فائزه هاشمی: تنها راه بازگرداندن سپاه به پادگانها باقی ماندن آن در لیست تحریم است
Nazaret chie?
Ayande eslahat o teife hashemi ha Che khahad bud?
@Hack-Hook
بعد از حمایتهای متعدد «فائزه هاشمی رفسنجانی» از تحریمهای آمریکا علیه مردم ایران، این بار فیلمی از او در فضای مجازی منتشر شده که محتوای آن اظهاراتی موهن درباره حضرت محمد(ص) است.
به گزارش گروه سیاسی
ایسکانیوز، بعد از اظهارات متعدد ضدملّی «فائزه هاشمی رفسنجانی» و حمایتهای متعدد او از تحریمهای آمریکا و بویژه ترامپ علیه مردم ایران، این بار فیلمی از او در فضای مجازی منتشر شده که محتوای آن اظهاراتی موهن درباره حضرت محمد(ص) است.
سخنان او بخصوص طی سالهای اخیر همواره با واکنشهای متعددی از سوی کاربران شبکههای اجتماعی مواجه شده است.
«فائزه هاشمی» پس از اظهار دوستی با عناصر فرقه ضالّه سیاس بهاییت، به همسویی با ترامپ علیه مردم ایران رسید با این حال کمتر کسی تصور میکرد او این کینهجوییها را به اظهارات موهن درباره پیامبر اعظم(ص) نیز بکشاند.
بعد از ØÙاÛتâÙØ§Û Ùتعدد «Ùائز٠ÙاشÙÛ Ø±ÙسÙجاÙÛ» از تØرÛÙâÙØ§Û Ø¢ÙرÛکا عÙÛÙ Ùرد٠اÛراÙØ Ø§Û٠بار ÙÛÙÙÛ Ø§Ø² ا٠در ÙØ¶Ø§Û ÙØ¬Ø§Ø²Û ÙÙتشر شد٠ک٠ÙØتÙØ§Û Ø¢Ù Ø§Ø¸ÙØ§Ø±Ø§ØªÛ ÙÙÙ٠دربار٠Øضرت ÙØÙد(ص) است.
www.iscanews.ir
- - - - -
Political storm in Iran as Rafsanjani's daughter meets Bahai leader
By Kasra Naji
BBC Persian
Published18 May 2016
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-36320816
- - - - -
These moderates, as well as their reformist sidekicks (who in many respects are worse even), have a similar agenda for Islamic Iran as freemasonry has had in the west: to do away with and sideline the social and political relevance of the dominant religion of the nation, one incremental step at a time, in preparation for disintegration into the messianist Noahide one-world order.
Much like masonry neutralized both Catholicism and Protestantism. And how it infiltrated the Vatican and converted it to liberal and zionist thought to the point that traditional Catholicism took refuge in movements such as sedevacantism, which consider the Pope as an impostor.
To this effect and in line with the long haul, step-by-step approach, liberals will of course have to appear as as flawlessly religious at first. And seek to justify western decadence, liberalism, feminism, homosexualism, destruction on the nuclear family structure, annihilation of the principle of filiation as well as
patria potestas as basic pillars of (natural) law and societal organization, desacralization of human beings' relation to the world they're living in, no-holds-barred individualism, exacerbated materialism, pornocracy and uprooting of traditional sexual ethics, in short the entire bundle of traditional values, on a concocted pseudo-Islamic basis.
In other terms, they will try to use
ejtehad and bend it to irrational degrees in order to claim that all these social and human calamities witnessed in the west, which are stemming from three to four centuries of intense social engineering by the esoterist secret society, are in fact "compatible" and even "conforming" to the spirit of Islamic precepts as well as to our local history. In reality, traditionalist forces the world over, including in the west, are our objective allies in this struggle for survival.
The enemy's creeping disruptive strategy is age-old and can be summarized by the triple instruction 'infiltration, deviation, subversion'.
Liberals endeavor to align Iran on the western "model" from ground up and in every possible respect - western model which in fact has nothing traditionally western to it, and is in fact a form of alienation imposed on the peoples of the west by an unelected, domineering, megalomaniac, sinister and criminal globalist oligarchy. Which of course aims at the dissolution of Iran and (all traditional branches of) Islam into the totalitarian, anti-specist one-world regime this cabal aims to establish.
