Iranian Chill Thread

[Xerxes22]

You are yourself lackey of some other country so at least you should not make such comments.At least You should not talk about self respect and honour.
You are bangali but i have never seen a single post of yours in Bangladesh related threads.

Have some shame.
And political stability in Pakistan is our problem.you have no right to say shit about us.
And one thing more,all no confidence dramma was well in Pakistan's constitutional framework.It was only overruled due to US involvement.So it is not easy for any one to topple Pakistani Government.

Hahahahahaha....says the guy who sniffs around all day on iranian thead trying to find weakness lol...if i say anything at all about Bangladesh - Pakistan history u will run to moderators crying and complaining lmao. Want me to burst ur false macho bravado based on historical facts? Be my guest.

 

[sha ah]

But the Romans and Greeks were largely slave owners and advocated homosexuality. The Romans even fought three slave uprisings called the Serville wars. In the third war they fought the legendary gladiator, freedom fighter Spartacus.

The USA was also founded by slave owners and they fought in the civil war over slavery where the North basically waged a brutal and vicious war to free the slaves. Lincoln said that no states which joined the union could leave the union. However nothing like that had been mentioned when the southern states had initially joined the union.

In stark contrast, Cyrus the great freed slaves everywhere he went which was completely mind blowing and unheard of back then. Also he established the first human rights, establishing the first real liberal society and it was a multi ethnic empire. The empire established by Cyrus was actually ideologically more than 2 millennium ahead of its time.

And yet if you look beyond Nazi Germany

Most of the worst genocides in human history by death toll were done by African, Middle Eastern, Asian countries (Japan) including Ottoman Empire as well as Russia/Soviet Union

List of genocides - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

So again, your blinders are focused on Western powers while you ignore rest of human history.

While Colonial powers are responsible for insensibly drawing borders of many regions, it is those regions themselves that for the next hundreds of year infighted with one another over petty power plays (Africa and Middle East)

 

[TheImmortal]

In stark contrast, Cyrus the great freed slaves everywhere he went which was completely mind blowing and unheard of back then. Also he established the first human rights, establishing the first real liberal society and it was a multi ethnic empire. The empire established by Cyrus was actually ideologically more than 2 millennium ahead of its time.

Intresting you must have had a time machine because records of the Persians empires administrative policies are few and far in between. If your source is Cyrus Cylinder than you might as well be quoting from ancient times version of Fox News....propaganda. Royal accounts and tablets are very unreliable as they seek to portray governments in favorable light. Persia was no exception to this, what actually took place across the empire could have been very different.

How would Cyrus know where slaves were used? A simple message would take weeks if not months to arrive depending on where it was coming from. Cyrus likely inherited the Babylon practice of slavery when he conquered them and absorption of theirs laws and practices. Though a definitive conclusion either way can’t be made or at least I haven’t come across it.

Cyrus cylinder is similar to other cylinder from antiquities mainly propaganda.

The fact is Persian society on issue of abolishment of slavery or proponent of slavery is unknown, their simply isn’t enough recovered data. Greeks wrote about Persians, but official accounts are limited to some documents and tablets from Persepolis. Not enough to generate a clear consensus on what was going on across the empire during that time.

We know much more about Greeks and Romans than we do about Persian society.

 

[BigMelatonin]

And yet if you look beyond Nazi Germany

Most of the worst genocides in human history by death toll were done by African, Middle Eastern, Asian countries (Japan) including Ottoman Empire as well as Russia/Soviet Union

List of genocides - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

So again, your blinders are focused on Western powers while you ignore rest of human history.

This list conveniently leaves off the majority of European colonial genocides such as the Belgian genocide in the Congo, the British genocide in Bengal, or the French genocide in Algeria.

I guess if we're defining genocide as something only non-whites and Nazis (apparently an exception to otherwise benevolent European civilization) can do then you would be right. Aimé Cesaire puts it perfectly, the true crime of the Holocaust wasn't that they did but who they did it to. The did to Europeans what had been reserved only for their colonial subjects.

