jamahir
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2014
- Messages
- 28,132
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
what does jamhiriya mean?
"jamahiriya" is a word invented in muammar gadddafi's libya... it refers to libya being "a society governed by the masses"... "a direct democracy "... it derives from two arabi words... "jamah" meaning group or gathering or people... and remotely from "jamhooriya" meaning democracy or modern republic.
this new word, jamahiriya, was needed because the 1969 "al fatah" socialist revolution in libya brought a different concept of government into mainstream, where the people rule themselves... every person participates in governing of this society... "direct democracy"... similar to "referendums" in switzerland but with a socialist political basis... "jamahiriya" is a natural idea, quite scientific.
my user-name, "jamahir", refers to a revolutionary person who forwards the jamahiriya idea, or lives under a jamahiriya system.
in jamahiriya, there is no political party and no elections... what the people decide at local level affects functioning at national level... please read these...
1. ( Refworld | Libya: Great Green Charter of Human Rights of the Jamahiriyan Era )... features of a jamahiriya society.
2. ( The Green Book - I )... details of how a jamahiriya society is arranged in practice.
and there is the idea of "world jamahiriya" where all of humanity is governed under the direct-democracy basis of "jamahiriya".
I dont know about it.
this... ( Why I'm on the brink of burning my israeli passport? | Page 5 )... it has your thanks too.
Any material to back that claim?
even the post above yours, by spade, has hints to the non-hindu origin of zero...
Why are you confusing decimal system symbol (or placeholder) zero with number zero? even mayans wrote 10 (in decimal system). They had different symbol to denote "0" in 10. But they had zero. What Brahmagupta invented is a number, similar to 1. Before him, there was no solution to the problem 1-1 (or 10-10 or 10-11 for that matter). It was considered invalid. I hope you know the difference.
and there would be other sources on the internet... and you know, things like detailed astronomical knowledge were brought to hindus by greeks... how sure are you that mathematics among hindus might not have non-hindu origin??... you see, in history, hindus did not produce any beautiful and grand architectural projects ( like pyramids, alhambra, leaning tower of pisa, great wall of china etc ) nor any machinery ( like that of al-jazari or the automated spinning loom of jacquard ) and so on...
try this Dr Stephen Hawking’s Opinion on the Science in Veda
This is what our upnishad teaches....
oḿ pūrṇam adaḥ pūrṇam idaḿ
pūrṇāt pūrṇam udacyate
pūrṇasya pūrṇam ādāya
pūrṇam evāvaśiṣyate
and that is in reference to zero....
oḿ — the Complete Whole; pūrṇam — perfectly complete; adaḥ — that; pūrṇam — perfectly complete; idam — this phenomenal world; pūrṇāt — from the all-perfect; pūrṇam — complete unit;udacyate — is produced; pūrṇasya — of the Complete Whole; pūrṇam — completely, all; ādāya — having been taken away; pūrṇam — the complete ; eva — even; avaśiṣyate — is remaining.
1. "Institute of Scientific Research on Vedas"?? what does this institute say about other things in veda's like sati and caste-ism??
2. stephen hawking is en route to being discredited.
and levina, you are beginning to sound like indrani... please rewind
Veda: The Origing of the Pure Mathematics - Yougachrya Swami Pranabanandaji Maharaj
the authors of this website were so fanatic about veda's and mathematics that they forgot to correct the spelling for "origin" and to see that "the" should be removed from before "pure mathematics".
Science is based on iteration (observe, hypothesis, experiment and repeat)
true.
But maths is the language of science. Some say it is even language of nature, but lets not go there. Maths can live happily without any science, but not the other way around. And then, I like the dilly-dally you do to complete a single task.
you must be hating maths along with english...
again that misty-eyed self-congratulations... being emotional unnecessarily.
if you want more spec, just draw a line with a pen on a paper which is 10 cm long and start counting number of points in it.
how big is the point?? that has to be told, because otherwise it will be another case of taking maths too seriously.
And there is no line between here and next star system...
refer to your own exercise above.
About microprocessor, why do you tell me? go ahead and sell your idea to mp designing companies. make billions, then it proves what you are telling is true. Else you are just bullshitting. Whoever designed mp is certainly smarter than you. Atleast in oopl you need main.sub structure so as not to confuse with different sub numbers...
my socialist political movement has a microprocessor project... it has new concepts and a socialist basis... and is meant to create much political changes.