WinterNights
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2018
- Messages
- 1,222
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
"small country like Iran". I know these Americans are not known for the intelligence and/or geography skills but godamn that comment made me lol.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
American obsession with Iran. They bark how a “small country” like Iran, and they show Afghanistan while they talk about Iran !!!Iran, hands down, is now the pioneer of drone warfare! Such operation using so many drones at the same time is unprecedented!
Maybe Iran is using Antman?!!
Well Iran has an area of 1/6 of that of US and a population of almost 1/4 of US. So comparatively, we are a small country. There is nothing wrong with that. Even more credit to IranAmerican obsession with Iran. They bark how a “small country” like Iran, and they show Afghanistan while they talk about Iran !!!
Iran is 17th largest (considering Caspian sea part of Iran, Iran is 12th largest) country in the world. Iran is as large as half of Europe. PS. USA is not a country but an stolen occupied land...Well Iran has an area of 1/6 of that of US and a population of almost 1/4 of US. So comparatively, we are a small country. There is nothing wrong with that. Even more credit to Iran
There is one truth: Iran has no communication satellite in orbit.
Russian or Chinese channels granted to Iran can't be regarded as secure.
The new SATCOM variant of the S-129 could be instead a long range, line of sight, directional data-link.
You would need one S-129 in the target area, and another near home. The communication relay created could bridge significant distance, up to several hundreds of km.
This exercise was stated as 1000-1200km distance (distance to Israel). This sounds to large for such a link but 600km would certainly be in the realm of possibility. However I don't have enough info in this field to go beyond that.
This concept would also mean that the communication S-129 could still be 50-100km behind the drone that does the targeting and the swarm that would do the bombing. Even if taken out, the swarm would just do an automatic static bombing of pre-programmed targets or return back home on autopilot.
Infact SATCOM is still many years away, why should the IRGC-ASF already now field such a S-129 variant of long range directional air data-link was not the goal?
Ok some notes:
The S-191 in the exercise have their bomb-bay door disassembled: Maybe the RCS was too low for them to be tracked by ground radar (concerning airspace safety regulations).
Seems that 20 S-12X bombers were used
8-10 S-191
4? S-129 (two with directional data-link?)
5? prop-Saehge, probably higher in numbers
and at least 2 older low-end Sadeq.
So its close the the number of 50. All apparently from one small base.
In terms of firepower this results in 80-100 Sadid variants and soft targets killed.
I suspect that there are many americans who still wouldnt even know where iran was on a map,or that iran isnt even an arab country or sunni state for that matter."small country like Iran". I know these Americans are not known for the intelligence and/or geography skills but godamn that comment made me lol.
The problem is the targeting equipment on S-129 don't have that range.That S-129 establishes a omni-directional link to a "non-SATCOM" older S-129 variant with targeting payload at 100km distance.
That S-129 then has omni-directional link to the whole swarm that is 10km ahead of it bombing the target.
The distance sum would be 1210km.
why do you think General Hejazi insisted on UCAVs flew 1200km before hitting their targets pinpoint!?Note that a map of Israel is behind the command center displays during Gen. Salamis statement
why do you think General Hejazi insisted on UCAVs flew 1200km before hitting their targets pinpoint!?
Imagine 100s of missiles (heavy warheads) fired first to Israel and then a swarm of +500 UCAVs carry on simultaneously to finish the job and give the damage report!
Given a rational 50% loss of all missiles and UCAVs... Still Israel is finished for the first wave of strike... Specially of targets are chosen strategically...
btw, the more opposition pressure the people inside Iran for an uprising and regime change the closer we will be for such an attack from timing point of view ... if u know what I mean!
Yes but if it is necessary these cheap UCAVs can stay there in Israel as a kamikazi too!! Still the same effectif they flew 1200 km to get to target that mean they have to fly back 1200 km to land which make it 2400 km range UCAV before that IRGC said saeghe has range of 1000 km.