And Japan is an exception, since the Meiji restoration, they endeavored to rapidly westernize and, after studying Europe and it's history, decided to skip ahead to the inevitable end form of monopoly capitalism - fascism. They created the zaibatsus, some of which continue to exist to this day, and created a myth of racial superiority, in true European fashion, to justify their atrocities.

 

[Muhammad Saftain Anjum]

Hahahahahaha....says the guy who sniffs around all day on iranian thead trying to find weakness lol...if i say anything at all about Bangladesh - Pakistan history u will run to moderators crying and complaining lmao. Want me to burst ur false macho bravado based on historical facts? Be my guest.

I visit every active thread but reply if it has anything to do with Pakistan.

But you a bangali will visit every thread and reply on only Iranian threads.
Its that you are either false flagger indian or some bangali folk who is brainwashed by mullahs to serve other countries instead of thinking and proposing solutions for the progress of your own country.
So at least you should not talk about self respect related issues as you have no self respect.

And i know 1971 history well.
There is no point to discuss it again and again.We fought our wars lost or won is another issue.We will fight again if anyone challenges our sovereignty but this time there is no question of single sided loss because we have nuclear weapons to end the aggressor country once and for all.

 

[SalarHaqq]

China has only recently came to power. So the jury is out on how it would rule versus the US. Even though today China is quite powerful it is still able to be sanctioned. Something that was made quite clear if it supplied Russia with arms.
arms.

US can wage any war without retribution of sanctions. Who will sanction it? EU? Canada? Australia? Japan? Almost all major economies give US a blank check to do what it wants. This makes starting wars quite easy when you have no worry about what the world will think.

China does not have this luxury and likely never will as long as Western world order leads this world. So it has to play its cards much more shrewdly and win over countries differently.

We can legitimately examine how present day China compares to the early stages of US militarism, when the American regime was vulnerable to potential counterreaction from the powers of old. And yet, as other users have underscored, the US regime has been an interventionist and expansionist one from its very inception.

All the Monroe doctrine did prior to World War I was to confine this aggressiveness to a certain geographical expanse, namely the American continent, although even that wasn't an absolute rule seeing how the US colonized the Philippines and occupied Hawaii in the late 19th century. The rationale behind that doctrine was mostly that the US regime was not powerful enough yet to embark on a venture of global conquest. Again as other users highlighted, these episodes gave rise to some of the most awful crimes of the colonial era against indigenous peoples.

This is beside the staggering number of military interventions launched by the US regime on sovereign territory of Latin American states, beside the mid-19th century war waged against the fellow freemason regime of Mexico (followed by the steal of the regions of New Mexico, Utah, Nevada, Arizona, California, Texas and western Colorado), beside the conflict against Spain triggered by a probable American false flag operation.

Let's not forget how at its core, the US regime came into being as a result of genocide. Which practically caused the extinction of the native north American population. This is another major criterion setting apart the USA, shaping its political outlook as well as the way it deals with the rest of the world.

China's reservedness is not only due to the risk of US sanctions. The underlying difference in ideologies and geopolitical worldviews is paramount. Messianist Christian zionists, believers in rapture theology as well as freemasons (fervent messianists in their own right) are the main founders of the US polity. Unbridled interventionism, craving for global dominance and pretension to determine the fate of the human species, to impose a universal order of governance are part and parcel of the political essence of the US regime. This isn't the case of China.

Short of dramatic, resounding actions, there's a lot Beijing could do in terms of imperialist intervention in various parts of the world without risking game changing sanctions from America. However, China is deliberately refraining from such policies.

Furthermore, China's foreign policy is fundamentally predicated upon efforts to preserve regional balance, upon avoidance of and non-intervention into third party conflicts, as well as upon maintaining diplomatic and extensive trade ties with all sides. This is running counter to habitual American policy making.

Another point to consider is that unlike other such undertakings by Washington, any serious sanctions regime against China will come at a considerable and immediate economic cost to the USA itself.

At any rate, given that the initial question was related to the consequences Pakistan would face if it ditched the US and made China its sole major strategic partner, the reply would be that in such an event, Islamabad would not be subjected to the same sort of dependence nor to comparable curtailment of its sovereignty, irregardless of the reasons for China's non-interventionist stance on the international scene.

 

[SalarHaqq]

Let's see what happens.
If Imran came to power again,he will be clearly Anti US.
Otherwise US puppets are here to rule Pakistan again.

You will probably hear lots of discouraging narratives and propaganda from the west and its local Pakistani clients, pretending it'd be the end of the world for Pakistan if she dared distance herself from the US regime. I'd recommend not to pay much attention to these, nor to let them have any impact.

And I hope Pakistani people will show lots of support for their Prime Minister in his commendable struggle to assert Pakistan's sovereignty against the single biggest contemporary threat to national self-determination, namely the relentless, patronizing and extremely detrimental interventionism of the US empire.

Cuba, which is not particularly rich in mineral resources, has stood its ground for over seven decades against the American superpower right next door. So has the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, despite many limitations of its own. Where there's a will, there's a way and Pakistan has what it takes to stand up to Washington and reorient her foreign policy and geopolitical outlook.

With the obvious exception of eastern borders with India, the US cannot use any of Pakistan's remaining three neighbors (Iran, Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, China) as a staging ground and territorial basis for destabilization attempts or proxy attacks. The main challenge to overcome will be America's domestic clients in the political, military and economic spheres.

Pakistan will be able to count on various forms of assistance from influential players if she attempts to break free from chronic US bullying though. China will be on board. So will Russia. Afghan Taleban will welcome it.

And so will Iran. If the current political stand off results in sustained aggressiveness from Washington, Tehran will doubtlessly offer its support to Islamabad. Unconfirmed reports are already circulating that Imran Khan held talks with Iranian authorities a day prior to his recent move, although I'm incapable of gauging their credibility. But Khan's Tweet referencing the battle of Karbala and Imam Hussein's (a.s.) steadfastness in defense of haqq against batel suggests to me that they may perhaps not be too far off after all. Either way, any open hostility by the US against Pakistan would bear great potential for enhanced bilateral ties between Iran and Pakistan, which in turn might contribute to improved coordination of security measures and result in pacifying border areas as well.

Moreover, certain US allies like Turkey are bound to preserve their links with Pakistan. In Turkey's case, Iran could function as a land bridge for the transportation of commodities to Pakistan, either by rail (the connection between the three nations was reactivated recently, right on time), or by road (the bulk of the route on Iranian soil consists of highways). Iran would certainly be glad to provide dirt cheap energy (such as in gaseous form if Pakistan completes its stretch of the IP pipeline) to help Pakistan resist pressures from Washington.

Resisting the empire induces efforts and sacrifice however self-determination is priceless, particularly to a Muslim nation. This could be the next milestone cementing the advent of the multipolar era, and the end of zio-American hegemony and oppression.

 

[SalarHaqq]

But why don't they consider purchasing price parity with GDP per capita or relative costs of living ? Freedom to make your own choices ? Like the choice to change sexes or kill yourself ? Also the study added a variable known as "dystopia" to the very bottom. You can quickly see that the test itself is structured largely around some superficial western cultural norms/perceptions

I might have misunderstood the above statement, but it seems to reflect a slight confusion. The choice to change sexes or to kill oneself do not represent western "cultural" norms or rather, innovations introduced by western regimes? They sure do.

Question: who are the forerunners in promoting third generation feminism and gender theory? That same theory which preaches strict dissociation of biological and so-called subjective gender identities, in other terms, wants people to be able to "change sexes" on a whim as often as they like, simply by declaring that they woke up one morning and suddenly "felt like" being of the opposite sex. Gender theory also requires state authorities to recognize and officially record these changes. Because it considers that traditional gender roles such as transmitted by classic education and by heterosexual parents is "discriminatory" towards females, homosexuals and transvestites.

It goes hand in hand with the push to legalize homosexual marriage and worse, child adoption by so-called same sex couples; complete with the development of a capitalist market for the sale and re-sale of newborns, infants, toddlers. And with the expansion of the profession of surrogate mother in low income and less developed countries.

