And I thought ramblings was your mother tongue!! Apparently, it was all you had done up there.
Au contraire, I would have easily understood what you rambled about if it was my mother tongue, but you are not the smartest bloke around anyway.
So the Chief of the Armed forces was a fool and you and your kind are smarter?? LOL!!!!
Kid, Kargil was a brilliance, a once in a lifetime opportunity that was lost because of fools like you and your kind! Kargil was the jugular of India and the idea was never to keep it a secret indefinitely. I mean you are so darned low on IQ, it does not even occur to you, that it was meant to force India to back down from Siachin and possibly to force India to the negotiation table in regards to Kashmir. What kind of traitor would want to find a permanent solution to Siachin & Kashmir????
What amazes me further is your negligence to the fact that the fighters, who had volunteered for the mission, were meant to survive on low rations and that their supply lines could just never be cut off completely unless India crossed the LoC. There are so many things that you fail to understand that there is no point in me wasting my time on your education.
Now your are forcing me to stoop down to the level of a lalookheti goon, but I will remain composed and polite just to make you feel out of place. I will try to ignore the insults and stick to the topic at hand.
Kargil was not a new idea Zia was also given a specific briefing on such a plan which he had turned down immediately, he was definitely more realist than Musharraf. You must have read the following conversation took place between him and the then DGMO.
Zia:When we take Kargil, what do you expect the Indians to do? . . . I mean, don’t you think they will try and recapture it?
DGMO: Yes sir, but we think that the position is impregnable and we can hold it against far superior forces.
Zia: Now that’s very good, but in that case, don’t you think the Indians will go for a limited offensive elsewhere along the line of control, take some of our territory, and use it as a bargaining chip?
DGMO: Yes sir, this is possible, but . . .
Zia: And if they are beaten back there also, don’t you think they will attack across the international frontier, which may lead to a full-scale war?
DGMO:That’s possible, sir.
Zia: So in other words, you have prepared a plan to lead us into a full-scale war with India!
After the debacle of 1965 war it had become clear to the Pakistani establishment that India would never hesitate to attack on the international borders if it feels to be on a disadvantageous position along the LoC in Kashmir. Judging by the fact that compare to Pakistan India is a military and economic giant and enjoys solid support of international community due to various reasons, it will be Pakistan that will come out as a loser in the wake of any all-out-war against India. Where did I say that it was meant to be kept secret indefinitely? Even assuming such a thing speaks volume about your mental level. India eventually cut off all the supply lines and its air force even crossed the LoC which shows their determination and seriousness. Musharraf should be thankful that his little adventure didn't escalate into an all-out-war, otherwise the outcome of that war would be quite detrimental for Pakistan.