What's new

Iranian Chill Thread

Why in the world would Turkey want such an attack to be conducted at this time? Makes no sense.

Also what drones are terrorists supposed to have used to provoke this much destruction at once?

Finally, what's the motivating rationale behind the Palestinian assault today, if the Homs attack wasn't done directly or indirectly by Tel Aviv?
they may not want it but when you sleep with terrorist there bound to be consequences .
do we knew all Iran drones ? you want me to knew all Turkish drones


about Palestine . do i need to count Israel provocation in last several months ?

If they manage to get this back into Gaza and hide it, then IRGC engineers can take it apart and reverse engineer the tank and send the data back to Tehran. A very successful tank design (arguably much better than T-90)
65ton vs 48ton
you can make T-90sm as survivable by adding 15 ton more armor to it
 
they may not want it but when you sleep with terrorist there bound to be consequences .
do we knew all Iran drones ? you want me to knew all Turkish drones


about Palestine . do i need to count Israel provocation in last several months ?

Turkey had no such intentions but Al-Nusra somehow got their hands covertly on Turkish drones and used them on their own? Or Turkey would supply and train them in such impactful weaponry without making sure to maintain control over it? Sounds improbable to me, to be honest.

Also zionist provocations are constant, aren't they. The Palestinians follow implicit rules of engagement as well. This event today must have been triggered and must have come in response to something big.
 
Last edited:
Turkey had no such intentions but Al-Nusra somehow got their hands covertly on Turkish drones and used them on their own? Or Turkey would supply and train them in such impactful weaponry without making sure to maintain control over it? Sounds improbable to me, to be honest.

Also zionist provocations are constant, aren't they. The Palestinians follow implicit rules of engagement as well. This event today must have been triggered and must have come in response to something big.
so you claim a terrorist group by nature always follow your wish ?
 
so you claim a terrorist group by nature always follow your wish ?

No, but I doubt Turkey would supply rather powerful UAV weapons to a grouplet like Al-Nusra. As for the other, Turkish-controlled terrorist grouplets of Idlib, again I doubt the Turks would supply them this sort of weaponry. Those people don't really need it and it's technologically a step above the materiel they're used to operate. Furthermore I think if Ankara did actually supply them such drones and associated air-to-ground munitions nonetheless, then it would make sure to maintain sufficient operational control over it. I don't see those groups being armed with more or less hi-tech drones by Turkey and then left to their own devices. Small arms, even armored vehicles and cheap quadcopters with low firepower yes, but not the thing(s) which struck Homs on Thursday.

To Turkey these organizations are not what HezbAllah is to Iran, the relationship is not as organic and tight-knit to justify arming them at this level. Also to date no one seems to have claimed responsibility for the Homs attack.
 
Last edited:
No, but I doubt Turkey would supply rather powerful UAV weapons to a grouplet like Al-Nusra. As for the other, Turkish-controlled terrorist grouplets of Idlib, again I doubt the Turks would supply them this sort of weaponry. Those people don't really need it and it's technologically a step above the materiel they're used to operate. Furthermore I think if Ankara did actually supply them such drones and associated air-to-ground munitions nonetheless, then it would make sure to maintain sufficient operational control over it. I don't see those groups being armed with more or less hi-tech drones by Turkey and then left to their own devices. Small arms, even armored vehicles and cheap quadcopters with low firepower yes, but not the thing(s) which struck at Homs on Thursday.
I believe a mohajer-1 level drone with a gps strapped to it is enough for that operation . right now you can acquire more advanced drones online and fill it with explossives . it don't need long range like shahed drones

by the way an ababil-1 from 37 years ago can do that , why you believe they can't reach such level today
 
Hamas seem to have fully unleashed the hatred (that is partially justified) they had for decades on them, judging by the violence and random killings.

Unfortunately this will cover most news outlets and overshadow how Israel was taken by surprise in a ridiculous fashion, like being taken hostage and killed in your own "country".
 
I believe a mohajer-1 level drone with a gps strapped to it is enough for that operation . right now you can acquire more advanced drones online and fill it with explossives . it don't need long range like shahed drones

by the way an ababil-1 from 37 years ago can do that , why you believe they can't reach such level today

Chances are that >100 martyrs and additional dozens if not hundreds of injured weren't concentrated at one spot.

I don't see the Turkish-controlled groups defy Ankara to such an extent, launch this massive an operation and Turks not noticing their intent on time. There doesn't seem to be any precedent either.
 
Hamas seem to have fully unleashed the hatred (that is partially justified) they had for decades on them, judging by the violence and random killings.

Unfortunately this will cover most news outlets and overshadow how Israel was taken by surprise in a ridiculous fashion, like being taken hostage and killed in your own "country".
Partially?
 
Hizbullah should join the initiative started by Hamas and open up the Lebanese front. If this turns out to be continuous over a long term, Israel will lose its sting and then the Muslims can liberate Palestine and Al-Aqsa.

The additional benefit of the situation will be that Arab countries will end their current cooperation with Israel.
 
Partially?
Partially because killing random civilian isn't something ethic or written in religious books, even if zionists did it in way larger numbers, its putting themselves at the same level as them and opening a hole for white propaganda to take on

I call it partially justified at the same level of the 9/11 attacks, eye for an eye but in the same manner

Nonetheless Israel and its war propaganda are being critically exposed since a very long time
 
Partially because killing random civilian isn't something ethic or written in religious books, even if zionists did it in way larger numbers, its putting themselves at the same level as them and opening a hole for white propaganda to take on

I call it partially justified at the same level of the 9/11 attacks, eye for an eye but in the same manner

Nonetheless Israel and its war propaganda are being critically exposed since a very long time
And where has that happened exactly?
 
Just another long-winded run of the mill nonsense typed by none other than SalarHack.

He who resorts to ad hominem loses an argument. Expectedly, you lost with your opening sentence. Congrats.

On the contrary, Immigration does not solve socioeconomic problems, it compounds them. Look at what migration has done to US and Europe. It has created social, economic, and political problems of epic proportion for all to see except may be you,

Who suggested it would "solve socieconomic problems"?

a turkoloid azari who sits at the keyboard with an opium pipe in one hand and a wet dream on the other, such as more Afghans and Azaris in Iran is a good thing for Iran, while Taliban on the east, and Azari turkoloids, and their russians supporters on the northwest are conspiring against Iran. These turkoloids just caused another explosion or terrorist attacks in Northern Iran, and this SalarHack wants more of them in Iran.
What a traitor azari hypocrite!

Of course, a certified Iranophobe uttering racialist epithets, is now in a position to explain to us what's best for Iran. :lol:

Indeed.

So hard, Salarhack and company here try to pass off themselves with high conservative islamic values or lack of which, and claim to be strongly against Neo-liberalism. However nothing is further from "their hypocrisy", he is embracing the Noe-liberalism highest value, migration.

And the next conceptual confusion right here.

Migration is desired by liberals and globalists,

1) Insofar as it usually tends to dilute and uproot both the host population and migrant communities' national and religious identities. Does not apply to Afghans in Iran.
2) Insofar as it serves to create a steady stream of foreign subproletariat maintaining downward pressure on wages. Again not part of what I proposed.

Thus, as anyone able to grasp what I wrote will have understood, I never endorsed migration as a value. On the contrary. I underscored how in the very peculiar, out of the ordinary case of Afghan migration to Iran, it serves to offset Iran's fatal demographic dynamics (brought about in no small part by liberal administrations and their policies), all the while of sparing Iran from the disintegrating impact mass immigration generally has on national and religious cohesion.

Naturally the quoted subject fails to ask themself, why would liberal factions in Iran, when it comes to Afghans in particular, suddenly switch to marketing themselves as staunch opponents of immigration, in line with right-wing nationalistic discourse far removed from liberalism? Then again, the subject is obviously not here to participate in constructive discussions, but to vent visible accumulated frustration at me, seeing how my input for whatever bizarre reason must have struck quite a nerve with them. Fuming with rage, they're still following my posts obsessively. Lo and behold.

In reality, migration is bad specially these days. You're better off at home. The problem may be you, so anywhere you go, you will take them with you, much like many immigrants in the west. immigration will not solve your problems, just cause problems for the nations you migrate to.

If you can't solve your problem at home, rest assure that you will not be able to solve them abroad.

Slogans of no analytical substance.

Dude, what do you do at home all day? Smoke opium in your basement, cut and paste other's articles at the keyboard and pass them off as you own.

Trash clumsy attempts by the likes of the quoted subject to cobble together a semblance of anti-Iran propaganda. In addition to successfully debunking actual, cohesive anti-Iran narratives from slightly more competent sources.

You're like the one who talks a lot but tells very little, talks the walk but never walks the walk.

Says a troll who popped out of nowhere to pollute the section with hollow gossip.

Are you out of your mind dude with your encouraging migration, refugees, and so forth.

Sound, documented demonstrations were offered. I understand this sort of thing tends to fly over your head though.

You really need to put the opium pipe down so you can see the reality after the fog clears your head.

Reported for unprovoked insults.

Cliques like you have chased away many good people from this forum.

Who are you again? A false flagging troll displaying Jamaican nationality and Afghan location flags, who's illustrated themself by rehashing soporific anti-Iranian drivel. The personification of a bad joke, in sum.

You constantly type long stupid comments made out of cut and pasting articles you dont even understand yourself with your pigeon English.

What "articles" would these be? Go ahead, cite a few so we can all have a good laugh.

By the way, what is "pigeon" (sic) English?

Typing such long comments do not make you look smart to others, it shows what a reletless schill you are, a hack.

Above all it shows your staggering inability to comprehend this sort of content. You're as uncreative at trolling as you are at sharing useful information, bug off.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom