What's new

Iranian Chill Thread

ببخشید یادم نبود که نیروگاه بوشهر رو ایرانی‌ها ساختن!!! حتماً از این به بعد یادم می‌مونه که نیروگاه بوشهر ساخته ایران هست

بعد از سی سال هنوز ۴ فاز بوشهر کامل نشده. تازه فاز ۴ که کنسل هم شده
فاز ۲ رو روس‌ها هنر کنند ۲ - ۳ سال آینده تحویل بدن که با شناختی که از روس‌ها دارم بعید هست سر زمان تحویل بدن
فاز ۳ هم ۵ سال دیگه که به نظرم روی ۲۰۳۰ می‌شه حساب کرد

تا اون زمان امارات شاید حتی ۱۰ گیگاوات برق هسته‌ای رو هم رد کرده باشه​


F*ck off.

الان ایران سی درصد ساخت نیروگاه بعدی و صد در صد غنی سازی و پرتاب ماهواره رو انجام میده

استخراج اورانیوم تا نود در صد​


یک مهندس موفق اماراتی یا عربستانی به من معرفی کن که در پنج گوشه عالم نه دیدم نه شنیدم​


یک مرتبه مریخ پیماشون که ساختن رو هم توی سر ما بزن
پاتریوت و اجیس شون همچنین

اف پانزده هاشون رو هم که ساختن همجنین​
 
الان ایران سی درصد ساخت نیروگاه بعدی و صد در صد غنی سازی و پرتاب ماهواره رو انجام میده

استخراج اورانیوم تا نود در صد​


یک مهندس موفق اماراتی یا عربستانی به من معرفی کن که در پنج گوشه عالم نه دیدم نه شنیدم​


یک مرتبه مریخ پیماشون که ساختن رو هم توی سر ما بزن
پاتریوت و اجیس شون همچنین

اف پانزده هاشون رو هم که ساختن همجنین​
ببین تو فاز چرت و پرت نزن شانی
هر راکتور نیروگاه بوشهر ۲۶ تن اورانیوم ۳/۵ درصد غنی شده در سال می‌خواد (احتمالاً این عدد به شکل اکسید اورانیوم محاسبه شده)
در نتیجه ۳ تا راکتور بوشهر ۷۸ تن اورانیوم ۳/۵ درصد غنی شده می‌خواد

ما این همه خودمون رو کشتیم این همه سال قبل از توافق ۲۰۱۳ حدود ۱۳ تن اورانیوم ذخیره کرده بودیم
الان بعید می‌دونم ظرفیت ذخیره اورانیوم غنای پایین ما بیشتر از ۵ تن شده باشه

با ظرفیت غنی‌سازی ایران حتی یک راکتور اتمی بوشهر ۱۰ سال طول می‌کشه تا سوخت یکسالش تامین بشه
اگه ۳ تا راکتور بوشهر عملیاتی بشن ایران هر ۳۰ سال یکبار می‌تونه سوخت راکتور رو خودش تامین کنه
باز هم بگم؟ این یعنی وابستگی کامل به روسیه برای تامین سوخت بوشهر. بقیه راکتورهای آینده بماند

ما برای تامین سوخت ۳ راکتور هسته‌ای بوشهر باید توان غنی‌سازی خودمون رو به دست کم ۵۷۰ هزار سو برسونیم
در حالیکه اگر برجام احیا بشه و بعداً تمدید بشه ظرفیت غنی‌سازی ما احتمالاً همون ۵۶۰۰ سو بشه. یعنی یک درصد از نیاز ما

تازه هزینه تحریم رو هم بهش اضافه کن. هزینه ۲۰ سال تحریم رو بهش اضافه کن. هزینه نفروختن نفت تو اوج قیمت رو هم بهش اضافه کن
اون وقت می‌بینی امارات داره برد می‌کنه یا ایران. تازه امارات به بازار آزاد دسترسی داره و مثل ما گزینه‌هاش فقط به روسیه و چین محدود نیست
بقیه‌اش دیگه داستان هست​
 
