What's new

Iranian Chill Thread

In all seriousness, that won't happen within (5) years whether they like it or not. But it should be spread as an awareness message among Persians that they should not favor the tazi money over what they consider as patriotic or nationalistic principals. Also, the people of the UAE themselves aren't the same as their government. While they are generally friendly and tolerant, Persians aren't among the most beloved people to them.

iran should embargo deliveries of diabetic medicine into the uae
 
In all seriousness, that won't happen within (5) years whether we like it or not. But it should be spread as an awareness message among Persians that they should not favor the tazi money over what they consider as patriotic or nationalistic principals. Also, the people of the UAE themselves aren't the same as their government. While they are generally friendly and tolerant, Persians aren't among the most beloved people to them.
Works both ways, soosmarkhoran also welcome Iranian money above nationalism and patriotism.
Maybe it's true that they say money talks, business brings countries closer to each other (to a certain level).
 
Works both ways, soosmarkhoran also welcome Iranian money above nationalism and patriotism.
Maybe it's true that they say money talks, business brings countries closer to each other (to a certain level).

You are right it works both ways, although welcoming is a receptive action when compared to the more deliberate and well planned action of packing stuff and living among the malakh-khoran for what you think is a 1 year which soon end up in being 15 years.

We should hereby thank our own Royals of Al Saud family for knowing what works for us and what doesn't.
 
cope harder
europe will become european again
we will drop the worship of vile semitic religions and return to our norse, pagan roots again
Great, I support that because I think the same, chrismas has nothing to do with Jesus, it's a germanic festival. A cultural change is possible. However Europeans are passive.
We Iranians will celebrate our "pagan" festival at 21 march (nowruz). Last wednesday the whole country jumped over fire in a paganist ritual (charshanbe suri) of respecting the fire as an element of creation.
 
Great, I support that because I think the same, chrismas has nothing to do with Jesus, it's a germanic festival. A cultural change is possible. However Europeans are passive.
We Iranians will celebrate our "pagan" festival at 21 march (nowruz). Last wednesday the whole country jumped over fire in a paganist ritual (charshanbe suri) of respecting the fire as an element of creation.

iranians should stick with islam like their arab forefathers intended
 
iranians should stick with islam like their arab forefathers intended
Europeans have no books or written form of religious traditions of their ancestors and that makes their history inferior. There is more chance that europeans stick with their semitic culture while the Indo-Iranians could fall back on their written traditions and religions (budhism, hinduism, zoroastrianism etc.)which are linked to proto-indoeuropean religion and which are still active.
If you beg in front of us maybe we can help you to find traces of your culture which you lost. But you're african, you should stick to your voodoo and bamboo tradition.
 
Europeans have no books or written form of religious traditions of their ancestors and that makes their history inferior. There is more chance that europeans stick with their semitic culture while the Indo-Iranians could fall back on their written traditions and religions (budhism, hinduism, zoroastrianism etc.)which are linked to proto-indoeuropean religion and which are still active.
If you beg in front of us maybe we can help you to find traces of your culture which you lost. But you're african, you should stick to your voodoo and bamboo tradition.

There are a few Europeans who still follow traditional Slavic, Norse, Greek etc. paganism.
 
Europeans have no books or written form of religious traditions of their ancestors and that makes their history inferior. There is more chance that europeans stick with their semitic culture while the Indo-Iranians could fall back on their written traditions and religions (budhism, hinduism, zoroastrianism etc.)which are linked to proto-indoeuropean religion and which are still active.
If you beg in front of us maybe we can help you to find traces of your culture which you lost. But you're african, you should stick to your voodoo and bamboo tradition.

iranians are not indo-european, they are semitic ethincally, religiously and culturally, stop making up false history

AymzUcw.png
 
iranians are not indo-european, they are semitic ethincally, religiously and culturally, stop making up false history

AymzUcw.png

This does not mean that Iranians have direct Arab ancestry, just that their ancestry resembles them most out of the other references. And Iranian isnt an ethnic group, they have Persian, Kurd, Luri, Gilaki etc. groups in them.
 
This does not mean that Iranians have direct Arab ancestry, just that their ancestry resembles them most out of the other references. And Iranian isnt an ethnic group, they have Persian, Kurd, Luri, Gilaki etc. groups in them.

no but most iranians have a common origin, which is now semitic

iranians today have very little in connection with ancient persians, like greeks and sicillians they have been arabized and are now a semitic race
 
no but most iranians have a common origin, which is now semitic

iranians today have very little in connection with ancient persians, like greeks and sicillians they have been arabized and are now a semitic race

Greeks and Sicillians have been Arabized?
 
Greeks and Sicillians have been Arabized?

yeah pretty much, most greeks today have very little in connection with ancient greeks

sicillians is obvious because sicily has been under arab rule in the past, and at the time arabs didn't respect the personal boundaries of conquered women
 
yeah pretty much, most greeks today have very little in connection with ancient greeks

sicillians is obvious because sicily has been under arab rule in the past, and at the time arabs didn't respect the personal boundaries of conquered women

I think it's obvious that people are going to be similar to their neighbouring populations. I dont think modern Greeks differ much genetically from Ancient Greeks.
Also, the thing to be noted is that Ancient Greeks (and Romans as well) did not see themselves as being kin to the Northern/Western Europeans or Germanics/Celtics whom they called 'savages' and 'barbarians'. They actually might have considered themselves closer to the Persians. There was no firm European identity at that time.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom