IRIAF | News and Discussions

[yavar]

So... What do you think @yavar ?

about what ??

 

[SOHEIL]

about what ??

The model !!!

 

[yavar]

The model !!!

i already said what i tought

70 time better as you know very well there is few project

we have to wait for Qaher hopefully maybe i said maybe they show Qaher soon this year or next year

 

[mike2000]

Your obsession with Turkey is unbelievable.

Could you act against Turkey an guarantor state when we invaded Cyprus ?? Talk is cheap my friend.

Who told u im talking about Turkey? Or do you think Turkey depends on NATO for protection and tech transfer?

 

[-SINAN-]

Who told u im talking about Turkey?

Don't play the stupid, mate.

Or do you think Turkey depends on NATO for protection and tech transfer?

Nope...

 

[mike2000]

Don't play the stupid, mate.


Nope...

Huh...who is playing Stupid?You alone quoted a sentence from my long post and attributed it to Turkey. Nobody did that but you. So i dont know why you think that, it applies to Turkey.

 

[Skull and Bones]

Serves well as a light fighter and advanced trainer.

 

[SOHEIL]

Serves well as a light fighter and advanced trainer.

Yes ... i can't understand the problem with people !

This is just a goddamn trainer ...

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

Dissecting the latest generation Saegheh fighter, from new body to Iranian radar

Thanks to the posters at IMF, that is where I got this report. Of course, non-Persian speakers like myself need Google translator.

 

[The SC]

A copy of an F-5 however, good step ahead indeed congrats to all Iranian brothers .

F-16 blocks 52 or 60 are copies of F-16A, however...

 

[TOPGUN]

F-16 blocks 52 or 60 are copies of F-16A, however...

That makes simply no sense lolz

 

[The SC]

That makes simply no sense lolz

Put it in its context of an answer to the guy saying that the latest Saequa is just a copy of the F-5. That is as true as saying that the F-16 block 52 is a copy of the F-16A, C or 15...etc, which obiously makes no sense.

 

[VelocuR]

Great progress but I have question - why Iran developed simple flat thin design, no muscle?

similar to missiles, satellites, and now this plane.

 

[TOPGUN]

put it in its context of the guy saying that the latest Saequa is just a copy of the F-5. That is as true as saying that the F-16 block 52 is a copy of the F-16A, C or 15...etc

No its not as all each blk f-16 blocks are newer upgrades of the original f-16 or have some differences its a huge difference in words and in reality with facts . Hence, the fighter Iran made is simply a "copy" with some modifications there is a huge difference from what that guy , you and from what I am saying simply I just state the facts although I am very much happy for them Iran that is .

 

[Arminkh]

Great progress but I have question - why Iran developed simple flat thin design, no muscle?

similar to missiles, satellites, and now this plane.

Cost efficiency. No point in overkilling it when you know you are lagging behind in technology.

For satellites it is a totally different reason. They are all experimental, each testing a different aspect of putting a satellite in geo orbit.

No its not as all each blk f-16 blocks are newer upgrades of the original f-16 or have some differences its a huge difference in words and in reality with facts . Hence, the fighter Iran made is simply a "copy" with some modifications there is a huge difference from what that guy , you and from what I am saying simply I just state the facts although I am very much happy for them Iran that is .

They are not exactly the same. Saeghe is 10% larger. Compare the dimensions of both F-5 and Saeghe in Wikipedia.