ببین تو فاز چرت و پرت نزن شانی
هر راکتور نیروگاه بوشهر ۲۶ تن اورانیوم ۳/۵ درصد غنی شده در سال می‌خواد (احتمالاً این عدد به شکل اکسید اورانیوم محاسبه شده)
در نتیجه ۳ تا راکتور بوشهر ۷۸ تن اورانیوم ۳/۵ درصد غنی شده می‌خواد

ما این همه خودمون رو کشتیم این همه سال قبل از توافق ۲۰۱۳ حدود ۱۳ تن اورانیوم ذخیره کرده بودیم
الان بعید می‌دونم ظرفیت ذخیره اورانیوم غنای پایین ما بیشتر از ۵ تن شده باشه

با ظرفیت غنی‌سازی ایران حتی یک راکتور اتمی بوشهر ۱۰ سال طول می‌کشه تا سوخت یکسالش تامین بشه
اگه ۳ تا راکتور بوشهر عملیاتی بشن ایران هر ۳۰ سال یکبار می‌تونه سوخت راکتور رو خودش تامین کنه
باز هم بگم؟ این یعنی وابستگی کامل به روسیه برای تامین سوخت بوشهر. بقیه راکتورهای آینده بماند

ما برای تامین سوخت ۳ راکتور هسته‌ای بوشهر باید توان غنی‌سازی خودمون رو به دست کم ۵۷۰ هزار سو برسونیم
در حالیکه اگر برجام احیا بشه و بعداً تمدید بشه ظرفیت غنی‌سازی ما احتمالاً همون ۵۶۰۰ سو بشه. یعنی یک درصد از نیاز ما

تازه هزینه تحریم رو هم بهش اضافه کن. هزینه ۲۰ سال تحریم رو بهش اضافه کن. هزینه نفروختن نفت تو اوج قیمت رو هم بهش اضافه کن
اون وقت می‌بینی امارات داره برد می‌کنه یا ایران. تازه امارات به بازار آزاد دسترسی داره و مثل ما گزینه‌هاش فقط به روسیه و چین محدود نیست
بقیه‌اش دیگه داستان هست​

خوب بگو هند برزیل
امارات چسکی چیزی نداره

قسمتی از مشکلات به علت شروع بد اول انقلاب و ریدن های انقلابیون بود

که متاسفانه سریعا قابل اصلاح نیست
 
خوب بگو هند برزیل
امارات چسکی چیزی نداره

قسمتی از مشکلات به علت شروع بد اول انقلاب و ریدن های انقلابیون بود

که متاسفانه سریعا قابل اصلاح نیست
هند و برزیل نفت ندارن. همسایه ما نیستند. رقابت منطقه‌ای باهاشون نداریم
امارات نفت داره. همسایه ما هست و شریک عربستان در رقابت منطقه‌ای با ما هست

یه دوره‌ای بحث سر این بود که غرب اجازه نمی‌ده کشورهای دارای نفت انرژی هسته‌ای داشته باشن
الان امارات از ما زد جلو. عربستان هم به زودی تو ۵ سال آینده می‌زنه
اون وقت ایران می‌مونه با نفتی که تحریم هست و تو اوج قیمت کم و ارزون فروخته و برنامه هسته‌ای که از رقبای منطقه‌ایش عقب افتاده

برای همین هست که وقتی می‌بینم انقدر ریلکس برجام داره احیا می‌شه خونم به جوش میاد​
 
هند و برزیل نفت ندارن. همسایه ما نیستند. رقابت منطقه‌ای باهاشون نداریم
امارات نفت داره. همسایه ما هست و شریک عربستان در رقابت منطقه‌ای با ما هست

یه دوره‌ای بحث سر این بود که غرب اجازه نمی‌ده کشورهای دارای نفت انرژی هسته‌ای داشته باشن
الان امارات از ما زد جلو. عربستان هم به زودی تو ۵ سال آینده می‌زنه
اون وقت ایران می‌مونه با نفتی که تحریم هست و تو اوج قیمت کم و ارزون فروخته و برنامه هسته‌ای که از رقبای منطقه‌ایش عقب افتاده

