TruthHurtz
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2016
- Messages
- 1,610
- Reaction score
- -21
- Country
- Location
Hey, were the protestors against the Shah that came out freaks too? How was that protest okay and not this. Ultimately the difference then was the compassionate of the Iranian army who decided not to shoot for the Shah . Here the Govt has no qualms about shooting.
Had Iran not had its 1979 occur this way (via protests against the regime's rpactices) , your point may make some sense.
Don't mine my words, I am referring to the groups that would tear Iran apart if they came to power, separatists, MEK etc. I didn't make a judgement about 1979, it was very messy, leading to nationwide purges of the military and political class, international isolation and ultimately a devastating war with Iraq. Many of the same people who came out to protest against the Shah are currently in the west demanding another one because it didn't go their way the first time. My point is that Iranians should avoid repeating the same chain of events as while the first time they attained freedom from foreign meddling, the next time they will become slaves to it, and the sacrifice of all those who gave their lives will be in vain. Not fun, be careful what you wish for and seek internal reforms, Iran is not North Korea, how the country prosecuted things like drug offenses 20 years ago is quite different now, change is possible and has happened. People in the clerical and political class won't live forever and new, younger faces will come through who will be open to new ideas. Iran is a revolutionary state and should remain as such, it sets an example for others that slavery to the unipolar Zio-American empire is a choice. And Iranians have been at the tip of the spear since the revolution,
I propose that Iran relax hijab laws and ban gender transition surgeries (disgusting wtf Iran)