The progressive legalization of euthanasia is yet another brick in this nightmarish edifice. Public authorities ought to contribute to making society livable, not to bring about unsustainable conditions generating high levels of distress and mental illness, and then go over to promoting legalized suicide as a supposed solution, glorifying it under the perverted guise of "individual freedom". Read Aldous Huxley's dystopian but visionary novel "Brave New World" published in the early 1930's, to get a glimpse into what these deceiving, fallacious narratives touting a "right to kill oneself" as some ultimate form of "freedom", may actually be aimed at: namely, to gradually and methodically persuade the masses into acquiescing to "voluntary" euthanasia once they reach a certain age and, due to dwindling physical abilities, are no longer of use to exploitative capitalists. This is downright criminal. By the way, Huxley was well acquainted with the world of masonic secret societies. I'd invite readers to conduct some research about his brother.

The same elites who promoted and institutionalized mass abortions, the same elites who have constantly been increasing the maximum time limit for abortions, are the ones now introducing the fake concept of "freedom to end one's life". Next in line is the legalization of paedocriminality, with the minds of western and global audiences being slowly prepared and conditioned already to accept and embrace it when the time is ripe. Hint: pay attention to the increased sexualization of underage persons in hollywoodian and associated consumerist entertainment media. I'd be surprised if the facilitated access of children to mass pornography through the internet was a "coincidence" or just an "unfortunate consequence" of regulatory and normative shortcomings. Every sign points to it having been pre-planned as well as being part and parcel of the sinister overarching agenda.

Western regimes are the ones which initiated these trends. They are also the ones which made these dangerous, dystopian forms of social and mental engineering part of school curriculae and began brainwashing young kids accordingly. Clearly, this represents a violation of natural law as well as of fundamental precepts put forth by every major, historically rooted faith system including Islam. Western regimes, along with western-controlled NGO's, inter-state organizations and UN agencies such as UNESCO are also the ones that have been imposing this degenerate and disruptive roadmap on the developing world, once they were done with their own populations.

Now these are all aspects of the globalist oligarchy's (bankers and other capitalist elites, high ranking freemasons, zionist leaders) totalitarian master plan for domination of mankind. And it is, at its core, a trans-humanist and anti-specist agenda, i.e. it strives to eliminate the human species and replace it with zombified, servile slaves literally remote (and mind-)controlled by the oligarchy, who may live under the tragicomical delusion of being "free", but whose existence from the very moment of their birth to their last breath has been pre-programmed by the unelected ruling class.

None of this is desirable from the perspective of mankind. None of it is conforming to Islamic law either. In fact, it reeks of luciferianism, and of war against God (astaghfirallah). As Dr. Abbasi said about usury (another element of subversion), "jange ba Khoda baraye ma alanist".

Remember that the powers to be have no issue with the sort of "anti-imperialism" inspired and okayed by the likes of Soros, which on the surface is critical of western regimes, colonialism and so on, but at the same time is endorsing the above mentioned liberalist deviations, and which operates under the banner of concepts such as human rights, an eminently masonic and western-centric notion. For these are constitutive of the oligarchy's agenda, the same oligarchy that is pulling the strings of western imperialist regimes. Let's not play into their hands. In keeping with their deceptive ways, these people are absolute masters at misguiding and misdirecting, and thus neutralizing revolt and opposition to their rule.

Even more insidiously, large chunks of those who more or less correctly identify and denounce the oligarchic agenda, are themselves controlled opposition and work in the interests of the globalist, zionist, masonic and capitalist ruling class. Either because they are being blackmailed, because they are useful idiots not knowing they're being manipulated, or actual trained agents and cognitive infiltrators. This is true of Trump(ists), and it is obviously true of other pseudo-oppositionists created and guided from above (including but not limited to Daesh and the likes).

In addition to a few others, the revolutionary core of the Islamic Republic and like-minded movements represent authentic opposition to the zio-American empire and its globalist ruling oligarchy. Which is why they've been demonized, attacked, and had countless plots hatched against them from every direction since 1979.