برای همین هست که وقتی می‌بینم انقدر ریلکس برجام داره احیا می‌شه خونم به جوش میاد​

چرا عربستان مثل امارات نیروگاه نداره
چون از حق غنی سازی صرفه نظر نکرد

نیروگاه مهم نیست
غنی سازی مهمه
زیر بنا مهمه

ما اتفاقا نفت انبار کردیم و الان در اوج قیمت داریم میفروشیم
پولشم میگیرم

برجام چه احیا بشه چه نشه من خامنه ای رو میشناسم

بد بینی خیلی
اگر چه گه کاری هم اول کار زیاد شد و ما میتونستیم راه بهتری رو بریم
 
چرا عربستان مثل امارات نیروگاه نداره
چون از حق غنی سازی صرفه نظر نکرد

نیروگاه مهم نیست
غنی سازی مهمه
زیر بنا مهمه

ما اتفاقا نفت انبار کردیم و الان در اوج قیمت داریم میفروشیم
پولشم میگیرم

برجام چه احیا بشه چه نشه من خامنه ای رو میشناسم

بد بینی خیلی
اگر چه گه کاری هم اول کار زیاد شد و ما میتونستیم راه بهتری رو بریم
کدوم غنی‌سازی؟ به ۹۰۰۰ سو که به زودی می‌شه ۵۶۰۰ سو می‌گی غنی‌سازی؟ کاربرد این مدل غنی‌سازی چیه وقتی هدف بمب ساختن نیست؟

ضمناً عربستان هم در حال ساخت نیروگاه هسته‌ای هست و احتمال زیاد تا ۲۰۳۰ اولین نیروگاه هسته‌ایش افتتاح می‌شه (اول خبر رو اشتباه خونده بودم بعد ادیت کردم). تا ۲۰۴۰ قرار هست ۱۶ نیروگاه هسته‌ای بسازن. روس اتم هم ۳ سال پیش پیشنهاد داده براشون بسازه
اسناد بسیار زیادی هست که اطلاعات سری هسته‌ای بسیاری رو آمریکا زمان ترامپ به عربستان فروخته که اگه درست باشه خیلی خطرناک هست

تولید نفت ایران الان زیر ۵ میلیون بشکه در روز هست. عربستان اگه بخواد جای روسیه رو پر کنه تولید نفتش می‌رسه به ۱۵ میلیون بکشه در روز
یعنی ۳ برابر تولید و فروش با حدود یک سوم جمعیت ما

بدبین نبودم اولش. بعد از ۱۰ سال پیگیر داستان بودن فهمیدم که سر کار هستیم و هیچ هدف و مسترپلانی برای برنامه هسته‌ای ایران وجود نداره
از سال ۲۰۰۳ به این ور برنامه هسته‌ای ایران به جز یه دوره کوتاه از سال ۲۰۰۵ تا ۲۰۰۹ سرگردان کامل بوده. فقط دور خودمون زدیم و لقمه رو دور گردون پیچوندیم و آخرسر هم نتونستیم لقمه رو بخوریم​
 
کدوم غنی‌سازی؟ به ۹۰۰۰ سو که به زودی می‌شه ۵۶۰۰ سو می‌گی غنی‌سازی؟ کاربرد این مدل غنی‌سازی چیه وقتی هدف بمب ساختن نیست؟

ضمناً عربستان هم در حال ساخت نیروگاه هسته‌ای هست و احتمال زیاد تا ۲۰۳۰ اولین نیروگاه هسته‌ایش افتتاح می‌شه (اول خبر رو اشتباه خونده بودم بعد ادیت کردم). تا ۲۰۴۰ قرار هست ۱۶ نیروگاه هسته‌ای بسازن. روس اتم هم ۳ سال پیش پیشنهاد داده براشون بسازه
اسناد بسیار زیادی هست که اطلاعات سری هسته‌ای بسیاری رو آمریکا زمان ترامپ به عربستان فروخته که اگه درست باشه خیلی خطرناک هست

تولید نفت ایران الان زیر ۵ میلیون بشکه در روز هست. عربستان اگه بخواد جای روسیه رو پر کنه تولید نفتش می‌رسه به ۱۵ میلیون بکشه در روز
یعنی ۳ برابر تولید و فروش با حدود یک سوم جمعیت ما

بدبین نبودم اولش. بعد از ۱۰ سال پیگیر داستان بودن فهمیدم که سر کار هستیم و هیچ هدف و مسترپلانی برای برنامه هسته‌ای ایران وجود نداره
از سال ۲۰۰۳ به این ور برنامه هسته‌ای ایران به جز یه دوره کوتاه از سال ۲۰۰۵ تا ۲۰۰۹ سرگردان کامل بوده. فقط دور خودمون زدیم و لقمه رو دور گردون پیچوندیم و آخرسر هم نتونستیم لقمه رو بخوریم​

ما در طورقوز آباد قالی میشستیم
و طوزقوز آباد ها ظاهرا خیلی زیادند

فکر کردی چرا قالی شویی بود و مثلا نه بقالی
قرار نیست همه چیز رو شسته رفته بگند
 
ما در طورقوز آباد قالی میشستیم
و طوزقوز آباد ها ظاهرا خیلی زیادند

فکر کردی چرا قالی شویی بود و مثلا نه بقالی
قرار نیست همه چیز رو شسته رفته بگند
البته اگه واقعاً تو طورقوزآباد قالی می‌شستیم و اسرائیل این قالی‌شویی رو با جاسوس پیدا کرده باشه خیلی حرف‌ها درش هست
از اینکه چرا اسرار مملکت باید سر از کشور دشمن در بیاره تا اینکه چرا این بار چندم هست که پروژه شکست می‌خوره تا اینکه چرا اگه واقعیت داره ۳۰ سال هست به نتیجه نرسیده​
 
البته اگه واقعاً تو طورقوزآباد قالی می‌شستیم و اسرائیل این قالی‌شویی رو با جاسوس پیدا کرده باشه خیلی حرف‌ها درش هست
از اینکه چرا اسرار مملکت باید سر از کشور دشمن در بیاره تا اینکه چرا این بار چندم هست که پروژه شکست می‌خوره تا اینکه چرا اگه واقعیت داره ۳۰ سال هست به نتیجه نرسیده​

ممکنه
بستگی داره ما چند تا قالی شویی داریم

سه چهار تا باشه خطرناکه
صد تا باشه تشویق هم داریم

این یک راهه نه یک بمب
پایانی توش نیست
 
Last edited:
ممکنه
بستگی داره ما چند تا قالی شویی داریم

سه چهار تا باشه خطرناکه
صد تا باشه تشویق هم داریم

این یک راهه نه یک بمب
پایانی توش نیست
مسئله اینجاست که ما هنوز نمی‌دونیم کجای راه هستیم
هر چیزی که هست بر پایه حدس و گمان هست

ولی منطق می‌گه اگه ایران پیشرفت خوبی در برنامه هسته‌ای نظامی داشت الان درگیر ۵۶۰۰ سو نبودیم
هر چقدر پیشرفت ایران بیشتر بشه محدودیت‌ها هم ذاتشون تغییر می‌کنه
وقتی ایران محدودیت ۵۶۰۰ سو رو می‌پذیره که عملاً برنامه هسته‌ای ما رو کاملاً به دردنخور می‌کنه یعنی یه جا داستان می‌لنگه​
 
they were not slave here , go and read about Mashrooteh uprising , there were women between the commanders of uprising who commanded several hundred people .

Ironic example, isn't it, given that Mashrouteh was largely a masonic-infiltrated and ultimately hijacked movement. Sheykh Fazlollahe Nouri (rahmatollah aleyha) was martyred for opposing these masonic-led forces and their sinister designs for Iran.

Anyway, my statement was that women weren't slaves back when they had lower education levels. The equation "lower female education" = "enslavement of women" is incorrect.

Also, there's no honor whatsoever in sending females into military combat. It would be an insult to women, actually. This is something zionists take pride in, as well as ethnicist separatists who claim to represent Kurdish people. As a matter of fact, female nature is such that it makes women unfit for fighting wars in comparison to men, given innate physiological differences.

Which is why Islamic Iran doesn't engage in inversion of traditional gender roles and never did (female Basijis during the Imposed War and other conflicts were not sent to the front lines on combat missions). We don't dispatch our women to get slaughtered in wars, we protect them - we have gheyrat.

what you suggest is to impose archaic European restriction on our women in the name of Islam and tradition . what you suggest is European tradition not ours or Islam

None of it is European.

don't knew it happens more in rural area than cities

The increase in divorce rate coincides with and is a consequence of cultural westernization and urbanization.

that's nonsense , its not fathers who work with children at home it mothers who teach the children when they have problem n their homework

Fathers can take care of it as well. Plus there are many other sources children can rely on to help them out with homework. At any rate, helping with her children's homework is not the primary educational task of a mother. When referring to this educational role, nobody will think of "helping with the children's homework" first, for it's not substantial in the grand scheme.

Forget about homework, if we want to support mothers in raising their children, we need to start rethinking this notion that every woman must absolutely have a remunerated occupation come hell or high water. For a woman, having enough time to attend to the needs of her children (rather than being exploited by some capitalist employer) is among the highest forms of self-realization, and thus of liberty.

and that's beside the point when in our teaching and culture and Islam women are said not to have higher education , where it come they must not control their money or what they poses . all you say is preaching archaic catholic and European teachings

There's nothing Catholic to my arguments. Iran has been an extremely patriarchal society since pre-Islamic times, thank God a million times for that. Not in any way comparable to feminism-infested post-modern western society, which has strictly nothing to do with Islamic and Iranian culture. Mark my words, we will make sure it stays this way.

the young people must be encouraged to marry when they understand their duty and rights when they marry , they must be encouraged to marry when they understand when they marry they are sharing their lives and they no longer are individual , they must be encouraged to marry when they can stand on their feet not a second sooner.

It's the duty of parents, society and state to teach young people these things. Let us not make excuses please.

and by the way being physically mature is not a good scale for seeing one is underage or not for marriage its more important to be mentally and socially mature.

Underage is a legal notion. Mental and social readiness are there in young people, and they can furthermore be transmitted by parents, society, state. A lot of practical social skills are acquired on the go as well, through experience, through trial and error.

God dislike it but didn't put hurdle in front of the way of people who think they had no option .

God dislikes it and therefore the Islamic government and Muslims must do what they can to direct people towards greater abnegation, patience and towards a mindset in which divorce is no longer considered an acceptable solution to trivial marital conflicts. Whether or not people think they have other options is eminently subjective and conditioned by culture.

God dislike lie , how many of our politician tell lies after lies after lies , why you don't do anything about that.

Strawman.

by the way ask yourself one thing if its so bad why god didn't put a punishment for it.

I showed valid sources which suggest that from an Islamic perspective, this is not something to be encouraged nor promoted, but rather to be considered a last resort suited for extreme cases only. At the societal level, it should thus be the exception rather than the rule.

again no mention of putting hurdle in front of the people who failed to find a solution

Nor any mention that the introduction of quotas is haram. When the phenomenon reaches unacceptable proportions, much to the displeasure of God, it is an Islamic government's obligation to counteract the trend.

that's man law not God laws and is fixed many years ago to a large extent

It's an Islamic regulation determined by Muslim clerics who are well versed in God's Law.

well some of our law makers are moving in that direction

They aren't.

that was not cause of divorce when everybody was poor , but when the society become more complex many thing changed . we must plan for now not for a hypothetical society based on dead values

Islamic values, Islamic lifestyle are never going to be dead. Generalization of divorce and questioning of the institution of marriage are anti-Islamic.

Economic considerations per se aren't a cause for divorce and don't need to be. Only when combined with individualist and materialist thinking will they have such an effect. Individualism and materialism are non-Islamic as well.

no they are not more prone to it , that's something called social pressure that made it they are less prone to it ,

All these considerations have a social dimension to them. Trying to promote divorce among the poor is an act of social engineering and akin to social pressure in its effects.

on other hand other social problem is a lot more in their families

Not necessarily, but it's off topic anyway.

