't have anything to do with anything.
And since you are not Muslim I can forgive you for not knowing this but for last 1000 years Europeans (much like many Hindus) have hated Muslims. Unfortunately for us, in the last 500 years they have had the ability to do something about it.
In the last 50 year Muslims have always been presented as crazy barbarians who go around hijacking planes and committing unforgivable crimes such as the Iranian revolution.
If you look at news reports about Muslims in the last 50 years, more than 90% have been negative.
Muslims being shown as crazy barbarians in western media for 50 years, clearly you are telling lies.
Western media shows muslims as oriental, part of a different civilization, and clubbed them with hindus and far east traditions(chinease/japanese) for major part of last 50 years.
Muslims were never treated badly in UK because they were muslims, but rather because they were south asians(clubbed together with hindus again).
Islamophobia is clearly a post 9/11 phenomenon.
Hindu muslim animity in India/pakistan/bangladesh is quite old(including last 50 years), I agree with that part.
Please dont bring crusade to the discussion.
Western tourists thronged in their millions to egypt, turkey, and some north african countries. If that was the popular sentiment, you wont get that many tourist there.
yeah clearly I am telling lies, I mean I obviously have nothing better to do then to sit in front of a computer and tell lies to some random hindu.
you must have been sick when your guru did the class on manners.
as for the rest.
Simply look at articles from western media, and when I say western I mean American because no one cares about the UK.
Most headlines about Muslims in the last 50 years were about radical Nation of Islam, about the crazy Palistinians, and about the nut job Ayatollahs of Iran.
The major narrative was basically how bad Muslims were.
The word "Islamophobia" is a post 9/11 word but the feelings are a thousand years old.
And sorry to shatter your ego but India never really fit into a narrative in the last 50 years, it just wasn't an issue in the west. The biggest thing that happened in India was that the Beatles went there, got high out of their mind on drugs and wrote a few songs.
In the last 10 years the Indian narrative has become that they are telephone salesmen and customer service people.
I think we know that. But there were apparently people who blurred the distinction between an American occupier of their land and an American citizen. You should go ask them why instead of accusing us. Peace.Ramming a military aircraft to an aircraft carrier is not same as ramming a civilian aircraft to a skyscraper.
I think we know that. But there were apparently people who blurred the distinction between an American occupier of their land and an American citizen. You should go ask them why instead of accusing us. Peace.
Not at all, and I don't know what you mean when you say that term (I know the people from the American bible belt are called Christian fundamentalists). I meant Quaida and her sister organisations, from what has been reported in the media.You mean Islamic fundamentalists.
I knew Sir you will not like Him Sir he is a great man and doing a great Job at least he is not ashamed of IslamZarvan dont post that racist fake muslim douche's vids
dont increase his popularity
Sir Geo politics is Part of IslamToo much power in the hands of mullah. Thats main issue with Islam.
I don't thing they teach any Islam after friday prayer. I bet it is mostly on geo-politics.