jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction score
- 387
- Country
- Location
I understand what you said earlier. My point -- maybe am being too kind -- is that remakes requires a certain amount of creative efforts themselves, and I have read arguments as to why sometimes the creative efforts are the same as trying to be original.
Take Saving Private Ryan, for example. I doubt that anyone is going to even try on paper of remaking that. No telling of a story is perfect or is completely satisfactory to its creator, but sometimes a movie telling a story was done so well that no one will even attempt to retell it. Saving Private Ryan is one end of find storytelling, on the other end is the almost campy Top Gun that I doubt anyone will try to remake that. For the real Top Gun school, supposedly there is a fine for anyone who quote the movie.
Movies tell stories and by extension entertains. Sure there are different kinds of entertainment, some cerebral, some visceral, and some just plain for laughs. If a formula works for the day, it will be followed until it no longer make money.
Well, I guess you and I were talking about different thing actually.
Don't get me wrong, Idea can be recycle, remake does not always means a copy of the original. Take Rec and Quarantine as an example.
REC (film) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quarantine (2008 film) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Now, both film are virtually carbon copy, the only different is the ending, while REC focus on the event with a religious aspect (Being the culprit is the Vatican) and Quarantine focus on the event with a cult aspect, basically the road lead to the ending is the same, the ending is different.
Now, the question, however, is not how these 2 movie represent. But how they branch out after their original instalment, while REC 2 focus on the event immediately before the story of REC (which made REC 2 a prequel) but Quarantine 2 uses a different aspect where the first story (Quarantine) lead to a subsequent event which create an outbreak on a plane.
There are original idea while even the movie is a remake to one another.
But the point I wanted to point out is that, Hollywood producer is getting lazy and unwilling to invest in ideas. It used to be about story telling like you said, that why Hollywood embrace independent production and literally everyone have money and a camera can hit big (This is how Steven Spielberg made his mark by the way). but since 2000s, this is not the game in Hollywood anymore. Where producer have to satisfied "Trent" which were set by other, and promptly follow suit, like "High School Musical" bring out an era of musical related TV/Movie and then it's the Vampire turn (Twilight, True Blood, Vampire Diary), and then it's erotic fantasy turn (50 Shade et el)
Don't get me wrong, the idea of High School musical , twilight or 50 shade is not bad, but making a string of movie at the same category in a short time, it's kind of dry, don't you think>?