Welcome to Salar dystopic police state . wonder how many of these dystopic future novel have you read ?

So preventing the use of subterfuges intended to circumvent the law is to establish a distopic police state? Quite a strange reasoning that would be.

by the way , its something related to Fiqh this matter is far more delicate than let some Minister or MP or even president mess with it . it must discussed in
between grand ayatollahs in Qom .

Iran's political system ensures that legislation passed by Majles is verified as to its compatibility with Islamic law.

what constitute a divorce ? registering it in a book or the ceremony being held by a just person in front of two witness and two party agree to it.
can you consider the man and woman as husband and wife if they travel to India there they hold the ceremony in front of several witness ? can you tell them from your point of vie you are still married and cant pursue another marriage ?

If a couple fulfills all the legal conditions, then it will have no problem obtaining divorce inside Iran. If authorities refuse to meet their request, it means they do not legally qualify.

- - - - -

The UAE is building 4 reactors each reactor (Korean built) generates 1.4 GWatts..(Iran's bushehr reactor is 1 GWatts)..

UAE is second largest Aluminium producers in the world and that kind of production requires huge amounts of electrical power...that is why they need 4 reactors..(where do they get aluminium ore from!!!)

I also think it is Korean operated for few years any way..hope we do not get a tsunami anywhere in the Persian Gulf because now there are three reactors along the shores..

View attachment 826849

There's no comparison between a western client regime merely purchasing nuclear power plants with petrodollars from a foreign supplier on the on hand, and an independent, sovereign state that has mastered the entire nuclear fuel cycle and indigenized large swaths of nuclear technology on the other.
 
Last edited:
Ironic example, isn't it, given that Mashrouteh was largely a masonic-infiltrated and ultimately hijacked movement. Sheykh Fazlollahe Nouri (rahmatollah aleyha) was martyred for opposing these masonic-led forces and their sinister designs for Iran.
Sheykh Fazlollah was not the religious leader of Iran , all the top clerics supported it and didn't knew you believed Shia clerics are supporting Masonry ?

well these nonsense aside Mashrooteh was a movement to give the power to people and take it away from a single person . if there was no Mashrooteh then there was no Islamic republic.
Anyway, my statement was that women weren't slaves back when they had lower education levels. The equation "lower female education" = "enslavement of women" is incorrect.
my question is exactly where it come that women must have lower education levels ? Is it in Islam ? is it in our culture ? or its from some beduine tribal culture ?

Also, there's no honor whatsoever in sending females into military combat. It would be an insult to women, actually. This is something zionists take pride in, as well as ethnicist separatists who claim to represent Kurdish people. As a matter of fact, female nature is such that it makes women unfit for fighting wars in comparison to men, given innate physiological differences.
in case of Jihad islam send women to battle , didn't knew you believe islam is a dishonorable religion , in Ohod it was'nt Nusaybah bint Ka'ab who take sword and protect the holey prophet when men went after their plundering , do you suggest the holy prophet was honor less ?
I believe you more think of your pride than honor and please don't talk nonsense a bout female nature , be honest and say man pride
Which is why Islamic Iran doesn't engage in inversion of traditional gender roles and never did (female Basijis during the Imposed War and other conflicts were not sent to the front lines on combat missions). We don't dispatch our women to get slaughtered in wars, we protect them - we have gheyrat.
wonder how we had female war prisoner. and again don't call your pride Gheyrat they are different.
None of it is European.
all of it are
The increase in divorce rate coincides with and is a consequence of cultural westernization and urbanization.
it means homicide
 
Fathers can take care of it as well. Plus there are many other sources children can rely on to help them out with their homework. At any rate, homework is not the primary educational task of mothers. When referring to this maternal role, nobody will think of "homework" in the first place, that's nothing substantial and represents a diversion.