 

[TheImmortal]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1511175099700850693

 

[SalarHaqq]

Let an independent investigations be carried out. God only knows who did it?

But why are you in such a hurry to point your finger at the Russian and assign the blame to them? Taking side.

Based on tales, track records in Dombass and other Eastern Provinces over the past 8 years and IMO these neo-nazi AZOV battalion are capable of commiting such atrocities. That will be my main suspects.

Why do you assumed the Russian soldiers are so stupid to leave such evidences behind?

In urban combat, even with the most sophisticated precision-guided weapons, a civilian to military casualty rate of 1 to 1 is generally expected. In other terms, a certain amount of civilians unfortunately are likely to succumb to the fighting, even if no war crime is committed, even if they aren't targeted, even if no disproportionate force is used.

I wonder how difficult it'd be for Ukrainian NATO sidekicks and their extremist paramilitary auxiaries to simply collect corpses of civilians who might have perished in this way, place them here and there to suggest they were simply executed by the Russians and stage a sonorous propaganda campaign.

Speaking of which, did you notice how this type of propaganda has gained momentum since circa a week ago? As if for the entire previous month, relatively few such crimes were committed and that all of a sudden, Russians decided to go on a rampage, for whatever strange reason.

All of a sudden, in tune with the general propagandistic onslaught, "condom boxes" are supposedly found in the pockets of fallen Russian troops - they didn't really need them before late March, but now they seemingly do. Or, perhaps have the frisking skills of Ukrainian soldiers and neo-nazis taken a sudden, miraculous upwards turn. Of course, just purchasing such an item, putting it next to a dead Russian and photographing the scene is inconceivable. It'd be too hard / too costly an endeavor considering how little gain it would offer in terms of conditioning gullible masses against Moscow... not.

Any actual, definitive proof for systematic Russian war crimes? I've not seen a single one to date. Quite peculiar really, considering that in this day and age, at least one such document would have been likely to leak if allegations leveled against the Russian army were accurate. You know, something along the lines of the footage recorded by Australian occupation troops in Afghanistan, which shows them executing multiple unarmed Afghan civilians. But we're asked to believe this was an "isolated incident" by "lone wolves" who will be handed "appropriate punishment", while in the case of Russian forces, it's supposedly standard practice despite the lack of undisputable evidence.

Again, we see zero critical thinking among certain sheepish elements who seem happy about getting brainwashed by NATO. It's all about bias and/or pent up resentment (depending on each individual case). Not that it'll make much of a difference on the battlefield though. Gone are the times when the US regime and its clients could "generate" and mold ground reality to their liking through mere media fabrications, propaganda and lies. Now they shout loudly, and they shout a lot but emerging powers keep doing their own thing with success.

This brings me to the concluding remark: the timing of this sudden eruption of 'atrocities propaganda' versus Russia is telling. It hints at severe desperation on the part of NATO and its Ukrainian allies. The Ukrainian armed forces have been inflicted such important losses and their outlook is so grim that they and their western sponsors are reduced to resorting to uncontrolled, all out demonization of their adversary. Some are sore losers, and the sheep among the audience will keep feeling comfortable inside their fictive bubbles.

 

[Hack-Hook]

I might have misread the above statement, but it seems to reflect a slight confusion. The choice to change sexes or to kill oneself do not represent western "cultural" norms or rather, western innovations? They sure do.

the choice to select sexes is actually not western , but more eastern, only the capability of actually doing it changes .it happen far more in far east and middle east than in western counties and or legal system and fiqh also allowed it.
my understanding of it is that the base of the fiqh decree abut it in our country is the role of a person in the society , must be clear . you must be clear that you want to be man or woman , you can't be part one part another .

That same theory which preaches dissociation of biological and so-called subjective gender identities, in other terms, wants people to be able to "change sexes" on a whim as often as they like, simply by declaring they "feel" like a being a man or a woman today.

well biological and psychological gender identity is different and both are fixed , we knew how to change biological gender phenomena but all works on psychological aspect of it failed till today , and that's probably we don't knew our psychology as we knew our biology .
and honestly its not done an whim , it take ears to reach such decision , its take long seasons of psychological evaluation that may take 1-2 years and needs months of actually living as opposite sex to make sure the man or woman is actually is transgender not some random person who think the other side is greener . for the first case the reassignment is beneficial and remove lots of stress from him/her and help reaching fulfilment in life for the second one its a disaster.

