That women used to be "slaves" before the liberal west imposed its norms on the world is a cliché spread by liberal elites who aim to uproot and destroy family, religion, nation.
they were not slave here , go and read about Mashrooteh uprising , there were women between the commanders of uprising who commanded several hundred people . what you suggest is to impose archaic European restriction on our women in the name of Islam and tradition . what you suggest is European tradition not ours or Islam
No, they were much more infrequent than in modern society. There's a clear correlation between cultural westernization on the one hand, divorce, suicide and plenty of other social ills on the other.
don't knew it happens more in rural area than cities
Mothers do not need specialized higher education to teach their children what they are expected to teach them. Everything else the children will learn at school.
that's nonsense , its not fathers who work with children at home it mothers who teach the children when they have problem n their homework and that's beside the point when in our teaching and culture and Islam women are said not to have higher education , where it come they must not control their money or what they poses . all you say is preaching archaic catholic and European teachings
Underage marriage is illegal by definition. However, before divorce rates went up, the average age of marriage was much lower than it is now. Therefore, young people must be encouraged to marry as early as legally allowed. This is a traditional value.
the young people must be encouraged to marry when they understand their duty and rights when they marry , they must be encouraged to marry when they understand when they marry they are sharing their lives and they no longer are individual , they must be encouraged to marry when they can stand on their feet not a second sooner.
and by the way being physically mature is not a good scale for seeing one is underage or not for marriage its more important to be mentally and socially mature.
The biggest restriction is that it is frowned upon by God according to ahadith.
There is a hadith in Mir'at al-'uqul from Imam al-Sadiq (a) according to which, God loves a home in which a married couple lives, and hates a home in which a divorce took place, and there is nothing hated by God more than divorce.
God dislike it but didn't put hurdle in front of the way of people who think they had no option . God dislike lie , how many of our politician tell lies after lies after lies , why you don't do anything about that. by the way ask yourself one thing if its so bad why god didn't put a punishment for it.
Whilst the Holy Quran suggests that other ways to settle a dispute ought to be privileged.
Divorce is not pleasant in the Qur'an as well. The Qur'an 4:35 has recommended that if there is a dispute between a wife and a husband, their relatives should moderate between them and try to make a reconciliation: "and if you fear dissension between the two, send an arbitrator from his people and an arbitrator from her people. If they both desire reconciliation, Allah will cause it between them. Indeed, Allah is ever Knowing and Acquainted [with all things]".
again no mention of putting hurdle in front of the people who failed to find a solution
Another considerable restriction is that unlike men, women can only demand divorce on specific, limited grounds
that's man law not God laws and is fixed many years ago to a large extent
Not really since in Catholicism divorce is outright prohibited.
well some of our law makers are moving in that direction
According to which surah or hadith?
according to traditional Catholics teachings, if it was according to Quran we were not discussing it here
Divorce rates are higher among relatively affluent people. While the poor must be supported for other ethical reasons, economic considerations have not traditionally been a cause for divorce. They became so with modernity and the rise of materialism and individualism, both of which must be combated relentlessly.
that was not cause of divorce when everybody was poor , but when the society become more complex many thing changed . we must plan for now not for a hypothetical society based on dead values
The poor are less prone to it. No need to try and promote it with them too.
no they are not more prone to it , that's something called social pressure that made it they are less prone to it ,on other hand other social problem is a lot more in their families
Then a motion must be voted to put an end to such practices meant to circumvent the law. This is obviously a legal loophole, and it can easily be corrected by the legislative power.
Welcome to Salar dystopic police state . wonder how many of these dystopic future novel have you read ?
by the way , its something related to Fiqh this matter is far more delicate than let some Minister or MP or even president mess with it . it must discussed in
between grand ayatollahs in Qom . what constitute a divorce ? registering it in a book or the ceremony being held by a just person in front of two witness and two party agree to it.
can you consider the man and woman as husband and wife if they travel to India there they hold the ceremony in front of several witness ? can you tell them from your point of vie you are still married and cant pursue another marriage ?