Forget about homework, if we want to help mothers in raising their children, we need to start rethinking this notion that every woman must absolutely have a remunerated occupation come hell or high water. For a woman, having enough time to attend to the needs of her children (rather than being exploited by some capitalist employer) is among the highest forms of self-realization, and thus of liberty.
again your backward taught on women must be barred from higher education , the real goal of such thing is keep women weak , keep them slaves to your whim and it in nature is against islam , come from old European beliefs
There's nothing "Catholic" to my arguments. Iran has been an extremely patriarchal society since pre-Islamic times, thank God a million times for that. Not in any way comparable to feminism-infested post-modern western society, which has strictly nothing to do with Islamic and Iranian culture. Mark my words, we will make sure it stays this way.
patriarchal , don't mean keep women week , in that patriarchal society women could be commander of army , could be a governor of a province , could be naval commander , could be king and even could wage war, yes real war against king.
It's the duty of parents, society and state to teach young people these things. No excuses.
it mean the young must not told to marry to make children and more population , they must understand the purpose of mariage is making a family which is the bricks that make a society , making babies come later.
 
Sheykh Fazlollah was not the religious leader of Iran , all the top clerics supported it and didn't knew you believed Shia clerics are supporting Masonry ?

Read up on the history of the Constitutional Revolution. Some clerics had been initiated into masonry. Besides, as said, it was an infiltrated movement, something masonry specializes in. Meaning that honorable clerics had good reasons to support the movement, but raised their voice in protest as soon as westernized masons and zionists achieved to hijack it.

There was no single religious leader of Iran, and Sheykh Fazlollahe Nouri was one of the greatest alims of the past century as far as his political engagement is concerned. He inspired Imam Khomeini (r.a.) and the Islamic Revolution, which is why expressways and other locations are named after him in Iran today.

well these nonsense aside

No nonsense there, only cold hard facts.

Mashrooteh was a movement to give the power to people and take it away from a single person . if there was no Mashrooteh then there was no Islamic republic.

Mashrouteh was infiltrated and hijacked by freemasonry, a secret society which among other things makes a mockery of democracy by defining state policy behind closed doors. None of which has anything to do with the Islamic Republic.

my question is exactly where it come that women must have lower education levels ? Is it in Islam ? is it in our culture ? or its from some beduine tribal culture ?

Strawman. My point was that lower education levels for women do not equal enslavement, not that they should have lower education levels. Just that it wouldn't be the end of the world if they did, unlike what feminists and westernized elements are trying to suggest.

in case of Jihad islam send women to battle , didn't knew you believe islam is a dishonorable religion , in Ohod it was'nt Nusaybah bint Ka'ab who take sword and protect the holey prophet when men went after their plundering , do you suggest the holy prophet was honor less ?

Islamic armies never recruited women in the same manner as men. There is obligation of lesser jihad upon the Muslim man, not upon the Muslim woman unless she is directly attacked in person. Exceptions are what define a rule.

I believe you more think of your pride than honor and please don't talk nonsense a bout female nature , be honest and say man pride

I am talking about the innate differences between male and female nature, something that is reflected in the different rights and expectations attributed to men and women in Islam including in the Holy Quran.

Women and men have different roles, and the military fighting function was always essentially reserved for men in the history of Islam. Islamic armies always consisted practically exclusively of men.

Let's not attempt to turn upside down centuries of tradition. That would be the sort of disingenuity our leader Imam Khomeini (r.a.) referred to as American Islam, and it is not going to cut it.

wonder how we had female war prisoner.

Females served in logistic roles, hardly ever as combatants. There's a reason why approximately 99.99% of these combatants have always been males, thank God.

and again don't call your pride Gheyrat they are different.

I have no pride of this sort. Gheyrat requires us to protect women, who by nature are less apt at defending themselves.

all of it are

Not a single one of it is. Feminism and liberalism however are western to the core and they represent the opposite of Islam or Iranian culture.
 
Last edited:
Also, there's no honor whatsoever in sending females into military combat. It would be an insult to women, actually. This is something zionists take pride in, as well as ethnicist separatists who claim to represent Kurdish people. As a matter of fact, female nature is such that it makes women unfit for fighting wars in comparison to men, given innate physiological differences.

I was watching this documentary on PKK and the guy who founded it genuinely believed tha society will be ultimately "free" when women are "free". So he thinks women should start doing farm work and being in war. He is probably one of the first radical feminists.
 
Back
Top Bottom