What's new

Is rising hindu extremism threat to the region and world peace?

If you are indeed attempting to discuss this seriously and not just troll, here's why you're wrong.

1. Modi did not murder any one. He was accused by some of complicity and by others of inaction during the Gujarat riots. Cases that lasted a decade, pursued, first, by a government that was bent on destroying Modi and, second, by a Supreme Court that even the most disenchanted Muslim respects, found no evidence against him. He asked for police reinforcements from the neighbouring Congress ruled states the day after the riots began. These forces would, presumably, not be amenable to Modi's control. Unfortunately they refused to help. From an unbiased perspective you can either say that Modi was incompetent or you can say he did a damn good job given the enormity of the problem in 2002. Neither makes him an extremist mass murderer.

Sorry, the base on which your argument is built is absolutely flawed. Going by that logic, Mullah Hafiz Saeed also has also not committed any murder and courts have found no evidence against him, how would you feel if he went on to become Pakistan's prime minister?

It is a shame that your Supreme court has not only acquitted him, but allowed him to become the prime minister of India.

By doing so, india has lost all the moral rights to ask Pakistan to arrest and punish Hafiz Saeed (as much as I would like to see him and likes of him behind bars).

The fact is, india is by no means a secular country any more (was she ever?), it is a country being ruled by fundamentalist hindus.
 
.
Let these indians live in their own world. Weather they eradicate all Muslims or protect them is none of our problem. They choose to live there after creation of pakistan so its now their world their problem.
I completely agree with you. Infact this is all we Indians want that you let us live the way we chose to live , and that you don't poke your nose into our business. ( hint: kashmir)

Hafiz Saeed also has also not committed any murder and courts have found no evidence against him, how would you feel if he went on to become Pakistan's prime minister?
Is Modi a UN declared terrorist too? Not only India, Saeed's organization is banned in United States,the United Kingdom,the European Union, Russia and Australia as well.
 
.
I completely agree with you. Infact this is all we Indians want that you let us live the way we chose to live , and that you don't poke your nose into our business. ( hint: kashmir)


.
Kashmir is different its our problem with u. Theres no hindu muslim thing on that issue. The ones who are to be blamed for that are yr Sardar Patel and our armed forces's initial days high command.
 
.
Kashmir is different its our problem with u. Theres no hindu muslim thing on that issue. The ones who are to be blamed for that are yr Sardar Patel and our armed forces's initial days high command.
Nehru is to be blamed, not Patel. If it was up to him there wouldn't be a Kashmir issue as India would have already annexed Kashmir during the Maharaja's rule.
 
.
Sorry, the base on which your argument is built is absolutely flawed. Going by that logic, Mullah Hafiz Saeed also has also not committed any murder and courts have found no evidence against him, how would you feel if he went on to become Pakistan's prime minister?

It is a shame that your Supreme court has not only acquitted him, but allowed him to become the prime minister of India.

By doing so, india has lost all the moral rights to ask Pakistan to arrest and punish Hafiz Saeed (as much as I would like to see him and likes of him behind bars).

The fact is, india is by no means a secular country any more (was she ever?), it is a country being ruled by fundamentalist hindus.

I would feel disgusted if Hafiz Saeed became the Prime Minister of Pakistan. I'm sure those Muslims (and others) who are convinced Modi was behind the Gujarat riots were disgusted when he became Prime Minister.

Ultimately, your argument comes down to a matter of evidence. My belief, based on my understanding of the evidence, is that Modi was not complicit in the riots. My belief, based on my understanding of the evidence presented in Indian and US courts, is that Hafiz Saeed was the mastermind of the Mumbai attacks. I don't believe the two individuals are comparable.

If you do have good reason to believe that Modi endorsed and participated in the murder of 3000 muslims, you can, legitimately, question India's secularism. I would too if that is what I believed.

You say it was a shame the Supreme Court acquitted him. What evidence do you think they disregarded?

You think India is a country ruled by Hindu fundamentalists, I think it's a country ruled by typical centre-right conservative nationalists.
 
.
Is Modi a UN declared terrorist too? Not only India, Saeed's organization is banned in United States,the United Kingdom,the European Union, Russia and Australia as well.

