Well - there is that Romanian video on youtube - even as the Tibetans are moving towards India seeking refugee status - the Chinese Army is shooting at them.
I have a bunch of Nepali friends with the last name Shakya - you can just Google "Shakya" you know. But since you prefer to entertain us with your antics - it is a win win.
You missed my "occasionally" there.
I'm no archeologist to prove to you that it came from this place. But you can refer to well-known archeologists. In layman terms, because you are so thick-skulled, whatever is posted on Wikipedia is moderated, especially when it comes to Buddhism, which is a sensitive topic for millions of people. So, it is not me and few Indians who claim it's from India, but millions of Buddhists who take the pilgrimage to Lumbini, or Bodh Gaya.
Buddy, you need to get some help. In one line you claim you have no idea how Shakya looks, second you claim they should look like East Asian. Even Nepali people do not look like East Asian.
While Chinese infested their food with frigging opium. LOL
What makes you think the Shakyans look anything like the people presently occupying the area that the ancient Shakyans once inhabited.I'm no archeologist to prove to you that it came from this place. But you can refer to well-known archeologists. In layman terms, because you are so thick-skulled, whatever is posted on Wikipedia is moderated, especially when it comes to Buddhism, which is a sensitive topic for millions of people. So, it is not me and few Indians who claim it's from India, but millions of Buddhists who take the pilgrimage to Lumbini, or Bodh Gaya.
Why not? He was sitting in the exact place and that's why Mahabodhi tree is important in Buddhism. Leaving a lifestyle means you are abandoning it. Buddha didn't preach his kshatriya lifestyle. That's what it is in Lumbini.
Now that you are an oxymoron who asks for proof for the existence of Buddha. Your issue is pathological. Take it this way, there was no reason for Buddha to write it down, it was his disciples who spread it to Magadha. Ashoka came more than 100 years later. Even during that time, Buddha was revered and worshipped in Bodh gaya. What Ashoka did was preserve the tree (which was destroyed many times after him).
Buddha was doing Yoga though. Surprise? All the archeological excavations show Buddha in yogic position. Also, the correlation between Buddhist texts and sculptures from Ashoka were all in Prakrit.
Buddy, you need to get some help. In one line you claim you have no idea how Shakya looks, second you claim they should look like East Asian. Even Nepali people do not look like East Asian.
Do you want to know how Shakya look? Just look at which region they were part of at the time. They were not part of East Asia or even Tibeto - Burman region. They speak the same language as rest of India. Language has strong correlation with ethnicity. East Asia had no Indio-aryan language. Please prove me otherwise.
Or at least a minute relation between the Chinese and Sanskrit language which proves the exchange of people at the time.
My comment is not based on assumptions. while your entire point is with assumptions and not to mention hate. Just cant accept fact.
While Chinese infested their food with frigging opium. LOL
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-35381169
Because the Shakyans were Aryans only they spoke languages of Indo-Aryan family. They spoke the same language like the others. While the South Indians formed a different language group because people were different in the sense. The Tibetans Speak different language altogether, Lumbini is just geographically in Nepal right now by few miles it should have been in India. And where did I abuse you snowflake? Get your Sikh friend and have him read some history else you won't say these kinds of half-cooked stories about India. If you want to prove they speak Prakrit, look at their names. Buddhas mother is Maya devi, Devi meaning Devine and Maya meaning illusion in Sanskrit.
Spouting nonsense again.Because the Shakyans were Aryans only they spoke languages of Indo-Aryan family. They spoke the same language like the others. While the South Indians formed a different language group because people were different in the sense. The Tibetans Speak different language altogether, Lumbini is just geographically in Nepal right now by few miles it should have been in India. And where did I abuse you snowflake? Get your Sikh friend and have him read some history else you won't say these kinds of half-cooked stories about India. If you want to prove they speak Prakrit, look at their names. Buddhas mother is Maya devi, Devi meaning Devine and Maya meaning illusion in Sanskrit.
Now, since you are running out of points you are deflecting the topic. That was a pathetic attempt though.
Your argument is bound by hatred of India, hence it's skewed. No matter what I prove, you just can't accept the fact we were part of a great civilization of philosophical thinking. There is no cure for that.
Good day.
Look buddy I don't give a damn about your language. What China has to do with the birth of Buddha?
Maybe it is too difficult for you to comprehend such simple concepts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_NepalBecause the Shakyans were Aryans only they spoke languages of Indo-Aryan family. They spoke the same language like the others. While the South Indians formed a different language group because people were different in the sense. The Tibetans Speak different language altogether, Lumbini is just geographically in Nepal right now by few miles it should have been in India. And where did I abuse you snowflake? Get your Sikh friend and have him read some history else you won't say these kinds of half-cooked stories about India. If you want to prove they speak Prakrit, look at their names. Buddhas mother is Maya devi, Devi meaning Devine and Maya meaning illusion in Sanskrit.
Now, since you are running out of points you are deflecting the topic. That was a pathetic attempt though.
Your argument is bound by hatred of India, hence it's skewed. No matter what I prove, you just can't accept the fact we were part of a great civilization of philosophical thinking. There is no cure for that.
Good day.
Neolithic era (6000+ years old)?
Fast forward 3000 years. We will reach Bronze and Iron age. Now, we are in Buddha's era. One who spoke Pali, according to the excavations and Pali canons preserved in Sri Lanka. The teachings were translated into oral traditions. Buddha was not a Hunter-gatherer but of royal origin.You can still find East Asians/Mongoloid in present day Nepal and North East India.Neolithic era (6000+ years old)?
Secondly, your own link says excavations happened outside Lumbini, more than hundred miles away from where Buddha lived. Everything that happened to him every name connected to Buddha is in Prakrit. Buddha's mother, Father, Son, Wife. This is not an Indian coverup.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_ten_principal_disciples
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Śuddhodana
If you are saying they are Pali speaking east Asians, wrong. The Sanskrit language was spoken by Indo - Aryan people. Not Mongoloid people. In fact if you want real Mongoloid people, search History of Bhutan.
I am quoting Indian infested Wiki for your reference, as you are Indian, believe what you will.Again, where is the proof that they are East Asian rather quoting their story? And you are a series oxymoronic comments, so no records of Shakyas were found but you are saying they got massacred.
It's not BS, you can't face the fact in the process you are only disproving yourselves. When you quote these sources, please do check their name. All Sanskrit names. Either Ashoka was naming people and rewriting history, or they were Indo-Aryans who spoke Indio- Aryan languages. Not someone who spoke Tibeto Burmese languages because there are people in Nepal who speak Tibeto -Burman languages and Tibetan names. And Present day, Nepal is not the same of BC400 - 200. A lot of things happened, from Mahajanapakas to Rajputs who ruled the place.
Lastly, what happened to India infested Wikipedia. You are fully relying on Wikipedia. Full of contradictions.
aww! That's so sweet of you. I couldn't care any less about you. So save it.
I own up to my words, I never claimed China is something. I don't speak for anyone else. So, what anyone says about China, in a non-issue here. We are talking about the influence India had culturally on China.
Says you. I asked you to prove your claim, rather than giving your intuition. Since most historians agree on the fact that Shakyans indeed spoke Indo - Aryan languages. That means they are in no way connected to East Asians. Sanskrit names didn't come after hundreds of years, it was there even before Buddha. Say more than 1000 years before. Now do not claim Shakyas are nameless people. Why do you think his disciples would rename them?
If you can't accept those proofs out of hatred for India it's fine.
Desperate attempt dude. Soo desperate.