Because it considers that traditional gender roles as transmitted by classic education and by heterosexual parents is "discriminatory" against females, homosexuals and transvestites.

this is nonsense as its not educational , tolerating it is educational , but you can't teach a boy to want to be a girl or a girl to want to be a boy . those 3rd or 4th or nth generation feminists who believe that are actually don't knew shit

It goes hand in hand with the push to legalize homosexual marriage and worse, child adoption by so-called same sex couples; complete with the development of a capitalist market for the sale and re-sale of newborns, infants, toddlers. And with the expansion of the profession of surrogate mother in low income and less developed countries.

well there are already far enough children who have no parents to car of them . but honestly its a misconception to put homosexual and transgender people in the same category , they are fundamentally different

Western regimes are the ones which initiated these trends. They are also the ones which made these dangerous, dystopian forms of social and mental engineering part of school curriculae and began brainwashing kids as young as 6 or 7 with them.

they are just made it public and out of closet , but it was present in many other cultures in some even they ae the person in question drugs to get rid of him without ever telling .

As Dr. Abbasi said about usury (another element of subversion), "jange ba Khoda baraye ma alanist".

a question western banks giving loans is more Islamic or our banks ?

 

[sha ah]

I can't believe you're writing this rubbish. Cyrus the Great was a genius 2 millenium ahead of his time in terms of his outlook on the world. The Jews were all freed by Cyrus as well as many others. At one point 60% of the worlds population lived under Persian rule, in a multi ethnic empire with human rights. Even the UN considers the Cyrus cylinder the first universal declaration of human rights. You should be ashamed of yourself as an Iranian spouting this nonsense about our great founder. Vagheaan khejalab vekesh as khodet.

Intresting you must have had a time machine because records of the Persians empires administrative policies are few and far in between. If your source is Cyrus Cylinder than you might as well be quoting from ancient times version of Fox News....propaganda. Royal accounts and tablets are very unreliable as they seek to portray governments in favorable light. Persia was no exception to this, what actually took place across the empire could have been very different.

How would Cyrus know where slaves were used? A simple message would take weeks if not months to arrive depending on where it was coming from. Cyrus likely inherited the Babylon practice of slavery when he conquered them and absorption of theirs laws and practices. Though a definitive conclusion either way can’t be made or at least I haven’t come across it.

Cyrus cylinder is similar to other cylinder from antiquities mainly propaganda.

The fact is Persian society on issue of abolishment of slavery or proponent of slavery is unknown, their simply isn’t enough recovered data. Greeks wrote about Persians, but official accounts are limited to some documents and tablets from Persepolis. Not enough to generate a clear consensus on what was going on across the empire during that time.

We know much more about Greeks and Romans than we do about Persian society.

 

[sha ah]

They literally chose Bucha because its sounds like "Butcher" in English.

At the start of the war the Ukrainian government called on their people to fight Russian troops by all means neccessary including by making Molotov cocktails. They even distributed a recipe online with instructions on where to targets tanks/armored vehicles.

Under Geneva, if a civilian attacks a convoy of tanks/armored vehicles/trucks/troops with a Molotov, they are now considered an active combatant or partisan fighter. They are considered civilians waging war. Under Geneva, if there is an urgent threat, troops being threatened have the right to respond with lethal force.

The Ukrainians demanded that civilians attack Russian troops and now they're crying about the end results. Come on.

The condom boxes are like those packs of viagra which Gaddafi was allegedly giving his troops to rape their own women for some reason. All fake.

The US/UK/allies went into Iraq in 2003 using false claims to chemical weapons. They killed 1 million Iraqis. Madeline Albright when told that 500,000 Iraqi children died of malnutrition under sanctions before the war and when asked "was it worth it", without hesitation said "YES IT WAS" Half of those children were little baby girls that starved to death. What f#cking filth she truly was. I pray that she's burning in hell as we speak.

Hypocrisy at its best

In urban combat, even with the most sophisticated precision-guided weapons, a civilian to military casualty rate of 1 to 1 is generally expected. In other terms, a certain amount of civilians unfortunately are likely to succumb to the fighting, even if no war crime is committed, even if they aren't targeted, even if no disproportionate force is used.

I wonder how difficult it'd be for Ukrainian NATO sidekicks and their extremist paramilitary auxiaries to simply collect corpses of civilians who might have perished in this way, place them here and there to suggest they were simply executed by the Russians and stage a sonorous propaganda campaign.

Speaking of which, did you notice how this type of propaganda has gained momentum since circa a week ago? As if for the entire previous month, relatively few such crimes were committed and that all of a sudden, Russians decided to go on a rampage, for whatever strange reason.

All of a sudden, in tune with the general propagandistic onslaught, "condom boxes" are supposedly found in the pockets of fallen Russian troops - they didn't really need them before late March, but now they seemingly do. Or, perhaps have the frisking skills of Ukrainian soldiers and neo-nazis taken a sudden, miraculous upwards turn. Of course, just purchasing such an item, putting it next to a dead Russian and photographing the scene is inconceivable. It'd be too hard / too costly an endeavor considering how little gain it would offer in terms of conditioning gullible masses against Moscow... not.

Any actual, definitive proof for systematic Russian war crimes? I've not seen a single one to date. Quite peculiar really, considering that in this day and age, at least one such document would have been likely to leak if allegations leveled against the Russian army were accurate. You know, something along the lines of the footage recorded by Australian occupation troops in Afghanistan, which shows them executing multiple unarmed Afghan civilians. But we're asked to believe this was an "isolated incident" by "lone wolves" who will be handed "appropriate punishment", while in the case of Russian forces, it's supposedly standard practice despite the lack of undisputable evidence.

Again, we see zero critical thinking among certain sheepish elements who seem happy about getting brainwashed by NATO. It's all about bias and/or pent up resentment (depending on each individual case). Not that it'll make much of a difference on the battlefield though. Gone are the times when the US regime and its clients could "generate" and mold ground reality to their liking through mere media fabrications, propaganda and lies. Now they shout loudly, and they shout a lot but emerging powers keep doing their own thing with success.

This brings me to the concluding remark: the timing of this sudden eruption of 'atrocities propaganda' versus Russia is telling. It hints at severe desperation on the part of NATO and its Ukrainian allies. The Ukrainian armed forces have been inflicted such important losses and their outlook is so grim that they and their western sponsors are reduced to resorting to uncontrolled, all out demonization of their adversary. Some are sore losers, and the sheep among the audience will keep feeling comfortable inside their fictive bubbles.

 

[Hack-Hook]

The US/UK/allies went into Iraq in 2003 using false claims to chemical weapons.

there is no false claim to chemical weapon . but the claim was about WMD, while chemical weapons are considered WMD and Iraq actually had it , they based their claims on nuke and let world think Iraq is building Nuke which was false

 

[SalarHaqq]

the choice to select sexes is actually not western , but more eastern, only the capability of actually doing it changes .it happen far more in far east and middle east than in western counties and or legal system and fiqh also allowed it.

The questioning of the relevance of biological gender identity from ground up, as well as the methodical attempt to reverse or dissolve conventional gender roles is genuinely a post-modern innovation. There's no recorded historic tradition of the sort, neither in the east nor in the west.

Islamic fiq is not allowing the type of gender relativization promoted by third generation feminism. The aims and spirit behind the two sets of reasoning are fundamentally incompatible with one another.

my understanding of it is that the base of the fiqh decree abut it in our country is the role of a person in the society , must be clear . you must be clear that you want to be man or woman , you can't be part one part another .

As opposed to western regimes, Iran doesn't allow people to change their gender on a whim, nor to durably dissociate biological and subjective gender identity without aligning the two. The Islamic Republic will not register an obvious male as a female simply because they "feel like" being of the opposite sex. A sex change operation is required to this effect, and serious conditions must be fulfilled including obtaining psychological certificates proving there is indeed a pathological, deep rooted gender confusion etc.

This is what's going on in the west. This what they're imposing on the rest of the world:

Karen White: how 'manipulative' transgender inmate attacked again

Former neighbours describe 52-year-old as volatile and violent amid questions over placement in all-female prison

www.theguardian.com

It's got nothing to do with the Iranian model.

and honestly its not done an whim , it take ears to reach such decision , its take long seasons of psychological evaluation that may take 1-2 years and needs months of actually living as opposite sex to make sure the man or woman is actually is transgender not some random person who think the other side is greener . for the first case the reassignment is beneficial and remove lots of stress from him/her and help reaching fulfilment in life for the second one its a disaster.

Hence why it has nothing to do with the gender theory that originated in the USA, nor with the policies that are being imposed on nations by western regimes and international institutions they control.

Like for example calling into question traditional gender roles; asking school boys to wear pink skirts and play with Barbie dolls and school girls to play cowboy and Indian while sporting boys' hairstyles; encouraging them to doubt their gender identity and sexual orientation - including by promoting and trivializing homosexuality, which is presented as "one possible option among others" and depicted as being "just as legitimate as all others"; cultivating the notion that gender identity is fluid and can be changed at will, literally any day of the week; and so on, and so forth.

Such sick practices will not be allowed to spread in Iran. The Supreme Leader is well informed on the subject, and has blocked any attempts to align the Iranian education system on the western-imposed model which entails all the above.

https://www.christian.org.uk/news/us-boy-6-wins-right-to-use-girls-toilets-at-school/

Mixed-gender toilets have ‘negative impact on girls’

A council says the introduction of gender-neutral toilets in its schools promotes inclusion, but a parent says they put girls at risk

www.tes.com

this is nonsense as its not educational , tolerating it is educational , but you can't teach a boy to want to be a girl or a girl to want to be a boy . those 3rd or 4th or nth generation feminists who believe that are actually don't knew shit

It's absurd. However it is also:

1) Influential.
2) Hazardous.
3) Being used by globalists to serve a broader agenda of uprooting humans, of pulling them out of their ultimate autonomous safety and solidarity net that is the nuclear family structure, for the sake of total domination by an unelected ruling clique of oligarchs.

_____

In her best-known work, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (1990), and its sequel, Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’ (1993), Butler built upon the familiar cultural-theoretic assumption that gender is socially constructed (the result of socialization, broadly conceived) rather than innate and that conventional notions of gender and sexuality serve to perpetuate the traditional domination of women by men and to justify the oppression of homosexuals and transgender persons.

...

Butler contended, somewhat paradoxically, that not only gender but sex itself—the fact of being biologically male or female—is “to some degree” a performative social construct. Sex is performatively constructed in the sense that it represents an essentially arbitrary distinction between individuals that is drawn (at or before birth) and later reinforced through speech acts such as (originally) “It’s a girl!” or “It’s a boy!” In heterosexist cultures, the repeated performance of the distinction serves (among other things) to impose a norm of sexual desire based on an artificial association between biological sex and gender (the “law of heterosexual coherence”), thereby sustaining a system of “compulsory and naturalized heterosexuality” (the “heterosexual matrix”).

well there are already far enough children who have no parents to car of them .

It isn't a reason to produce more in "child factories" of India, South Africa etc. Nor to legalize homosexual child adoption and marriage.

they are just made it public and out of closet , but it was present in many other cultures in some even they ae the person in question drugs to get rid of him without ever telling .

I described how these trends pushed by western regimes and their clients in developing countries are novelties.

a question western banks giving loans is more Islamic or our banks ?

Usury is un-Islamic. Marjas have ruled time and again that the banking system is rabavi and must be reformed completely. Dr. Abbasi has given numerous impassionate speeches condemning the practice.

This is one domain in which the Islamic Revolution is yet to achieve its goals. But it's not the revolutionaries who are standing in the way. It's influential liberal and capitalist lobbies backed by opposition factions.