Well not so far in the past, he was almost there and was banned entry to USA and European countries for his role in the mass murder.

I can understand the world, they have to work with India as a counter weight to China. What can you do , if the majority of indians elect such fundamentalist hindus as their prime minister?

West will work with any fundo crook as long as it is in their interest. A fact!
 
. . . .
Hindu fundamentalists ruling India. Muslim fundamentalists ruling Pakistan. Idiots living in Bangladesh. So, what's new ? :undecided:
 
.
Ooo Big threat. Yoda say. Hindoos fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan. Hindoos bump planes into building. Hindoos taking hostages in Sydney. Oooo... Hindoos in China too .. stabbing people... Big threat :cheesy::cheesy:

Fucking retard
 
. .
Last time I checked Praveen Togadia didn't send Bajgrang Bal goons to Karachi to kill 200, so no.
 
. .
Sure why not:

Narindra Modi: Britain can't simply shrug off this Hindu extremist


Need more help to come out of this denial mode?

the article is full of bias .. the author says "The Gujarat pogroms took place after an unexplained fire on a train, which killed Hindu activists " ,and this comment comes after the sit proving that the bogee of the train was put on fire by a mob of 1540 muslim extremists , wich killed 59 , among whom der were 25 women and 15 children only after this hindus went on a rampage ( innocents are dead on both sides but surely it wasnt hinus/bjp/rss who started it ) it was proved in the court that burning of the train was pre planned by Muslim radical group Harkat-ul Jehad-e-Islami .. and 31 of its members are convicted by the court...

Godhra train burning - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

next tym stop reading those biased anti hindu , anti bjp articles and try to get info frm a neutral source...

and abt the role of c.m in the riots is considered , the riots were completely stopped in 3 days wth the entry of army in to the state...

let me tell u tat modi became c.m in 2001 after a massive earthquake in guj , wch destroyed the economy of the state..
he wasn't even a mla before becoming c.m so he didn't hav a governing exp. before this , jst after 9 months of his swearing in the godhra train burning has occured and the reactive response by hindus has taken place . unlike a situation where riots happen at a particular place ,the riots are spread across the state and he couldn't jst control it with the limited existing police force tat is already stretched all along the state.. but, before the army was called in, modi asked for an additional police force from 3 neighbouring states to control the riots( these 3 states form border states of gujarat wth pakistan making the other border) , and all the 3 the states had congress c.m's who refused to send their police forces.. (u see , its politics they want to gain their political advantage over the death of innocents )..
if the que comes abt y central/army forces took so much tym to enter the state.. unlike pakistan there wl be a lot of bureaucratic work required to let army enter in to a state fr safeguarding securuity...

( watch the vdeo frm 2:55)

( watch ths vdeo to knw hw media ,insensitively played part in promoting the voilence )

and abt u r comments on majority of indians supporting 2002 riots by electing him , and calling india non-secular ... do u knw hw he has been ostracised by indian media, parties, politicians ?? after 2002 riots , BJP lost the national election even after doing tremondous work on development front , they improved the economic growth from a mere 3-4% to 8.2%. and vajpayee being the most sought after P.M even in kashmir valley..stl they lost the election, only bcz the majority of india felt wrong wth wat happend in gujarat... so stop questioning us on our secular credentials .....

it took modi a 3 consecutive wins in his state , with exceptional growth in his state and wth a minimum corruption levels and court declaring him to be non-guilts in the riots to be acceptable to the majority of india..

in an other post u wer comparing u r judiciary system wth ours .. do u knw all the perpetrators of the 2002 riots were convicted by the court , wch included a minister frm modi's own cabinet ??? stl u want to compare hafiz saeed wth modi ?? and pak judiciary wth ours ( i dnt want to gve lnks abt u r judiciary where a lawyer who supported punjab gov. assasinator is now a judge in kpk court) ??

if u stl want to look at him wth u r biased eyes , it doesn't matter to us .. it was we who elected him as our P.M and we are fine wth it , in the last elections almost 10-15% muslims of india voted for his party .... he is already accepted a section of muslims and the rest wl run over tym...

if u feel this is going to bring our country dwn , be it.. anyway isn't it the wsh of pakistan to see india fall ?? it was our choice and we wl be facng watever the consequences are.. thanks..
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom