What monarchs? What they have in gulf are modern states.
Not my problem if you lack grasp of basic English. Go look up the definition of "monarchy" (rather than "monarchs", by the way, which I did not use). It follows that according to you, the UK or Belgium are no "modern states". That is good to know.
All GCC states are monarchies. Just stating an obvious fact, get over it.
Those states are open to all world, unlike Iran where IRGC acts as thugs not only in Iran, but as well in Pakistan.
Much like the zionists whom you seem to draw inspiration from, you are resorting to projection here.
I have news for you: the world is dominated by a ruling oligarchy of genocidal, murderous zionist / bankster / corporate / masonist thugs. Being "open to all the world" is thus not something to particularly pride oneself in.
Resisting this anti-human global order, as the IRGC does, is everything but thuggish. It is highly honorable indeed.
All target killing rackets in Pakistan were operated by Iranian puppies in Pakistan, beside sabotaging every positive development.
1) No, they weren't.
2) Do not try to deflect from the topic at hand when proven wrong.
Similarly behind Iraq death brigades were Iranian puppies that used religion to kill, rape, plunder etc. while US had same objective objective.
The zio-American designed ISIS were involved and responsible for all those events. Nothing to do with Iran.
Any and all civil strife in Iraq was triggered by the bombing in February 2006 of the Al-Askari shrine, holy to Shia Muslims. Prior to that, no such mutual killings of civilians had taken place.
A Tunisian member of Al-Qaida in Iraq confessed to being responsible for the terrorist shrine bombing, along with four Saudi nationals.
Al-Qaida in Iraq's founder, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a tattooed former street thug from Jordan and a veteran of the Afghanistan war against the Soviets, had made public his goal of attacking Shia civilian and religious targets in order to ignite a "Shia-Sunni" civil war. In other words, the perfect candidate for handling by the CIA and Mossad. Much lke the so-called al-Baghdadi, who was released from a US prison camp before taking the lead of IS / ISIS.
Now you are outright fantasizing, and quite ridiculously so.
According to official American statements, the IEDs were Iranian-made.
Outside of that, there is literally not a single source of information anywhere in the world attributing these devices to "India", nevermind the absurdity of pretending that India would have engaged in targetting US forces in Iraq.
If I were you, I would at least try not to be that ridiculous. With such utter trash talk, you are only hurting the standing and credibility of your own anti-Iran camp.
and may be they used puppies like Zanibions and Fatimions to produce them in Iraq or Iran, that doesn't matter.
What exactly are you trying to gabble here?
Let's repeat it once more: according to official US regime statements, Iran extended military support to Iraqi resistance groups, resulting in the suppression of many hundreds of Yankee occupation troops.
Consequently, Iran and the US are not and were never "allies" in the Iraqi theater, they are enemies.
By the way, Zeynabioun and Faatemioun brigades did not exist at the time. Both these units were created years after the events under discussion.
In Afghanistan objective again objective was same to kill as many pashtoon villagers but to reach them out was easier with US helicopters, demographic shift confirms the quite genocide.
Iran does not and did not pursue the objective of "killing Pashtun vilagers", nor is it interested in any genocide anywhere. Iran is after securing its interests as a state, but also after resisting the zio-American-dominated regional and global order, which in turn is quintessentially genocidal.
When former US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, a bona fide zionist openly states on CNN that, I quote, "it was worth it" to mass-slaughter 500,000 Iraqi children, you know who the genocidal one is.
Iran has no bearing whatsoever on US actions on Afghanistan. As good as any Afghan grouping hostile or opposed to Iran enjoys assistance from Washington.
Otherwise US is the biggest consumer of Iranian oil in Afghanistan.
Iran does not deal with the US military and does not sell them any oil.
US forces did not enter Afghanistan through Iran. Guess from which bases they invaded that land?
Geroge Bush and Obama were best Iranian friends,
George Bush, either senior or junior, was an outspoken and hysterical enemy of Iran and anything Iranian.
Bush senior kept sanctioning Iran under a "twin containment" policy that was explicitly targetting both Iraq and Iran, while Bush junior dared place Iran on his so-called "axis of evil", his rabid neocon cabal is noted for supporting anti-Iranian armed terrorist and separatist groups, Iranian diplomats in Iraqi Kurdistan were abducted and tortured by Bush's G.I., it was under Bush junior that the US began, under zionist guidance, to use the peaceful Iranian nuclear dossier as a pretext to exert all manner of pressures on Iran, etc etc.
Same goes for Obama, who, contrary to his "Republican" counterparts, attempted a more subtle approach based on ruse rather than on brute force, that is, to strengthen the hand of the liberal pro-western fifth-column inside Iran - not the IRGC, not general Soleimani, not Supreme Leader Khamenei, but their reformist and moderate/centrist rivals who negotiated the JCPOA and were willing to give away Iran's missile power, so that Iran would disarm in a similar manner as Libya's Gaddafi did, which would have prepared the ground for ulterior military aggression against Iran, or for a "syrianization" of Iran through western- and zionist-backed armed groups.
Furthermore it was under Obama that the US regime, along with its European puppets, plunged Iran's ally Syria into civil war by arming and commanding the rebellion against the Syrian government (NATO-led command rooms for the Syrian insurgency were located both in Turkey and Jordan).
Leading "Democrat" figures in the US (including above cited zionist Madeleine Albright) published an open letter explicitly reminding that their goal with regards to Iran is identical to that pursued by their "Republican" counterparts. This says it all.
helped Iran to spread terrorism in entire region, by all means.
Nowhere has Iran been involved in "spreading" any sort of "terrorism". The terrorism we witnessed accross the region in the form of AQI / IS / ISIS and other extremist groups was designed and implemented by NATO, the zionist regime and their regional clients.
The zio-US regime has unrelentlessly sought to undermine Iran and its regional allies ever since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, sparing no effort and no criminal means to that end.
Now the current US president is sitting on heavy evidences being collected of Iranian terrorism in region,
The current zionist-controlled US president, who among other things is catering to islamophobic lobbies, is as credible when it comes to Iran as any one of his predecessors, that is not one bit.
I never realized I was conversing with a Muslim Pakistani Trump-apologist..! Some never cease to surprise.
while Pakistan is not willing to share evidence of Iran's terrorist history against Pakistan's sovreignity.
Because there is no such thing. Kudos to Pakistan.