_____
I bet with anyone we can get ToT for Volvo-RM12 from Sweden far sooner than Russia give us TOT for Klimov RD-33
The likelihood of Iran receiving fighter jet engines let alone transfer of technology for such an engine from any western country including Sweden, isn't superior to Russia consenting to supply RD-33 know how. The opposite is actually they case, given that Iran has been in a conflict against the US regime since the victory of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, and that all western states act like vassals to Washington, whereas Tehran-Moscow relations since the fall of the Soviet Union are no longer marked by hostility.
Which doesn't mean it's probable that Russia will proceed with such a thing. But, it is doubtlessly more probable than Sweden doing so, even if we're talking 0,5% versus 0,0001% probabilities - the second figure will still be inferior to the first.
rouhani downfall was stemmed in economical situation , if Raesi fail to improve the situation then he also fail again in the next election , people who their vote decide the outcome dont care about hijab or political view .
the only person who was elected because of freedom promises was Khatami .
ahmadi-nejad come to power because people didn't want rafsanjani . rouhani come to power because of his economical promises that well let say some people were "بی بصیرت" and he failed against Raesi because he failed his promises .
Raesi won later because Rouhani failed his promises and he promised improving economy and fighting corruption , if he fail them people choose another person later. and I assure you he was not elected for anti imperialist stances , he made no such promises in the elections .and the next election also will be competition about corruption and economy . who can satisfy people in those two regard will come up. the ones who their vote decide really don't care about a piece of clothes over their head (if you walk in tehran, shiraz or isfahan (or better say any city outside Qom and Mashhad) street , you'll see how they care about that or we import fighter from west or east or .....
The only credible opinion poll to be conducted by a western institution in Iran, namely the the University of Maryland's Iran Poll organized in conjunction with a Canafian research group, showed that at the time of the 2021 presidential election a significant majority of Iranians embraced geopolitical views similar to those of the revolutionary factions including seyyed Raisi. This included deep skepticism towards the possibility of a viable negotiated deal with the US regime, as well as rejection of its oppressive policies. Raisi very much made electoral promises in the foreign policy realm, and these were obviously far removed from the western-apologetic approach preached by both moderates and reformists.
Whether or not this was an important factor in voters' choice of Raisi is up for debate, but what it shows is that the electorate was (and surely continues to be) in tune with the President's views on foreign policy including as far as Resistance against imperialist bullying is concerned.
challenge the wast for the sake of challenging the west ?
No, but because Islamic Iran and oppressive western regimes have been at cold war against one another since the pro-western monarchy was ousted by the Islamic Revolution, over 43 years ago.
_____
Don't be naive my friend. Trump was a bully, republicans are Zionist more than the Jews.
If Iran gave up under pressure then it would have destroyed Iran's image internationally. Trump tried to bully Iran into submission, imagine If Iran gave in. Trump be like, hey did you guys see? I was the one who made them kneel to me. Trump didn't want a deal but only humiliation of Iran in an international level. Democrats called IRGC terrorist, Trump said that Iran is a terrorist nation. He pointed to 80 million people not an specific group.
If you want to work with Republicans while keeping your national pride then you would have to break their teeth in their mouth. Then they will respect you
If you want to work with Democrats while trying to keep your pride, then you would have to behave sneaky just like them. Then they will respect you.
We have an unfinished business with Republicans.
Exactly. The mere suggestion that Iran could have reached an acceptable agreement with a maniac and false opposition, deep state muppet like Trump or any other Republican US president for that matter is simply disconnected from reality. As for the notion that the Republican party is dominating the US regime or even its foreign policy, I've no idea where it stems from. The infrastructures of the regime aren't controlled by any single on of the two ruling parties but by a bipartisan oligarchy and even more so by banksters, freemasons, zionists. Not to mention that Trump sought to portray himself as detached from his own party's old guard and elites.
Yes, the issue between Iran and the zio-American empire is indeed an existential, zero sum one. It'll be either us collectively as a nation and people who are going to be erased, or their regime (not their people). I'm directly reminded of Zarif when hearing claims to the contrary (taking issue with zero sum perceptions in international politics was one of his favorites), and we witnessed how his efforts were defeated and his convictions proven wrong by geopolitical events.
As if such proof was even needed after 43 years of an Islamic Revolution which put an end to two some 200 years of subjugation of the Iranian nation at the hands of imperial powers, more than two centuries of exploitation of the Islamic Umma and other nations of the south by those same imperialists, as well as 243 years of thoroughly blood-stained history of a regime whose very existence is founded upon the genocide of the native population of northern "America".
as if these are important for Rahbar. 
www.cnn.com
hilarious
